San Diego CityBEAT

http://www.sdcitybeat.com/article.php?id=2041

Sign up for the weekly CityBeat eNewsletter

Search
j k l m n Web n sdcitybeat.com i j k l m

Subscribe

Dogs rule, neighbors duel over Grape Street Park by John R. Lamb All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others. from Animal Farm by George Orwell Its approaching four in the afternoon on a sparkling, blue-sky day in Apriltime for Laura Emerick to jumbo-clip the curtains closed and lock the doors of her turreted Golden Hill home. Around the corner, Herb Foelber secures his front door and a side wrought-iron gate that leads to a backyard fishpond, which is fishless at the moment. Why the simultaneous routines at this appointed hour in this historic neighborhood hugging the eastern edge of Balboa Park? For Emerick and Foelber, the answer is simple. The dog people are coming. They come in all shapes, sizes and modes of transportationthe dogs, that is. Some are chauffeured in pickup trucks and SUVs and sedans while others pull their masters behind them on foot, past Emericks shuttered windows. Theyre heading for a section of 28th Street the locals now refer to as a parking lot. A wooden fence separates the lot from the beginning of what the dog people consider canine nirvana. Welcome to Grape Street Park, where dogs are king and some neighbors are crying foul. For Emerick, a married, 40-something photographer who currently makes pottery for a living, the experience has become all but unbearable. She seals her thick curtains with big black clips, she says, so certain dog-park activists cant peer into her house. Emericks round, smooth face exudes no phoniness when she says it happens all the time unless she institutes the dog-time blackout. Her wariness of the dog people manifests itself in many ways. She declined to be photographed for this story, and at one point wasnt sure she wanted her name mentioned, either. An avid gardener, Emerick no longer tends to her colorful flowerbeds during dog hours. I try to avoid being in front of my home during the afternoon, she explained, because I dont trust those people. While she wont go so far as to say she, her husband and her cats are prisoners in their rented home during certain hours of the day, Emerick did allow, Well, Ive definitely rearranged things so that I dont have to interact

POOCH POLITICS

1 of 5

7/8/2007 3:40 PM

San Diego CityBEAT

http://www.sdcitybeat.com/article.php?id=2041

with these people. A little-discussed consequence of the regions unbridled housing construction boomespecially the growing trend to build bigger homes closer to property lines at the expense of usable private green space (read: backyards)has been the additional demand such decisions place on public green space. When I was a kid, one San Diego city government employee told CityBeat privately, our backyard was like three lots. Thats not so common any more in the urban areas. And with more people, you cant just let your dog run loose down the sidewalk any more because people get pissed off. Couple the increased urbanization with a growing phenomenon whereby, as the city employee described it, peoples dogs are elevated to a status of a family member, and emotions are bound to run high. Today, dog ownership appears to be on the rise and is occurring in parts of the citydowntown, for examplepreviously not considered dog-friendly. For those not sold on a dogs life, however, this can only mean one thing: Calls for dog-oriented public parkland will likely only get louder, and in the case of Grape Street Park, probably even more contentious. They are a requested and sought-after public amenity, the city worker explained. People are passionate about their dogs, and people who dont really like dogs are also passionate, so both sides get persistent. These days, dog owners are pushing in ever-increasing numbers for so-called off-leash areas, which the city generally describes as a place where dogs run free, play fetch and socialize with other dogs. These areasa dozen citywide with another planned for Rancho Bernardoare scattered all over San Diego and range in size from two-thirds of an acre at Maddox Park in Mira Mesa to Grape Street Parks 5.4 acres. Urban golfers will have an idea where this 5.4-acre park with the eucalyptus grove sitsjust beyond the chain-link fence that marks the boundary of the Balboa Park Golf Course driving range. In fact, golf balls do occasionally travel into the park, which might explain why an investment firm recently donated some 30 trees that were planted along the park side of the fence. But what makes Grape Street Park truly uniqueand on this both dog owners and area residents agreeis its proximity to homes; a dozen or so are a tennis balls toss from the park. Emericks home is only two doors away. Foelbers canyon home sits only feet from the parking lot, where dogs are supposed to remain leashed until led into the park. A resident near the horseshoe-shaped park since 1964, Foelber claims that rule isnt always followed. I would say maybe 60 percent of the people keep their dogs on-leash, the mild-mannered retiree said. The other 40 percent could care less. On occasions, dogs have headed for his house instead of the park. One time, a dog plunged straight into his fishpond, he said. But mostly, Foelber said, dogs cant seem to resist peeing on his front door, which hasnt held a proper finish in years. Other times, dogs run into the house, and then theyre not sure what to do, he said. The owners, he added, typically seem surprised that their dogs would be such eager trespassers and promise to be more careful the next time. Dog owners are currently required to keep their dogs leashed from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. at Grape Street Park on weekdays, and from 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. weekends and holidays. Dogs can run free from 7:30 a.m. until 10 a.m. and from 4 p.m. to 9 p.m. Monday through Friday and beginning at 9 a.m. weekends and holidays. But a group of activists that calls itself Dog Owners of Grape Street (DOGS) now wants those hours expandedleash-free from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Already, the Balboa Park Committee, which oversees the park, has approved the longer hours. The proposal is now expected to head to the San Diego City Councils Land Use and Housing Committee in mid-June, followed by a final public debate before the full City Council, which will consider it along with a slate of dog-park-related measures. If the previous public debates on Grape Street Park are any indication, the City Council might be in for a barnburner. Folks on both sides of the issue agree that the discussion so far has been anything but friendly. Talks between the

Dog Parks - U.S. & Canada Up-to-date list of hundreds of off-leash dog parks & beaches.
DogFriendly.com/DogParks

Dog Bark Park Find Deals, Read Reviews from Real People. Get the Truth. Then Go.
www.TripAdvisor.com

FETCH! Pet Care SD Inland Pet Sitting - Dog Walking We've got your tail covered!
fetchpetcare.com

San Diego Massage Searching for massage San Diego? See our massage San Diego guide.
MassageSanDiegoDirectory.com

Puppy Ringtone Send this ringtone to your phone right now!

RingRingMobile.com

2 of 5

7/8/2007 3:40 PM

San Diego CityBEAT

http://www.sdcitybeat.com/article.php?id=2041

factions ended long ago. Cindy Ireland, who formerly chaired the Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee, which has frequently sided with DOGS, said a talented mediator gave up trying to bring the parties together after only three sessions. Emerick said she was served with a defamation lawsuit after alleging that a Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee member had a conflict of interest because she frequently used the park in connection with a pet-care business. The suit was later dropped, but Emerick said the board member has threatened to renew the suit, including during a heated encounter with her husband at a South Park pizzeria. Tim Doyle, considered the unofficial mayor of Grape Street Park, said opponents simply want the dogs out of the park, and he vowed that would never happen. Doyle, who officially serves as president of DOGS and as a Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee member, acknowledged that a majority of committee members now are dog-park supporters, evoking memories of last years planning-board purge in North Park over the citys needle-exchange program. Is it fair to say a takeover occurred in Golden Hill? Yes it is, he said, but he stressed that the committee has tackled more issues than simply the status of dogs at Grape Street Park. We turned down a Kentucky Fried Chicken that wanted to put in a drive through, said Doyle. That was a big fight. Its not just dog issues. On a recent afternoon, Doyle held court as a frenzied gathering of at least 30 dogs dashed through the park in utter bliss, their owners showing nothing but smiles. Doyle, who is currently unemployed (I was fired from the South Park Bar & Grill, he said, because nobody likes me. Thats a quote), said he has visited the park every day for six years with his pound dog, Cami (named after Ken Caminiti, the former Padres third baseman), and enjoys the camaraderie. Ive come here in a bad mood from work, life, the girlwhatever, he said, in a voice reminiscent of Al Pacino. Aint never left in a bad mood. What does that tell ya? This is the best damn dog park around. Warren Edelson, a retired Philadelphia transplant, started bringing his tennis-ball-loving boxer, Superdog II, to Grape Street Park about nine months ago after he and his wife moved out of a downtown condo near Pantoja Park, where off-leashing is banned. The dog control got a little bit obsessive, he said, heaving a ball, much to Superdogs delight. This, on the other hand, is a wonderful park. The openness is great, to begin with. The hours are a tad inhibiting, but infinitely better than nothing. He said a recommendation by the citys Park and Recreation Department to divide the park with fencing to accommodate shared uses by large dogs, small dogs and the dogless public has not been met with any support among the local dog people. Edelson said he doesnt see the need for subdivisionswhich has occurred successfully in Poway and to a lesser extent at one of the citys newest off-leash areas at Pacific Beachs Capehart Parkbut said other uses should be welcomed. That kind of talk gets folks like Don Steele tied up in knots. Steele worked for the Park and Recreation Department for 23 years before retiring in 2000. He now sits on several committees that he once staffed as a city employee, but his particular pet project these days is Grape Street Park, which he calls a problematic off-leash area. Steele has arguedso far unsuccessfullythat the park should be partitioned with fences, thus allowing seniors and children and others without dogs to use a portion of the park without concern of being overrun by playful pooches. He said hes also concerned that so many people from outside the neighborhood have discovered Grape Street Park, which, while part of the regional Balboa Park, is still considered a neighborhood park. A dog park there is something that I never would have advocated. He believes the city has exposed itself unnecessarily to potential lawsuits should anyone be bitten or otherwise injured there. Fencing, he added, is a nationally recognized standard for dog parks, and the city knows it. This is not rocket science, people, said Steele, who walks with two canes due to severe arthritis but still enjoys visiting dog parks. Its just common sense

3 of 5

7/8/2007 3:40 PM

San Diego CityBEAT

http://www.sdcitybeat.com/article.php?id=2041

and prudence. Its an issue of land use, safety and equitable access for people in the community. Thats why its a dangerous condition and why the current proposalof expanded hours but no fencingis very troubling to me. Thats why Im still involved. They have essentially made this into a dog pasture, and thats not why this park is here. The proponents of expanded hours say their move into the park 10 years ago has helped chase away bad elements that had claimed the park for years. They say homeless people, prostitutes, drug dealers and gang members frequented the park until the presence of dogs made such activity hit the road. San Diego Police Lt. Boyd Long, whose command includes the park, said such claims are somewhat overstated, but he sympathizes with both sides of the debate. The real problem here, he said, is the convergence of the residential population on the edge of a park where now we have dogs running around. I think its fairly unique. He said his officers, along with park rangers, make random patrols of the park and will occasionally issue citations for illegal dog behavior. Hes heard most of the complaints, including the failure of many dog owners to leash-walk their dogs into the park. It infuriates the people that live there when they see that happening, because they believe thats a blatant violation of the law, he said. The tough part is, weve got to balance that with the spirit of the law. Could we write up every one of those persons? Without a doubt we could do it. Is it in the benefit of everyone to do that? Probably not. John Kroll, another member of DOGS, said only a few residents object to the expanded hours. Like Emerick, he noted that some opponents have moved away and described others dismissively as renters. He also boasted that the mailing list for his group contains nearly 200 names. A writer by trade, Kroll visits the park twice a day with his two golden retrievers. He said the park is typically empty during on-leash hours. He said another park to the south is suitable for non-dog users. Kroll later returned to soften his tone about the opponents. We think theres room for other activities as well, he said. But in as much that the park isnt used and there are people with dogs who want to use it at other hours, we think we should allow that. Emerick conceded that the park is little used during non-dog hours, but she said thats because people are at work and children in school during the available hours. She also suggested that the conditions at the park are not always sanitary. Meanwhile, Edelson, the Philadelphia retiree, is busy picking up a stray poop that someone left behind. Park users, he said, monitor the activity at the park, and he insisted that rules violators are dealt with swiftly. Youll definitely hear people yelling, Whose dog is this? when problems arise, he said. In this debate, there is no shortage of rumor and innuendo. Doyle, the unofficial mayor, said hes read a letter sent, he said, by an opponent urging the city to cut down the trees in the park and build housing on it. The homebuyers would certainly be thrilled with the scenic views of downtown, but stray golf balls and the outcry from losing a park would certainly make such a suggestion unfathomable. Emerick acknowledged that the opposition is small in number, but she and Steele wonder why the political winds seem to favor the dog owners. Shes convinced the parks fate was set while Christine Kehoe represented the area on the City Council. She also noted that Kehoes successor, Deputy Mayor Toni Atkins, lives nearby and once brought her dog there. Doyle, however, noted that Atkins no longer comes to the park, because if she did, people would hound her. Some people just want to alleviate the animosity. He also said if his group had as much political sway as opponents claim, We wouldnt have obstructed [dog] hours now. Atkins, in an e-mail to CityBeat, said she has observed the park for the past decadegoing back to her days as a Kehoe aideand has seen little use of the park except by dog owners, although she noted that since the city officially

4 of 5

7/8/2007 3:40 PM

San Diego CityBEAT

http://www.sdcitybeat.com/article.php?id=2041

sanctioned off-leashing there two years ago, tons of folks have come forward to say they now cant use the park because of the proliferation of dogs there. I can tell you, Atkins added, we have tried to work out the issues between the two sides for many years, calling the situation now pretty polarized. She did state categorically that she is opposed to carving up Grape Street Park with fences. As for not visiting the park of late, Atkins said her 15-year-old Lhasa Apso, Shiloh, is less capable of running the park like he used to like to do and that she is sensitive to, but not in agreement with, opponents calls that she refrain from voting on the matter because of her past use of the park. In that case I should recuse myself from 99 percent of the issues we vote on, since Im a San Diego citizen and resident and almost everything we vote on at council affects me as a resident!!! she wrote. So whats the answer for this polarized neighborhood? Lt. Long suggested that nearby residents fortify their homes with fences and hedges. I think a lot of them have gone to this, he said. The one thing he said he cant do is station a cop up there. I dont have the resources to do that. Im really hard-pressed to assign somebody up there and say, Your job is to watch dogs that are off leash, dogs that run into peoples yards. Thats where Im kind of stuck. Ironically, with all the political intrigue, Doyle said he recently found out that the Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee has never had any oversight authority of the parkthat belongs solely to the Balboa Park Committee. So, now the Golden Hill group has a pro-dog majority that cant weigh in any more on that subject. Not to worry, Doyle said. You have to be in this for the long haul. South Park is changing. We have 18 new businesses here. Its a lot like Mayberry. Dont write that. See, I dont want people coming to my neighborhood, you know? And perhaps Doyle offered a sliver of hope that there may come a thaw in the tensions at Grape Street Park. He offered to repaint neighbor Herb Foelbers pee-stained door. If theres a legitimate problem, Im more than happy to help. And then he made an interesting admission: I sure the hell wouldnt live across the street from this park, either. No way! Doyle said that if he ever hears what Emerick said was shouted at an earlier planning group meeting (someone threatened to key an opponents car), I would jump on their ass, because that tends to cause no good. We are passionate about things that breathe, he added. And when you get passionate about something, you do get emotional. Sometimes good, sometimes not good. And then he was off to cater to another constituent. Who wants a belly rub! he said to a dog that had rolled onto its back seeking attention.

2007 Southland Publishing, All Rights Reserved

5 of 5

7/8/2007 3:40 PM

April 24, 2012

Maintenance Assessment District (MAD) Business Improvement District (BID)

South Park Neighborhood Association (SPNA) Golden Hill Neighborhood Association (GHNA) Golden Hill Community Association (GHCA) Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee Friends of Balboa Park & Golf Course Anti-MAD Community Volunteers Verses City of San Diego Grater Golden Hill Community Development Corporation (GGHCDC) These documents are related to an ongoing 17 years conflict between the Citizens (Property owners) of the communities of SOUTH PARK and GOLDEN HILL, of San Diego, California, battling against the employees of the City of San Diego, and the Greater Golden Hill Community Development Corporation (GGHCDC) who dishonestly and maliciously caused the illegal establishment of a Maintenance Assessment District over the majority objections of the Citizens [property owners]. This to specifically provide funding and support with additional property assessments (taxes/fees) to be provided revenue to a privet membership corporation (GGHCDC). In 2012 the battle is continuing although the Citizens clearly and decisively won every court case, which ORERED a Writ of Mandate, vacating the unconstitutional and illegal governmental actions/proclamations establishing the Grater Golden Hill Maintenance Assessment District (GGHMAD) for the benefit of and administration by the Greater Golden Hill Community Development Corporation (GGHCDC). As of today the City employees are continuing the Battle and are refusing to return the stolen monies by the government to the property owners. These Documents are provided to CITIZENS to assists you in fighting the tyranny of our Governments uncaring Politicians, and their dishonest, officious, manipulative, bulling Bureaucrats. They were obtained and provided from many sources and volunteers to whom we shall never forget their goodwill and good-works. I recommend you to first review the following document repaired by community volunteers to better understand what has transpired to this point in time:

20111031 - GGHCDC MAD HISTORY.pdf

I also would recommend that you contact the following Anti-MAD Points of Contact:

www.goldenhillmad.blogspot.com madmatters@cox.net www.madenoughyet.com

INDEX [LIST] OF RELATED DOCUMENTS & PUBLICATIONS

19720000 - Landscaping & Lighting Act of 1972.pdf 19890000 - MAP - South Park & Golden Hill.pdf 19940000 - GGHCDC Revitalization Project.pdf 19951010 - GHCDC Excutive Director Report.pdf 19951010 - GHCDC Revitalization Plan Community.pdf 19951019 - GHCDC Boad Directors.pdf 19951024 - South Park Association 01.pdf 19970000 - CA Gov. Code section 53753.pdf 19970000 - TAX Right to Vote Proposition 218.pdf 19970609 - MAD City Resolution 288830 MAD Ballot.pdf 19980608 - SD MAD MuniCode.pdf 20000614 - MAD local-light mad.pdf 20000628 - GGHCDC Board Agenda.pdf 20000810 - GGHCDC MAD Misc Docs.pdf 20000810 - MAD GGHCDC - Kessler Letter.pdf 20000901 - GGHCDC MAD Hal Tyvoll Protest Flier - Tovel.pdf 20010213 - CDC Newsletter.pdf 20010305 - GGHCDC MAD Reminder Letter.pdf 20010330 - No GGHCDC MAD Flier.pdf 20010401 - MAD GGHCDC Status Report.pdf 20010401 - MAD SD Park Dept.pdf 20010403 - MAD GGHCDC Status Letter.pdf 20010412 - MAD GGHCDC Letter.pdf 20010425 - GHHCDC NewCity 01-10.pdf 20010425 - No GGHCDC MAD Flier.pdf 20010600 - GGHCDC MAD Newletter.pdf 20010608 - CMADJuneNewsletter2001.pdf 20010613 - MAD GGHCDC Letter - Councilmember.pdf 20010623 - MAD GGHCDC Letter - Mayor.pdf 20010710 - MAD GGHCDC Letter - Atkins.pdf 20020108 - MAD SD Process Ord1975.pdf 20020108 - The MAD Process.pdf 20020313 - No GGHCDC MAD Flier.pdf 20020430 - GGHCDC $150 Council Agenda.pdf 20021021 - BID GGHCDC.pdf 20021029 - GH Planning Committee - GGHCDC Business Districts.pdf 20021029 - GH Planning Committee - GGHCDC Community Center.pdf 20021029 - GH Planning Committee - GGHCDC Joint Committees.pdf 20030500 - SD Code MAD Lighting.pdf

20040000 - SD Policy#100-21 MAD Formations.pdf 20040913 - MAD Formation Handout.pdf 20040913 - San Diego MAD Formation Handout.pdf 20050000 - MAD BUDGETS 2004-8 v6_cedadmin.pdf 20050425 - No GGHCDC MAD Flier.pdf 20050622 - MAD SD Self-ManagedMAD-CityFY2006Budget.pdf 20060000 - GHCDC BoardRooster.pdf 20060311 - MAD Court Rulling Greene.pdf 20060318 - GHCDC ActionPlan.pdf 20060401 - GGHCDC strategicPlan2006.pdf 20060600 - GGHCDC eLetter3_06.pdf 20060601 - SD Block Grants amendfyar07.pdf 20060627 - MAD Council Meeting pmfinal.pdf 20061200 - MAD FUNDING SIDEWALKS pmpchap7.pdf 20070000 - FY08 MAD 06v3revenue.pdf 20070000 - San Diego CityBEAT - poochPolitics.pdf 20070101 - GGHCDC Self History.pdf 20070300 - GHCDC MAD SD CITY Survey.pdf 20070300 - MAD North Park AER.pdf 20070400 - GHCDC MAD SCI Engeneers Report-NO APPENDIX.pdf 20070400 - GHCDC MAD SCI Engeneers Report.pdf 20070400 - SD Developemnet services.pdf 20070401 - GGHCDC MAD Tony Atkins News.pdf 20070406 - No GGHCDC MAD Flier.pdf 20070423 - GHCDC MAD Request Council Agenda JUNE 2007.pdf 20070511 - City San Diego City GGHCDC MAD - Ohedia.pdf 20070521 - Hal Tyvoll MAD Ltr to Council.pdf 20070600 - GHCDC City Grants FY07.pdf 20070600 - MAD City FY08v3 CIP Budget.pdf 20070607 - Plan Group juneagenda.pdf 20070608 - MAD GGHCDC Letter 01 - Mayor.pdf 20070608 - MAD GGHCDC Letter 02 - Aguirre.pdf 20070609 - GGHCDC Meeting.pdf 20070612 - Council Agenda - GHCDC MAD1.pdf 20070615 - GGHCDC MAD cert of mailing_1.pdf 20070615 - GGHCDC MAD cert of mailing_2.pdf 20070616 - MAD GGHCDC SD City Flier.pdf 20070617 - NP News- GHCDC MAD SD CITY Advertisement.pdf 20070618 - GGHCDC MAD SD City Ballot.pdf 20070618 - GHCDC MAD SD CITY Letter.pdf 20070619 - GHCDC MAD - SD City Opposition Consultant.pdf 20070621 - Citizen No GGHCDC MAD Ltr to James T. Waring.pdf 20070630 - GHCDC MAD SCI Engeneers Report-02not complete.pdf 20070701 - No GGHCDC MAD Flier.pdf 20070702 - Citizen No GGHCDC MAD Ltr to Toni Atkins.pdf

20070702 - GHCDC MAD SD CITY Flier.pdf 20070702 - Toni Atkins Leter.pdf 20070706 - Dear Neighbor Letter - No MAD tax.pdf 20070708 - MAD GGHCDC Todd Gloria TaxpayersAdvocate.org.pdf 20070709 - MAD Fellow Neighbor Helpful Note.pdf 20070710 - GGHCDC MAD Ben Hueso Website.pdf 20070710 - GGHCDC MAD Vote No Flier.pdf 20070712 - MAD 18July07 MAD Meeting CHANGE.pdf 20070712 - MAD GGHCDC City SAN Diego Parcels.pdf 20070712 - NoMADTax - Gerrymandering.pdf 20070716 - Neighbors Communications & Response from SD Clerk.pdf 20070718 - GHCDC MAD Meeting CHANGE.pdf 20070719 - SCI MAD san diego golden hill response.pdf 20070723 - CA Code 549546.pdf 20070723 - CA Code R28830.pdf 20070723 - CA Constitution-ARTICLE 13 _Prop. 218_.pdf 20070726 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20070726 - San Diego Reader MAD GGHCDC.pdf 20070730 - MAD GGHCDC - NOT A HONEST VOTE.pdf 20070800 - NP NEWS - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20070900 - NP NEWS - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20071000 - GGHCDC MAD Directory.pdf 20071000 - GGHCDC MAD Oversite Committe.pdf 20071100 - NP NEWS - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20071207 - GGHCDC MAD Ballots Oversite Committe.pdf 20080000 - GGHCDC brochurefinal_so (3)_1.pdf 20080000 - GGHCDC MAD City Contract 2008-9.pdf 20080123 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080200 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080200 - NP NEWS - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20080204 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080225 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee By Laws.pdf 20080225 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080317 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080421 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080519 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080519 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20080521 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20080600 - GHCDC MAD SCI Engeneers Report.pdf 20080602 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080616 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080617 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20080620 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20080714 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080715 - GGHCDC MAD Notice of Inviting Bid .pdf

20080723 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20080730 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20080818 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee Procedures.pdf 20080818 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080819 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20080900 - GGHCDC MAD Newspaper.pdf 20080915 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20080917 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20081020 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20081022 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20081112 - SD 21.reporttocitycouncilfy09.pdf 20081117 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20081118 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20081215 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20081216 - MAD MAP SD City.pdf 20081230 - HUD Audit - San Diego ig0991005.pdf 20090105 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20090202 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20090302 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20090303 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20090307 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20090323 - GGHCDC MAD sidewalk repair Letter.pdf 20090406 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20090504 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20090601 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf 20090606 - GGHCDC MAD Oversite Committe.pdf 20090629 - GGHCDC MAD Promotions Letter.pdf 20090630 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTfy092ndreprogramming.pdf 20090707 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20090717 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20090814 - MAD Democratic Values and Special Assessments.pdf 20090918 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20090930 - GGHCDC MAD Disband Oversight Committee Vote.pdf 20100000 - FY11 SD budget MAD 14v1appendix.pdf 20100203 - MAD Court Final Judgment GHAA.pdf 20100203 - MAD Court Findings Judgment GHAA.pdf 20100223 - GHNA - MAD help.pdf 20100324 - MAD University Avenue - uampmtgpresentation.pdf 20100411 - MAD GGHCDC Illegale $732,746 Budget.pdf 20100421 - San Diego Reader - CDC No Refunds.pdf 20100501 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20100600 - MAD GGHCDC.pdf 20100726 - fy11ao.pdf 20100831 - GHHCDC Audit.pdf

20100913 - MAD VENDOR LOT SUMMARY 9958.pdf 20101001 - GGHCDC MAD Annual Report 2009.pdf 20101105 - GGHCDC Hotline Investigation 11-5.pdf 20101110 - UTSanDiego.pdf 20101120 - 25th Street Project.pdf 20101201 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20110000 - MAD 25th Street.pdf 20110200 - MAD Oversight Cmte agenda-Feb 2011.pdf 20110415 - GGHCDC 25thFINAL-FLYER#3.pdf 20110504 - GGH CPUAC.pdf 20110505 - GGHCDC 25th St Project.pdf 20110510 - GGHCDC MAD Farmer's Market.pdf 20110517 - SD Developemnet services.pdf 20110600 - FY11 SD budget 10_37.pdf 20110600 - SD Planning Groups contactlist.pdf 20110604 - Fed Report CDC990-ending Aug 2010.pdf 20110604 - Fed Report CDC990.pdf 20110711 - GGHCDC MAD Audit.pdf 20110726 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20110900 - GHHCDC Boardmembers.pdf 20110922 - COURT Appellate-Final Ruling-D057004.pdf 20110922 - D057004.PDF 20110922 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20111003 - Todd Gloria & David Alvarez GGH MAD D3_D8 Memo.pdf 20111004 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20111006 - GGHCDC MAD BMurry email.pdf 20111014 - California Taxpayers Association - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20111014 - San Diego Uptown News - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20111020 - NP NEWS - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20111021 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf 20111031 - GGHCDC MAD HISTORY.pdf 20111031 - GGHCDC MAD HISTORY.ppt 20120000 - MAD 25th Street v3schedule1.pdf 20120215 - UTSanDiego.pdf 20120219 - SD Planning Groups contactlist.pdf 20120312 - GGHCDC MAD City Dissolution.pdf 20120329 - Property Tax Letter 2011-12.pdf 20120412 - Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee.pdf 20120412 - UpTown News Artical.pdf 20120419 - GGHCDC Meeting Agenda.pdf 20120419 - GGHCDC WebPage.pdf 20120422 - Marco LiMandri - New City America.pdf 20120423 - GGHCDC MAD Trash Cans.pdf 20120900 - GGH Planning.pdf