Table of Contents
Executive Summary...1 Industry Backdrop...2 Regional Factors...2 Winners and Losers...4 The Road Ahead...11 Study Methodology...12
Authors:
Executive Summary
This report highlights the results of a recent PRTM study of more than 350 global automotive suppliers. Based on more than 20 financial and qualitative criteria, Bankruptcy & Consolidation in the Global Automotive Supply Industry assesses trends within the sector and identifies possible winners and losers (see sidebar, page 12). The study reveals that the economic crisis and the resulting downturn in the global auto industry have caused a significant shift in the automotive supply chain. Our findings indicate:
n n
Global 100 European suppliers and Chinese suppliers will be among the top global consolidators. Several large Global 100 North American suppliers are currently at risk of going bankrupt. Only one U.S. supplier is among the top 10 potential global consolidators, while two Chinese suppliers are on the list. The chassis and electronics sectors will experience the strongest bankruptcy and mergers and acquisitions activity. Chinese suppliers will play a top role in consolidating within the interior systems segment. North American and European suppliers will be the biggest consolidators in powertrain systems.
The number of automotive supplier bankruptcies has grown significantly since 2007 and is continuing to grow. These bankruptcies will be followed by a period of consolidation, which will intensify as the global credit markets continue to loosen within the next 12 months.
|1
in the
Industry Backdrop
The financial crisis has left an indelible mark on the automotive sector. The housing bust, followed by a severe worldwide recession, has resulted in mortgage defaults, a tight credit lending market, massive job losses, reduced compensation, and a drop in consumer spending. Without cash and borrowing clout, consumers have stopped buying high-ticket items like cars in an effort to limit cash outflow. Current and predicted global vehicle sales volume paints a clear backdrop of how badly car makers have been hitand how they must adjust planning and supply chain processes to account for continued weak demand. To date, sales volume in several major geographies, except for China, has dropped about 40% from 2007. Although the economy may be improving, PRTM predicts sustained lower vehicle sales volumes for most regions going forward, particularly in North America, where it is estimated that longer-term light vehicle sales volumes will mature around 13 million units per yeara far cry from the 16.5 million units that were common during the earlier part of the decade. However, there is another side to this picture. China and emerging markets like Brazil are experiencing an uptick in auto demand. Chinas vehicle sales, for example, are estimated to increase by more than 50% from 2008 levels of approximately 9.5 million units within the next five years. Given the incredible growth during the last few monthsmore than 30%its possible that this progress may be realized much sooner. The sharp disparities in business conditions have left automotive suppliers on shaky ground, and in the last year, have forced many into bankruptcy. As the industry begins to assess the impact of restructurings and bankruptcies, sizes up near-term demand and production capacity, and refocuses on emerging markets, PRTM anticipates even more bankruptcy and M&A activity among the global auto supply base. To better understand what is happening in the industry and to identify which companies may fare better or worse than their competitors, PRTM studied more than 350 global suppliers from North America, Europe, South America, China, India, Japan, and South Korea. Our analysis shows several scenarios likely to unfold in the coming quarters. The most significant scenarios point to:
n n
An accelerated pace of bankruptcy filings An industry-wide consolidation led by large European and Chinese suppliers A noticeable shift in winners and losers on a regional level
Regional Factors
European and Chinese suppliers will be the major industry consolidators. Based on our analysis of various financial and qualitative criteria, companies from these regions scored, on average, the highest and are in the best position to become buyers (Figure 1). By contrast, North Americas Global 100 suppliers fared worse than the population overall, and will constitute the largest percentage of bankruptcies and divestitures. Regional growth may explain, in part, why some geographies have better-performing companies. Chinas auto suppliers grew at an average compounded rate of about 20% from 2004 to 2008more than double the rate of Indian, Japanese, and European suppliers, and nearly seven times that of North American suppliers (Figure 2).
2|
Region
Global Global North America North America Global Europe Europe Japan Brazil India China South Korea Total/Average of All
Number of Companies
93 31 30 38 52 97 10 33 24 35 355
Buyer
5.4 4.9 5.1 5.5 5.1 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.2 4.5 5.0
Seller
3.2 3.3 4.1 3.4 4.0 2.9 3.0 3.7 3.6 3.2 3.4
Divest
4.1 4.6 3.7 4.1 3.7 3.1 3.6 4.1 4.2 3.3 3.7
Fail
4.2 4.8 4.2 4.5 4.4 3.3 3.3 4.1 4.4 3.8 4.0
ebitda
CAGR 0408
6% 4% 5% 10% 37% 10% -3% 16%
EBITDA % of Sales**
11% 12% 12% 15% 10% 10% 15% 15%
* Global 100 companies also counted in regional numbers ** Average sales per company compared to average EBITDA per company
|3
in the
4|
10.0
US-based companies
8.0
China-based companies
Other
Consolidation Score*
G ua ng zh ou Au
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
has also formed joint ventures with Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co. Ltd. in China, giving it more influence with and access to key modern manufacturing and product development capabilities. Likewise, Weichai Power recently bought Moteurs Baudouin SA, a French maker of diesel engines and gearboxes. And FAWERwhich last year changed from a state-owned company to a holding company recapitalized at one billion Chinese yuan renminbi (about $146 million) is a solid profitable company. It has access to modern technology via FAWs two established vehicle assembly joint ventures with Volkswagen AG and Toyota, as well as one recently-formed joint venture with General Motors for light trucks. North American suppliers, longtime industry stalwarts, generally did not score as well as potential buyers.
Only one of the top 10 potential global buyers is from the United States: PPG Industries Inc., a Pittsburgh, PA-based diversified glass and paint supplier. Four other U.S. suppliers also rank among the top 25 potential buyers: Cummins Inc. (diesel engines), El DuPont de Nemours (paint), Gentex Corp. (exterior, electrical), and Federal-Mogul Corp. (powertrain and seals). Japanese suppliers are also not expected to be consolidation leaders, even though they have strong buying scores. Eight Japanese suppliers made the top 25 potential global buyers list, several of which are Toyota Keiretsu companies lead by Denso Corp. and Toyota Boshoku Corp. Based on their histories and our industry experience, however, we believe they will not engage in mergers or acquisitions in any significant way.
|5
in the
40 35
30 25 20 15
40
10 5 0
35 30 25 20 15 10 5
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
6|
Tenneco Inc., and Shiloh Industries Inc. These companies all have three things in common: they provide capital-intensive subsystems, have close ties to the former Detroit Three automakers, and maintain a U.S.intensive footprint. Divestitures. Several North American and European suppliers may try to escape the threat of bankruptcy by divesting certain assets or businesses (Figure 6). According to our analysis, electronics firms that have financial difficulties stemming from the downward slide in consumer electronics purchases may decide to shed their automotive businesses. This includes companies such as Clarion Co., Ltd., Alps Electronics Co. Ltd., and Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV.
Schaeffler KG, a German producer of bearings and many other components, is a special case. Previously in good financial health, Schaeffler encountered financial difficulties as a result of acquiring Continental AG. It is likely that Schaeffler will try to divest several businesses, like Contis tires or rubber products, to mitigate the situation. Major Developments by Vehicle System Within the six main vehicle systems (exterior, interior, chassis, electrical/electronics, powertrain, and body), two segments face the greatest consolidation pressures. Based on the number of total suppliers by vehicle system and the number of possible strong
10 9 8
60
50
Bankruptcy Score*
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
40
30
20
10
D e er lph ica i n Ax l H ay Vis e es te on Le m m er Ac z er Ku m tec bo Ti r D Ch e ia m as on ys d El ec tri c Le a Br r em b C o Ar lar vin ion M er it Sc Fa or ha ur ef e fle cia r/ Co W nt ilh i el m TR Ka W rm an n Ci e Au Fl ex t -N o Ka -G sa ate iK o M gyo et al dy Te ne nn ec o Sh ilo h Va le o Be hr ED AG Am
*Company's risk of bankruptcy, based on score of 010. See Study Methodology.
|7
in the
9.0 8.5 8.8 7.5 7.0 6.5 Toyota Boshoku Denso ZF Hella
Top Buyers
Top Divestors
Top Sellers
Top Bankruptcies
Strength as a Consolidator
6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0
TS TECH Federal-Mogul Magna Intl Du Pont Hyundai Mobis BASF SKF Saint Gobain Magneti Marelli PPG NSK Benteler JTEKT Bayer Marne TI Group Auto. Eaton Alsin Seiki Timken Alpine Electronics Cummins Freescale Semiconductor Sumitomo Electric JCI Brose Linamar Clarion Behr Flex-N-Gate Metaldyne Valeo Schaeffler Conti Mahle Wilhelm Karmann TRW Tenneco Faurecia Lear Martinrea International Hayes Lemmerz ArvinMeritor Visteon American Axle
Delphi
120
Number of Suppliers
Powertrain
Exterior
Body
8|
Risk Level
High
Medium
Low
Interior
Body
Exterior
Electrical/ Electronics
buyers in each of these systems, PRTM forecasts that the intensity of bankruptcies and consolidation will be strongest in electrical/electronics (wire harnesses, switches, door systems, etc.) and chassis (brakes, steering, axles, suspensions, etc.) (Figure 7). Electrical and Electronics. The electrical and electronics vehicle system has a large number of total suppliers and strong possible buyers, which suggests the segment is ready for consolidation. The M&A activity will take place among system-level players and across systems. In the latter category, suppliers from main vehicle systems will look to buy electrical and electronics companies to increase their electronic content know-how. This trend will be driven by the increasingly important role of electrical and electronics components in system-level configurations. In 2010, electrical and electronics will account for 40% of a cars overall value, up from 25% in 2000. Chassis. This segment is ripe for consolidation, with 120 chassis suppliers of relevant size globally and 24 strong potential buyersM&A pressures will almost certainly increase in the future. Capital-intensive
chassis systems providers have been severely affected by declines in demand, so companies in this sector will have a hard time meeting performance expectations in the current market (Figure 8). Of the most recent wave of supplier bankruptcies, roughly 30% were chassis system suppliers, including Metaldyne, Hayes Lemmerz, CONTECH, and J.L. French Corp. Within the main vehicle systems likely to experience a high degree of consolidation of the supply base, M&A activity will take place unequally. For example, within the chassis system, the suspension, axles, and steering subsystems will undergo the greatest amount of consolidation. Each has relatively high numbers of suppliers and several strong potential buyers (Figure 9). The specific consolidation scenarios that play out will be very closely tied to the following factors: strategies of the specific companies, product and technology portfolios, customer bases, manufacturing capabilities, and so on. In steering systems, for example, 68% of the volume is controlled by five large suppliers, and most auto manufacturers generally have a go-to supplier. This has created an unusual
|9
in the
40 35
Number of Companies
degree of stability on the M&A front in this subsystem. However, key new trends are emerging: the rapid growth of Indian and Chinese players; the development of low-cost country steering subsystem manufacturing footprints by several participants; a near-term shift from hydraulic to electrical power-steering; and a mid-term shift to steer-by-wire total chassis control systems. These trends will encourage suppliers to form new partnerships with other companies. Suppliers will use these alliances to fill in gaps in their technology portfolios and more closely link steering to braking, acceleration, and suspension control.
Two of the weaker companies in the steering subsystem have already begun the consolidation process. Delphis Saginaw Steering System was sold into a GM temporary trust in July, but will soon be back on the block as part of Old GM assets (assets being sold in the GM bankruptcy proceedings). Metaldynes chassis business was similarly purchased by private equity firm The Carlyle Group as part of the troubled companys Chapter 11 restructuring in August. Strong potential buyers include Chinese firms like Guangzhou Automotive and FAWER, as well as Sona Group Ltd., Indias largest steering subsystem supplier.
10 |
Subsystem
Thermal
Lighting
Wipers
Front-End Modules
Wire Harnesses
Chassis
Tires
10 8
Divestor Score
6 4 2 0
Delphi
Visteon
TRW
Lear
ArvinMeritor
Potential Buyer
Behr
Hella
Mahle, IAC
Yazaki
Benteler
| 11
in the
Inc., which is a good fit for ContiTech. In the thermal subsystem, Delphi, emerging out of Chapter 11 U.S. bankruptcy protection under new ownership, may decide to focus its business activities even further and shed its thermal division. Behr GmbH & Co. KG and CalsonicKansei North America, Inc. are potential buyers, using those assets to expand their geographic and customer reach.
The automotive supplier industry is in the early stages of what will prove to be a major industry restructuring. Companies that understand how they rank vis-vis their competitors will be well positioned to prevail in the years ahead.
Study Methodology
The 2009 PRTM study included 357 global suppliers from North America, Europe, South America, China, India, Japan, and South Korea. The study took into account more than 20 financial and qualitative criteria in eight main categories. Based on these criteria, a score was developed to rate each companys 1) risk of bankruptcy or 2) ability to acquire other companies. The categories are as follows:
n
Size and criticality (the measure of the relative size of the supplier, in terms of revenue, and its OEM criticality, based on an assessment of supply chain and technology) Capital structure and health (a measurement of a companys short- and long-term capital structure, market solvency, and degree of corporate distress) Commodity structure (an assessment of the companys commodity portfolio) Business health (an evaluation of EBITDA growth, cash flow, sales and profits relative to assets, union participation, litigation, and environmental issues)
Business flexibility (measured against R&D and capital intensity and manufacturing flexibility) Customer base (a review of nonautomotive business, regional sales, business with bankrupt OEMs, and percent of revenue from car vs. truck business) Ownership structure and management (evaluation of the companys historic acquisitiveness, senior management strategy, and the favorability of structure to acquisition, divestiture, and/or sale) Pricing (EBITDA multiple and price/earnings ratio)
12 |
Beijing
+86 10.6808.0296
Munich
+49 89.516.175.5
Bengaluru Boston
+91 80.4010.0900
New York
+1 212.915.2600
+1 781.434.1200
Orange County
+1 949.752.0100
Chicago Dallas
+1 847.430.9000
Oxford Paris
+44 1235.555500
+1 972.980.8200
+33 0.1.56.68.30.30
Detroit Dubai
+1 248.327.2500
Shanghai
+86 21.3860.7888
+971 4.434.5977
Silicon Valley
+1 650.967.2900
+49 69.219.940
Tokyo
+81 3.5326.9090
+44 141.616.2616
Washington, DC
+1 202.756.1700
+44 207.872.5770
www.prtm.com
49087
2009 PRTM