0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
526 tayangan5 halaman
CE 121 unit weight, Void Content and Surface Moisture Content of Aggregates Lab Activity No. 3 Formal Report Lean Michael P. Tapel 2004-04165 BS civil engineering. The main goals for this activity are to: a. Determine the bulk density in loose or compacted condition. B. Compute the void content in fine and coarse aggregates.
CE 121 unit weight, Void Content and Surface Moisture Content of Aggregates Lab Activity No. 3 Formal Report Lean Michael P. Tapel 2004-04165 BS civil engineering. The main goals for this activity are to: a. Determine the bulk density in loose or compacted condition. B. Compute the void content in fine and coarse aggregates.
Hak Cipta:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Format Tersedia
Unduh sebagai DOCX, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
CE 121 unit weight, Void Content and Surface Moisture Content of Aggregates Lab Activity No. 3 Formal Report Lean Michael P. Tapel 2004-04165 BS civil engineering. The main goals for this activity are to: a. Determine the bulk density in loose or compacted condition. B. Compute the void content in fine and coarse aggregates.
Hak Cipta:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Format Tersedia
Unduh sebagai DOCX, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
Unit Weight, Void Content and Surface Moisture Content of Aggregates
Lab Activity No. 3 Formal Report
Lean Michael P. Tapel 2004-04165 BS Civil Engineering
I. Objectives The main goals for this activity are to: a. To determine the bulk density (unit weight) in loose or compacted condition. b. To compute the void content in fine and coarse aggregates c. To determine the percentage of evaporable moisture in a sample aggregate by drying both surface moisture and moisture in the pores of the aggregate. II. Experimental Procedure a. Equipment and Materials 1. Sieves 2. Tamping Rod 3. Measure/ Mold 4. Vessels 5. Oven 6. Shovel b. Methodology 1. Data Sampling. Sampling should be done in accordance with Practice D75. These were thoroughly mixed and reduced to an amount suitable for testing using the applicable procedures described in Practice C702. 2. Washing. The samples gathered were washed with flowing water inside the container in order to remove the impurities in it. Then, the water would be sifted out from the container where it was washed 3. Oven-Drying. Place the sample in a container and it would be dried to a constant mass at a temperature of 110
5 O C. The sample would be dried for a duration of 24
4 hours then let it cool down until desired temperature is
achieved. Determination of Bulk Density and Void Content of Coarse and Fine Aggregates 1. Rod Tamping. Fill the Mold with a third of the volume and level the surface with fingers. Using the rod, tamp the surface with 25 strokes uniformly spread all over. Fill the measure two-thirds full and again level the rod as above. Finally, fill the measure to overflowing and rod again in the manner previously mentioned. Level the surface of the aggregate with the fingers or a straightedge in such a way that any slight projections of the larger pieces of the coarse aggregate approximately balance the larger voids in the surface below the top of the measure. Be cautious in preventing the rod to strike the bottom of the measure forcibly. In tamping the second and third layers, use vigorous effort, but not more force than to cause the tamping rod to penetrate to the previous tamping layer. Determination of Surface Moisture Content of Aggregates 2. Measure of oven dried Aggregate. Get the weight of the oven-dried aggregate.
c. Equations Utilized
UNIT WEIGHT (OD condition) V T G M / ) ( = where: M = bulk density of aggregate G = mass of the oven dried-aggregate plus the measure T = mass of the measure V = volume of the measure
VOID CONTENT ( ) | | ( ) W S M W S Void = 100 %
where:
M = bulk density of the aggregate
S = bulk specific gravity (dry basis) as determined in accordance
W = density of water, 998 kg/m 3
SURFACE MOISTURE CONTENT
( ) D D W p =100
A p SMC = where: A = Absorption (get values calculated from Lab Experiment 2)
W = mass of original sample
D = mass of dried sample
p = Total Evaporable Moisture Content
SMC = Surface Moisture Content
III. Results and Data
Data gathered were plotted on the table below. Results were computed simultaneously for both fine and course aggregate. FINE COARSE Aggregate (ORIGINAL),kg 1.68 6 Aggregate (DRY),kg 0.48414 4.299 Aggregate(DRY &Untamped) + Mold,kg 6.344 6.155 Aggregate(DRY & Tamped) + Mold ,kg 6.617 6.809 Absorption 3.3 9.2 Bulk Specific Gravity(DRY) 8.59 3.44 Mold,kg 2.211 Volume m^3 0.002678
FINE COARSE Total Evaporable Moisture Content 247.0071 39.56734 Surface Moisture Content 243.7071 30.36734 Bulk Density (Dry Basis) 3345.046 3192.079 Void Content 60.98079 7.021049
Unit Weight/Bulk Density, Void Content and Surface moisture contents were computed for both fine and coarse aggregates.
IV. Discussion The experiment has provided data necessary for solving the Total Evaporable Moisture Content which is a requisite for solving Surface Moisture Content. Then a similar set of data is needed to solve the Bulk Density (dry basis) or also known as Unit Weight for both Fine and Coarse Aggregates. Void Content was then computed through tamping of the aggregate by a rod. With values guided by American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), a certain range could be considered useful in cement applications. Unit Weight range is between 1200-1760 kg/m 3 . Void content also has normal ranges of 30-45% for coarse aggregates and 40-50% for fine aggregates. Absorption is a value that helps determine proper proportioning for concrete production. Aggregates normally have an absorption value that ranges between 1%-2%. Higher values would affect durability negatively.
V. Laboratory Suggestions and Recommendations Transferring of aggregates in the course of the experiment has been inaccurately done producing more discrepancies as seen. Some materials generate static electricity during the dry sieving process. When particles charge themselves as they come in contact with other particles, they stick to the metal frame and cloth of the sieve. This prevents you from obtaining accurate results. It is also commendable to use mechanical sieving analysis to get more consistent results.
VI. Summary and Conclusion Based on the calculated values, errors were seen to have emanated in the procedure. Though values are still not that far from the range of acceptance, we are still very much considerate in reworking on the experiment.