= <
(2)
where
2 2 1/ 2
( )
z
k k k
= . Enforcing zero tangential electric field at the wire surface and after some manipulations the
total magnetic field at the wire surface is
( )
( )
( )
( )
(2)
1
1 0
(2)
0 0
2Im
2
z z
k
jk z jk z t
z z
k k
H k b
K b P
H j dk e k dk e
ak K a H k a
| |
= +
'
'
)
(3)
where jk
= . The current flowing along the wire is proportional to the total magnetic field in (3). Two contributions
can be extracted from this spectral representation of the current. The first term is the main contribution to the total
current and if the wire were finite it would be responsible for the resonant modes present in the dipole. On the other
hand the second term represents clearly an evanescent current. This second term can be easily obtained in closed form
using just a few exponentials by the GPOF method. The resulting evanecent current is
0 0
2 2
2 2 cos sin
( ) Im
i
kb
jkz i
i i
i i i i
P P b kz z kz e
I z j e a j a
k b jz k b z
= =
+
(4)
The current in (4) is pure imaginary and it is shown in Fig. 2. As can be seen from the figure this reactive current mode
has a peak at the ring location and a vanishing oscillatory behaviour that resembles very much the residue function
obtained numerically in Fig. 1. The current so obtained is what we call the source mode. The addition of this mode to
the characteristic mode series greatly improves its convergence as will be shown later.
FREQUENCY INDEPENDENT BASIS FUNCTIONS
As it has been stated before, one of the drawbacks to use characteristic modes as basis functions for the MoM
formulation is that characteristic modes vary with frequency. Fig. 3 illustrates the evolution with frequency of the first
radiating mode of a dipole of length l=0.5 m, and radius a=0.5mm, discretized in 100 segments. It can be observed that
although the current distribution of the mode is slightly modified for frequency points close to resonance (300MHz), the
oscillation of the mode grows as frequency increases. This variation in the current modes has to be taken into account to
get to accurate results, specially at the highest frequencies. Hence, characteristic modes need to be obtained and stored
at many frequencies. It would be very advantageous to obtain a set of basis functions that would not depend on
frequency and would comprise the behaviour of the characteristic modes in the hole frequency band. As proposed in [6]
the procedure suggested to generate this set of frequency independent characteristic modes (FICM) can be summarized
as follows:
1. Choose the number of characteristic modes, say M, to be used to expand the total current.
2. Calculate these M characteristic modes at N different frequencies over the frequency band.
3. Form a new matrix W, that needs not to be a square matrix, whose columns are the MxN modes obtained in
step 2, plus the source mode described in section 2 to accelerate convergence.
4. Then, apply singular value decomposition (SVD) to matrix W, to get a new matrix U of the same dimensions
as W. The columns of the new matrix U are orthonormal basis vectors that span the subspace formed by the
vector columns of W.
5. Take the columns of U with larger associated singular value, say P in number, to form the new set of
frequency independent basis functions.
6. Finally, use these P FICM at every frequency to get to a compressed MoM equation of dimension PxP that can
be solved by direct inversion.
RESULTS
For the sake of illustration, let us consider a square loop antenna of perimeter 0.916m, and wire radius 0.5mm. The
structure is fed in the middle of one of its sides by a delta gap generator. To perform the analysis the loop is divided into
48 segments. To illustrate first the problem of our concern, Figs. 4 and 5 show the total current and the aproximation
using just a few charasterictic modes for a one-wavelength square loop. As can be seen, the real part converges using
just the first mode (notice that the loop is tuned at its first resonance) while the imaginary part fails to converge and
eventually it even diverges. Now, let us carry out the improvements described in the preceding sections The number of
modes used to expand the total current is M=7. These M modes are numerically computed at N=6 frequency points over
the band of interest, 20MHz -1GHz. The 42 resultant modes plus the frequency independent source mode, are arranged
as column vectors to form matrix W of size 48x43. Next, SVD is applied to matrix W to get the new set of P=15
FICM. Fig.6 compares the input impedance computed using pulse basis functions, with our set of FICM. The quadratic
error for both the real and the imaginary parts of the input impedance keeps below 1% within the band of interest.
CONCLUSION
A new method for accelerating MoM computation is presented. This method is based on a new class of frequency
independent entire domain basis functions that are directly obtained from the characteristic modes defined by
Harrington and Mautz, [4]. Including a source mode to model the coupling between the feeding source and the structure
dramatically accelerates the convergence of the characteristic modes.
References
[1] E. Suter, and J.R. Mosig, A subdomain multilevel approach for the efficient MoM analysis of large planar
antennas, Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, vol. 26, no.4, pp. 270-277, August 2000.
[2] V. V. S. Prakash, and R. Mittra, Characteristic basis function method: A new technique for efficient solution of
method of moments matrix equations, Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, vol. 36, no.2, pp. 95-100,
January 2003.
[3] G. Angiulli, and G. Di Massa, Mutual coupling evaluation in microstrip arrays by characteristic modes, AP2000,
Davos, 2000.
[4] R. F. Harrington, and J. R. Mautz, Theory of characteristic modes for conducting bodies, IEEE Trans. Antennas
Propagat., vol. AP-19, no. 2, pp. 622-628, Sept. 1971.
[5] A. O. Yee, and R.J. Garbacz, Self- and mutual-admittances of wire antennas in terms of characteristic modes,
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. AP-21,no. 6, pp. 868-871, Nov. 1973.
[6] V.V.S. Prakash, RCS computation over a frequency band using the characteristic basis and model order reduction
method, 2003 APS/URSI, Columbus-Ohio, June, 2003
z/
-0.250 -0.125 0.000 0.125 0.250
R
e
s
i
d
u
a
l
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Fig 1. Residual current of a half-wavelength dipole
obtained after subtracting 5 characteristic modes from the
actual total current.
z /
-1.00 -0.75 -0.50 -0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00
S
o
u
r
c
e
m
o
d
e
a
m
p
l
i
t
u
d
e
(
A
m
p
s
)
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Fig 2. Source mode for an infinite wire of radius a=0.05
fed by a magnetic ring of radius b=0.07.
Segments
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
J
1
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
200 MHz
400 MHz
600 MHz
800 MHz
1000 MHz
1400 MHz
1800 MHz
Fig 3. Mode evolution with frequency for the first mode
of a dipole of length l=0.5 m and radius a=0.5 mm.
Segments
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48
I
(
m
A
)
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
Re (I
total
)
Re (I
1 mode
)
Fig 4. Real part of the current in a one-wavelength
square loop.
Segments
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48
I
(
m
A
)
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
Im (I
total
)
Im (I
3 modes
)
Im (I
5 modes
)
Fig 5. Imaginary part of the current in a one-wavelength
square loop.
Frequency (MHz)
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Z
i
n
(
O
h
m
s
)
-3000
-2000
-1000
0
1000
2000
3000
R (pulse B.F.)
X (pulse B.F.)
R (15 FICM)
X (15 FICM)
Fig 6. Input impedance of a square loop (0.06-3 in
perimeter) computed using direct MoM computation
(pulse BF) and frequency independent characteristic
modes (FICM).