The Varying Speed of Light : c is Not a Constant If the pressure of deep space is not a constant, and light speeds

up or slows do wn according to pressure zones... then how can we confidently believe that the t raveling speed of light doesn't vary in proportion to the surrounding pressure? The vacuum of space is not a constant, therefore the speed of light is not a const ant. There will always be more discoveries of deeper parts of space with even le ss pressure than ever recorded; As well as, more massive objects with exponentia lly more pressure that tip any current scale. What if "c", "the speed of light", more accurately describes the speed at the moment of impact when light slows do wn to bounce off matter? Not the speed at which light "travels" in between bounc es. Light bounces off matter on the atomic level and on the atomic level, all th e particles have the same interior pressure; therefore, the speed at which light bounces off any given density matter will be a constant. That constant speed is 186,282 miles per second because light must always slow down before it hits mat ter. But, in order to measure the bouncing speed, some amount of energy must dis sipate, so youre never going to accurately measure the traveling speed unless you have a frame of reference for cosmic pressure zones. What is matter? Matter is positive pressure. There is only one neutral point, or singularity, or dead cent er to a sphere. Like Leonardo Da Vincis Vitruvian Man, all things can fit inside of a sphere.

Take any object spin it and it will trace a circumference. While "stationary, the radius, or singularity point will experience the most pressure from all sides. T hats positive pressure or "density". Every thing has a unique amount of positive pressure in it s singularity (frequency of pressure)... except on the atomic lev el. All things have equal interior pressure on the atomic and subatomic level fr om our relative perspective. So if you spin an object in a Centripetal fashion, the reactionary Centrifugal force will push all the positive pressure outward, a way from the singularity. Less weight on the singularity = less weight as a whol e. There is no definitive weight to an object since weight is always dependent u pon so many factors that are constantly fluxing. (Pressure, speed of rotation, e tc.) The more massive a star or planet, the more that light from another source will slow down and bend around it. But not all the light bends around it. Some o f that light bounces off of it allowing you to see the object that the rest of t he light bends around. So we have 2 different speeds: The TRAVELING speed at whi ch light travels in between mass. And the BOUNCING speed at which light reflects off mass. In addition, the distance from the singularity (neutral center) to th e outer reach of the total diameter of Any mass is the same proportion on the at omic scale at which light bounces... and since All scales are relative, the grav itational effect on light at an atomic level is a constant. And since all matter is merely the total sum of atomic parts... and all atomic parts have the same d ensity... that means light will always bounce off matter at the same speed. So i f you had a 1 foot diameter ball, the singularity would be 6 inches inward from any given direction within that ball. The singularity (neutral center) of an "el ectron" would be the same proportional distance from the outer shell as the 1 fo ot diameter ball, but on a different scale. If the distance from the singularity (neutral center) to the outer perimeter of the diameter of any given mass is th e same proportional distance, then we can say that the gravitational affect on l ight is relative to any given mass. That is a constant. Not, that the speed that light travels in between mass (pressure) is a constant. (Now I m starting to be lieve that a "black hole" is an extreme spherical point of less pressure where l ight is Prevented from ever entering, not prevented from escaping.) The speed th at light "travels" between mass in space can vary greatly depending on the surro unding pressure. (or lack thereof)

But when light BOUNCES OFF of any given sized particle of matter WITHIN any give n pressure zone, we can measure that speed at a constant 186,282 miles a second. Light traveling THROUGH or AROUND different mediums means that the speed will v ary. The thinner the medium = the faster light travels. But when it comes to mea suring the speed at which light BOUNCES OFF mass WITHIN different mediums... tha t relative speed of the moment of impact seems to be a constant. So, the misinte rpretation of E=mc^2, may be that Einstein thought it meant the speed at which e nergy converts to matter. I m not sure that s accurate. I don t believe c is a c onstant in the regard to the "speed of light", more specifically, the traveling speed. I think it s referring to the speed at which we can measure the reflectio n of light off of any given particle of matter. And no matter how big or small y ou measure that reflection, whether it be a moon, or a particle... the speed of the REFLECTION will always be a constant 186,282 miles per second. The more I lo ok into the exact traveling speed of light... the more ridiculous a constant tra veling speed seems. Even in a vacuum, since the vacuum itself is not a constant. They only measure from within our own solar system. Imagine the lack of pressur e in the depths of space beyond where any telescope can reach! And even though w e can reach depths of space with telescopes.... the speed of light upon impact o f matter is relative no matter where you look! So that gives the false impressio n that the "speed" of light traveling before impact must be the same as the impa ct itself. In order for us to measure the Bouncing speed of light. Light must slow down from its Traveling Speed. There is immeasurable energy that dissipates from th e impact giving the false impression that the bouncing speed is the same as trav eling speed. There are a multitude of answers for how the Traveling speed of lig ht was determined. And there is seemingly no attempt to discern the difference b etween the Traveling speed and Bouncing speed. Some rookie back in 1676 determin ed the speed of light by "basing his observations from the eclipses of the moons of Jupiter." Then definitions go on to describe that the speed of light "in a v acuum" is 186,272 miles per second.... but that vacuum can always have more or l ess pressure .So if they are basing their observations of the speed of light fro m the vacuum within our solar system... then I don t sense that the speed of lig ht can be a constant in other parts of space.

Even the lame mattress theory of gravity shows that light and time is slowed dow n as it approaches mass in space. (See my 2 other papers called The Fallacy of a Straight Line and Magnetic Over-Unity via Centripetal Spin) http://www.scribd.com/ doc/36586248/The-Fallacy-of-a-Straight-Line-andBlack-Holes http://www.scribd.com /doc/35527270/Magnetic-Over-Unity-via-CentripetalSpin So, I really don t get how someone can ultimately determine the TRAVELING speed of light as a constant whe n all they ve ever measured is the REFLECTION speed. ANY light we measure is wit hin our pressure zone since the devices we use to measure are located within our pressure zone. If we attempt to look beyond our pressure zone, we will see a Re d Doppler shift in any given direction. That will give the false impression that nothing is beyond that. It s like looking at a wall. There is indeed another si de to every wall. In reality, Light IS. Light doesn t travel at all as Walter Ru ssell emphatically states in his book "The Secret of Light" http://www.scribd.co m/doc/29714925/Walter-Russell-The-Secret-of-Light As well as many other of his b ooks which can be found at the University of Science and Philosophy site: http:/ /www.Philosophy.org/ In reality, light does not travel. Light is. It takes corpo real things to measure light because the light needs to bounce off those things in order to measure it. (Observation) So then can we go so far as to say that th e speed of observation is 186,282 miles per second?

The light that bounces off of everyone s eyes is a constant speed of 186,282 mil es per second; therefore, the speed of everyone s observation is relative! But a ctual "time" is proportional with the TRAVELING speed of light, not the speed at which light slows down to REFLECT off the eye! And the TRAVELING speed can be i nfinitely times more than the BOUNCING speed. Look at the symbol for the Eye of Horus in the regard of this concept! The energy in the BOUNCING speed of light is greatly dissipated from the impact upon the atoms that make up your eye. We can only measure the dissipated energy. There is no telling exactly how many times Faster the TRAVELING speed is before the impact upon matter unless you have an unimaginably large frame of reference for cosmic PRESSURE ZONES. All things SPEED UP with less pressure because there is less resistance, less drag, less inertia to prevent those things from loosin g energy until they are at a state of rest. But a state of "rest" on Mars is diffe rent relative to the Earth because we are not stationary to each other like Eart h is to the moon. So there never is any Universal state of rest because it s all relative on your starting location.

Just like there is no Universal limit to ANY speed. If you allow something to fl oat in space and send it away from all planets and stars that you can..... you w ill see that thing SPEED UP. That s why NASA can t figure out why a Voyager Sate llite wasn t where it was supposed to be when they plotted on their charts as Ri chard C. Hoagland stated many times on Live Radio. They think that speed is a co nstant in space because they assume that a vacuum is a vacuum, that s it and tha t s all. No. There can always be less pressure in a vacuum the deeper in space y ou go. And the deeper you go, the less resistance; therefore, the more you SPEED UP. Now I m thinking that the reason why you can t hear any sound in space is m ore than "because it s a vacuum." Perhaps that vacuum allows for the sound to tr avel without any resistance, rather, exponentially less resistance. That would a llow for sound itself to travel faster than 1125 feet per second. (You can never achieve zero resistance because there is no universal frame of reference for ze ro! You can always have less resistance, or more for that matter) If sound itsel f traveled faster than 1125 feet per second... we wouldn t consider it sound and we wouldn t be able to hear a thing. So sound and light behave in a similar fas hion. With increasing pressure, sound and light slow down because of resistance. With decreasing pressure, sound and light are able to "travel" at more natural speeds. Natural meaning, without resistance. Interesting to note the number 1125 . That is how many RPMs the 3rd ring of magnets spin on John Searl s SEG, when p owered with 1.5 volts @ .06 amps. The law of squares has specific numbers that w ork and the number 1125 falls within those rules. Another thing interesting to n ote is that if there is nothing for sound to bounce off in space.... the sound w ill speed up until it meets resistance. It MUST bounce off of something in order to loose energy and dissipate.

Decades ago, the NAZIs broadcasted the Olympics into space. About a decade later ... scientists received a radio signal which they though was Extraterrestrial. I t was actually the same broadcast but being reflected from a source they didn t know. The scientists had no clue where the sound came from and it s still a myst ery to them because they don t realize that sound speeds up in space. Sound will only slow down to the speed at which it was initiated when there is matter for it to bounce off of. So if you send a T.V. signal into space... it will speed up faster than light until it encounters resistance in the form of matter. At whic h point, it will slow down to the speed at which it was initiated. In this case, a T.V. signal. So then it will reflect off that matter and some of the energy w ill be dissipated from that impact. But not all the energy is absorbed, so the s ignal will go back into space. It will speed up again until it encounters anothe r object. Each particle that is vibrating and traveling with the information, is it s own particle yet has all the information of the whole. Like a pixel in a h ologram. Each pixel contains the entire picture. You can cut the hologram s pixe ls in half and you would only see a picture half the size. It s not like half th e screen is missing or half the message is missing. You just need to focus your eyes to see the picture small enough if it was cut in half too many times. Even if the pixel was as small as an atom... you could still watch the hologram in it s entirety. So when sound or light bounces off of matter in space, it gets refle cted in other directions. But the information contained in any given part of tha t wave remains in it s entirety. It might be dampened a whole lot, but you can s till focus in on it given that you had a powerful enough radio or something to t une in the frequency and amplify it. I believe that is what our brains are. And meditation is tuning in and amplifying any ideas or information that has already been reflected time and time again throughout the cosmos.

Gaining insight through meditation is like fishing. Unless you sit in silence fo r a while, you ll disturb the waters and scare away the fish. The fish represent the ideas and answers you want. The waters in this case represent your flow of thought. The more you think, the more you are splashing around scaring away the "fish". Your intention is the bait / net. A fishing net doesn t think. It effort lessly collects the fish that swim in its path without disturbing the waters. A net is made according to the size of fish it wants to catch. The bigger nets all ow the small fish to pass through. Spend the time to sow your own nets and reap your own fish. The last part of the equation is knowing when and where to fish. There is a time and place for everything. Make time for yourself in any quiet pl ace. The more natural and ancient the surroundings the better, in my opinion. I prefer late at night when everyone else in the area is asleep and not consciousl y thinking. (Less splashing about in the sea of consciousness) Articles of other s who question the so called limit of light: http://www.kottke.org/02/08/speed-l ight-not-constant http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/10/991005114024.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_speed_of_light http://en.wikipedia.org/wik i/Alcubierre_drive http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_sea http://en.wikipedia.or g/wiki/Dirac_equation#Hole_theory Particles have been consistently measured in N aval research labs going faster than light. Violating causality. Lightspeed barr ier has been breached already, mathematically, AND with practical experiment, in cluding HYPER-LIGHT communication systems. Scalar Transceivers. Lightspeed in 20 10, is no more a barrier to human and information transport, than the sound-barr ier was to living legend Chuck Yeager, and the Bell X-1 Rocket-plane. In fact, t he equations and formulae for the sound barrier are the SAME as for the so-calle d "Light-Barrier". The speed of light depends on the permeability and permittivi ty of free space. If you can alter those you can change the speed of light, but only locally. But... When you isolate the space around you via an electro-static vacuum, your locality becomes relative to another point in space compared to th e altered pressure in your vacuum.

When you alter the local space around you to equal the intensity of negative pre ssure equal to other parts of the universe... you can travel instantly to those depths of pressure because an equalization wants to take place. That equalizatio n will come in the form of Distance in any given amount of time. Given that you alter your local surrounding pressure, you will be attracted to the like potenti al of the nearest like pressure. In this case, the nearest like pressure would b e deep space, therefore you will "zip off" at super-luminal speeds to until your local pressure matches the surrounding pressure. So if you generate an electrostatic vacuum equal to the pressure of the vacuum just outside of Earth.... you will zip off to that pressure zone instantly, REGARDLESS of how far away the nea rest pressure zone is of like potential. To my knowledge, only a magnetic bearin g with a helical variation of North / South can handle the torque necessary to g enerate an instantaneous drop in local pressure. (SEG) A vacuum of negative pres sure = Aetheric low pressure. Anything gaining positive pressure = physical dens ity. Anything decreasing in pressure through a vacuum= Aetheric pressure. "IMPLO SIVE UNIFORMITY" Human Kind has yet to witness what I call "Implosive Uniformity " which is a directional vacuous beam of negative pressure. A laser beam is an e xample of "Explosive Uniformity". How do we achieve suction in an even uniform c olumn? We can have a fan that blows air chaotically. Or we can have the new dyso n fan which creates a focused beam of uniform air. http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=8he8afjQyd8&feature=related Chaotic in this sense means blowing outward or suc king inward in the shape of a cone and Uniform means blowing outward or sucking inward in an even column. We can have a vacuum cleaner hose which sucks in air c haotically. (cone) I have yet to see a focused beam of a uniform vacuum. (column ) Our breath is chaotic because we suck in and blow out in the shape of a cone. We can have a flash light which emits light chaotically. Or we can have a laser pointer which sends a focused beam of uniformed light. We can have a speaker whi ch sends sound outward chaotically. Or we can have the new hypersonic audio ray invented by Woody Norris: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HF9G9M0cR0E So if we ca n have outward forces that generate chaotic and uniform beams of frequencies, th en why can t we have implosive forces that generate the inverse

uniform frequencies? Anything gaining pressure will radiate heat. Anything decre asing in pressure will give off gravity. A source of positive pressure will make light move slower around it s circumference, or, light slows down around a curv e. But a source of negative pressure will make light speed up around it s circum ference, or light speeds up around a curve. The TRAVELING speed of light seems t o be Uniform while the BOUNCING speed is Chaotic. There is NO limit to uniform e nergy, but chaos has no order; therefore, it will always meet resistance. A worm hole would be what you experience if you were to be riding within that vacuous b eam. The trip within that beam is instant! That s how communications can be nonlinear and instant over VAST distances of space and even time. But the frequency of that vacuous beam can be tweaked from the lowest possible hertz range to the highest possible hertz range. And you can always increase the frequency given t hat you have enough power! "Warp Speed" is literally the equalizing of pressure f aster than the Bouncing speed of light. So if you generated an electro-static va cuum, that would drop your local pressure dramatically. The lower you drop your local pressure, the less you weigh. It would get to the point where you would be floating over the ground and if you had your surrounding vacuum pressurized eno ugh.... I could flick your ship with my finger and you would zip off to a point in deep space where the pressure was equal. In essence, you would weigh less tha n a photon; therefore, you would travel faster than a photon. Anything that trav els faster than a photon is "super luminal" or Warp Speed. Take an empty water b ottle and put the cap on it. You can squeeze the bottle lightly until the cap po ps off from the pressure..... or you can stomp your foot on the bottle and watch the cap zip off. The cap will go as far as the amount of pressure you squeezed the bottle. So, how fast and how far would that cap shoot if you stomped on that bottle with a Million pounds of pressure? That bottle cap will reach a farther distance in the same amount of time. Same principle except the bottle uses outwa rd pressure. We want vacuum pressure. The only way to achieve that is through el ectro-statics.

John Searl s SEG can provide the power needed, but that still doesn t answer how to achieve a vacuum in a beam. Even a "black hole" is cone shaped. What I m ref erring to could be similar to a Tipler Cylinder http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tip ler_cylinder Is Implosive Uniformity another term for "Scalar Technology?" Id con sider it a non-hertzian wave form. PLEASE WATCH THE NEWEST 4 PART INTERVIEW WITH PROFESSOR JOHN SEARL ON MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL: http://www.YouTube.com/user/TheRealVerbz John Searls SEG pairs electrons from the Dirac Sea of negative energy as describe d in the above link. It doesnt destroy anything. It converts the energy already p resent. Like funneling a reservoir of water through a dam. 2 electrons paired tog ether behave like a photon but still carry the electric charge. But the electric charge is slightly different than any electric charge we know, since all electr icity we know travels through a wire or chaotically through induction and doesnt behave like a photon. When the charge is released, the pair of electrons go back to behaving like normal electrons, Still carrying their original charges. A tru e synergistic effect through resonance occurs while they are paired. (Go back an d look at the Quantum Double Slit Experiment with this notion in mind.)

The SEG takes a few of the 7 extra electrons from the F shell of the rare earth neodymium and pairs them up. Then tunnels them through the other 3 layers of mat erials. From the center outward, we have electric, dia-electric, magnetic and di amagnetic. Neodymium, Teflon (nylon 66), permanent magnet, copper. Collector, Ga te (insulator), accelerator, emitter. All working harmoniously to create that sy nergistic effect of wave resonance.

But it s also because the magnets on the rollers and plates are all magnetized i n a specific fashion where the North / South has variations (waveform) rather th an anything normally commercially magnetized with regular diametrical or axial m agnetization. Perhaps he modulates certain frequencies while magnetizing the mat erials so that all frequencies But the frequency he wants gets imprinted. So we think that John Searl isolates a certain bandwidth like blue magnetism or green magnetism. No.

He possibly solates a particular electric frequency which in turn imprints an eq ual and opposite magnetic frequency. When you see the color red, you are actuall y seeing every BUT the color red. So that missing color is what you perceive. Jo hn Searl is imprinting everything BUT that bandwidth onto his materials. You can magnetize a material with just a direct current and standard charge, or you can modulate that current and isolate the frequency of electricity which in turn wi ll imprint the frequency of magnetism, or rather.. every frequency BUT the frequ ency you left out in the modulated current.

Another member of the Searl Team, Russell Anderson of http://www.AppliedElectroG ravitics.com says: The DC with one strip of superimposed AC makes all these littl e N/S poles running at regularly spaced intervals around the plate going one way , and 90degrees out of phase on the runner sets going the same direction: making helical gears out of magnetic-fields instead of solid material. Since the poles are skewed, like helical-cult gears, the system can never find equilibrium (or magnetic-lockup), so is free to rotate without any input save for the current th at is running thru the layers of plate and runner systems, which tests show is a nywhere from 5-15 Volts DC. Thats is MORE than enough EMF to sustain rotation. An d of course, more load is placed on the SEG, the faster it runs and the colder a nd lighter in weight it gets. Fernando Morris with the modulated magnetizing equi pment weighing 8 Tons.

The SEG can provide limitless power to ANY device with no outside fuel source an d no pollutants. You can put this in a car and NEVER need gasoline. You can go s o far as to hand the device down generation after generation because it never we ars down. It never gets old. It s frictionless, heatless and vibrationless. It a ctually gets so cold that it reaches super conductivity and levitates, if you al low the magnets to spin fast enough. It will levitate and create its own gravity field and can fly at thousands of miles an hour with no inertia and 1/2 gravity on board. The motor/generator is known as the SEG, but when it takes flight, it can more accurately be called the IGV (Inverse Gravity Vehicle). We want these in hospitals because they promote rapid healing of burns and scar tissue. The de vice puts out an excess of negative ions and those can also turn grey hair back to its natural color as well as grow back lost teeth. The negative ions also nul lify nuclear radiation. So just by using this to power our devices, we would hea l and purify the atmosphere. Within 5 years of implementing this technology, the re would be no smog in China, no worries of nuclear radiation, and promotes Glob al cooling. The reason why dust is able to float in our rooms is because our roo ms are positively charged. With a strong negative field emitted from the device. ... no dust is able to float. Which means all that bacteria and virus on that du st can t get into your lungs and nose. There are too many other benefits to list here. It will change the energy industry rendering gas, oil, goal, nuclear, sol ar, wind and everything else obsolete. The fraudulent pharmaceutical industry wo uld perish. The airline industry would fail. Etc etc etc. The world as we know it would end. And without the 2012 Doomsday scenario. This would be a pleasant tran sition if we simply accepted the technology. Just think how many new jobs will b e created to tear down the current infrastructure and re-build anew? More jobs t han exist today with Real direction and nobility.

Article from 1968:

The BBC filmed John Searl flying his IGVs every Sunday for 2 years from 1968 197 0. He successfully flew the unmanned Demo 1 model around the moon and back at 35 00 km/hr in 1968 via a triangulation of ham radio signals. He gave an 11 foot ve rsion of the IGV to Edwards Airforce Base back in 1968 as well. Here is the lett er from Major George Uhlig requesting advice on flight and information on the te chnology:

When the Air Commodor of Great Britain saw John Searl flying his devices, he got on the live radio the next day and said, I witnessed John Searl flying his machi nes and he speaks the truth. John Searl will be master of all air and space very soon. The Russians and Americans were in a cold war at that time and were racing to the moon using conventional rocketry. When they heard the radio broadcast, t hey werent pleased. And began intensely studying the technology while effectively railroading John Searl in the process which is why we need to re-build the infr astructure and get volunteers, funding and any help available to bring this tech nology to the people! This stuff cant be patented because 1) Its a know-how and you cant patent a know-how. And 2) Any patent can be seized under a National Security O rder if the powers that be deem it a threat to their security. This will Not be pr ivatized or patented. So WE need to help this to fruition. --Jason Verbelli http ://www.Facebook.com/Verbelli http://www.SearlSolution.com http://www.SwallowComm and.com http://www.MySpace.com/JohnSearlStory http://www.JohnSearlStory.com

This will replace the grid. You re home s power box would be connected to the SE G from within your own home. So anything you plug into the sockets in your wall will be powered by the SEG. It can handle ANY load. The more you use it, the mor e negative ions are released which means the more health benefits. You d still u se the same wall sockets in your home, but you wouldn t have to pay anyone for t he power and you will never have black outs. The power company could monitor the ir meter all they wanted. They would just see that no power was being used in yo ur home. Well..... not THEIR power.