Presentation to:
Jamie Heller
April 15, 2011 Hellerworx, Inc. 301-654-1980 jamie@hellerworx.com
Agenda
Review of 2008 - Present Coal Market Global Market Drivers Key Drivers of Coal Price Volatility Coal Transportation Changes Closing Observations
2008-2010 Totals
(millions of tons) Coal Supply Region Central Appalachia (CAPP) Northern Appalachia (NAPP) Illinois Basin (ILB) Powder River Basin (PRB) Colorado and Utah Other Regions Total 2008 232 134 100 512 56 137 1,171 2009 192 125 104 470 50 132 1,073 2010 (DTC 2009-2010 est.) % chg. 183 127 106 484 44 131 1,075 -4.7% 1.6% 1.9% 3.0% -12.0% -0.8% 0.2%
Sources: 2008-2009 EIA data; 2010-YTD 2011 Doyle Trading Consultants estimates.
Volatility of Coal Prices Has Increased Dramatically (2000 through late Feb 2011)
No spare production capacity US Central Appalachian region hitting serious supply limits Strong demand for export coal Australian coal mines flooded Coal stockpiles low at eastern utilities Railroad network congested and pricing to match
Excess production in major basins CAPP prices falling below production costs Export demand shrinking dramatically Strong demand shifts in US market driven by FGD installations Natural gas displacing coal Stockpiles overflowing Railroads experiencing major traffic declines
8
Coal production levels close to expected 2010 demand Coal prices beginning to recover, but still below expected long-term equilibrium levels 2010 coal exports and imports expected to be close to 2009 levels Natural gas prices increasing as economy begins to recover Coal stockpiles still high Aussie vessel queues but no price spikes
9
Coal demand partially recovered from 2009 lows, showing limits of natural gas displacement of coal. Declines in CAPP and CO/UT coal production have almost completely offset cautious expansions in other regions. Mining costs continue to increase, especially in CAPP (impact of new environmental and mine safety regulations, plus increased enforcement of new regulations) Strong market for exports of metallurgical coal Coal stockpiles built up during 2009 are being drawn down Service issues on some railroads as available crews, locomotives and railcars fail to keep pace with recovery in demand
10
2006
CAPP NAPP ILB PRB Colorado/Utah Other Regions Total U. S. Coal Production Consumption for Electricity Generation Coke Plants Other Industrial Plants Residential and Commercial Total Domestic Consumption Exports (Metallurgical Coal) Exports (Steam Coal) Total Exports Imports Net Exports Total Demand for U.S. Coal Coal Supply Surplus (or Deficit) 234 135 95 489 62 148 1,163 1,027 23 60 3 1,113 28 22 50 36 14 1,127 36
2007
224 131 96 497 61 138 1,147 1,046 23 57 3 1,129 33 27 60 36 24 1,153 (6)
2008
232 134 100 512 56 137 1,171 1,044 22 55 3 1,124 43 39 82 34 48 1,172 (1)
2009
192 125 104 470 50 132 1,073 937 15 45 3 1,000 37 22 59 23 36 1,036 37
2010
183 127 106 484 44 131 1,075 981 20 48 3 1,052 58 24 82 19 63 1,115 (40)
2011
174 129 111 493 44 132 1,083 1,001 22 50 3 1,076 57 25 82 17 65 1,141 (58)
11
12
According to the EIAs International Energy Outlook 2010, global coal consumption is expected to grow 55% between 2009 and 2035 (an increase of about 4.2 billion short tons per year, from about 7.6 billion short tons/year currently to 11.8 billion short tons/year by 2035), with most of the increase occurring in China and India. Demand for metallurgical coal will likely increase even faster. Peabody Energy expects global steel production to increase 66% between 2010 and 2020 (an increase of almost 900 million metric tonnes/year), leading to a 33% increase in demand for metallurgical coal (an increase of about 400 million metric tonnes/year) over this ten-year period. Most of this increase is expected to occur in China and India.
13
14
15
Strong Growth in Asian Coal Demand Expected to Continue Over Long Term
16
Exports of metallurgical coal from the U.S. increased by more than 20 million short tons during 2010 (from about 37 million short tons in 2009 to about 58 million short tons in 2010), and may increase further during 2011 due to strong global demand for, and tight global supplies of, metallurgical coal. The Queensland Resources Council estimates that flooding in the Australian state of Queensland earlier this year may reduce total Australian coal production (including steam coal and metallurgical coal ) by 30 to 50 million metric tonnes during 2011. In Europe: German nukes shutdown, Gazprom reliability issues; limitations on South African and Russian exports Increased export opportunities for Illinois Basin steam coal, shipped via the Gulf of Mexico. Coal imports into the U.S. (which are primarily steam coal) are likely to contract in the near term due to high international coal prices, and competition between coal and natural gas.
17
Estimated Available Capacity 4.9 4.0 4.3 13.2 4.8 2.5 7.3 11.9 32.4
Data source: T. Parker Host presentation to Coaltrans USA conference, February 4, 2011
18
19
20
22
23
Recent Coal Price Volatility (And Soft Demand) Appears To Have Reversed 2002-2006 Decline in Stockpiles
24
D. Coal Transportation
25
26
27
Origin
% change 2010-2011
% change 2007-2011
MGA District
Base Rate (US$/short ton) Fuel Surcharge (US$/short ton) Total (US$/short ton)
70.7%
5.3%
19.2%
114.4%
Base Rate (US$/short ton) Fuel Surcharge (US$/short ton) Total (US$/short ton)
61.7%
6.4%
21.0%
108.1%
MGA District
Notes: 1. The base rates shown above assume 10,000 ton unit trains. 2. CSX switched from a revenue-based to a mileage based fuel surcharge effective April 23, 2007. The mileage-based fuel surcharge was 22 cents per carload per mile effective June 2, 2007. All fuel surcharges have been converted to $/ton to facilitate comparisons across periods. The mileage-based fuel surcharges were computed based on shipments originating at Bailey, PA (for the MGA district) or Harris, WV (for the Kanawha district) in 100-ton cars. Sources: CSX Transportation Tariffs 4734-I, 4734-M, 4734-O, 4734-P and Publication 8661.
28
Rail rates for coal shipments to both captive and competitively-served destinations are approaching the Surface Transportation Board (STB) maximums for movements to captive destinations. Thus far, the railroads appear willing to accept some loss of volume in return for higher margins, rather than structuring rates to improve dispatch at coal plants affected by coal vs. gas competition. Service on some railroads has suffered as the rebound in coal demand has outstripped the available supply of railcars, train crews, and locomotives.
Closing Observations
Key Observations
US coal growth will slow: limited new plants, strong competition in near term from low-priced natural gas Scrubber installations will drive increased use of high-sulfur Illinois Basin and Northern Appalachian coal (often as a substitute for CAPP coal. The Illinois Basin will likely be the next new major coal growth area For structural reasons coal prices are likely to remain volatile Non - US coal demand will increase over long term Mine permitting issues, rising mining costs, and difficult economics vs. natural gas generation will likely lead to continued declines in CAPP coal production in the near term. The high coal inventories built up during 2009 are being drawn down. Both Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) regulations and potential CO2 emissions regulations are significant sources of uncertainty for coal-fired generation, and will likely be key drivers of coal vs. gas economics, and planning decisions for new generation, for the foreseeable future.