Anda di halaman 1dari 17

Monetary Economics: The Cagan Model

Nicola Viegi

August 2010

Monetary Economics ()

Lecture 2

August 2010

1 / 17

Introduction

Roles of money: medium of exchange, unit of account, and storage of value (often dominated by other assets). Money is macro model is typically identied with currency which gives no interest. The liquidity service of money ( medium of exchange) is emphasized, rather than store of value or unit of account. General Equlibrium models (Like RBC models) do not require money to specify a model with money we need to give it a function Agent will demand money only if it has a use

Monetary Economics ()

Lecture 2

August 2010

2 / 17

Modelling Money

Cagan Model - The Price of Money Money in Utility Function Approach Cash in Advance Models

Monetary Economics ()

Lecture 2

August 2010

3 / 17

The Cagan Model

Originally a model of Hyperination Main Point: Expectation about future fundamentals determine prices now Used extensively in Exchange rate analysis, assets prices A lot of modern models look like this

Monetary Economics ()

Lecture 2

August 2010

4 / 17

The Model

Money Demand Mtd = L (Yt , it ) Pt Fisher Equation

(1 + it ) = (1 + rt )
log approximation and uncertainty

Pt +1 Pt

log (1 + it ) = log (1 + rt ) + Et pt +1

pt

Monetary Economics ()

Lecture 2

August 2010

5 / 17

Assume Yt and rt xed, the money demand equation (in log):


d mt

pt = pt =

(Et pt +1 (Et pt +1

pt ) pt )

mt or pt =

1 mt + Et pt +1 1+ 1+

Monetary Economics ()

Lecture 2

August 2010

6 / 17

Forward Solution

pt

= = =

1 mt + Et pt +1 1+ 1+ 1 1 mt + Et mt + 1 + Et +1 pt +2 1+ 1+ 1+ 1+

2 1 mt + Et m t + 1 + Et pt +2 1+ 1+ 1+ = ......... s T 1 T 1 mt + s + Et pt +T = 1 + s 1 + 1+ =0

(1)

Monetary Economics ()

Lecture 2

August 2010

7 / 17

Law of Iterated Expectations

Et (Et +1 pt +2 ) = Et pt +2 No Bubble lim 1+


T T

T !

Et pt +T = 0 1+
s

1 T ! 1 + lim

s =0

mt + s <

Monetary Economics ()

Lecture 2

August 2010

8 / 17

Solution

Generic Solution pt = 1 1+

s =0

1+

mt + s

Prices at time t depend on all future expected money supply. Expected fundamentals (not actual)

pt e

Monetary Economics ()

Lecture 2

August 2010

9 / 17

Constant Money Supply

mt m Et m t + s = m

(s

0)
s

pt

= =

1 1+ 1 + s =0 1 1 m 1 + 1 1 +

= m

Monetary Economics ()

Lecture 2

August 2010

10 / 17

Future One Time Money Increase at T>0

Consider an surprise announcement at time t = 0 of a change of policy at some time in the future T > 0 m t<T m0 > m t T

mt = Thus

pt =

m t<T m0 t T

How would the transition look like?

Monetary Economics ()

Lecture 2

August 2010

11 / 17

Solution

In the period between 0 1 1+

T
s

pt pt pt

s =0

1+ 1+
T t

m+
T

1 1+

s =T

t s

1+ m0 m

m0

= m+ = m+

1 1+ 1+

s =0

1+

m0

Monetary Economics ()

Lecture 2

August 2010

12 / 17

Solution
log price level

p0
m

time

Prices "Jump" at the announcement, before the policy is implemented Expectations drive economic dynamics
Monetary Economics () Lecture 2 August 2010 13 / 17

Seignorage

St Rewrite St Mt Mt Pt
1

Mt

Mt Pt

Mt Pt

Mt Pt

1 1

Mt Pt

1 1

Mt 1 Pt

Seignorage = Increase in real balance+"Ination Tax"

Monetary Economics ()

Lecture 2

August 2010

14 / 17

Optimal Seignorage

St Cagan Money Function

Mt

Mt Pt

Mt

Mt Mt

Mt Pt

Mt = Pt

Pt +1 Pt

Constant gross money growth rate (1 + ) , constant ination

Mt Pt = (1 + ) = Mt 1 Pt 1

Monetary Economics ()

Lecture 2

August 2010

15 / 17

Optimal Seignorage
Constant Seignorage S FOC dS = (1 + ) d
(1 + ) (2 + )

(1 + ) (1 + )

= (1 + )

(1 + )

0 =

(1 + ) (1 + )
(2 + )

opt

= [1 + 1 =

(1 + )] (1 + )

Monetary Economics ()

Lecture 2

August 2010

16 / 17

Cagan puzzle
Under hyperination, actual money growth much higher (wrong side of Laer curve). Obstfeld-Rogo: Absence of commitment, time-consistency problem? Promise = 1/ ) M/P = [(1 + )/ ] . For given M/P , S = (M/P )/(1 + ). Temptation to one-time increase in . New equilibrium under discretion, smaller M/P, higher . Note: Other budgetary consequences of surprise ination (value of outstanding nominal debt). Seignorage in industrialized countries small relative to government spending and GDP (less than 1% of GDP) (Obstfeld-Rogo, box 8.1) Seignorage more important in developing countries

Monetary Economics ()

Lecture 2

August 2010

17 / 17

Anda mungkin juga menyukai