1700

http://zhurnal.ape.relarn.ru/articles/2004/156e.pdf

Hierarchical structure of unalive nature and laws of the universe expansion

Grinchenko S.N. (sgrinchenko@ipiran.ru )
Institute of Informatics Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affirms, that meta-evolution (the consecutive escalating of levels/tiers in system hierarchy) of unalive occurs to deceleration in time from the moment of the Big Bang (that distinguishes it from evenly lifes meta-evolution and accelerated socials meta-evolution). Basing on analogy between these three hypostasis by the universe considered in the informatics-cybernetic terms as system of hierarchical search optimization (of energy character target criteria) [Grinchenko,2004], the "ideal" hierarchical structure of unalive nature is offered. The spatial and temporary characteristics of its tiers in hierarchy represent geometrical progressions with the denominator ee = 15,15426... , in which basis lay fundamental (M.Planks) length and time. The connexity, existing between them, determines dependence between the current time T ( m ) of unalives meta-evolution from the moment of the Big Bang and "ideal" size l ( m ) , achieved to this time, of the Universe: l ( m ) = T ( m ) . Received thus their calculated "ideal" meanings, on the one hand, demonstrate good enough concurrence of the majority of the appropriate real objects, and with another allow to reveal a number of tiers, which material structures till now in experiments and supervision are not identified (having predicted thus their important properties). On this base it is possible to estimate and functional dependence Hubbles "constant" from number n( m ) of above tiers in hierarchy, on which the formation of material objects is possible:

n( m ) H = H (m) (m) . n +1

1. Introduction in a problem. On lifes meta-evolution and socials meta-evolution

Earlier I put forward the offer to interpret adaptive behaviour of systems both life and lifeless Nature, and also social-technological system of Humankind, as is generalized adaptive, realized by means of the hierarchical search optimization mechanism of energy character target criteria (see [1-3]). Thus, I offer to expand a spectrum of languages involved within the framework of Big History researches by means of informatics-cybernetic language use. The important role is played in him with such enough aggregated concepts, as "search activity", "adaptive algorithm of search optimization", "target criteria of an extreme type, of equalities type and of inequalities type", "system memory", etc. In the specified publications, the basic accent is made on study from offered positions of life system, and, to a lesser degree, of social system. The system of a lifeless nature was mentioned only briefly: were resulted its block diagram and basic spatial-temporary characteristics. Its more detailed research, joint with the experts in concrete scientific areas, was referred to the future. Nevertheless, as has appeared, at least one important aspect of this research can be carried out already now. There is a problem of lifeless (unalive natures) meta-evolution. The term meta-evolution means process of consecutive escalating of hierarchical levels/tiers of the appropriate hierarchical system in a course of formation its as such. Actually, this process is close to set meta-passage on V.F.Turchin [4]. Concept of life natures meta-evolution as process of its permanent development and complication, which characteristic attribute is the occurrence new (above) hierarchical levels/tiers in hierarchical system of search optimization of life and the complication enclosed in them before arisen was entered earlier in job [3]. The consideration of lifeless, life and social systems as "projections" of the uniform hierarchical mechanism is permanent demonstrating determined optimizational! property, allows concretizing meanings of the spatial and temporary characteristics realizing it "substratum". In particular: the practice of technical cybernetics shows, that the ratio of characteristic times should make some search of optimization process and process of its parametrical adaptation approximately 1 to 1020. Attraction for this ratio specification of results received A.V.Jirmunskiy and V.I.Kusmin [5] at the decision by

1701

http://zhurnal.ape.relarn.ru/articles/2004/156e.pdf

more local (but close on sense) task of study of critical levels of biological systems development, allows to accept the given ratio equal ee = 15,15426... With reference to wild life in job [3] it was marked, that the calculated spatial and temporary characteristics of the appropriate search optimization system should be considered only as the ideal estimations specifying some basis in the specified spaces variable, instead of as the requirements to their exact meanings in a reality. It follows from interpretation them as parameters of the appropriate hierarchical contours of search optimization living system that does not impose on their sizes of too strong restrictions and does not require of them of high accuracy. The hierarchical contour of search optimization will work and at significant (naturally, in "reasonable" limits) evasion of these parameters from "ideal" calculated. As the characteristic spatial sizes of life and lifeless natures objects coincide (thus, providing opportunity of occurrence life), the constant ee appears as a progression denominator and for unalive nature. There was shown, that lifes meta-evolution occurs in due course evenly: the occurrence of each new tier in this hierarchy requires identical time. Moreover, the identity here should be understood doubly: in the theory of ideal model system formation in direct sense, and in empirics of similar process realization (which for us while is known only in one, Terrestrial specimen) in some rounded, approached sense. Specified empirics contacts to the theory with the help of the assumption, that to each of eons (Katarchaean (Hadean), Archaean, bottom Proterozoic, top Proterozoic and current Phanerozoic) there corresponds occurrence "ternary" of adjacent levels in lifes hierarchy. This process began about 4,6 milliard years back from cooling of a superficial layer of the Earth up to temperatures, at which the synthesis of organic molecules became possible, and on everyone "ternary" is spent about 1,01 0,16 milliard years. From here follows, that for formation of each separate tier in hierarchy of life it is required about 337 million years, which well demonstrates other empirical estimation duration of Palaeozoic era (which beginning coincides with the beginning Phanerozoic about 570 million years back, and end define about 235 million years back) in 335 million years. For the description of the specified process in [3] such metaphor is offered: "Meta-evolutions wave, determined by a combination current spatial-temporary ( l ) characteristics of optimization life hierarchical contour, varied from the minimal meanings l in a direction of their increase at preservation of their ratio, forms meta-evolutionally new bio-objects on the front (or "horizon of lifes meta-evolution"), having maximal (achieved on the appropriate moment of time) meanings l . After the occurrence similar bio-objects evolve, according to laws of their adaptive behaviour, but not metaevolve". That is horizon of lifes meta-evolution is understood as the spatial characteristic determining for its any moment of time the maximal size of hierarchical formations (generated on this moment) of life, as holistic search optimization system. In other job [2] was shown, that socials meta-evolution occurs in due course is accelerated: the occurrence of each new tier in this hierarchy requires the lesser and lesser time. It follows from the assumption, that the key moments of "reclamation" by a formed human society of space, environmental it, (i.e. achievement of sizes of the appropriate tiers in hierarchy) are joined to cardinal events of metaevolution of Humankinds social-technological system. That is from a beginning cephalization of vertebrata, through some important events, before occurrence the man of speech/language (about 120 thousand years back had tier spatially appropriate to a biogeocenosis tier), writing (about 8 thousand years back, biomes tier accordingly), technology of the information duplicating (about 550 years back, tier of natural zones), electronic memory (about 60 years, Biogeosphere tier), distributed network memory (about 25 years back, tier of near-the-planet Space) etc. Thus, being based both on offered theoretical representations and on empirical data, it is possible to insist, that the periods between such moments represent a geometrical progression with a denominator besides ee (more precisely speaking, as the progression decreasing, here it makes 1/ ee , 1/15,15426... ) Thus, social has property "to reclaim" the same spaces (tiers in hierarchy), as living nature, not only in one much faster, but also in consecutive speeding up tempo.

2. On "ideal" structure of lifeless natures meta-evolution

The consecutive approach to representation about the Universe as uniform system essence is necessary results in a conclusion that all three hypostasis of a Nature lifeless, life and artificial (or "second", created by Humankind in a course of his social-technological development and indissolubly

1702

http://zhurnal.ape.relarn.ru/articles/2004/156e.pdf

with him associated) should be considered as "projection" of this complete system essence. Which can be exhibited (or not be exhibited) in those or other zones of the Universe. Nevertheless, near interrelation of which allows putting forward hypotheses basing analogies: transferring (expansion) of some properties, characteristic for one of such "projections" of uniform system, on others. In particular, in a context of a considered problem pertinently to raise the question: if metaevolution of most advanced (in the most various aspects) social-technological system of Humankind develops with acceleration, and meta-evolution of some less perfect lifes system occurs evenly, what is possible to say about lifeless (unalive) meta-evolution? How occurred (and there is) this process, certainly, most "primitive" of all three? As it is represented, for the answer it is necessary to involve reasons of symmetry/asymmetry. Moreover, he then is obvious: unalive natures meta-evolution should pass with deceleration. That is the occurrence of each new tier in this hierarchy should require the increasing and increasing time. To find out validity of this hypothesis (as is mentioned, basing only on rather abstract analogy and indirectly on the items of information from branches of knowledge rather far from physics of micro-, macro- and mega-world), it is necessary to address to the empirical facts saved by a physical science. The moment of a beginning of lifeless meta-evolution is, certainly, moment of occurrence (our) Universe. As far as it is possible to judge under the literature, last is usual associated with the hypothetical moment of the "Big Bang", for the proof of which reality the rather wide circle of arguments is put forward. Then, as it is represented, the zero step unalive natures meta-evolution is, that the linear size of the arising Universe is increased from zero up to fundamental (gravitational, M.Planks) length l f , i.e. up to ~0.16 10-32 cm. Zero it is expedient to consider it for the reason, that on its extent the new tier in hierarchy does not arise. The linear size of the Universe by the end following, first step unalive natures meta-evolution occurrence of the first "maximum" tier in hierarchy is determined with the help of multiplication of fundamental length l f on a denominator of a progression ee , second multiplication of the received thus result to this denominator, etc. That is by calculated way the same sequence of estimations of the linear sizes derives which earlier already was is interpreted as set of the spatial characteristics of the ideal framework of hierarchical system of Nature search optimization. Here it is necessary once again to emphasize, that the speech goes about the ideal sizes of structural hierarchical elements of the Universe. The material structures, their filling, not necessarily should be near to the borders, achieved by it, though also it is quite probable. The time (duration) of a zero step unalive natures meta-evolution is similar represents fundamental time T f (which is determined as time, for which light passes distance l f , i.e. ~0.54 10-43 sec.). And as the denominator of a progression of the temporary characteristics in system hierarchy alive also makes ee , by the specified analogy the duration of the first step unalive natures metaevolution is determined with the help of multiplication of fundamental time T f on this denominator, second multiplication of the received thus result to a denominator, etc. The received thus results, with the necessary comments, are shown in the table 1. Table 1. The theoretically designed spatial-temporary characteristics of unalive natures hierarchical system
The characteristic tier ps. linear size of a tier tier in hierarchy (calculated) 0 0 0.16 10-32 cm l f - Fundamental (M.Planks) length 0.24 10-31 cm 0.37 10-30 cm 0.56 10-29 cm 0.85 10-28 cm 0.13 10-26 cm 0.19 10-25 cm The names of the empirically observable representatives of the given hierarchical level/tier and their typical sizes Fundamental (primary) cell of space-time of the Universe, or "plankteon" * Meta-evolutions characteristic time of a tier in hierarchy (calculated) 0.54 10-43 sec. Fundamental time Tf = l f / c 0.82 10-42 sec. 0.12 10-40 sec. 0.19 10-39 sec. 0.28 10-38 sec. 0.43 10-37 sec. 0.65 10-36 sec.

1 2 3 4 5 6

? ? ? Spheres of "postplankteon-1" * ? ? ? Spheres of "postplankteon-2 *

1703

http://zhurnal.ape.relarn.ru/articles/2004/156e.pdf

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47

10

11

12

13

14

15

0.30 10-24 cm 0.45 10-23 cm 0.68 10-22 cm 0.10 10-20 cm 0.16 10-19 cm 0.24 10-18 cm 0.36 10-17 cm 0.54 10-16 cm 0.82 10-15 cm 0.12 10-13 cm 0.19 10-12 cm 0.29 10-11 cm 0.43 10-10 cm 0.66 10-9 cm 0.999 10-8 cm (1 ) 0.15 10-6 cm 0.23 10-5 cm 0.35 10-4 cm 0.53 10-3 cm 0.80 10-2 cm 0.12 100 cm 0.18 101 cm 0.28 102 cm 0.42 103 cm (4.2 ) 0.64 104 cm (64 m) 0.97 105 cm (970 m) 0.15 107 cm (15 km) 0.22 108 cm (222 km) 0.34 109 cm (3370 km) 0.51 1010 cm (51 Mm) 0.77 1011 cm (770 Mm) 0.12 1013 cm (11.7 Gm) 0.18 1014 cm (177 Gm = 1.18 a.u.) 0.27 1015 cm (18 a.u.) 0.41 1016 cm (270 a.u.) 0.62 1017 cm (4130 a.u.) 0.94 1018 cm (0.3 parsec) 0.14 1020 cm (4.6 parsec) 0.21 1021 cm (70 parsec) 0.32 1022 cm (1.06 kiloparsec) 0.49 1023 cm (16 kiloparsec)

? ? ? Spheres of "postplankteon-3 * ? ? ? Spheres of "postplankteon-4 * ? ? ? Spheres of "postplankteon-5 * ? ? Spheres of nucleuses of atoms (~ 10-12 10-13 cm) ? ? Spheres of atoms (N.Bohrs radius of hydrogen atom 0.529 10-8 cm) (bioanalogue organic molecules) (bioanalogue macromolecules) Spheres of "dusts" * (bioanalogue prokaryote units) (bioanalogue sub-compartments of cell) (bioanalogue compartments of cell) Spheres of "kern" * (bioanalogue eukaryote cells) (bioanalogue tissues) (bioanalogue organs) Spheres of "boulders" * (bioanalogue pluricellular organisms) (bioanalogue populations) (bioanalogue parcels) Spheres of "mille-planets" * (bioanalogue biogeocenosis) (bioanalogue biomes) (bioanalogue natural zones) Spheres of planets (bioanalogue Biospheres) (bioanalogue sub-compartments of terrestrial group planets: a complex "Earth-Moon and near satellites") (bioanalogue compartments of terrestrial group planets: a complex "Earth-distant satellites") Spheres of group of planets (bioanalogue Sphere of terrestrial group planets) Complex "Star-planets" Complex "Star-distant not planetary formations" Star systems Large globules (~unto 0.3 parsec) Clusters of stars (~several parsec) Associations of stars (~ 40-200 parsec) Star complexes (~unto 1 kiloparsec) Dwarf galaxies (~unto 10 kiloparsec)

0.99 10-35 sec. 0.15 10-33 sec. 0.23 10-32 sec. 0.34 10-31 sec. 0.52 10-30 sec. 0.79 10-29 sec. 0.12 10-27 sec. 0.18 10-26 sec. 0.27 10-25 sec. 0.42 10-24 sec. 0.63 10-23 sec. 0.96 10-22 sec. 0.14 10-20 sec. 0.22 10-19 sec. 0.33 10-18 sec. 0.50 10-17 sec. 0.76 10-16 sec. 0.12 10-14 sec. 0.17 10-13 sec. 0.27 10-12 sec. 0.40 10-11 sec. 0.61 10-10 sec. 0.93 10-9 sec. 0.14 10-7 sec. 0.21 10-6 sec. 0.32 10-5 sec. 0.49 10-4 sec. 0.7410-3 sec. 0.11 10-1 sec. 0.17 100 sec. 0.26 101 sec. 0.39 102 sec. 0.59 103 sec. (10 minutes) 0.90 104 sec. (2.5 hours) 0.14 106 sec. (1.57 day) 0.21 107 sec. (24 days) 0.31 108 sec. (0.99 year) 0.47 109 sec. (15 years) 0.72 1010 sec. (227 years) 0.11 1012 sec. (3.4 Thousand years) 0.16 1013 sec. (52.2 Thousand years)

1704

http://zhurnal.ape.relarn.ru/articles/2004/156e.pdf

0.75 1024 cm (242 Galaxies (seen part ~ 30-40 kiloparsec) kiloparsec) 49 0.11 1026 cm (3.67 Groups of galaxies (~ 1-2 megaparsec) megaparsec) 50 0.17 1027 cm (55.7 Cluster of galaxies (~ 12-14 megaparsec) megaparsec) 51 17 0.26 1028 cm (844 Supercluster of galaxies ~ 200 megaparsec megaparsec = 2.75 Billions of light-year) ~4,2 gigaparsec, or ~13,7 Billions The current moment: Meta-galaxy of light-year 52 0.39 1029 cm (12.8 ? Sub-compartments of post-meta-galaxies * gigaparsec = 42 Billions of lightyear) 53 0.59 1030 cm (194 ? Compartments of post-meta-galaxies * gigaparsec = 632 Billions of lightyear) 54 18 0.90 1031 cm (2.94 ? Post-meta-galaxies * teraparsec = 9.58 trillions of lightyear) The notes: of a pseudo-tier; * names operative, preliminary 48 16

0.25 1014sec. (790 Thousand years) 0.38 1015 sec. (12 Millions years) 0.57 1016 sec. (182 Millions years) 0.87 1017 sec. (2.75 Billions years)

~13,7 Billions years 0.13 1019 sec. (42 Billions years) 0.20 1020 sec. (632 Billions years) 0.30 1021 sec. (9.58 Trillion years)

For comparison with existing representations about chronology of the Universe I shall bring the table of article "Big Bang" of the Astronomical dictionary [6], placed on a site of Space Research Institute (IKI RAS): Table 2. Approximate chronology of the events, which have followed from the zero moment of time [6].
Time from a beginning of Big Bang 0 5*10-44 sec. 5*10-44 10-36 sec. 10-36 10-4 sec. 10-4 1-3 sec. Temperature (Kelvin scale) 1,3*1032 1,3*1032 1028 28 10 1012 1012 1010 Event Any authentic items of information no A beginning of action of the known physical laws, era of inflationary expansion Era of intermediate bosons, and then era of adorns, existence free quarks Occurrence of particles and antiparticles from free quarks, and also them annihilation, occurrence of a transparency of substance for neutrino Passing of nuclear reactions of helium nucleuses synthesis and some other easy chemical elements Ending of recombination era Development gravitational heterogeneities of gas Consequences Expansion of the Universe proceeding and until now Occurrence of barions asymmetry, occurrence of neutrino relict radiation Determination of a primary ratio of chemical elements Occurrence of relict radiation and neutral gas Formation of stars and galaxies

1-3 100-120 sec. Between 300 thousand 1 million years 1 million 1 billion years

1010 109 3000 4500 4500 10

The comparative analysis of these tables allows formulating the following preliminary conclusions: A). Rushes in eyes the absence in the second table (together with in the majority of other references see, par example, [7-9]) spatial characteristics enumerated there basic (from the point of view of their authors) events of the Universe chronology after the Big Bang. Sometimes them adduce (par example, [10], fig. 1), but there is a problem of conformity interpretation of spatial and temporary

1705

http://zhurnal.ape.relarn.ru/articles/2004/156e.pdf

scales: in particular, not clearly, what material object by size 10-8 cm was generated in time about 1 sec. after the Big Bang, the size that in 1 cm was achieved in time about 107 years after the Big Bang, etc. On itself the addition of estimations of the linear sizes, and, hence, and volumes in the appropriate analysis is rather productive, as immediately allows to switch on in consideration many of the additional characteristics. Thus information basis necessary for understanding of properties of a Nature, exhibited by it on all meta-phases their meta-evolution, at addition by their "ideal" characteristics (based on the offered informatics-cybernetic approach), can be rather essentially extended see section 3. B). Besides it is necessary to note, as temporary characteristics of the second table it is possible referent fairly from being with all possible "cellules" for first. But for those cases, when it to make work out, that fact is obvious, that in all such cases the times of events from the second table are not less the appropriate times from first (if to treat one of tiers "postplankteon-1" or "postplankteon-2" as a tier of intermediate bosons). That is the "ideal" tiers as such in the beginning have time to be generated, and only then on them begin to arise those or other material formations.

3. On speed of the Universe expansion

So, from positions of the offered informatics-cybernetic approach, the Universe really extends! At least, its ideal borders or, by analogy to living system, horizon of unalives metaevolution are moved apart with a course it meta-evolution, and with speed of light. And entered for interrelation of fundamental length and time the interrelation l f = T f is generalized not only on fair for any tier in hierarchy of a nature a ratio between the size of this tier and time of unalives metaevolution from the moment of the Big Bang, but also on a ratio between any current time T ( m ) of unalives meta-evolution and "ideal" size l ( m ) , achieved to this time, of the Universe: l ( m ) = T ( m ) (1) So, the current moment it meta-evolution, which define in 13,7 Billion years from the moment of the Big Bang, corresponds to the horizon of unalives meta-evolution, achieved to this time, in 13,7 Billion light-years, or ~4,2 gigaparsec. Moreover, any attributes (and, main, possible reasons!) end of process of such expansion of ideal borders of the Universe in its offered "cybernetic" approach is not looked through From expression (1), in general, follows, that the specified ideal borders act faster in a role asymptote of expansion process of the Universe real structures as material objects, which always proceeded and proceeds with speed V < , not necessarily identical at the various moments of unalives meta-evolution. Thus, it is expedient to raise the question about an estimation of value of speed V of existence sphere expansion of material objects in the Universe in a course of unalives meta-evolution, that, in turn, will allow to specify, how and depending on that can vary so-called Hubbles "constant". Some hypothesis about interrelation of the "ideal" sizes of tiers in hierarchy of the Universe with by their "ideal-real" sizes is necessary for the answer to these questions. She can look as follows: "Time, for which the horizon of unalives meta-evolution grows from fundamental length up to size some n -th of a tier in hierarchy, and the time, for which the horizon of the Universe material structures formation grows from fundamental length up to size some (n 1) -th of a tier in hierarchy, coincides". Here under horizon of the Universe material structures formation (we shall designate it G ) we shall understand that maximal size of their size, within the limits of which the material objects in a course of their expansion (after the Big Bang) already can arise (and, hence, to be accessible to observation), and outside which - still no, the only appropriate "ideal" tier for their subsequent possible occurrence is formed. As well as any hypothesis given also is vulnerable for criticism (for example, "why the meaning (n 1) is chosen?"), but from something you see it is necessary to begin Therefore, according to a hypothesis it is possible to write down, that: Tn = whence (2)

ln Gn = , c Vn

Vn = c

Gn ln

1706

http://zhurnal.ape.relarn.ru/articles/2004/156e.pdf

Let's estimate the tendency of change of values Gn , ln Vn . Let us assume, that the sizes of "distances" in (2) are measured not in the linear sizes of tiers, and in their "pieces" (i.e. actually in the logarithms of distances). Then at n =1: G1 = 0 , l1 = 1 , and, hence, V1 = 0 ; at n =2: G2 = 1 , l2 = 2 , and, hence, V2 =

1 2 c ; at n =3: G3 = 2 , l3 = 3 , and, hence, V3 = c ; etc. Is generally finally received: 2 3 n 1 (3) Vn = c n

For last achieved by material structures of the Universe (about 11 Billion years back see tab.

50 c 0,9803921c , for formed by them 51 51 c 0,9807692c , for formed (will be achieved through ~28 Billion years ) tier 52 V52 = 52 52 "ideal" circle (will be achieved through ~660 Billion years ) tier 53 V53 = c 0,9811321c . 53 That is for a "today's" situation it is quite possible to accept this coefficient equal 0,98 .
1) in a course of their meta-evolution, of a tier 51 V51 = Let us compare this expression with empirical Hubbles "the law recession": v = HR , (4) where v speed of recession; R distance; H Hubbles constant, in round figures equal 15 /106 [8]. From (4) follows, that the speed v can unlimited (at least, up to light speed) to be increased. Nevertheless, according to the put forward hypothesis v cannot be higher V . That is the increase of speed v "today" is limited only insignificantly, up to 0,98c (but at the first stages of unalives metaevolution after the Big Bang this restriction was essential large, up to 0,5c ). Thus account (3) allows to
formalize dependence Hubbles "constant" in this case from numbers n ( m ) of the summit tier of material structures in the Universes hierarchy (arising in a course their meta-evolution), closely connected with time T ( m ) and sizes G ( m ) , l ( m ) . Moreover, if the given hypothesis is correct, then

H =H

(m)

n( m) (m) . n +1

4. On other consequences of proposed unalives meta-evolution concept

1. As it is easy to see, concept of horizon of unalives meta-evolution rather close to known concept horizon of the Universe (see, par example, [11]). But last concept fixes only fact of restriction of an opportunity of events viewing: " any event which was having place outside this distance, not till now be rendered on us of any influence by it is behind horizon" [there]. As against it, horizon of unalives meta-evolution in addition accent attention on system hierarchism by the Universe, allocating in a course of the consecutive growth the certain tiers in this hierarchy. 2. In job [3] is shown, that the tiers in the hierarchical mechanism of search optimization lifeless as a first approximation represent so-called "pseudo-tiers" set at once of three adjacent tiers from the table 1, and each pair such adjacent pseudo-tiers forms "pseudo-contour" of hierarchical search optimization (which name are selected in tab. 1 with a bold font). And already within the framework of activity (the realizations of adaptive behaviour) such pseudo-contour on the basis of elements concerning a triad of tiers, making its maximum pseudo-tier, plus of elements of its lowest pseudo-tier, can arise sporadic optimizational sub-contours (any of six possible combinations: three dyads, two triplets and tetrad). That is in the second approximation in unalives hierarchy role is executed also by separate tiers from tab. 1 (detail see in [3]). Thus, at the analysis of occurrence process of unalives hierarchical search optimization system tiers, which have been not marked by a bold font in tab. 1, also should be involved in consideration by analogy with alive as a little- and medio-dimensional variants of the full-size representative of maximum tiers of the appropriate triad.

1707

http://zhurnal.ape.relarn.ru/articles/2004/156e.pdf

3. It is necessary to recognize what to give exact "referencing" with sufficient reliability of electrons, neutrino, quarks etc. of real or theoretically entered formations to the appropriate "ideal" tiers "postplankteon-1,2,3,4,5" in the given first publication on a considered problem it is not obviously possible. Too differ available in the literature as theoretical estimations of their sizes (and time of occurrence), and appropriate experimentally received results. Nevertheless, as it is represented, for the appropriate experts, based on proposed concept about a sequence of occurrence of these tiers in a course of meta-evolution development of the Universe after the Big Bang, it not only is quite possible, but also can give a positive effect.

The conclusion
Use for the description of some aspects of structure and behaviour of the Universe of informatics-cybernetic language, and is concrete terminology of hierarchical search optimizational systems, it is represented rather perspective in the given area of knowledge. Unalive, alive and social, reproducing the most general laws of adaptive behaviour of search optimization hierarchical systems and differing among themselves by concrete kind of the appropriate structural skeleton, show and differing properties its meta-evolution: "reclaim" the appropriate spatial formations according to delay, uniform and with acceleration. On an offered basis, with reference to unalives meta-evolution: - it is possible to detail both moments of occurrence, and the spatial characteristics of "ideal" hierarchical tiers of system of unalives nature, within the framework of which after the Big Bang consistently arise natural objects; - for each of such objects (some of which while were not known at all, and their existence only hypothetically follows from proposed concept about unalives meta-evolution) it is possible to specify a number of the additional characteristics reflecting their place and a role in is permanent to formed hierarchical system of search optimization unalives.

The literature
1. Grinchenko S.N. A phenomenon of optimization, adaptation and evolution in natural systems // Sbornik NTI, issue 2, Information processes and systems, 1999, 6. M.: VINITI, 1999, pp. 20-30 (in Russian). 2. Grinchenko S.N. Social meta-evolution of Humankind as a sequence of mechanisms formation steps of its system memory // Electronic magazine "Investigated in Russia", 145, pp. 16521681, 2001, http://zhurnal.ape.relarn.ru/articles/2001/145.pdf (in Russian). 3. Grinchenko S.N. System memory of life (as the basis of its meta-evolution and periodic structure). M.: IPIRAN, Mir-Publishers, 2004, 512 p. and http://www.ipiran.ru/S.N.Grinchenko.shtml (in Russian). 4. Turchin V. The Phenomenon of Science. A Cybernetic Approach to Human Evolution. New York: Columbia University Press, 1977. 5. Jirmunskiy A.V., Kusmin V.I. Critical levels during development of biological systems. M.: Nauka, 1982, 179 p. (in Russian). 6. Sanko N.F. The large explosion // The Universe and Man. The astronomical dictionary. A site of Institute of space researches of RAS http: // www.iki.rssi.ru/hend/Dictionary/Big%20b ang.htm (in Russian). 7. Physical encyclopaedic dictionary. M. Sovietskaya Encyclopedia, 1983, 928 pp. (in Russian) 8. Vasilev .N. Evolution of the Universe // Soross educational magazine, 1996, 2 http://www.issep.rssi.ru/pdf/9602_082.pdf (in Russian). 9. Site GAISH MGU http://astronet.ru/ 10. Penionzhkevich J.E. Nuclear astrophysics Site of MGU physical faculty http://phys.web.ru/db/msg.html?mid=1168517*s=260000110 (in Russian). 11. Weinberg S. The First Three Minutes. A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe. New York: Basic Books, 1977, 188 p.