Instructor: Lexine M. Trask, Ph.D. Email: trask.12@osu.edu Phone: 614.247.8634 Office Hours and Location: 12:00 3:00 p.m. Wednesday, Smith Lab 4100 Class Time and Location: 10:30 a.m. 12:18 p.m. Tuesday & Thursday, Caldwell Lab 177
Course Description
This course provides an overview of historical and contemporary theoretical paradigms in socio-cultural anthropology in the United States and Europe from the 19th century to the present. We will read key articles from various theoretical orientations and consider their historical significance and current relevance to the study of human culture and behavior. To do so, we will critically evaluate the general premises, basic concepts, theoretical principles, and methodological assumptions associated with a particular orientation. In addition, we will examine how differential theoretical perspectives guide and structure the research of anthropologists.
Required Texts
Erickson, Paul A. and Liam D. Murphy. 2008. A History of Anthropological Theory. 3rd Edition. Toronto: Higher Education University of Toronto Press. McGee, R. Jon and Richard L. Warms. 2008. Anthropological Theory: An Introductory History. 4th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. A number of articles and book chapters are also posted on Carmen and are required reading.
Course Objectives
Students will be able to 1. 2. 3. 4. Identify, describe, and discuss major theoretical paradigms in cultural anthropology. Understand the social and political contexts influencing the development of anthropological theory. Identify concepts, themes, strengths, and weakness associated with different theoretical paradigms. Apply specific theoretical perspectives to specific anthropological issues, questions, and or evidence.
Academic Integrity
All students should be familiar with the rules governing alleged academic misconduct. According to the Code of Student Conduct (#3335-23-04 Prohibited Conduct):
Academic misconduct is any activity that tends to compromise the academic integrity of the university, or subvert the educational process. Examples of academic misconduct include, but are not limited to: 1. Violation of course rules as contained in the course syllabus or other information provided to the student; violation of program regulations as established by departmental committees and made available to students; 2. Knowingly providing or receiving information during examinations such as course examinations and candidacy examinations; or the possession and/or use of unauthorized materials during those examinations; 3. Knowingly providing or using assistance in the laboratory, on field work, in scholarship or on a course assignment; 4. Submitting plagiarized work for an academic requirement. Plagiarism is the representation of another's work or ideas as one's own; it includes the unacknowledged word-for-word use and/or paraphrasing of another person's work, and/or the inappropriate unacknowledged use of another person's ideas; 5. Submitting substantially the same work to satisfy requirements for one course or academic requirement that has been submitted in satisfaction of requirements for another course or academic requirement, without permission of the instructor of the course for which the work is being submitted or supervising authority for the academic requirement; 6. Falsification, fabrication, or dishonesty in creating or reporting laboratory results, research results, and/or any other assignments; 7. Serving as, or enlisting the assistance of a substitute for a student in the taking of examinations;
Grading
Each students letter grade is based on a standardized scale using the total points earned for all assignments. I do not give grades; students earn their grades. Your final grade is your responsibility. The only legitimate reason to change a grade is if there was a mistake in grading. Any questions about grading must be in writing and given to the instructor within the first week following the exam. The following are not legitimate reasons to request a grade change: 1) you need a higher grade or you will fail to graduate, lose a scholarship, or lose athletic eligibility; or 2) you are only a point shy of a higher grade. Each time that argument is accepted then many others are also only one point shy. Due to university policy, grades cannot be given over the phone,
Good
Average
Total Available
500 Points
Prcis (19th CE) Due: 1/19/12 Group A&B Film: Karl Marx and Marxism (OSU library streaming)
Prcis (FST) Due: 1/26/12 Group B Films: Shackles of Tradition (OSU library streaming); Franz Boas: 1852 1942 (Course playlist) Prcis (HP) Due: 2/2/12 Group A Film: Off the Verandah (OSU library streaming)
Prcis (Str) Due: 3/1/12 Group A Research Paper Due: 3/1/12 Distribution of Take Home Final Exam 3/1/12