67.

Dawson PE. New definition for relating occlusion to varying conditions of the temporomandibular joint. J Prosth Dent. 1995;74(6):619-627.

68.

Lee R. Anterior guidance. In: Lundeen HC, Gibbs CH (eds). Advances in occlusion. Boston: Wright; 1982. p. 51-79.

69.

Prschel P, Hofmann M. Frontal chewing patterns of the incisor point and their dependence on resistance of food and type of occlussion. J Prosth Dent. 1988;59:617-624.

70.

Prschel P, Hofmann M. Problems in interpreting functional mandibular movements. I: The effects of multifactorial influences on the interpretability of recordings of masticatory movements. Dtsch Zahnrztl Z. 1987;42:696-700.

71. 72.

Kraljevi K. Anatomija i fiziologija okluzije. Zagreb: Globus;1991. Gibbs CH, Lundeen HC. Jaw movements and forces during chewing and their clinical significance. In: Lundeen HC, Gibbs CH (eds). Advances in occlusion. Boston: Wright; 1982. p. 2-32.

73.

LePera F. Understanding graphic records of mandibular movements. J Prosth dent. 1967;18:417-424.

74.

Takayama H, Hobo S. The derivation of kinematic formulae for mandibular movement. Int J Prosthet. 1989;2:285-295.

75.

McCoy RB, Shryock EF, Lundeen HC. A method of transferring mandibularmovement data to computer storage. J Prosth Dent. 1976;36:510-516.

76.

Klett R, Lckerath W. Einflu von Projektionsfehlern auf die pantographische Diagnostik bei gestrter Kiefergelenkfunktion. Dtsch Zahnrztl Z.1989;44:3640.

77.

Mack PJ. A computer analysis of condylar movement as determined by cuspal guidances. J Prosth Dent. 1989;61:628-633.

78. 79.

Hjortsj CH. Motion and movements. Acta Univ Lund. 1964;6:1-31. Weijs WA. The functional significance of morphological variation of the human mandible and masticatory muscles. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand. 1989;27(12):149-62.

80.

Gibbs CH, Messerman T, Reswick JB, et al. Functional movements of the mandible. J Prosth Dent. 1971;26:604-620.

81.

Schulte JK, Wang SH, Erdmann AG, Anderson GC. Working condylar movement and its effects on posterior occlusal morpholoy. J Prosth Dent. 1985;54:118-121.

82.

Schulte JK, Wang SH, Erdmann AG, Anderson GC. Threedimensional analysis of cusp travel during nonworking mandibular movement. J Prosth Dent. 1985;53:839-843.

83.

Spiegel MR. Theoretical mechanics. Schaums Outline series. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1967.

84.

Hylander WL, Johnson KR. Jaw muscle function and wishboninig of the mandible during mastication in macaques and baboons. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1994;94:523-547.

85.

Prschel P, Feng H, Ohkawa S, et al. Analysis of the movement of condylar points. Dtsch Zahnrztl Z. 1993;48:323-326.

86.

Prschel P. An extensive classification of chewing patterns in the frontal plane. Cranio. 1987;5:55-63.

87.

Gallo LM, Airoldi GB, Airoldi RL, Palla S. Description of mandibular finite helical axis pathways in asimptomatic subjects. J Dent Res. 1997;76:704-713.

88.

Blaschke DD, Blaschke TJ. Normal TMJ bony relationships in centric occlusion. J Dent Res. 1981;60:98-104.

89.

Hobo S. A kinematic investigation of mandibular border movement by means of an electronic measuring system, part 2: a study of the Bennett movement. J Prosth Dent. 1984;51:642-646.

90. 91.

Rader AF. Centric relation is obsolete. J Prosthet Dent. 1955;5:336. Graddock FW, Symmons HF. Evaluation of the face-bow. J Prosth Dent. 1952;2:635.

92.

Adrien P, Schouver J. Methods for minimizing the errors in mandibular model mounting on an articulator, J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:929-935.

93.

Beck HO, Morrison WE. Investigation of an articulator. J Prosth Dent. 1956;6:359.

94.

Derksen AAD, Van Haeringen W. The protrusive movement in articulators. J Dent Res. 1958;37:125-135.

95.

Derksen AAD, Korenhof CAW. The protrusive movement in articulators. II. Its practical importance. J Dent Res. 1966;45:751-761.

96.

Bonwill WGA. The geometrical and mechanical laws of the articulation of the human teeth. The anatomical articulator. Am Syst Dent. 1887;486-498.

97.

Guichet NF. The Denar system and its application in every day dentistry. Dent Clin N Am. 1979;23:243-257.

98.

Bellanti ND. The significance of articulator capabilities. Part I. Adjustable vs. semiadjustable articulators. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;29:269-275.

99.

Isaacson D. A clinical study of the condyle path. J Prosthet Dent. 1959;9:927935.

100. Mack

H.

Instrumentelle

Voraussetzungen

zur

Erfassung

des

okklusoartikulren Systems. In: Drcke W, Klemt B. Kiefergelenk und Okklusion. Berlin, Chicago, Tokyo: Quintessenz; 1980. p. 67.

101. Freesmeyer WB, Luckenbach A, Mller TH, Hls A. Vergleichende Untersuchungen zwischen in mechanisch Beziehung und zur elektronisch registrierten Dtsch

Unterkieferbewegungen

Gelenktopographie.

Zahnrztl. 1984;39:870-875.