Page 1 of 4
Gravity surface, line and point loads as well as seismic masses were input into the RAM Modeler Module. RAM Frame Module was used to input the parameters for the lateral wind and seismic loads for the main lateral load resisting system. Frame generated the required lateral loads as point loads imposed on the rigid floor diaphragms. Since RAM Structural System does not have the capability to design masonry walls, in order to complete the design, the model was exported to RAM Advanse for further analysis. Loads input in RAM Structural System are converted to nodal point loads on shell elements and point and line loads on beam elements when imported into RAM Advanse. After the full gravity and lateral model was imported, some adjustments were required to change the material properties and member sizes to conform to the different naming convention used by RAM Advanse. Gravity column end releases were adjusted and corrected to conform to the pure finite element structure of the masonry module.
https://www.masonryedge.com/site/bios-authors/191-knowledge-edge-loadbearing-masonry... 03/01/12
Page 2 of 4
https://www.masonryedge.com/site/bios-authors/191-knowledge-edge-loadbearing-masonry... 03/01/12
Page 3 of 4
in the general module. The masonry module cannot be analyzed if there is not at least one service and one design load combination set up. After analyzing various configurations of the wall panel with different wall joint locations in RAM Structural System, the analysis results were comparable to our hand calculations. Multiple load cases, with in-plane and out-of-plane forces, were quickly analyzed and designed. Good graphical display options allow the engineer to review the forces and displacements calculated at sections through the wall panel. The detailing module did a good job of detailing the reinforcing steel in the wall and around the openings. The lintel design module could not design the lintels as tension stresses were generated in the top of the shell above the windows due to the arching effect and distribution of forces around the window openings. The lintel design module is programmed to provide tension reinforcing at the bottom of the lintel beam and not at the top of the beam, thereby generating a No Good design message in the output. Editors Note: RAM Elements V8i Release 10.0 corrects the lintel issue, along with several other updates. IMI has also placed on its website information to assist designers with how to handle the negative moment at the lintel. Similarly, using large panels, the narrow piers between the windows were under designed as the point loads applied to the corners of the panels and the effects of arching reduced the amount of axial load in the pier. Carefully locating the wall joints to transfer the loads correctly into the wall and limiting wall panel sizes eliminated the lintel design issues and properly accounted for axial load in the piers. When large wall panels were modeled with multiple window openings, the program did not correctly design the lintels over the openings or the piers between the openings.
The detailed analysis printout gave capacity curves for each design segment for in-plane and out-of-plane forces. The output, however, does not give a detailed breakdown of the individual calculations, making it difficult to cross check program results with hand calculations.
Comparative Results
At Desai/Nasr, it has always been our practice to use new software products on smaller projects. This is done mainly to compare results of hand calculations versus those obtained with the use of the software. This practice allows the engineers to become familiar with the program and develop a higher level of comfort with the use of a particular software product. Since the release of RAM Advanse Masonry Module, Desai/Nasr has used it to analyze and design small-scale one - and two-story buildings and individual wall panels with openings. The Michigan Tech student housing project was the first large multi-level loadbearing masonry building Desai/Nasr analyzed and designed using this masonry module. After thorough understanding of how RAM Advanse imports the RAM Structural System models and loads the masonry shell Figure 9 Analysis elements with few modifications to the model, a workable result Results was achieved. The RAM Structural System modeler quickly and effectively generates a full building model with the required Figure 10 Detailing Module gravity and lateral loads with minimal input. Careful consideration is recommended when setting up wall joint locations to ensure that loads are correctly transferred into the wall shell elements. Dummy members are an effective way of isolating the wall continuity at wall intersections and control joints, improving analytical results. Analysis time can be reduced by limiting load combinations and carrying out detailed analyses on typical wall panels only. Before the release of RAM Advanse Masonry Module, masonry design software focused on component design with independent tools to design separate components such as shear walls, lintels, bearing walls, piers and columns. The independent tools often are constrained to specific geometric and load parameters. Engineers will surely find time-saving benefits from the introduction of this masonry module to the suite of structural software available.
https://www.masonryedge.com/site/bios-authors/191-knowledge-edge-loadbearing-masonry... 03/01/12
Page 4 of 4
Editors Note: Steel-framed and concrete-framed buildings have been designed for years using whole building design software. This is not the case for masonry buildings. Most have been designed using hand calculations, spreadsheets written by individual engineers or commercial packages that design elements or components. The suite of Bentley software makes whole building design a reality for loadbearing and hybrid masonry. Engineers who design even modest-sized loadbearing buildings recognize that hand calculations can be tedious and repetitious. For a simple four-story building, it is not uncommon for an engineer to spend six to eight weeks developing design calculations. To put the effect of using this software into perspective, that time can be reduced to approximately half. In addition, it is possible to evaluate alternate designs or modifications to a design without starting over.
Figure 11 Interaction Diagrams
RESIDENCE HALL | MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY | HOUGHTON Architect Neumann/Smith Architecture Southfield Engineer Desai/Nasr Consulting Engineers West Bloomfield General Contractor Gundlach Champion Houghton Budget $14.2 million Expected date of completion July 2010
https://www.masonryedge.com/site/bios-authors/191-knowledge-edge-loadbearing-masonry... 03/01/12