AND
COORDINATION WORKSHOP
2006
DISTRICT AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT OFFICE
RAMECHHAP, NEPAL
by
/fd]5fksf] gSzf
*%+%)Ú *^+#%Ú @&+%)Ú
gS;f–!
/fd]5fk
cjl:ylt gS;f
u'Db]n
l;Gw'kfNrf]s
r'r'/]
uf}Zjf/f
7f];]
sfe|]knf~rf]s nvgk'/ bf]nvf jfDtL
6f]s/k'/ /:gfn'
:yn L
;f]n'v'Da'
s'e 'sf
u'G;L 88'jf u'Kt]Z j/ lk|tL
bf]/Daf a]tfnL
lbdLkf]v/L
a]yfg gfdf8L
lxn]b]jL vfF8fb]jL ufun km'nf;L e'hL
kmk'{ b'/fufpF
vlgofkfgL ebf}/]
k'/fgfufpF
l;Gw'nL ;'sfhf]/
/fdk'/
@&+@*Ú @&+@*Ú
;+s]t lrGx
lhNnf l;dfgf ^ ) ^ !@ ls=dL=
uflj; l;dfgf *%+%)Ú *^+#%Ú 3
Regional IPM Review and Coordination lgdf{0f tyf ljsf;M dfgj ;+zfwg ljsf; s]Gb| /fd]5fk
Workshop, Ramechhap
Land Terrain : Agriculture Ramechhap
lxdu+uf uf=lj=;=
4
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
River Basin based
Cereals and Vegetables Pocket
Bhatauli-Pakarbas-Bhaluwajor
Manthali-Khurkot Road
tfdfsf]zL gbL
5
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
Agriculture Ramechhap
7
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
d'uL6f/ kmfF6df Joj;flos
t/sf/L v]tL
8
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
wfg kmfF6, dGynL ;b/d'sfd
9
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
h'gf/ au}+rfdf tf]/Lsf] cGt/–jfnL
10
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
Agriculture Ramechhap
11
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
Agriculture Ramechhap
j=s[=lj=c= :ofp cjnf]sg ub}{ kl/jf/, s[lif / kz' j]df};dL t/sf/L a]gf{ pTkfbg
lh=s[=lj=sf= sf] ;xof]udf s[ifs l;Tvf kmfF6 l;+rfO{ cfof]hgf, t/sf/L v]tLsf nfuL
;d"x4f/f kfgL kf]v/L lgdf{0f dem'jf uf=lj=;= u[lxl0f4f/f kfgL ;+sng
12
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
a]zL kmfF6 -dGynL_df l;+rfO{ ;+/rgfsf ;d:ofx?
a]zL kmfF6df l;+rfO{ ;+/rgfsf ;d:ofx?
13
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
a]zL kmfF6 -dGynL_df l;+rfO{ ;+/rgfsf ;d:ofx?
a]zL kmfF6df l;+rfO{ ;+/rgfsf ;d:ofx?
14
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
a] zL kmfF 6df l;+ r fO{ ;+ /rgfsf ;d:ofx?
a]zL kmfF6 -dGynL_df l;+rfO{ ;+/rgfsf ;d:ofx?
15
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
Agricultural Marketing Ramechhap
dlxnf ;d"x
20
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
Problematic insect pests of crops in Ramechhap
• Citrus green bug Fruit fly of cucurbits
• Citrus scale insect Citrus fruit fly
• DBM Various aphids, Citrus aphids
• Mango stone weevil Cucurbit stem splitter
• Cut worms Potato tuber moth
• Red ants Rice leaf folder
• Termites Red pumpkin beetle
• Epilachna beetle Cabbage bud grasshopper
• Red spider mite Citrus nematode
• Litchi leaf curl mite Brinjal fruit and shoot borer
• Litchi bug Banana stem borer
• Banana bunch beetle Chilly thrips
21
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
Problematic diseases of crops
in Ramechhap
• Citrus gummosis Leaf spot of maize
• Damping off of vegetables Leaf spot of rice
• Wilt of solanaceae Chilly anthracnose
• Papaya virus Blight of chilly
• Alternaria of brassicas Powdery mildew of citrus
• Blast of rice Downy mildew of cucurbits
• Chilly mosaic virus Gummy stem blight of BG
• Yellow rust of wheat Black rot of crucifers
• Cauliflower boron deficiency Bacterial soft rot of cabbage
• Blight of potato
22
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
Role of DADO / IPM Officer
Rofp v]tL ljsf;
dGynLdf Rofp v]tL /fd]5fk jhf/df Rofp v]tL
23
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
Role of DADO / IPM Officer
df}/L ljsf;df k|fljlws ;xof]u
gf=k|f=;= s[i0f jxfb'/ e'h]n rfsf lgl/If0f ub}{}{
24
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
Role of DADO / IPM Officer
25
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
/f]u tyf sL/f lgoGq0fdf k|fljlws ;xof]u
26
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
/f]u tyf sL/f lgoGq0fdf k|fljlws ;xof]u
28
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
lhNnf :t/df b]lvPsf sL/fx?sf] k|sf]k
wld/f
aGbfsf] k'tnLsf km'nsf] y'k|f]
29
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
Damage by Red Spider Mite
30
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
Role of IPM Officer
IPM FFS
4 Chanaute Dhande IPM FSS Tilpung-9 Paddy * - 2061/03/28- 2061/7/24 Dipsikha Dahal -
5 Raktakali IPM FSS Sukajor-3 Cauliflower - * 2061/8/12 - 2061/12/13 - Jahan Bdr karki
7 Kartike Taja Tarkari Utpadan Ramechhap-4 Cauliflower - * 2062/ 08/ - 2062/11/ Narayan Kumar magar Jahan Bdr Karki
*2046-2054 in Sericulture Regional IPM Review and Coordination 2057-2060 M. Sc. Study Leave 35
Workshop, Ramechhap
HDO/ IPM Trainer : Bharat Bahadur Acharya
(IPM Training 2058, Vegetable)
FFS conducted
S.N. Activities district Number budget source FFS Location Crop FFS start date
36
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
Benefits of IPM Adoption to
Farmers
• Empowers farmers for field problem identification and agro-
ecology analysis.
• Helps farmers to judicially use pesticide based on insect
pest, disease or severity.
• Social cooperation and understanding is increased.
• Commercial farmers in pocket areas are more benefited.
• IPM brought awareness on their own friends, the "natural
enemies of insect pests, weeds and diseases".
37
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
Experiences from IPM FFS
• Small plot trials (simulation trials) helps progressive
farmers to design and test small farming problems on their
own field.
• Due to balanced fertilizer use, proper doses and
frequency of pesticide use, quantity as well as quality of
agriculture produce is increased, farming cost is
decreased.
• Conservation of natural enemies is enhanced.
• Participants could diagnose field problems and solve it by
themselves.
• Overall package of production practices helps farm
families to sustain their agriculture.
38
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
ISSUES OF IPM IMPLEMENTATION
• IPM is an ecological approach to agriculture and needs more
labour and understanding, which is in short supply even in the
farm families.
• Educated family members do not want to continue agriculture
occupation; their parents guide their children to search
occupations that are more rewarding.
• Consumers have not focused their interests to get healthy or
good quality products. Therefore, there is no support to IPM.
• There is no any social, moral or intellectual value of agriculture
from elite groups.
• Different trainings, workshops, meetings, seminars are
entertained nowadays, but the field allowance for IPM farmer
facilitators are stagnant since a decade.
39
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
ISSUES OF IPM IMPLEMENTATION
-----continued
40
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
Recommendations to improve
farming situations
All basic infrastructures such as land holding size,
irrigation water, access to reasonably priced supplies and
road networks, packaging and transportation discounts,
access to free education and health services provided in
integrated way can sustain agriculture and farming
tradition. Farmers should be empowered to fix prices of
their products, and they should not be compelled to sell
their products in compulsion or due to poverty.
41
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
Recommendations to improve IPM Adoption
• Participants should all be commercial farmers, but may
not be available in such numbers required at one pocket.
• Second FFS on another crop should be given to the same
group to increase learning habit (environment).
• The FFS should be conducted on economically important
crop, incorporating significant bottlenecks (more on rice?).
• Farmer trainer him/her-self should be commercial farmer,
& known for his/her performance in farming.
• More than one FFS per week by a single IPM trainer may
not be so effective.
• Facilitator allowance should be increased to Rs 600/week.
• Adoption can not be enforced, facilitation may help it.
42
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
PROBLEMS ON IMPLEMENTING IPM
• Farmers, students and school teachers want to
participate the FFS on Saturdays when the IPM
facilitator is legally obliged to take rest.
• When commercial pocket areas are far from either
DADO or ASC offices, the IPM facilitator must be ready
to spent 2-3 days; 3-5 hours walk one way, each week is
certainly difficult.
• Follow-up programs, such as monthly meetings, monthly
savings, or linkages with ASCs are poor.
• Professional videos on IPM / ICM / IDM / IPNS / ICWMP
are far better effective medium of communication for the
public, than the FFS, but are not created or are costly or
not available. Regional IPM Review and Coordination
43
Workshop, Ramechhap
HDO
DPA
Himganga VDC
SADO
THANK YOU
44
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap
THE END
45
Regional IPM Review and Coordination
Workshop, Ramechhap