P ENGALAMAN P UBLIKASI DI J URNAL I NTERNASIONAL

Terry Mart
Departemen Fisika FMIPA Universitas Indonesia Depok 16424, Indonesia

DRPM UI 2008

Terry Mart (Universitas Indonesia)

Publikasi Internasional

DRPM UI 2008

1 / 17

Motivasi

1 2 3

Berbagi Pengalaman Tidak Mengajari Setiap orang memiliki jalan sendiri

Terry Mart (Universitas Indonesia)

Publikasi Internasional

DRPM UI 2008

2 / 17

Makalah Sekedar Laporan?

1 2

Benar! Asumsi: Metoda riset yang digunakan sudah benar, memenuhi kaidah/standar yang biasa digunakan oleh ilmuwan di dalam komunitas tersebut. Yang pertama dilihat referee adalah temuan dan metode untuk mendapatkan temuan tersebut! Namun cara menulis juga penting, karena jika salah bisa fatal.

Terry Mart (Universitas Indonesia)

Publikasi Internasional

DRPM UI 2008

3 / 17

Umumnya, seberkas makalah memiliki:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Judul Abstrak (Ikhtisar) Pendahuluan (Mengapa penulis mengerjakan ini?) Material dan Metode (Apa yang dilakukan penulis?) Hasil (Apa yang ditemukan penulis?) Diskusi (Apa artinya penemuan tersebut?) Kesimpulan Ucapan Terimakasih (Acknowledgments) Daftar Acuan

Terry Mart (Universitas Indonesia)

Publikasi Internasional

DRPM UI 2008

4 / 17

Judul, Nama Penulis, dan Institusi

The Title is the rst thing a reader will see of our paper. Therefore, the writing of the title deserves special care. It should convey the greatest amount of information in the smallest number of words.

Pengalaman Penulis: Tidak pernah menjadi masalah. Judul bisa menarik. Contoh:
G.T. Horowitz and E. Silverstein, The Inside story: Quasilocal tachyons and black holes, Phys.Rev.D73:064016,2006. A. Adams, J. Polchinski, E. Silverstein, Dont panic! Closed string tachyons in ALE space-times, JHEP 0110:029,2001. H. Georgi, Fun with Higgsless theories, Phys.Rev.D71:015016,2005.
Terry Mart (Universitas Indonesia) Publikasi Internasional DRPM UI 2008 5 / 17

Abstrak (Ikhtisar)

Every paper must have an abstract. It should be about 5% of the length of the article, but less than 500 words. It should state all subjects about which new information is given and the conclusions and results. For experimental papers it should specify clearly what quantities were measured. It should not contain footnotes, coined words, or acronyms which are not explained.

Pengalaman Penulis: Jarang menjadi masalah

Terry Mart (Universitas Indonesia)

Publikasi Internasional

DRPM UI 2008

6 / 17

Pendahuluan (Mengapa penulis mengerjakan ini?)

The purpose of a scientic paper is to communicate new scientic information among the scientist. Therefore, the rst objective is to demonstrate that the story being told is worth telling and it is the job of the Introduction to do this. In order to arrive at this objective an Introduction should also contain a hypothesis preceded by a series of logical statements which make that hypothesis a sensible thing to have tested.

Pengalaman Penulis: Sering menjadi masalah! Contoh

Terry Mart (Universitas Indonesia)

Publikasi Internasional

DRPM UI 2008

7 / 17

Contoh problem pada Pendahuluan

The objective of the paper is to calculate the role of the neutron structure on the binding energy of neutrons.In particular the authors wish to consider the role of the electric form factor that is nite at nite momentum transfers. Using the usual method of fourier transforming I believe that there is an effect of the neutron charge form factor but it is not appropriate to dramatize it when it is really small and perhaps within the difcult calculations for the binding energy of the neutron in Deuteron and much more so in the case of Be. In view of these comments I would suggest that the authors consider the suggestions carefully and modify the paper accordingly. The introduction part of the paper can be compactied considerably. The paper should not be published it its present form.

Terry Mart (Universitas Indonesia)

Publikasi Internasional

DRPM UI 2008

8 / 17

Metode (Apa yang dilakukan penulis?)

This section is straightforward. The criterion for a well-written Methods of Research section is that a reasonably knowledgeable colleague could repeat our investigation (or experiment) after reading the description. This could become a serious problem since the author is usually very familiar with the research technique and, therefore, could leave out important details unconsciously.

Pengalaman Penulis: Bagian yang paling sering menjadi fokus pemeriksaan referee. Sering menjadi masalah

Terry Mart (Universitas Indonesia)

Publikasi Internasional

DRPM UI 2008

9 / 17

Contoh problem pada Metode

The subject of the study sounds interesting since the author compares the calculations from the Regge model with the isobar model and nds a strong difference in absolute cross sections. Prior to further consideration the author should clarify several details of this study:
1

Generally the Regge model is applied at high energies, and at low energies Regge calculations are comparable with the isobar model. Can the author derive the low energy limit of the Regge propagator and show whether it converges to the Feynman propagator; alternatively, what is the difference? There is a strong statement by A. Donnachie and P.V. Landshoff that Regge theory is applicable at at s 5 or 10 GeV (Phys. Lett. B 296, 227 1992). Does this negate the authors analysis? It is not clear whether the author used a form factor for the Regge model calculations. Regge calculations require phenomenological form factors in order to reproduce the measured t dependence. Please clarify. Why were the rst two diagrams not considered in the Regge model and how does the author motivate that? Nucleon exchange is well treated by the Regge approach, which is discussed in detail in the series of publications by J.-M. Laget.
Publikasi Internasional DRPM UI 2008 10 / 17

Terry Mart (Universitas Indonesia)

Hasil (Apa yang ditemukan penulis?)

Results should be reported correctly and honestly but this does not mean that we have to present all raw data taken in the lab. In fact, a most common mistake in reporting a scientic investigation is that the results were presented in the form of a direct transcription from the laboratory notebook. Instead, use graphs or gures to present the results since they cary more impact than tables, especially where continuous changes associated with continuous inputs are being described. Since graphs are usually less precise, a proportional combination of graphs and tables is necessary.

Pengalaman Penulis: Bagian yang paling sering menjadi fokus pemeriksaan referee. Sering menjadi masalah

Terry Mart (Universitas Indonesia)

Publikasi Internasional

DRPM UI 2008

11 / 17

Diskusi (Apa artinya penemuan tersebut?)

The main topic for the Discussion should be whether or not the hypothesis mentioned in the Introduction is supported by the results of investigation. All literature cited in this section must have the function of supporting arguments about the Results. Some scientic journals allow the authors to combine Results and Discussion in one section. However, the advantage of separating Results and Discussion is that it preserves the objectivity of the Results.

Pengalaman Penulis: Bagian yang paling sering menjadi fokus pemeriksaan referee. Sering menjadi masalah

Terry Mart (Universitas Indonesia)

Publikasi Internasional

DRPM UI 2008

12 / 17

Kesimpulan

The Summary, which is usually placed after the Discussion, is the rst thing a reader will normally look at after he/she has been attracted by the title. The formula for a good summary is: it should expand the title and condense the paper! A summary for a scientic report should be informative, while for review articles it should be descriptive.

Pengalaman Penulis: Jarang menjadi masalah

Terry Mart (Universitas Indonesia)

Publikasi Internasional

DRPM UI 2008

13 / 17

Ucapan Terimakasih (Acknowledgments)

Acknowledgments should be a simple statement of thanks for help and may not be a dedication or memorial. Acknowledgments to people should precede those of nancial support.

Pengalaman Penulis: Tidak pernah menjadi masalah

Terry Mart (Universitas Indonesia)

Publikasi Internasional

DRPM UI 2008

14 / 17

Daftar Acuan
Every journal has a rigid format for the citation of references. Unfortunately, this is not standard among journals and is one of the most frustrating aspects of writing papers. In general, a reference for a journal article usually consists of The name of all authors Year of publication The name of journal, written in abbreviated form Volume number First page numbers of the article The complete format for a book reference may have a different form, as well as for conference proceedings, theses, or scientic reports. Refer to the NOTATION GUIDE of the TARGET JOURNAL.

Pengalaman Penulis: Jarang menjadi masalah

Terry Mart (Universitas Indonesia) Publikasi Internasional DRPM UI 2008 15 / 17

Masalah Bahasa Inggris

Meski tidak esensial, bisa menjadi masalah besar! Lihat contoh potongan komentar Referee:
In its current form, I am not ready to recommend publication of this paper. I would like the authors to address the comments that I raised above . Ideally, I would like to see a new . I would also like the authors to add tting uncertainties to their tabulated resonance parameters. Finally, the authors should have an expert in English grammar review their paper before it is resubmitted.

Terry Mart (Universitas Indonesia)

Publikasi Internasional

DRPM UI 2008

16 / 17

Kesimpulan Presentasi Ini

Please conclude by yourself!

Terry Mart (Universitas Indonesia)

Publikasi Internasional

DRPM UI 2008

17 / 17