• Container Capacity
• Quantity vs Quality
• Cost
• Overflow issues
Improved
Sorting
Kerbside
Systems Sorting
facilities Pilot
bring
No plastic
schemes
recycling facilities
Key Systems For Kerbside Collection
HIGH
COSTS
• Basic “refuse only”
Low
participation • Non-integrated “add on recyclables (kerbside and / or
Low recycling
rates bring bank) ”
• Partially integrated “recyclables collection, reducing
the costs of residual waste management”
• Fully integrated “same day collection of recyclables
and residual refuse using split body vehicles”
LOW
COSTS • Fully integrated “alternate weekly collections of
High
participation
recyclables and residual refuse”
High recycling
rates
Kerbside : Options and Opportunities
20
% recycling rate
15
10
0
no plastic with plastic
• You are already paying to collect plastic bottles from households and
transport them to landfills around the UK
Scheme Efficiency
It is possible to decrease the cost of residual waste management
through:
• 30,000 households
• Save 5% volume capacity
(50% of bottles removed)
• 20 rounds equates 1 vehicle saving
Newport Vale Royal
• Retrospectively added plastic bottles • Fortnightly kerbside sort system in
place for dry recyclables
• No opportunity to redesign the scheme
• No opportunity for vehicle redesign
• Reconfiguration of vehicles
• Paper, card, food and drink cans and plastic bottles were collected for
recycling with plastic bottles specifically included due to public demand
• Considering AWC
• Implementing AWC
Case Study : Waveney District Council
“we believe that including plastic has increased the volume of other
materials collected. In terms of costs, including plastics has not
directly increased scheme costs but has significantly reduced the
volume of residual waste. By far the biggest benefit has been
householder satisfaction”.
Considerations For Mixed Plastics
10% of UK authorities actively accept ‘other’ plastics
• Operational requirements
• Economics
• Communication / quality
• Possible,
• Could the effort and cost be better used to increase bottle collection ?
• Quality
• Bale density
• Plan loading
150
100
£/tonne
50
0
Oct-04 Apr-05 Oct-05 Apr-06 Oct-06
Month
Clear and light blue PET Coloured PET HDPE single col HDPE mixed col Mixed Average £ per PRN/one tonne of plastic
Handling Options Assessment
Item Cost (£)
RORO collection Loading Shovel X
Infeed Hopper X
1 2
Moving Plate X
RORO RORO
Container Container
Bottle Piercer (1) X
4x4m Can Flattener (2) X
feed
18m hopper Feed Conveyor X
4x10 input storage
Output Conveyor X
20m
Infeed material
1 tonne + / hr
60kg/person/hr
• Target 10 kg/hh/yr
Achieving 10 ? Then … Target ANOTHER 10 !