Case No 12345678 district court of the United States.

Inferior Court of the supreme Court known as Anywhere USA

Freeman Jane of the Family Doe Administrator for JANE DOE Plaintiff/Injured people v. Tooth Fairy, Peter Pan, Brer Rabbit Defendants. _________________________________/

Case No 12345678

ANSWER TO: DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS FROM Defendants Tooth Fairy, Peter Pan, Brer Rabbit VIA Yosemite Sam,
(to be made public record and jury evidence)

For the Record Freeman Jane of the Family Doe claims the Right and hereby holds Defendants Tooth Fairy, Peter Pan, Brer Rabbit personally liable for violating Freeman Does Rights without her expressed consent. These Defendants have been given the opportunity to either 1) provide remedy for their unconstitutional/unlawful acts or, 2) defend their superior right to violate Freeman Does Rights in front of a lawful tribunal of twelve (12) Freemen/people.

Freeman Jane of the Family Doe

1 of 4

The Defendants motion/attempt to deny Freeman Does inviolate Right to a lawful jury trial according to the common law of the people, pursuant to the 7th Amendment, cannot be granted and is hereby denied. The Defendants, as well as Yosemite Sam and Hon. Porky Pig, U.S.D.J., are aware that granting the Defendants request in the absence of Freeman Does expressed consent, would be a violation of a peoples common law, an attempt at fraud, and an act of conspiracy. The Defendants and Yosemite Sam are asking the Hon. Porky Pig to commit fraud. This is why Freeman Doe has demanded a common law grand jury be empaneled to hear such objections, motions, etc. and thereby avoid conflicts with any of the district judges, magistrates, etc.. For the Record Freeman Jane of the Family Doe claims the Right and hereby enters into the record the errors in the Defendants' request for dismissal. 1) Yosemite Sam quotes Federal Rules of Civil Procedure-Rule 12(b)(6) Defendants now move to dismiss pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. 12(b)(6) which reads (b) How to Present Defenses. Every defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading if one is required. But a party may assert the following defenses by motion: (6) failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and... Error: First, no legal relief is being sought by Freeman Doe; therefore the Motion for Dismissal is in error and denied. Error: Second, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure cannot be used to abridge or modify a peoples Rights or Freeman Does Rights: 2072. Rules of procedure and evidence; power to prescribe (b) Such rules shall not abridge, enlarge or modify any substantive right.

Freeman Jane of the Family Doe

2 of 4

2) Yosemite Sam states Nowhere in plaintiff's complaint does he identify a federal right that he contends the defendants violated Error: Defendants must understand that a people's Rights do not originate from any federal corporate code. A peoples Rights originate from God, and are to be protected by the public servants. The peoples unalienable Right to move about freely cannot depend on a granted Federal, State or Municipal written code. The mere fact that a Constitution exists at all is evidence that any form of government is granted limited authority, which is dependent upon the consent of the people or a people; therefore, the Motion to Dismiss is in error and denied. 3) Yosemite Sam states The Ninth Amendment states,"the enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." By its plain language, it confers no specific rights. Error: Defendants are attempting to separate the people and Freeman Doe from their unalienable Rights by purposely misquoting The Ninth Amendment. It is true that the plain language of The Ninth Amendment does not specifically enumerate a peoples unlimited Rights; this would be impossible. However, it is also true that the Ninth Amendment makes the point, as intended by the Founders, that the mere listing of some Rights in the Constitution for the United States of America does not preclude the people from owning and exercising ALL of their unalienable Rights at THEIR discretion. Therefore the Motion to Dismiss is in error and denied. For the Record Freeman Jane of the Family Doe claims the Right and hereby enters into the record the fact that the Defendants have failed to answer the Subpoena. Yosemite Sam states [Freeman Doe] does not allege that she was arrested without probable cause. Yosemite Sam is implying that it is Freeman Doe's responsibility to cite case law. He lists more than ten (10) legal cases in an attempt to establish a legal pattern of judge-made decisions that he maintains are relevant to this matter.
Freeman Jane of the Family Doe 3 of 4

Error: Defendants must understand that all government exists by the consent of the people. The defendants have used, and are continuing to use, coercion to engage Freeman Doe against her expressed consent. Defendants must understand that it is not up to any people or Freeman Doe to clarify, justify, or understand the Defendants actions; on the contrary, the burden remains upon the Defendants to prove their jurisdiction and to justify their breach of duty of care to Freeman Doe. Further, it is incumbent upon the Defendants to demonstrate that their Rights are superior to the Rights of the people, in general, and to Freeman Does Rights, in particular. Therefore the Motion to Dismiss is in Error. In Truth and Honor ____________________________________________________, Freeman Jane of the Family Doe

____________________________________________________, Mary with her Little Lamb, Acting as common law counsel for Freeman Jane of the Family Doe

Freeman Jane of the Family Doe

4 of 4