Programme: MBA Course Title: Legal Environment of Business Course Code: L501
Page
1 1
Transfer of Share 1 Withdrawal made by Mr. Sattar.. 1 Witholding remuneration and Work Barriers (no entry and no desk). 2 Formation of Sattar Real Estate Ltd 2 Winding up of Sattar Homes Ltd 3 Transferring the entire fund and using office space. 4
Since the exact number of appointed directors has not been provided in the case, it is assumed that all the five shareholders were made directors and the analysis will be carried on accordingly.
Transfer of share:
Section 30(1) -states that shares of a company are movable property and shall be transferable. Section 38 -states the registration process of transfer of shares. Subsection 7 permits the company to refuse the registration of the transfer thereof.
Since the transfer did comply with these sections, it can be inferred that the aforesaid transfer is legal assuming that it was approved in general meeting of the board of directors.
Since the incident took place does not comply with these sections it can be assumed illegal and thus Mr Sattar should be fined or imprisoned and in
addition, his office should be vacant upon application made by Mr Titu to the court.
These incidents can be identified and solved based on these aforesaid sections (195 and 233) again upon application made by Mr. Titu.
Section 11 (1, 2, 3) states that a company can not be registered with a name identical, to the name of an existing company or with a similar name as to deceive. However if the existing company is being dissolved and signifies written consent then the new company can be registered and failure to obtain this will compel the newer one to change its name within 120 days and subsequent failure will fine the company 500tk per day and its officers 100tk per day.
Without further analysis, it is difficult to determine whether the name of Sattar Real Estate Ltd should be changed or not since it is unknown whether Sattar Homes Ltd is going to be dissolved and providing its written consent. So this report carries on towards next argument and comes back to the point.
Based on these sections and case scenario(no over burdening liability), it appears that Sattar Homes Ltd can only be wound up by special resolution assuming that the duration was not fixed by articles. Moreover, it is clear that this special resolution was not presented to the board of directors as Mr. Titu came to know it later on. However, Mr. Sattar and other shareholders still may try to wind up Sattar homes Ltd and make application to the court.
Section 253 states that the winding up of a company may be stayed upon application of creditor(s) or contributor(s) bringing satisfactory proof to the court after making the order for winding up. Section 254 states that the court shall consider the wishes by sufficient evidence of the creditors or contributories relating to winding up.
As to the matter of law Sattar Homes Ltd can not be wound up and to stop the efforts in doing so, Mr. Titu can plead under above mentioned sections before the court.
The name of Sattar Real Estate might be changed if Mr. Titu files an application under section 11 to the court alleging that this company is likely to deceive customers by using a name similar to Sattar Homes Ltd. He might try to stop business of Sattar Real Estate under section 346 stating that the business in not in operation. However, this approach is less likely to be effective. In this case, applying under section 195 and 233 he might claim that Sattar Real Estate is: Using office space illegally, Transferring fund illegally and Using loan of 5000,000tk made by Mr. Sattar This might result in a stop to the business of Sattar Real Estate Ltd.
The bank account of Sattar Homes Ltd can be frozen by the order of the court upon application filed under section 195 and 233 if it appears that Loan of 5000,000tk was illegal (violation of 103) Transferring the entire fund is illegal
How can he know the income and expenditure of both the companies?
According to section 191, Mr. Titu has legal rights to the financial statements of Sattar Homes Ltd. Since he is not a member of Sattar Real Estate Ltd he is not entitled to the reports of this company. However, he may plead for such, claiming fraudulence therein under section 195 and 197.
A group of illegalities have been discussed earlier. Those are listed below as asked in the question: Withholding remuneration of Mr. Titu Loan of 5000,000tk made by Mr. Sattar Office desk removal and no entrance Using office space of Sattar Homes Ltd by Sattar Real Estate Ltd Attempt to wind up Sattar Homes Ltd
Initially Mr. Titu owned 100 shares of Sattar Homes Ltd. But later on, he was offered 100 more shares at 100,000tk and he paid for in cash. In the analysis, it has been assumed that this transfer has been approved by the board of directors. Thus Mr. Titu is provided with 100 more shares which totals into 200 shares. However, if he seeks to have more shares then it is difficult to predict whether there will be any transfer or not.