Economic Philosophers Presentation

Economic Philosopher Date Due Group Members

Date Presented
Presentation Start Time End Time Question Time Duration Start Time End Time Duration 0:00 * Expected tiime 10 min. (no more than 12 min) * Plus 5 minutes for questions * Provide student handouts
* Caveat- If presentation is too short effectiveness is greatly reduced with a corresponding mark adjustment

0:00

Economic Philosophy * Background info on philosopher * Description of philosophy * Period significance * Historical impact on economics / society * Current impact on economics / society * Future impact on economics / society

I C E
Demonstrates a knowledge of facts / concepts and how they are related and extends this information into a viewpoint on its (historical/current/future) significance Demonstrates awareness of and respect for different points of view and uses contrasting positions to support development of presentation and / or thesis

LEVEL 1
ideas and arguments reflect LIMITED knowledge of relevant facts and concepts and how they are related

LEVEL 2
ideas and arguments reflect SOME knowledge of relevant facts and concepts and how they are RELATED

LEVEL 3
ideas and arguments reflect SOLID knowledge of relevant facts and concepts and how they are RELATED and creates RELEVANT EXTENSIONS

LEVEL 4
ideas and arguments reflect SOPHISTICATED knowledge of relevant facts and concepts and how they are RELATED and creates INSIGHTFUL EXTENSIONS

% Mark

% Wght

Net Mark

demonstrates LIMITED awareness of different points of view

TAKES INTO ACCOUNT different points of view

SKILLFULLY ACKNOWLEDGES SKILLFULLY ACKNOWLEDGES different points of view and different points of view EFFECTIVELY uses contrasting positions as a FOIL to support development of presentation and/or thesis responses to questions are CLEAR AND APPROPRIATE responses to questions are CLEAR, APPROPRIATE AND INSIGHTFUL

responses to questions are HESITANT or UNCLEAR and may lack appropriateness information is presented with SIGNIFICANT LAPSES in LOGIC opening and conclusion LACK CLARITY

responses to questions are SOMEWHAT CLEAR and appropriate

0%
information is presented with SOME LAPSES in LOGIC opening introduces topic and conclusion is PARTIALLY CLEAR information is presented in a LOGICAL SEQUENCE opening is ENGAGING and CLEARLY INTRODUCES topic; conclusion is CLEAR and EFFECTIVE word choice and language are APPROPRIATE to the purpose and audience information is presented LOGICALLY and INSIGHTFULLY opening is ENGAGING and THOUGHT PROVOKING; conclusion is CLEAR, EFFECTIVE and INSIGHTFUL word choice and language are SKILLFULLY SUITED to the purpose and audience

70%

0%

Presentation * Persuasive argument * Effective use of voice * Maintain good eye contact * Effective use of visuals * Group Members shared work equally * Group performed smoothly & effectively * Effective time management * Effective student handouts

Presents information in a convincing way

word choice and language word choice and language reflect a LIMITED sense of ATTEMPT to suit the purpose purpose / audience and audience speech LACKS FLUENCY, expressiveness, or audibility use of visuals or technology LACKS speaks fluently, expressively, and audibly SOME OF THE TIME use of visuals or technology is

speaks FLUENTLY, speaks FLUENTLY, HIGHLY EXPRESSIVELY, AND AUDIBLY EXPRESSIVELY, AND AUDIBLY

Comments

Makes effective use of visuals and technology

use of visuals or technology is

EFFECTIVENESS

EFFECTIVE TO SOME DEGREE

EFFECTIVE

use of visuals or technology is HIGHLY EFFECTIVE

0%

30%

0% ####

TOTAL