Anda di halaman 1dari 23

My First Step to Research

1. Introduction

Evidence-based practice [EBP] has been increasingly promoted as a model for physiotherapy practice (Ritchie, 1999).

Evidence-based practice is conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients(Sackett et al., 1997).

The main aim of the EBP is to provide better result for the patient care and the members of the family, to improve the attribute of the health care team members and the systematic arrangement of the health care (Craig and Smyth, 2007). The first step to research can be challenging to most researchers and may seem an impossible task. According to Hicks (2004), the rise of EBP encourages all health professionals to be research minded in developing and assessing empirical evidence that corroborates their professional practice. The aim of this essay is to outline a research journey to find the effectiveness of mental practice [MP] in stroke patients. A review of the available evidence base will guide the area of investigation and formulate a research question.

| VN Mummadisetty |

Page | 1 |

2. Background

Stroke is a very limiting disease for the patient and a major health problem in most parts of the world (AHA, 1997). The World Health Organisation (1988) has defined stroke as a condition with rapidly developing clinical signs of focal loss of cerebral function, with symptoms lasting more than 24 hours or leading to death, with no apparent cause other than that of vascular origin.

Stroke accounts for around 53,000 deaths each year and estimated 150,000 people have a stroke in the United Kingdom [UK] each year, at least 450,000 people are severely disabled as a result of stroke in England (Stroke Association, 2011). The National Commission on Macroeconomics and

Health, India, estimates there will be 1.67 million stroke cases in India in 2015 (WHO, 2010).

Neurological conditions play a significant role in economic, social and personal burden on the NHS and patients families, as most of the neurological conditions need long term rehabilitation (Neurological Alliance, 2003).

A research agenda should reflect the appropriate ways to answer the questions. The acknowledgement of where the evidence falls short and how the evidence falls short is essential to the development of important research questions and in providing guidance in how to direct those questions.

| VN Mummadisetty |

Page | 2 |

3. Literature Review As a process, EBP is about finding, appraising and applying scientific evidence to the treatment and management of health care (Timmermans and Mauck, 2005). Its ultimate goal is to support practitioners in their decision making to eliminate the use of ineffective, inappropriate, too expensive and potentially dangerous practices (Hamer and Collinson, 2005). Heller et al. (2008) suggests that many clinicians are also cautious to critically appraise published literature. However, a logical review of the literature can identify clear research questions building on what is already known and identifying areas to be addressed (Burns and Grove, 2002). MP according to Richardson (1967) is the symbolic rehearsal of a physical activity in the absence of any gross muscular movements. MP has been proven to be useful in sports training and other skills training (Athletic Insight, 2004). Still, much is yet to be determined if the same assuring results may be derived when this training method is used in persons with brain lesions, like stroke (Dizon and Calayan, 2009).

2001-2011 Eighteen studies, in which six Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) (Page et al., 2001a, 2005; 2007;2011; Liu et al., 2004; Riccio et al., 2010), two Controlled Clinical Trials (Dijkerman et al., 2004; Muller et al., 2007), one is pre-post treatment study (Simmons et al., 2008) and remaining are case studies and case series. All studies included both men and women as participants. Study sizes were small, in 12 studies had 63 participants and 6 | VN Mummadisetty | Page | 3 |

study had 180 participants (Dijkerman et al., 2004; Muller et al., 2007; page et al., 2007; 2011; Liu et al., 2004; Riccio et al., 2010). Few studies had good randomization procedures (Page et al., 2001a; 2005; 2011; Riccio et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2004). In few studies, subjects in the chronic phase of recovery were recruited (Page et al., 2005; 2011; Dijkerman et al., 2004). Liu et al., (2004) included exclusively patients in the subacute phase of recovery (727days poststroke). Page et al., (2001a) included patients in the chronic and acute phase of recovery (4weeks to 4years poststroke).

MP intervention was given by using, audiotaped instructions (Hewett et al., 2007; Page et al., 2001a; 2005; 2007), written instructions (Dijkerman et al., 2004), self regulation (Liu et al., 2004), videotaped instructions (Crosbie et al., 2004; Muller et al., 2007), computer-generated image (Gaggioli et al., 2006), or visual displays of the less affected limb via a mirror box (Stevens and Stoykov, 2003).

Additionally, the studies used various tasks such as functional reaching and grasping tasks (Crosbie et al., 2004; Dijkerman et al., 2004; Page et al., 2005), line tracing (Yoo et al., 2001), selective finger opposition sequences (Muller et al., 2007), during the MP sessions. In several studies, the perspective used was not clearly articulated (Crosbie et al., 2004; Dijkerman et al., 2004; Yoo et al., 2001).

| VN Mummadisetty |

Page | 4 |

The intensity and duration of MP, in RCT studies varied substantially regarding the number of trials or minutes engaged in practice, with participants receiving around 45 hours of MP over a 3-weeks (Riccio et al., 2010) to 10 weeks period (Page et al., 2011). In each study, frequency with which the MP was given varied, but a minimum of 2 times a week for 20-30 minutes was reported.

Most studies used the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (Gaggioli et al., 2006; Page et al., 2001a; 2001b; 2009; 2011; Stevens and Stoykov, 2003), the Jebsen Test of Hand Function ( Muller et al., 2007; Stevens and Stoykov, 2003), the Arm Function Test (Riccio et al., 2010), the Motricity Index (Crosbie et al., 2004; Simmons et al., 2008; Riccio et al., 2010), or the Action Research Arm Test (Gaggioli et al., 2006; Page et al., 2001a; 2005; 2007; 2011) as primary outcome measures. Hewitt et al. (2007) used a kinematic analysis of functional reaching tasks, and Dijkerman et al. (2004) used outcome measures aimed at complex task function.

Few studies showed statistically significant differences favouring MP on at-least one outcome measure (Crosbie et al., 2004; Dijkerman et al., 2004; Hewett et al., 2007; Muller et al., 2007; Page et al., 2005). MP alone did not result in a clinically meaningful improvement in upper-limb impairment and also the researchers described how these interventions may elicit plastic changes in the brain (Butler and Page, 2006).

| VN Mummadisetty |

Page | 5 |

Moreover, from the studies, it appears that MP combined with physical practice yields better outcomes than physical practice alone or conventional therapy (Dijkerman et al., 2004; Muller et al., 2007; Page et al., 2005; 2007). Interestingly, only three studies included a follow-up, after 1 month (Liu et al., 2004), after 3 months(Page et al., 2009) and after six months(Page et al., 2011) therefore little is known about possible long-term effects of MP. Gentili, Papaxanthis and Porro (2006) compared the improvement in arm motor performance in which the MP groups improved significantly in the pointing task by decreasing their duration time that engaged in eye-movement training. However, Gentili et al. (2006) study had participants with an intact nervous system function. So, further studies employing quality research designs are needed to strengthen the evidence. The fact that intensive training on tasks, which have shown activate motor regions in neuroimaging studies does not result in behavioural change, may question the functional relevance of cortical activation in mental simulation of action (Cinzia and Jean-Claude, 2003). Numerous neuroimaging studies had demonstrated non-motor tasks (Rizzolatti and Craighero, 2004).

The consideration of existing evidence often highlights important areas where deficiencies in information limit our ability to make decisions. Encouraging outcomes were noted in some RCTs and much of the literature suggests further studies are needed to evaluate the effects of MP in stroke rehabilitation.

| VN Mummadisetty |

Page | 6 |

4. Research Question

By analysing the literatures thoroughly the research question will be well-organised and formulated (LoBiondo and Haber, 2010). Reviewing of the articles and literature has come into the conclusion of development of research question by the identification of the gaps.

Possible methods of approach to the research journey will concentrate around the question: Investigating evidence for the effectiveness of mental practice in stroke rehabilitation to improve function

According to Sackett et al. (1997) a well structured research question should answer PICO framework. The above research question answers the four parts:

Population Intervention

: Stroke patients : Mental Practice

Comparison (If any) : Null or No Comparison Outcome . : Function Improvement

| VN Mummadisetty |

Page | 7 |

5. Methods of Approach

The kind of role adopted by a researcher determines what kinds of methods can be utilised, means the extent to which the aims and methods of a piece of research match and link to the way the researchers account for their purpose (Ballinger; cited Finlay, 2006).

How researchers set about offering a convincing and relevant interpretation may also vary according to the methodology employed. In

reference to discourse analysis, Potter and Wetherell (1994) suggest that presenting work to a variety of different audiences helps researchers evaluate how compelling their explanations are. When it comes to choosing criteria, there is considerable divergence of opinion (Willig, 2001; cited Finlay, 2006).

5.1. Quantitative Approach The quantitative approach is called the logical positivism. Positivism contends that there is a single reality and therefore seeks to identify causal relationships through objective measurement and quantitative analysis (Firestone, 1987; cited Doyle et al 2009). The only known way to avoid selection and confounding bias is to use randomisation (Schulz and Grimes, 2006) as it heightens the internal validity of the study. There are numerous ways of designs in the quantitative; they are descriptive to represent the variables, correlation to exam relationship between the variables, quasi-experimental and the experimental to figure out the cause | VN Mummadisetty | Page | 8 |

and effect among variables, which includes the range from uncontrolled method to controlled methods (Burns and Grove, 2010). Historically the approach in health care research was nearly exclusively of the quantitative or positivist tradition for the researcher to be objective and unbiased, (Firestone, 1987; cited Doyle et al 2009) and for many, it is considered to be the gold standard (Bowling, 2005) of research strategies in healthcare where the results of objective testing on samples of patients are applied to wider populations. In corresponding to the question, RCT appears be the most appropriate and well controlled approach method to conduct a research.

5.1.1. Randomised Control Trial Approach According to Bolyai and Bova (2010) when the intervention is more efficient it presents the identical outcomes even when it is trialled more number of times. To answer the question with RCT, the samples are enrolled into two groups with an experimental group receiving the MP intervention and the other control groups receiving the normal and usual guidelines. So, that whatever may be variance in outcome is the effect of intervention. Gray (2001, pp. 133) suggests that for RCTs to be ethical there needs to be equipoise, that is, genuine doubt prior that one option is better than another. Alternative quantitative strategies that may need to be considered include cohort studies, which may have limited internal cogency due to confounders as a result of neglecting the essential element of randomisation (Schulz and Grimes, 2006). However, the RCT is determined not to be the

| VN Mummadisetty |

Page | 9 |

suitable method of approach for the research question owing to shortage of perceptibility and the training of techniques, though it contributes the desired result in the clinical effectiveness (Evans and Pearson, 2001), then the clinical experimental method using the design of controlled pre-test and post-test or can be done only with the design of controlled post-test group can be considered. 5.1.2. Quasi Experimental Approach The research question can also be approached by the quasi experimental research. The non-equivalent control group design is effective, because the researcher can collect the data in the pre-test and the independent variable can be introduced by relating the sameness of two groups (Bolyai and Bova, 2010). Although, there are advantages of using the design, but it cannot be approached as it has threats to selection, maturation, testing and morality are probable within this design (LoBiondo and Haber, 2010). 5.1.3. Non Experimental Approach The other method to approach the question is by using the nonexperimental research to investigate the relationships and the dissimilarity among the variables (LoBiondo and Haber, 2010). However, the results produced by the non-experimental are not stronger than the experimental study, since the independent variables are not manipulated, the randomisation of participants are not considered and there is an absence of a control group (LoBiondo and Haber, 2010).

| VN Mummadisetty |

Page | 10 |

Meanwhile the qualitative research method also considered although most of the methods of quantitative approaches are applicable to the research question. 5.2. Qualitative Approach Qualitative researchers study things in their natural settings, attempting to make sense of or interpret Phenomena in terms of the meanings that people bring to them (Denzin and Lincoln, 1994 pp.2). Mason (2002) described the qualitative research as encompasses modes of inquiry oriented towards how the social world is interpreted, understood, experienced, produced or constituted. 5.2.1. Grounded Theory Approach Grounded Theory [GT] is a method of qualitative approach; the development of a systematic understanding, the data can be obtained from variety of sources, is clearly recognisable and understandable to the members of the setting and is done as much as possible in their own terms (Holloway and Todres, 2010) such as uses their words, ideas and methods of expression, but cautiously goes beyond these (Glaser and Strauss, 1967). GT can also be approached for the research question. Though, this method is very good at constructing theories and lead to future research in testing theories, it has drawbacks like measuring the effectiveness of MP is unwieldy; consumes more time for collecting and analysing data; due to subjective nature it may even be difficult to ascertain validity, reliability and prevent bias (Chenitz and Swanson, 2010, pp.14).

| VN Mummadisetty |

Page | 11 |

Qualitative investigators are concerned with the beliefs, motivations, and experiences, as well as the actions and interactions of people, organisations and institutions (Gibson and Martin, 2003). Qualitative research is concerned with describing and explaining complex social phenomena that occur in natural settings (Pope and Mays, 1995).

5.3. Mixed Method Approach Both the qualitative and quantitative methods are equivalent in nature. No method is considered to be the comprehensive design because they vary a lot, in which each and every method has its own strengths and limitations. Burns and Grove (2002) described that RCTs are good for all the studies, but it needs much time and effort.

Giddings (2006) describes that mixed method is widely used in the health care settings which answers in positive way for the difficult questions which can be done only with the approach of different methods. Wooley (2009) suggested that mixed methods can be used to contribute an efficient methodology in multiple studies. Therefore, mixed methods can be used for the research question. Brannen (cited Finlay 2006) claims that it is quite rare that the mixed method research or indeed the individual researcher, is likely to put equal emphasis on qualitative and quantitative methods (Bowling, 2005). It was only with the rapid development of statistical methods that these two strands diverged and the field of health research does seem particularly keen on combining qualitative and quantitative research methods, given the

| VN Mummadisetty |

Page | 12 |

pragmatic nature of the discipline, coupled with the complexity of the many factors that influence health and health care (Bowling, 2005). 5.4. Action Research Action research is a form of self-reflective enquiry attempted by participants in social situations in order to improve the rationality and justice of their own practices, their understanding of these practices, and the situations in which the practices are carried out (Carr and Kemmis, 1986). Positivism, used in scientific and applied research, has been reckoned by many to be the antithesis of the principles of action research (Winter, 1989; cited OBrien, 2001) and it is useful method to answer the question.

Though, sharing a number of perspectives with the interpretive paradigm, and making considerable use of its related qualitative

methodologies, there are researchers who feel that neither it nor the positivist paradigms are sufficient epistemological structures under which to place action research (Morley, 1991; cited OBrine, 2001). Because action research is carried out in real-world circumstances, and involves close and open communication among the people involved, the researchers must pay close attention to ethical considerations in the conduct of the work (Ahmed, 2009). Although, I felt this approach as appropriate initially because of direct involvement of researcher to understand people needs, values and beliefs regarding the effectiveness of MP which is required for the study. On the other side, it makes me really think of its applicability because of its nature of data

| VN Mummadisetty |

Page | 13 |

overload leading to misinterpretation of information and even sometimes resulting omitting the information.

6. Evaluation Morris and Williams (2009) recommends that further research is needed to explore new ways of working and delivering focused interventions in stroke, and that physiotherapists can play a key role in achieving this.

Delivering MP interventions that meet the needs of people with stroke will require thorough research, careful planning and good communication networks in order to understand the perceptions of those affected, and to ensure adequate funding and training (Physiotherapy, 2010).

Processes of functional redistribution have been presented in early poststroke, if the neural principle of firing is rewiring applies to MP in stroke, expect to find a clinical benefit in patients (Nelles et al., 2001).

The rationale for the efficacy of MP in stroke, which is subscribed by researchers and clinicians, generates a feeling that this is a useful rehabilitation method, that activation of motor brain areas through imagery will enhance brain plasticity (Nelles et al., 2001).

The evidence is limited to suggest MP to be beneficial in improving function, when compared to other treatments in stroke rehabilitation (Barclay

| VN Mummadisetty |

Page | 14 |

et al., 2011). Evidence of MP regarding, improvement in motor recovery; quality of movement; effectiveness; ideal dosage required to improve function is less clear.

7. Systematic Review A systematic review is an overview of primary studies which contains an explicit statement of objectives, materials, and methods and has been conducted according to explicit and reproducible methodology (Trisha, 1997)

In clinical care for many interventions the evidence base is relatively weak (Bowling, 2005 pp. 47) because comprising studies with small group of participants and poor methodological back up with evidence. Grootens et al., (2003) claims that systematic reviews and meta-analyses have assumed an increasing role in healthcare literature reviews during the past decade because it provides the best evidence from the numerous literatures for the EBP.

Systematic reviews of all relevant research about the efficacy of a treatment are progressively seen by clinicians and healthcare suppliers as providing the most reliable basis for conclusions about treatment effects (Gray, 2001). In order to achieve reliable and valid systematic reviews and metaanalysis the studies being compared must be directing the same hypothesis in the same direction (Bowling, 2005).

| VN Mummadisetty |

Page | 15 |

A systematic review carried to investigate MP describes quality of movement is less clear (Barclay et al., 2011) which shows lack of in-depth empirical evidence regarding the MP.

A systematic review is suggested at this stage as the treasure and influence they posses for clinical deciding (Gray, 2001) makes thoughtfulness of this approach worthy for further enquiry of the research question as it offers a problem solving and practice development strategy that can evaluate (Walsh and Wigen, 2003).

8. Conclusion The emergency of EBP has thrown many involved in clinical care into the daunting research world (Burns and Grove, 2002). Many approaches are very near to address the research question but there are disadvantages in the models to investigate and find the effectiveness of MP. In a Cochrane review Barclay et al., (2011) also suggested that further studies are required to evaluate the effectiveness of MP; to affect the outcomes on the post stroke as numerous ongoing studies might improve the evidence base of MP. So, the best way to find the effectiveness of MP can be answered by a systematic review of quantitative studies. (Appendix 1)

| VN Mummadisetty |

Page | 16 |

Bibliography References: Athletic Insight (2004) Mental Skills Training for Sports: A brief review. Volume 6 (1). American Heart Association. (1997) Stroke facts. Dallas: AHA. Ahmed, J U. (2009) Action Research: A New Look. KASBIT Business Journal 2(1&2): pp.19-32. http://www.kasbit.edu.pk/journal/index.htm Burns, N. and Grove S.K. (2002) Understanding nursing research. 3rd Edition ISBN 13: 9780721600116 ISBN 10: 0721600115 Burns, N. and Grove, S. K. (2010) Understanding nursing research: building evidence based practice. 5th Ed. Philadelphia Saunders. ISBN-10: 1437707505 Butler, A J. and Page, S J. (2006) Mental practice with motor imagery: evidence for motor recovery and cortical reorganization after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehab 87(12 Suppl 2):S2-11. http://www.archivespmr.org/article/S0003-9993(06)01272-X/abstract Barclay-Goddard, R E., Stevenson, T. J., Poluha W. and Thalman, L. (2011). Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 5. (2006, Issue 2) Art. No.: CD005950. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005950.pub4. Bowling, A. and Ebrahim Shan. (2005) Hand book of health research methods: Investigation, measurement and analysis. Open University press ISBN10: 0335214606 Bolyai, S. S. and Bova, C. (2010) Experimental and Quasi -experimental Designs. In: LoBiondo-Wood, G. and Haber. J. (Eds) Nursery Research: Methods & critical appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice. 7th edition, Elsevier Mosby: pp.177 193. Dizon, J. M., and Calayan, L. M. S. (2009) A systematic review on the effectiveness of mental practice with motor imagery in the neurologic rehabilitation of stroke patients. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice 7(2). Available: http://ijahsp.nova.edu/articles/Vol7Num2/pdf/dizon.pdf Carr, W. and Kemmis, S. (1986) Becoming critical: Education, knowledge, and action research. Philadelphia: Flamer Press. Craig, J. V. and Smyth, R. L. (2007) The evidence based practice manual for nurses 2nd edition, Philadelphia: Elsevier: pp.3-16.

| VN Mummadisetty |

Page | 17 |

Cinzia, C. and Jean-Claude, B. (2003) Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Motor Recovery After Stroke in Adults: A Review Stroke 34: pp.15531566, doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000071761.36075.A6 Stroke. Available at http://www.strokeaha.org Chenitz, W. and Swanson. (2010) Triangultion of qualitative methods: Heideggerian hermeneutics and grounded theory [Online] Available at www.qhr.sagepub.com/content/1/2/263.short Crosbie, J. H., McDonough, S. M., Gilmore, D. H. and Wiggam, M. I. (2004). The adjunctive role of mental practice in the rehabilitation of the upper limb after hemiplegic stroke: A pilot study. Clinical Rehabilitation 18; pp.6068. doi:10.1191/0269215504cr702oa Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1994) Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage. ISBN-10: 0803946791 Dijkerman, H. C., Ietswaart, M., Johnston, M., and MacWalter, R. S. (2004). Does motor imagery training improve hand function in chronic stroke patients? A pilot study. Clinical Rehabilitation 18: pp.538549. doi:10.1191/0269215504cr769oa Doyle, L., Brady, A. M. and Gobnait, B. (2009) An overview of mixed methods research. Journal of Research in Nursing 14: 175 DOI: 10.1177/1744987108093962 http://jrn.sagepub.com/content/14/2/175 Evans, D. and Pearson, A. (2001) Systematic reviews: gatekeepers of nursing knowledge. Journal of Clinical Nursing 10: pp.593 599. Gaggioli, A., Meneghini, A., Morganti, F., Alcaniz, M. and Riva, G. (2006). A strategy for computer-assisted mental practice in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 20; pp.503507. doi:10.1177/1545968306290224 Gibson, B. E. and Martin, D. K. (2003) Qualitative research and evidencebased physiotherapy practice. Physiotherapy 89(6): pp.350-358. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science Grootens K. P., Assendelft, W. J. and Overbeke, A. J. (2003) Increased number of systematic reviews in the Netherlands in the period 19912000. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 147(45): pp.22262230. Gentili, R., Papaxanthis, C., and Pozzo, T. (2006) Improvement and generalization of arm motor performance through motor imagery practice Neuroscience 137(3): pp.761772. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.10.013 Gray, J. A. M. (2001) Evidence-based Healthcare: How to Make Health Policy and Management Decisions. 2nd edition Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. ISBN-10: 0443062889.

| VN Mummadisetty |

Page | 18 |

Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine. ISBN 0-202302601 Giddings, L. (2006) Mixed-Methods research: positivism dressed in drag? Journal of Research in nursing 11(3): pp.195-203 Hicks, C. M. (2004) Research Methods for Clinical Therapists. Applied Project Design and Analysis. 4th edition. Churchill Livingstone. ISBN 0 443074305; Hamer, S. and Collinson, G. (2005) Achieving evidence-based practice: a handbook for practitioners. 2nd Edition. Bailliere Tindall. ISBN10: 0702027766 Heller, R. F., Verma, A., Gemmell, L., Harrison, R., Hart, J. and Edwards, R. (2008) Critical appraisal for public health: A new checklist. Public Health 122; pp.9298 Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science Hammick, M. (1995). Qualitative and quantitative research: Adjuvants and alternates. British Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 2(7): pp.341-342. Hewett, T. E., Ford, K. R., Levine, P. and Page, S. J. (2007). Reaching kinematics to measure motor changes after mental practice in stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 14: pp.2329. doi:10.1310/tsr1404-23 Holloway, I. and Todres, L. (2010) In: Gressih, K. and Lacey, A. The Research process in Nursing. Wiley-Blackwell; 6th Edition. ISBN-10: 1405190485 LoBiondo-Wood, G. and Haber, J. (2010) Nursery Research: Methods and critical appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice. 7th Edition. Elsevier Mosby. ISBN-10: 0323057438. Finlay, L. (2006) Rigour, Ethical Integrity or Artistry? Reflexively Reviewing Criteria for Evaluating Qualitative Research. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 69(7). Liu, K. P., Chan, C. C., Lee, T. M. and Hui-Chan, C. W. (2004) Mental imagery for promoting relearning for people after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: pp.1403-1408 Mason, J. (2002) Qualitative Researching. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage. ISBN-10: 0761974288 Morris, J. H. and Williams, B. (2009) Optimising long-term participation in physical activities after stroke: exploring new ways of working for physiotherapists. Physiotherapy 95: pp.22733. Muller, K., Butefisch, C. M., Seitz, R. J. and Homberg, V. (2007) Mental practice improves hand function after hemiparetic stroke. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 25: pp.501511.

| VN Mummadisetty |

Page | 19 |

Neurological Alliance Neuro numbers (2003): a brief review of the numbers of people in the UK with a neurological condition, the neurological alliance. Available: http://www.neural.org.uk Nelles, G., Jentzen, W., Jueptner, M., Muller, S. and Diener, H. C. (2001) Arm training induced brain plasticity in stroke studied with serial positron emission tomography. Neuroimage, 13: pp.11461154. http://www.sciencedirect.com O'Brien, R. (2001) An Overview of the Methodological Approach of Action Research. Available: http://www.web.ca/~robrien/papers/arfinal.html

Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and social psychology: beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage. ISBN-10: 0803980566 Pope, C. and Mays, N. (1995) Qualitative research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. British Medical Journal 311(6996): pp.42-45. Page, S. J., Levine, P., Sisto, S. A. and Johnston, M. V. (2001a) A randomized efficacy and feasibility study of imagery in acute stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 15: pp.233240. doi: 10.1191/026921501672063235 Page, S. J., Levine, P., Sisto, S. A. and Johnston, M. V. (2001b) Mental practice combined with physical practice for upper-limb motor deficit in subacute stroke. Physical Therapy, 81: pp.14551462. Page, S. J., Levine, P. and Leonard, A. C. (2005) Effects of mental practice on affected limb use and function in chronic stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86: pp.399402. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004. 10.002 Page, S. J., Levine, P. and Leonard, A. C. (2007) Mental practice in chronic stroke results of a randomized, placebo controlled trial. Stroke, 38: pp.1293 1297. doi:10.1161/01. STR.0000260205.67348.2b Page, S. J., Levine, P. and Khoury, J. C. (2009) Modified constraint-induced therapy combined with mental practice - thinking through better motor outcomes. Stroke, 40: pp.551554. Page, S. J., Dunning, K., Hermann, V., Leonard, A. and Levine, P.(2011) Longer versus shorter mental practice sessions for affected upper extremity movement after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 25(627). DOI: 10.1177/0269215510395793 Physiotherapy 96 (2010) Qualitative research highlights the challenges of developing new roles for physiotherapy in the optimisation of activity following stroke 7576. doi:10.1016/j.physio.2009.09.005

| VN Mummadisetty |

Page | 20 |

Richardson, A. (1967) Mental Practice: a review and discussion (part 1). Research Quarterly (38): pp.95-107 Rizzolatti, G. and Craighero, L. (2004) The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neuroscience, 27: pp.16992. http://www.annualreviews.org Riccio, I., Iolascon, G., Barillari, M.R., Gimigliano, R. and Gimigliano, F. (2010) Mental practice is effective in upper limb recovery after stroke: a randomized single-blind crossover study. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 46: pp.1925. Ritchie, J. E. (1999) Using qualitative research to enhance the evidence-based practice of healthcare providers, Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 45(4): pp.251-256 http://ajp.physiotherapy.asn.au/AJP/vol_45/4/AustJPhysiotherv45i4Ritchie.pdf Sackett, D. L., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W. and Haynes, R. B. (1997) Evidence-based Medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. New York: Churchill Livingstone. Simmons, L., Sharma, N., Baron, J. and Pomeroy, V. M. (2008) Motor imagery to enhance recovery after subcortical stroke: Who might benefit, daily dose, and potential effects. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22: pp.458467. doi:10.1177/1545968308315597 Stevens, J. A. and Phillips Stoykov, M. E. (2003) Using motor imagery in the rehabilitation of hemiparesis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84: pp.10901092. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00042-X Schulz, K. and Grimes, D. (2006) The Lancet Handbook of Essential Concepts in Clinical Research. (Elsevier, 2006) ISBN 0-080448666 Stroke Association (2011) http://www.stroke.org.uk/media_centre/facts_and_figures/index.html (Accessed online 9 March 2011) Timmermans, S. and Mauck, A. (2005) The promises and pitfalls of evidence based medicine. Health Aff (Millwood) 24 (1): pp.18-28 Trisha Greenhalgh. (1997) How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses) BMJ 315: pp.672-675 Available from: http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7109/672.full World Health Organization (2010) Workshop report on Stroke surveillance in India. World Health Organization. New Delhi. Available: http://www.whoindia.org/ World Health Organization MONICA Project (1988) (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease): a major international collaboration. WHO MONICA Project Principal Investigators. J Clin Epidemiol 41(2): pp.105114. | VN Mummadisetty | Page | 21 |

Walsh, M. and Wigen, L. (2003) Introduction to research: Foundation in nursing health care. Publisher: Nelson thornes. ISBN 0748771182 Wooley, C. (2009) Meeting the mixed methods challenge of Integration in a sociological study of structure and agency. Journal of mixed methods 3(1): pp.7 25. Yoo, E., Park, E. and Chung, B. (2001) Mental practice effect on line-tracing accuracy in persons with hemiparetic stroke: A preliminary study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82: pp.12131218. doi:10.1053/apmr. 2001.25095

| VN Mummadisetty |

Page | 22 |

Appendix 1: As illustrated in the JBI model evidence generation that includes discourse, experience and research (of any methodology) precedes evidence synthesis (systematic review). It follows then that JBI reviews address questions by systematically examining evidence that may include discourse, experience or research.

| VN Mummadisetty |

Page | 23 |

Anda mungkin juga menyukai