Design and Analysis using the Ansoft Product Suite Richard Remski, Brian Gray, Liza Ma Ansoft Application Engineering Staff
Presentation #4
Outline
w
Introduction
w w w
FSS applications Definition, types, and characteristics Traditional analysis techniques Ansoft Designer EM Ansoft HFSS Optimization/Parameterization Non-planar FSSs
w w
What is an FSS?
w
A Frequency Selective Surface (FSS) is any surface construction designed as a filter for plane waves
w w w
Evolution from Radar Cross Section (RCS) Angular/frequency dependence Band pass/band stop behavior Typically narrow band Periodic, typically in two dimensions Element type: dielectric or metallic/circuit Element shape, size, loading Element spacing and orientation
FSS Characteristics
w w
Some different types of planar FSS circuit Some different types of planar FSS circuit elements. Source: Reference [1] elements. Source: Reference [1]
FSS Applications
w
Traditional Applications
w w w
Radomes Dichroic subreflectors Reflect array lenses RFID tags Collision avoidance RCS augmentation Robotic guided paths EMI protection Photonic bandgap structures Waveguide or cavity controlled coupling Low-probability of intercept systems (e.g. stealth)
FSS are used in dish antenna dichroic feeds & avionics FSS are used in dish antenna dichroic feeds & avionics antenna applications antenna applications 4
Planar FSSs w Printed circuits on substrates w Loaded or unloaded elements w Single or multi-layer Non-Planar FSSs w Periodic dielectric shapes w Cross-layer connected elements w Photonic bandgap (PBG) structures Circuit-equivalent effects w Band pass w Band stop
Unloaded (left) and Loaded (right) FSS circuit elements. Unloaded (left) and Loaded (right) FSS circuit elements. Loading is also accomplished in some cases by element Loading is also accomplished in some cases by element packing. (Reference [1]) packing. (Reference [1])
Dielectric Grid FSS (left) and Hexagonal mushroom Dielectric Grid FSS (left) and Hexagonal mushroom Sievenpiper PBG (right, design from Reference [3]) Sievenpiper PBG (right, design from Reference [3]) 5
Periodic Moment Method (PMM) w Method-of-Moments in combination with array theory w Plane Wave Expansion technique w Specific MoM code limitations
w w w
Waveguide Simulation Limitations w Unit cell analysis w Discrete incidence angles w Enforced polarizations Fabrication & Measurement w Difficult w Expensive
w w
Cost Time
Waveguide simulation limits analysis of behavior vs. Waveguide simulation limits analysis of behavior vs. incidence angle, which is a major design challenge for most incidence angle, which is a major design challenge for most FSS types. FSS types.
Ansoft Designer
w
w w
Integrated PMM solver Full model parameterization Automated parameter sweeps Mixed-meshing capabilities Automated transmission and reflection calculation Circuit and EM Integration Variable source angle
Ground planes Traces Dielectrics Slots Traces Size Skew Theta Phi
w w
Cross slot drawn on ground layer Cross slot drawn on ground layer becomes hole in solid plane becomes hole in solid plane
w w
Slots drawn/meshed on ground plane layers Magnetic currents calculated Efficient compared to meshing metal Elements drawn/meshed on signal layers Electric current calculated
10
Axial
Ansoft DesignerTM Planar EM allows axial and skewed arrays to be easily defined.
Skewed
11
Plane of incidence phi, theta TE and TM polarizations computed automatically Center location Cell size Lattice skew angle Scan angle
w w
Infinite Array and Plane Wave Excitation Infinite Array and Plane Wave Excitation Settings available right from the Toolbar Settings available right from the Toolbar
Plane Wave Excitation Dialog (Note: Variable Friendly!) Plane Wave Excitation Dialog (Note: Variable Friendly!)
Infinite Array Setup Dialog, Infinite Array Setup Dialog, permitting skewed as well as permitting skewed as well as rectangular lattices (Also Variable rectangular lattices (Also Variable Friendly!) Friendly!)
12
Gangbuster Array
Dx Dz lattice provides the basis for the Gangbuster Element Dx Dz lattice provides the basis for the Gangbuster Element
Gangbuster
w w w
Linear dipole array Band-pass surface Parameterize Dx, Dz, order n, and dipole width w
Dz
n=1
2Dz Dx
n=2
Dx
3Dz
n=3
Dx
By setting the start point of an element at (x,z) and the By setting the start point of an element at (x,z) and the endpoint at (x+Dx,z+nDz), many different element lengths endpoint at (x+Dx,z+nDz), many different element lengths and packings are possible with the same overall lattice and packings are possible with the same overall lattice repeat. repeat. All drawings adapted from Figures in Reference [1] All drawings adapted from Figures in Reference [1]
13
The lattice, order, and line width can all be varied with a The lattice, order, and line width can all be varied with a few central Project Variables to permit analysis of any few central Project Variables to permit analysis of any similar Gangbuster element. Or, a parametric sweep can similar Gangbuster element. Or, a parametric sweep can generate and maintain results for many variations at once. generate and maintain results for many variations at once.
14
n=4 Gangbuster results n=4 Gangbuster results (Compare to Reference [1], Figure (Compare to Reference [1], Figure 2.6) 2.6)
15
Fixed angle of incidence Compares well to literature [2] Metal extends beyond unit cell outline
w
Measured and Analytical Results Measured and Analytical Results from Reference [4] from Reference [4]
Double Ring FSS, showing Ensemble Solver mesh Double Ring FSS, showing Ensemble Solver mesh in Ansoft Designer in Ansoft Designer 16
Ansoft HFSS FSS simulation capability documented during 2000 Ansoft Roadshow Analysis using Ansoft Designer Planar EM
w
17
Incident waves, periodic boundaries are features present since 2000 Ansofts phased-periodic boundaries permit off-normal analysis, unlike less general wraparound boundaries
Reference [5] Reference [5]
Ansoft technical staff have published papers on these applications References at right may be obtained from our website or applications staff
HFSS unit cell model requires air above/below the cell, as well as a terminating layer
w
Standard radiation boundary acceptable for normal incidence Perfectly Matched Layer for offnormal incidence studies
0 0 -5 -5
-10 -10 -15 -15 -20 -20 -25 -25 -30 -30 -35 -35 0 0
Frequency/GHz Frequency/GHz
Transmission and Reflection Coefficients calculated using Field Post-processing Results Plotted via Macro and compared to reference
Ring Inner Diameter: 5.6 mm Ring Inner Diameter: 5.6 mm Ring Outer Diameter: 6.1 mm Ring Outer Diameter: 6.1 mm Dielectric Thickness: 0.64 mm Dielectric Thickness: 0.64 mm Cell Size 7.24 mm Cell Size 7.24 mm Dielectric Constant: r = 11 Dielectric Constant: r = 11 FSS Design and Measured FSS Design and Measured Results from Reference [7] Results from Reference [7]
19
Ansoft Designer Planar EM no longer appropriate due to 3D dielectric properties HFSS 3D analysis required
w
Deformed dielectric lattices at top Deformed dielectric lattices at top (Reference [8] FSS, left and Reference (Reference [8] FSS, left and Reference [9] PBG, right) and a woodpile dielectric [9] PBG, right) and a woodpile dielectric stackup PBG at bottom (Reference [10]) stackup PBG at bottom (Reference [10])
Solve with dispersion curve analysis, direct-transmission with waveguide simulations, or reflection analysis, as described in [5] and [6].
Analysis of an FSS used as one wall of a dual-band waveguide structure is only possible in full 3D Field Solvers
w
The FSS layer behaves as a transparent wall at the frequency of the overall WG, allowing a TE01 mode, while providing a conductive wall for higher-frequency propagation of an orthogonal WG mode in the isolated rectangular section.
An FSS curled around a dielectric rod forms this conceptual wireless application antenna
w
21
This periodic dielectric lattice FSS is solved for normal and oblique incidence using a unitcell approach in HFSS Results matched well with the data in reference [8], as shown.
Dielectric blocks are 1 x 1 x 0.2 cm, Dielectric blocks are 1 x 1 x 0.2 cm, spaced 2 cm apart. Blocks have r=10, spaced 2 cm apart. Blocks have r=10, surrounding layer r=4. Tested for surrounding layer r=4. Tested for normal and 30 degree incidence angles normal and 30 degree incidence angles from 10 12 GHz. from 10 12 GHz.
22
Another form of FSS used in avionics applications due to higher strength is the perforated metal plate [13]
w
The holes are loaded with a dielectric, which also provides a pressure seal Material choice, hole diameter and spacing, and metal thickness all influence transmission.
A solid metal plate perforated with A solid metal plate perforated with holes filled (incompletely) with a holes filled (incompletely) with a dielectric filler having r=11. Green dielectric filler having r=11. Green slabs top and bottom of image are slabs top and bottom of image are perfectly matched layers (PMLs) perfectly matched layers (PMLs) while gray planes are for data while gray planes are for data extraction. extraction.
23
Match to circular waveguide input port shown. Antenna patterns conform to reference expectations, showing that the FSS will squint the main lobe from the vertical
9 GHz Antenna Gain, 9 GHz Antenna Gain, showing pattern squinted showing pattern squinted toward FSS elements toward FSS elements (only 2 columns) (only 2 columns) 24
Design contains loaded tripoles in a triangular array, arranged on both isotropic and anisotropic layers [14] Hexagonal unit-cell design created using HFSS.
w
Sides are linked boundaries Top and bottom terminated with PML surfaces
Tripoles have arm lengths of 9 mm, Tripoles have arm lengths of 9 mm, trace widths of 0.5 mm, with inner trace widths of 0.5 mm, with inner spacing (opening width) of 3 mm. spacing (opening width) of 3 mm. The are arranged in an equilateralThe are arranged in an equilateraltriangle periodicity with period of triangle periodicity with period of 16.5 mm. Substrate thickness is 6 16.5 mm. Substrate thickness is 6 mm, material characteristics to mm, material characteristics to follow. follow. 25
26
FSS transmission and reflection coefficients incorporated directly into communication system analysis
w
27
Select reflection & transmission coefficients for desired polarization Copy to file saves resulting data table Modify to create S2P file format
28
System-level FSS:
With some edits to the line-feed format and the header, you can re-save this data table as a S2P file
29
Ansoft DesignerTM
w w w
EM Circuit System
30
Example at right shows FSS added in the link path between two parabolic dish antennas
Antenna Antenna
Antenna Antenna FSS Black Box, FSS Black Box, containing full containing full complex complex reflection and reflection and transmission transmission coefficients coefficients
31
Conclusion
w
Much theoretical/measurement expertise required Long and costly build/test cycle Commercial Design Tools Available Planar and 3D EM, circuit/system capabilities
w w w w w
Fully paramaterizable geometries, materials, analyses Automated analyses, sweeps, optimization, postprocessing Integrated design environment with EM, circuit and system analyses Flexible geometry types/shapes and array configuration Efficient design flow
32
References
1. 2. 3. Ben A. Munk, Frequency Selective Surfaces: Theory and Design, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2000, ISBN 0-471-37047-9 The OSU Autonomous Vehicle Website, Ohio State University Center for Intelligent Traffic Research (CITR), http://eewww.eng.ohio-state.edu/citr/Demo97/osu-av.html D. Sievenpiper, L. Zhang, R. F. J. Broas, N. G. Alexpolous, and E. Yablanovitch, HighImpedance Electromagnetic Surfaces with a Forbidden Frequency Band, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol 47, Number 11, November 1999, pp. 2059-2074. T. K. Wu and S. W. Lee, Multiband Frequency Selective Surface with Multiring Patch Elements, IEEE Transations on Antennas and Propagation, Vol 42, Number 11, November 1994, pp. 1484-1490 I. Bardi, R. Remski, D. Perry and Z. Cendes, "Plane Wave Scattering from Frequency Selective Surfaces by the Finite Element Method", COMPUMAG Conference Proceedings, Evian France, July 2001 R. Remski, Analysis of Photonic Bandgap Surfaces using Ansoft HFSS, Microwave Journal, September, 2000 J. Huang, Te-Kao Wu and Shun-Wu Lee, Tri-Band Frequency Selective Surface with Circular Ring Elements, IEEE Trans A&P, Vol. 42 No. 2, Feb, 1994, pp. 166-175
4.
5.
6. 7.
33
References
8. 9. T. F. Eibert, J. L. Volakis, D.R. Wilton and D.R. Jackson, Hybrid FE/BI Modeling of 3-D Doubly Periodic Structures Utilizing Triangular Prismatic Elements and an MPIE Formulation Accelerated by the Ewald Transformation, IEEE Trans. On Ant. Propagat., Vol. 47, May 1999, pp 843-850 John D. Shumpert, William J. Chappell, and Linda P. B. Katehi, Parallel-Plate Mode Reduction in Conductor-Backed Slots Using Electromagnetic Bandgap Substrates, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol 47, Number 11, November 1999, pp. 2099-2104 R. Gonzalo, C. Sagaseta, I. Ederra, B. Martinez, H.P.M. Pellemans, P. Haring-Bolivar, C. Mann, and P. deMaagt, The Effect of a Woodpile Photonic Crystal at Sub-millimetre Wave Frequencies used as Substrate in a Dipole Configuration, Proceedings of 24th ESTEC Antenna Workshop on Innovative Periodic Antennas, June 2001 R. J. Langley, A Dual-Frequency Band Waveguide Using FSS, IEEE Microwave and Guided Wave Letters, Vol 3, Number 1, January 1993, pp 9 - 10 Cox, G.J.; Zorzos, K.; Seager, R.D.; Vardaxoglou, J.C., Study of frequency selective surface (FSS) resonator elements on a circular dielectric rod antenna for mobile communications, Antennas and Propagation, 2001. Eleventh International Conference on (IEE Conf. Publ. No. 480) , Volume: 2 , 2001, pp. 758 -761 FSS Geometry provided to Ansoft by Dr. Youseff Kalatisadeh, ERA Technology Ltd., Surrey, UK. (Prior text source not known to presentation authors.) G. Kristensson, M. Akerberg, and S. Poulsen, Scattering from a Frequency Selective Surface supported by a Bianisotropic Substrate, Publication of the Dept. of Electroscience and Electromagnetic Theory, Lund Institute of Technology, Sweden, Code LUTEDX/(TEAT-7085)/1-28/(2000), Revision 1, Jan 2001
10.
11. 12.
13. 14.
34