Anda di halaman 1dari 2

eEarth final project- Environmental Atlas/Energy grading Rubric

Criteria SUPREME!!!!! 20 points Provides TOTAL analysis of primary & secondary energy sources with pros/cons, an estimate for how long before resources are depleted, and proposals for at least 2 possible available alternatives with pros/cons. Data is research-based and properly cited. Construction: Original, clear and concise plot with awesome intro, engaging mid-plot and thrilling conclusion. Needs to be written for appropriate audience (your peers or younger) HUGE (100%) variety of at least 1 of each of following elements for each equivalent story page: pictures, drawings, 3D objects, videos, imported audio, other media, etc. Storyline and graphics combine together to produce a highly creative, varied, and engaging chapter for the reader VERY Good! 17 points Provides PARTIAL analysis of primary & secondary energy sources with pros/cons, an estimate for how long before resources are depleted, and proposals for some possible available alternatives with pros/cons. Data is research-based and properly cited. Construction: Original, clear and concise plot with good intro, good mid-plot and good conclusion. Needs to be written for appropriate audience (your peers or younger) (75%) variety of at least 1 of each of following elements for each equivalent story page: pictures, drawings, 3D objects, videos, imported audio, other media, etc. Storyline and graphics combine together to produce a creative, varied, and engaging chapter for the reader Good 15 points Provides analysis of primary energy source with pros/cons, and proposal for a possible available alternatives with pros/cons. Data is Research-based and properly cited. Fair 13 points Some analysis of current primary energy source and proposal a possible available alternatives. Weak documentation, improperly cited. Poor :( 11 points Little or no information, no pros, no cons, no alternative, not based upon research and not properly cited.

Content

Story : main and supporting characters and setting are well dened and developed.

Construction: Original, clear and concise. Has a plot with intro, mid-plot and conclusion. Needs to be written for appropriate audience (your peers or younger) Some variety of at least 1 of each of following elements for each equivalent story page: pictures, drawings, 3D objects, videos, imported audio, other media, etc. Storyline and graphics struggle to work together. Story is not engaging for the reader

Construction: Original, plot that wanders and rambles and lacks clear direction. Needs to be written for appropriate audience (your peers or younger) Little to no variety of at least 1 of each of following elements for each equivalent story page: pictures, drawings, 3D objects, videos, imported audio, other media, etc. Storyline and graphics clash somewhat with each other. Story is confusing and struggles to make any sense for the reader.

Poor organization and little or no story line, no planning, virtually no plot.

Pictures, Movies, Animations, etc. (at least one for each page of your story)

hardly any media elements, missing from individual pages (needs to be at least one)

Overall Creativity

Storyline and graphics do not work together. Story is not engaging for the reader.

eEarth final project- Environmental Atlas/Energy grading Rubric


Criteria SUPREME!!!!! 20 points It is neat and checked for grammar, spelling, etc. In other words it shows that you spent a months time on it! VERY Good! 17 points It is neat and checked for grammar, spelling, etc. In other words it shows that you spent at least 3 solid weeks time on it! Good 15 points It is neat and checked for grammar, spelling, etc. In other words it shows that you spent at least 2 solid weeks time on it! Fair 13 points It is not neat, contains grammatical errors. In other words it shows that you might have spent at least 1 solid weeks time on it! Poor :( 11 points It looks like Layne Meyers, and you put it together last minute!

Appearance

grand total _____/25

Anda mungkin juga menyukai