HANDBOOK
SP 43 (S & T) : 1987
ISBN 81-7061-025-7
PRICE
Rs 380.00
PRINTED IN INDIA AT BENGAL OFFSET WORKS, 33 5 KHAJOOR ROAD, KAROL BAGH, NEW DELHI 110 005 AND PUBLISHED BY BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS, NEW DELHI 110 002
Chairman
DR H.C. VISVESVARAYA Cb&nan & Director General National Council for Cement and Building Materials New Delhi *
Members Representing
SHRI V. RAO AIYANGARI SHRIA. K. BANERJEE SHRI J. D. CHATURVEDI DIRECTOR SHRI GURNAM SINGH SHRI U. R. KURLEKAR DR M. RAMAIAH SHRI G. S. RAO SHRI A. CHAKRABORTY (Altemate) SHRI T. S. RATNAM SHRI P. K. KALRA (Alternate) SHRI G. RAMAN
(Member Secretary)
Department of Science & Technology, New Delhi Metallurgical and Engineering Consultants (India) Ltd, Ran&i Planning Commission, New Delhi Central Building Research Institute (CSIR), Roorkee Ministry of Food and Civil Supplies (Finance Division) Ministry of Food and Civil Supplies Structural Engineermg Research Centre (CSIR), Madras Central Public Works Department, New Delhi
Bureau of Public Enterprises, New Delhi Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi
WORKING GROUP FOR PROJECT B -8 Memhers SHRI k K. BANERJEE SHRI D. S. DESAI SHRI J. C. GANGULY SHRI P. V. NAIK DR M. RAMAIAH SHRI V. S. PARAMESWARAN (AZternfzte) SHRI A. RAMAKRISHNA SHRI S. SUBRAMANIAM (AZternate) SHRI G. S. RAO SHRI A. CHAKRABORTY (AZternate) Representing Metallurgical & Engineering Consultants (India) Ltd, Ran&i M. N. Dastur & Co Pvt Ltd, Calcutta Braithwaite Burn & Jessop Construction Co Ltd, Calcutta Richardson & Cruddas Ltd, Bombay Struc@rralEngineering Research Centre (CSIR), Madras
DR P. SRINIVASA RAO Indian Institute of Technology, Madras ~ROF (DR) L. N. RAMAMURTHY (Akern&e) SHRI T. S. RATNAM SHRI P. k. KALRA (AZternute) SHRI D. AJITHA SIMHA SHRI C. N. SRINIVASAN SHRI ASHOK TREHAN SHRI A. C. GUPTA (AZternate) DR H. C. VISVESVARAYA Bureau of Public Enterprises, New Delhi * Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi C. R. Narayana Rao Architects & Engineers, Madras National Thermal Power Corporation Limited, New Delhi
iV
FOREWORD The Department of Science and Technology set up an Expert Group on Housing and Construction Technology in 1972. This Group carried out in depth studies in various areas of civil engineering and construction practices :bllowed in the country. During the preparation of the Fifth Five-Year Plan in 1975, the Group was assigned the task of producing a Science and Technology Plan for research, development and extension work in the sector of housing and construction technology. As a result of this and on the recommendation of the Department of Science and Technology, the Planning Commission approved the following two projects which are assigned to the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS): a) Project B-7 - Development Programme on Code Implementation for Building and Civil Engineering Construction; and b) Z+oject B-8 - Typification of Industrial Structures. BIS has set up a special committee (SUP) consisting of experts to advise and monitor the execution of these projects. A Working Group under SCIP oversees the work of Project B-8. In a developing country like India, the capital outlay under each Five-Year Plan towards setting up of industries and consequently construction of industrial buildings is very high. It is, therefore, necessary that the various parameters of industrial buildings be standardized on broad norms so that it will be feasible to easily adopt prefabricated members, particularly where repetitive structures could be used. The standardization of parameters for industries by itself wilI be, no doubt, a difficult task as it will not be possible to specify the requirements of each industry. The layout including height, will vary from industry to industry, for it depends on the process of mantiacture and end products. However, a little more detailed analysis of the requirements indicated that the problems may not be as difficult as it appears. Although it would not be possible to specify any constraint on the parameters, a broad norm can be given within which most industries could be accommodated. The object of the Project B-8 is to typify at national level the common forms of industrial structures used in light and medium engineering industries, warehouses, workshops and process industries, and to obtain economical designs under these conditions. Even if an industrial complex is classified as heavy industry, it need not necessarily mean that alI the industrial structures coming within the complex should be heavy industrial structures and that many structures could be from the typified design. The main objective of typification of industrial structures is to reduce the variety to the minimum and provide standard prefabricated designs so that the structures could be easily mass produced and made available to the user almost off the shelf. In doing so, there will be tremendous saving in time in putting up an industry into production and hence increased production. This would indirectly increase the overall economy to the country. This would also help in the orderly use of scarce materials like steel and cement. This would be of immense use to structural engineers as well, since it would relieve them to a large extent from the routine and repetitive calculations. Thus the engineers time could be used to look at more innovative and economical alternatives. The project on typification of industrial structures involved the following three main tasks prior to preparation of typified designs: a) TuskZ
- Survey and
b) TuskZZ - Identification of industrial structures repeated a large number of times in the country, which are amenable for typification from the classified list prepared during task I; and
c) Task ZZZ Specifying the elements of the industrial structures to be typified taking -
into consideration a number of parameters, such as structures with cranes and without cranes, span length, height, support conditions, slope of roof, wind and earthquake forces, spacing, field and shop connections, material (steel, reinforced concrete), etc. The data regarding physical parameters like span, spacing, roof slope, column height, crane loading, etc, of existing structures has been obtained from several public sector enterprises through Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE). Some information from private industries has also been collected by BIS. The typified design for the following types of industrial structures in steel and reinforced concrete is envisaged to be brought out based on appropriate Indian Standards: a) Steel Structures 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Structures Structures Structures Structures Structures with with with with with steel roof trusses (with and without cranes) steel kneebraced trusses (without cranes) steel portal frames (without cranes) steel portal frames (with cranes) steel latice frames (without cranes)
b) Reinforced Concrete Structures 1) Structures with RCC roof trusses (with and without cranes) 2) Structures with RCC portal frames (without cranes) 3) Structures with RCC portal frames (with cranes) In each case of structures with cranes, the maximum capacity of crane considered is limited to 20 tonnes, normal range in light industries. This Handbook deals with typification of structures with RCC portal frames (without cranes). Typification includes analysis and design of RCC portal frames. The portal frame has been analyzed and designed for vertical and lateral loads (wind andearthquake forces) using the moment resisting portal frame action, with pinned_ and fured support alternatives. Adequate wind bracing along the length of the building should be provided to withstand the wind on end gable and drag force on the roof and walls. Since the design for this depends upon the length of the building, locations of the expansion joint, etc, the typified design of these bracings is not given in the Handbook. However, an illustrative example of bracing design has been included. Some of the points to be noted regarding analysis and design of these structures are as. follows:a) The typified designs have been given for the following parameters: Span lengths (metres) Spacing of frames (metres) Roof slopes
Span (ml 9.0
(1
*
2 *
3 * . *
4
l
* * * *
8 * L _
* -
vi
The column height specified above includes 0.5 m length of column which is embedded below ground level. b) The analysis of portal frames has been made using a computer programme based on the stiffness method of analysis. c) The internal pressure/suction specified in 1338751964 for buildings with normal permeability (kO.2) has been considered in design. d) The structural design of RCC sections is based on IS:4561978. Since the designs presented in the Handbook could be used either for a cast in-situ construction-or for a precast construction, therefore M 25 concrete has been used for the design of all portal frames, and 6.0 m span RCC purlins and cladding runners. The 12.0 m span prestressed concrete purlins and cladding runners are designed using M 40 concrete.
4 For portal frames, of both fmed and hinged support, prismatic rafter sections are
adopted. Prismatic column sections are adopted for portal frames with fured support and non-prismatic column sections are adopted for portal frames with hinged base.
0 To facilitate prefabricated construction, the position of joints and the joint details fd The typified design results are given for purlins, cladding runners and frame
have been included to illustrate the method of detailing. This should not be considered as the only available method for detailing. members. Design of other elements, such as lugs to support the purlins, brackets to support cladding runners and eaves beams are also covered. Bracing and foundation designs have not been typified because of varying design parameters. However, a typical example of bracing design and footing design is included.
h) A detailed design example in the design of?ice format is given in the Handbook illustrating the use of analysis and design information presented. j) On the basis of typified designs for different spans, spacings, roof slopes, etc, some conclusions regarding the more economical designs is covered in the Handbook. k) The Handbook is intended to be used by qualified engineers only. This Handbook is based on the work done by Structural Engineering Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Madras. The draft handbook was circulated for review to Shri J. Durai Raj, New Delhi; University of Roorkee, Roorkee; National Projects Construction Corporation Limited, New Delhi; Engineer-in-Chiefs Branch, Army Headquarters, New Delhi; Gammon India Limited, Bombay; Association of Consulting Engineers (India), New Delhi; Tata Consulting Engineers, Bombay; Metalhugical and Engineering Consultants (India) Limited, Ranchi; National Industrial Development Corporation Limited, New Delhi; Research Designs & Standards O;ganization, Lucknow; S. B. Joshi and Company Limited, Bombay; Food Corporation of India, New Delhi; Engineers India Limited, New Delhi; National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Limited, New. Delhi; National Thermal Power Corporation, New Delhi; Western Railways, Bombay; Braithwaite and Company Limited, Calcutta; Tata Iron and Steel Company Limited, Jamshedpur; B.C. Shirke and Company, Pune; City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited, Bombay; Stup Consultants Limited, Bombay; Bharat Heavy Electrical Limited, Ranipet; Housing and Urban Development Corporation Limited, New Delhi; Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited, Calcutta; Hindustan Prefab Limited, New Delhi; Planning Commission, New Delhi; C..R.Naraya_na Rao Architects and Engineers, Madras; Engineering Construction Corporation Limited, Madras; Central Building Research
vii
Institute (CSIR), Roorkee; Jessope & Company Limited, Calcutta; National Council for Cement and Building Materials, New Delhi; Structural Engineering Research Centre (CSIR), Madras; Bureau of Public Enterprises, New Delhi; Central Public Works Department (CDO), New Delhi; M. N. Dastur and Company Private Limited, Calcutta; Bokaro Steel Limited, Bokaro; Housing and Urban Development Corporation. Limited, New Delhi; and the views received have been taken into consideration while finalizing the Handbook.
Vlll
...
CONTENTS
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.
GENERAL ANALYSIS DESIGN RESULTS OF PORTAL FRAMES : ANALYSIS AND DESIGN e MISCELLANEOUS ILLUSTRATIVE DESIGN EXAMPLES OF CONCRETE/STEEL
I
3
26
27 29 . 181
1. GENERAL 1.1 Introduction - Reinforced concrete portal frame is one of the structural systems that can be adopted for construction of industrial buildings. The resistance of vertical loads and to lateral loads (due to wind, earthquake, etc) in the transverse direction in such buildings is generally derived from the frame action, whereas the resistance to lateral loads in the longitudinal direction is provided by means of longitudinal column bracings in the end bays. Industrial sheds using reinforced concrete portal frame as the main load carrying system may be with or without cranes. The Handbook gives information only about portal frames without cranes but subjected to dead load, live load and wind load/ seismic load according to appropriate Indian Standards. The analysis and design results are given for purlins, cladding runners and frames for the following parametres: = 9.0,12.0,18.0,24.0and 30.0 Spacing of frames (m) = 6.0 and 12.0 =1in3,1in4,and1in5 Roof slopes = Asbestos cement sheet Roof covering roofmg Span length (m)
column members are adopted. Purlins and cladding runners are assumed to be located at a maximum spacing of 1.4 and 1.7 m on the rafter and column members respectively. 1.3 Terminology
Bay
Bracing
Single or diagonal members which form a truss system with columns or rafters to provide stability and resist horizontal load. Members carrying side sheeting and supported by columns. Members generally vertical which primarily resist axial load and bending moment. The height of the column from top of the foundation to the junction of the centre lines of rafter and column. Members carrying roof sheeting and supported by rafters. The slope of the rafter with respect to the span length. It is obtained by dividing the rise of the portal frame by half the span length. The centre line distance of two adjacent portal frames in the longitudinal direction. The centre line distance between the columns at top of the foundation in the transverse direction.
Spa c*ng of
1 * * * * *
* * * * -
* * * -
* * -
2. ANALYSIS 2.1 Loads - The purlins, cladding runners and portal frames are analyzed for dead load, live load and wind load, and subsequently checked for seismic load. 2.1.1 Dead Load - The purlins, cladding runners and portal frames are designed for their self-weight according to IS:19911-1967.* 2.1.2 Live Load -The purlinsand portal frames are designed for live loads according toIS:875-1964.f taken with appropriate reduction for roof slopes, whenever applicable. 2.1.3 Wind Load -The purlins, cladding runners and portal frames are designed for the three basic wind pressure zones given in ,13:875-1964s The internal *Since revised as IS:875 (Part 1) - 1987.
t Since revised as IS:875 (Part 2) - 1987. %ince revised as
* Combination is available.
The analysis and design results are presented for both fared and hinged support conditions. The column height specified includes 0.5 m length of column which is embedded below ground level. 1.2 Portal Frame Confguration - For portal frames, of both fixed type and hinged type, prismatic rafters are adopted. For frames with fixed support condition, prismatic cohunn members axe adopted and for frames with hinged base, non-prismatic
SP43(S&T):1987 pressure/suction specified in IS:8751964,* for buildings with normal permeability (+ 0.2~) has been considered. Under each basic wind pressure, the following t.hree different wind load conditions (see Drg. 142) have been analyzed: a) Wind perpendicular to the ridge with internal suction (WL 1) b) Wind perpendicular to the ridge with internal pressure ( WL 2) C)Wind parallel to the ridge with internal pressure (WL 3) The basic wind pressure is reduced by 25 percent for the design of all members if the height of the building is less than 10.0 m and for columns alone if the height of the building is more than 10.0 m but less than 30.0 m. In the case of multi-bay portal frames, drag force due to wind on interior slopes has also been considered according to IS:8751964.* Cladding and cladding fasteners shall be designed for increased wind pressure due to local effects according to IS:8751964.* 2.1.4 Seismic Load - Seismic load is generally not of significance for low rise buildings such as those considered in the Handbook. But a few cases of frames with the shortest spans and the shortest column height, and also of frames with the largest spans and the largest column height have been checked for seismic load effects. The seismic load characteristics and intensities in such cases are assumed as specified for different earthquake zones in 13:1893-1984. Snow load typification. has not been considered for the For the purposes of design of both the reinforced concrete (RC) and prestressed concrete (PSC) purlins according to the limit state of collapse, the design forces in the appropriate planes are arrived at in accordance with IS:456-1978 and IS:1343-1980 for load combinations shown below: a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) j) k) 1.5DL t1.5LL 1.5DL+1.5C,,WLl 1.5DL t1.5GWL2 l.SDLtl.Sc,WL3 0.9DL t1.5C,,WL 1 0.9DL t1.5c,WL2 0.9DL t1.5c,WL3 1.2DL t1.2LL + 1.2C, WL 1 1.2DLt1.2LLt1.2C,,WL2 1.2DL t1.2LL t 1.2C, WL 3
Where C, = 0.75 for members of building whose heights are less than or equal to 10.0 m and for columns of buildings whose height is less than 30.0 m and C,, = 1.O for all other cases. 2.3 Analysis of Cladding Runners - Cladding runners of span 6.0 m and 12.0 m span are analyzed as simply supported beams for the loads described in 2.1. The load combinations considered for evaluating the design bending moments at the service load stage and .the limit state of collapse are as given in 2.2. 2.4 Analysis of Portal Frames - All the portal frames are analyzed according to the principles of elastic theory for dead load, live load and wind load as described in 2.1. For simplifying the analysis, the loads are assumed to act at four intermediate points on the rafter andat one intermediate point on the column. It is assumed that the frames are supported on an isolated footing. In the case of isolated footing, the idealized support condition for the column can be fixed end condition or hinged end condition depending on the soil strata. If the isolated footing is resting on hard rock, it can be assumed as a fiied base because the rock will not deform much to allow the rotation of the foundation, and if it is resting on normal soil, it can be assumed as hinged because due to the compressibility of the soil, the foundation can undergo a rotation relieving off the moment. In the case of the columns supported by a pile foundation, the base of the column should be assumed as fixed. Analysis has been carried put for both cases of support conditions, that is, fured and hinged. The portal frames have been analyzed using a plane frame computer programme which is based on stiffness method of analysis. Three degrees of freedom are assumed at each node. In this method, the structure coordinates are specified at all the nodal points including the supports. The number of forces at each node is equal to the possible degrees of freedom per node that are inputted. Then, the stiffness matrix of the structure is assembled and the boundary conditions are incorporated. The resulting simultaneous equations are solved for displacements, using which the member end actions are finally obtained. 2
2.2 Analysis of Purlins - The maximum spacing of purlins is assumed to be 1.40 m centre-to-centre supporting asbestos cement sheets. Galvanized iron sheeting may be used in place oi 4C sheeting without any modifications. However, in case of GI sheeting, if a larger spacing than 1.40 m is to be adopted (as per recommendation of the manufacturers), the purlins will have to be suitably redesigned. The portal design will remain unaltered. Purhns are analyzed as simply supported beams subjected to biaxial moment due to dead load, live load and wind load/seismic load as described in 2.1. First the bending moments due to the dead load (DL), liveload (LL) and the wind loads (WL 1, WL 2, WL 3) are computed. For checking the permissible stresses at various service load stages of 12 m prestressed concrete purlin, the load combinations as shown below are considered: a) b) c) d) DLtLL DLtLLtWLl DLtLL+WL2 DLtLLtWL3
(Part 3) - 1987.
SP43(S&T):1987 3. DESIGN
3.1
Materials
3.1 .I Concrete - Since the designs presented in the Handbook could be used either for a cast in-situ construction or for a precast construction, M25 concrete is used for the design of all portal frames, and of 6.0 m span RC purlins and cladding runners. For the illustrative design of bracings in concrete, M2S concrete is used. The 12.0 m span PSC purlins and cladding runners are designed using M40 concrete which is the minimum grade prescribed for pretensioned prestressed concrete work. For the illustrative design of foundation, Ml5 concrete is used.
dimensions of different structural components influence the analysis. Hence, considerable thought had to be given for the choice of cross-sectional shapes and dimensions. The purlins and cladding runners are supported and analyzed as simply supported members of 6 or 12 m span. The cross-section shape chosen is either an angle section or a channel section because these are the most suitable ones for a member subjected to biaxial bending permitting at the same time easy fixing on to the lugs. For the main portal frames, a solid rectangular section has been chosen mainly from the considerations of ease of construction and partly from the considerations of stiffness against lateral loads. Particularly in the case of long span and relatively high portal frames, it has been observed that the imposed limit of height/325 on the lateral deflection governs the design rather than the strength. In case a user decides to adopt a section which is governed by only strength and not deflection, then the sections can be redesigned making use of the analysis tables given in the Handbook. 3.2.3 Load Combination Governing ihe Design From amongst the large number of load combinations listed in 2.2, the governing load is that which gives the bending moment or that combination of bending moment and axial force which requires the maximum percentage of steel at the section under consideration. Thus, it is possible that designs of different sections are governed by different combinations of the possible loads. 3.i Design of the Purliis Cladding Runners - The purlins and the cladding runners can be of reinforced concrete, prestressed concrete or steel sections. In the Handbook, details of 6.0 m span RC purlins and cladding runners, and 12.0 m span prestressed concrete purlins and cladding runners are given. However, hot rolled angle or channel sections or cold formed Z-sections can also be used as purlins.
3.3.1 Design of the 6.0 m Span RC Purlins and Cladding Runners - 6.0 m span RC purlins and clad-
3.1.2 Steel - High yield strength deformed bars conforming to 13:1786-1985 are used as reinforcement in all RC members except in case of ties for purlins and cladding runners for which mild steel conforming to IS:432 (Part 1)1982 is used. The pretensioned prestressed concrete purlins and cladding runners of 12.0 m span are assumed to be prestressed using 3 ply, 3 mm diameter uncoated stress-relieved strands conforming to IS: 6006-l 983. 3.2 Basic Criteria for Design 3.2.1 Limit States of Collapse and Serviceability Design of reinforced concrete or prestressed concrete structural members is carried out to satisfy the criteria laid down in 18:456-1978 and IS:1343-1980 for safety against limit state of collapse, and limit states of cracking and deflection at working load stage, whenever available. In addition to the specific guidelines available in the respective Indian Standards for ensuring the required safety against limit state of collapse, both for reinforced concrete members and prestressed concrete members, the safety against cracking is assured in prestressed concrete members through the provision of limiting stresses under working load stage. 133456-1978 has specific recommendations also for limiting deflections of simple flexural members like purlins and cladding runners. No specific recommendations exist at present in IS:456-1978 for calculation of crack width or on lateral deflection of structural systems such as portal frames. Crack widths have been investigated based on the formulae of AC1 318-1983 and a value of height/325 has been adopted as the limihg deflection for the lateral deflection of the portal frames when the deflections are calculated using the values of Youngs modulus and effective moments of inertia as recommended in IS:456-1978.
and
ding runners are designed by the limit state method according to 13:456-1978 for the governing bending moments and shear forces obtained from the analysis. It is found that the design is not very much influenced by the variation of the roof slope and wind load/seismic load. Hence, one common design is given for all the load cases described in 2.2. Effect of torsion is neglected as it is not significant. 3.3.2 Design of the 12.0 m Span. Prestcessed Concrete ,Furlins and Cladding Runners - The prestressed concrete purlins and cladding runners are designed for the bending moments and shear forces described in 2.2 according to IS:1343-1980. Since it is found that the design of the purlins and cladding runners is not very much influenced by the variation in roof slopes and the wind load/seismic load, only one common design is given. This is applicable for
3.2.2 Choice of Preliminary Cross-Sectional Shape Dimensions - In reinforced and prestressed concrete structures, the self-weight of the structural members contributes quite significantly to the total vertical load coming on to the structural members. Furthermore, in the design of statically indeterminate structures like portal frames, the relative
1 -
SP 43 (S & T):1987 frames with all slopes considered zones/seismic zones. 3.4 Design of the Portal Frames 3.4.1 Strength Design - The critical sections of the principal rafter and the column of the portal frames are designed for all the load combinations given in 2.2. The effective length for strong axis buckling under axial compression of the columns has been considered as 1.5 times the actual columns height for fixed type of support and 2.25 times the actual length for hinged type of support according to the provisionsof IS:456-1978. Theeffective length for weak axis buckling of columns under axial compression has been considered as 0.75 times the height for fwed and hinged type of supports following the provisions of IS:800-1962. The columns are designed for bending moment along minor axis also, wherever applicable. It is found that the design of the critical crosssections of a portal frame is not very much influenced by the variation hi slopes and wind/seismic loads. Hence, common designs are worked out which are applicable for all slopes and wind/seismic forces. With the critical cross-sectional details being common for all slopes, the influence of the slope has been incorporated while fming the lengths of the rafters, location at which bars could be curtailed and other points related to reinforcement detailing. Normal clear cover according to IS:456-1978 is assumed in the design. In a particular case, if additional cover has to be provided due to aggressive environment, etc, then the column dimensions have to be increased to the extent of increase in the cover. In the design of the rafter, the effect of axial force is neglected as it is not significant. 3.4.2 Deflection - As already mentioned, it is ensured that the lateral deflection at the top of the columns is less than l/325 of height of the columns under the worst combination of all the vertical and lateral loads. It is significant to note here that a considerable portion of the lateral deflection at the top of the column is due to the action of vertical loads themselves. 3.4.3 Crack Width - The maximum widths of the cracks in the portal frames are checked according to ACI-318-1983 and they are found to be within the permissible values. 3.4.4 Special Considerations for Frames in Seismic As mentioned in 2.1.4, some of the frames with largest span and largest column height, as well as shortest spanand shortest column height are analyzed for seismic forces. It is found that the seismic forces dq not govern the strength design. However, the joints in the frames to be constructed in areas where seismic coefficient is 0.05 or more are to be so detailed that enough ductility is ensured according to 18:4326-1976. These special joint details should be incorporated at the joints of the frames to be constructed in areas where seismic coefficient is 0.05
Zones 4. RESULTS
or more even though the seismic load does not govern the design.
4.0 The results of the extensive analysis and design work carried out for the large number of portal frame configurations as described in the earlier clauses are presented in the form of detailed design drawings and tables. , Whereas the detailed design drawings prepared can be straight away adopted for fabrication and erection, they are naturally strictly valid only for the definite set of assumptions like the material properties, section dimensions and other relevant data chosen as the basis for design. On the other hand, information given in the analysis tables about bending moments, shear forces and axial forces at critical sections will at times be useful to such of those designers who may, for valid reasons, like to adopt different materials, say M20 grade of concrete, for example, or deviate marginally from the section dimensions chosen. The values obtained for design bending moments, shear forces and axial forces in the present analysis should be applicable quite closely for any frame of the same overall dimensions as long as the areas and moments of inertia of the alternative sections chosen do not deviate too much from those adopted in the designs presented in the Handbook. In a large number of cases, such values will be of immense use at least in working out preliminary designs. Hence, information is presented in the form of design tables svhich give the design bending moment, shear force and axial forces not only at all critical sections of the portal frames but also at the foundation level of each frame. 4.1 De&n Tables 4.1.1 Portal Frames - Tables 1 to 140 give complete information about bending moments, shear forces and axial forces at all the critical sections for each of the 140 portal frames typified in the Handbook. All the values given for the critical sections of the portal frames are for the ultimate load stage. It may, however, be noted that the combination of loadings governing the design of different critical sections may be different and hence the design bending moments, shear forces and axial forces given in each of the tables for each critical section may be from a different set of load combinations. This is appropriately accounted for whi?e considering the governing load combinations. It needs to be emphasized here that the bending moments, shear forces and axial forces given in Tables 1 to 140 give the values from the basic analysis of the portal frames. Slenderness effects are not included in the values given in these tables. Hence, any designer who wishes to make use of the values given in these tables should be careful to take into account the additional slenderness effects, wherever applicable.
SP43(S&T):1987 4.1.2 Foundations - It is still common practice in our country to design the foundations based on the allowable soil pressure at working load stage. Therefore, the critical combinations of axial force, bending moment and shear force required for the design of foundations are given for the working load stage in the later part of each of the Tables 1 to 140. Here again, it is to be noted that the data given in the tables do not take into account the additional moments caused due to slenderness of columns. Hence, while designing the foundation of the portal frames with the base of the column assumed as fixed, the additional moments due to column slenderness, if any, should be taken into account. A typical design of foundation is given in 6.5. Design of foundations has, however, not been typified in this Handhook since the soil conditions, which vary from site to site, would influence the design of foundation. Foundations supporting the frames may be designed using simple spread footings, pile foundations or caisson foundations depending upon the type of soil and type of support conditions assumed in analysis. The column heights specified in 1.1 gives the total height of column from top of foundation to the junction of . centre lines of rafter and columns. This includes 0.5 m length which is assumed below ground level. However, if firm strata is not available at this depth and the foundations are to be carried deeper, then a pedestal can be constructed as indicated in 6.5.4. 4.2 Design Drawings 4.2.1 Drawings of Portal Frames - Drawings 1 to 140 give detailed drawings of all the portal frames analyzed and designed as part of the typification programme. As mentioned earlier, the influence of the slope and wind zone on cross-sectional dimensions and reinforcement required at critical sections of the portal frame is only marginal. Hence, the same cross-sectional detailing can be adopted for all wind zones and the slopes considered, namely, 1 in 3,1 in 4 and 1 in 5. But the lengths of the rafter, the rise of the rafter at mid-span and other related geometrical quantities will be affected by the differences in geometry implied through the differences in slopes. Hence, each of the drawings 1 to 140 also contains information about the geometrical dimensions required for each of the three different slopes considered. Drawing No. 141 shows the general arrangement of RC portal frames along with its related fixtures. Three different wind loading conditions have been considered in analysis as indicated in Drawing No. 142. Specific notes are given in the relevant drawings. General notes pertaining to all drawings are also given. The drawings are directly appliable for any cast construction planned with the assumed dimensions. For prefabricated construction, however, a few modifications are needed (see 5).
in-situ
4.2.2 Drawings of Purlins and Cladding Runners For each of the four structural members, namely, the 6 m span RC purlin and cladding runner, the 12 m span PSC purlin, and the 12 m span PSC cladding runner, typical designs are worked out according to the guidelines already mentioned in the earlier clauses and the details are shown in the Drawing 143 and 144 respectively. 4.2.3 Drawing of Lugs - Details of concrete lugs required to support the purlins and bracket details of cladding runners are shown in Drawing No. 145 and 146 respectively. The fixing details of purlins and cladding runners are also given in these drawings. The bracket details for supporting the rain water gutter along with details of external gutter and valley gutter are given in Drawing No. 147. 4.2.4 Drawing of Eaves Beams - To give rigidity in longitudinal direction, eaves beams have been provided as shown in general arrangement drawing No. 141. The design of eaves beams has been typified both for 6.0 m and 12.0 m spacing of portals. Separate details have been shown for precast and cast in-situ construction in Drawing No. 148. 4.2.5 Ductility Requirements of Joints - It is found that the seismic forces do not govern the design of portal frames typified. However, the joints in the frames to be constructed in earthquake zones IV and V are to be so detailed as to ensure enough ductility according to 18:4326-1976. A typical joint detail is shown in Drawing No. 149. These joint details should be incorporated in the joints of the frames to be constructed in areas where seismic coefficient is 0.05 or more. 5. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS 5.1 Construction of Portal Frames with Precast Elements Special Precautions - If in a prefabricated construction, the connection details are so dimensioned that the members joined at the joint develop their full moment and shear carrying capacity required, then the behaviour of a prefabricated structure after jointing is essentially the same as that of a cast in-situ structure. Hence, from the point\of view of structural behaviour, a lot of thought should
go into:
a) determining the location of the joints between precast elements; and b) detailing of the joint at the chosen location.
Incidentally, the decision on the location of the joints is influenced also by the lifting capacity of the crane available at site. The method of handling individual elements and the erection procedure also have to be taken into account in detailing of the reinforcements in individual elements. The frames given in Drawing No. 1 to 140 can be constructed also out of precast elements according to the procedure described below.
SP43(S&T):1987 5.2 Suggested Sckme of Cast& and Erection The frames are cast as segments as shown in Drawing No. 150. The segments are cast flat on the ground. They are lifted in horizontal position using the points for transportation shown in Drawing No. 150. Schematic details of different types of futures used for handling precast members are given in Drawing No. 15 1. Then the columns are tilted, erected, aligned and laterally braced. Temporary bracings and other such precautions should be taken, as found necessary during erection. The columns are erected using the holes provided for erection as shown in Drawing No. 150. The distances marked as a and b in Drawing No. 150 are given in Table 141. The typical details of the connection between precast columns and foundations in the case of fixed bases and hinged bases are shown in Drawing No. 152 for the typical design worked out in 6.5.2 and 6.5.3.2. Of course, any other suitable details can also be adopted depending on the site conditions. Next, the rafter is erected in the vertical position using the holes provided for erection. The tie member shall be -suitably tightened before lifting so that there are no erection stresses induced in the rafter. After aligning, the joints are made. It is always desirable to provide the joints in the rafter at the points of contraflexure. But these points will get shifted depending on the loading condition. Hence, it is not possible to fix a permanent point of contraflexure. So there can be some bending moments in the joints. Hence, it is advisable to provide a moment resisting connection. Two typical joint details are shown in Drawing No. 153. The salient dimensions indicated in Drawing No. 153 are given in Table 142. As in the case of the connection between columns and foundations, any other suitable connection details can also be adopted depending on the field conditions. The basic aim during erection should be to commence and complete the erection of an end bay or group of bays in which bracing has been incorporated before proceeding with the erection of the remainder of the structure. Components of the end bay or bays will require support until the bracing has been completed. Purlins and cladding runners should not be relied upon to provide stability. When permanent bracings are included elsewhere in the building than in the end bay, erection should commence at the bay or group of bays where they have been incorporated, unless temporary bracing is used. Where nature of design precludes erection in the foregoing manner, proper steps should be taken to provide alternative support. Precast reinforced concrete, and prestressed concrete purlins and cladding runners are handled at the support points during erection and these are shown in the respective drawings. They should be lifted in the same position in which they are to be finally placed at site. 5.3 Suggested Locations of Joints - Although one should try to have a joint with sufficient moment resisting capacity, it is always an advantage to have
6
the joints at the point of contraflexure or at least in a zone with very small bending moments. Table 141 gives the information about the recommended points at which joints and lifting hooks can be provided in the rafters and in the columns for all the 140 frames typified in this Handbook. The main reinforcement in the precast column and rafter members need not undergo any change from what has been given in Drawing No. 1 to 140 as they are found to be adequate to withstand possible handling stresses also. 5.4 Bracing - Even though bracing may appear to be a secondary matter, it is highly important and deserves careful attention. Probably more failures, or at least unsatisfactory performances, have resulted from inadequate bracing than from deficiencies in main framing. There can be several alternatives by which loads can be carried to the ground and in a number of bays redundant diagonals may be used. This makes the design of bracing in even simple structures highly indeterminate. In order to ensure stability in the longitudinal direction, to take the wind forces acting on gable end and the forces due to wind drag on roof, bracings have to be provided at the rafter level and in the vertical plane between columns. Normally, these bracings are provided in the end bays - one at each end of building. If the length of the building is large, bracings are provided in some of the intermediate bays also. A typical arrangement of bracings is shown in Drawing No. 154. The diagonal bracing members can be either in concrete or in steel. Section dimensions required for the bracing members either in concrete or in steel depend on the total horizontal force coming on the building in the longitudinal direction. This, in turn, depends on the area of the gable end of the building, surface area of the roof and the wind zone in which the building is situated. A design of such a bracing in concrete and in steel for one typical case is presented in 6.6. Details of the bracings designed in the illustrative example are shown in Drawing No. 155. The bracings needed in any given case can be designed on similar lines. Typification for bracing has not been attempted since lot of variations are possible due to different design parameters like length of building, span, spacing, height, wind zone, etc. 5.5 Expansion Joints - Expansion joints have to be provided after taking into consideration various factors, such as temperature, exposure to weather, the time and season of laying of concrete. For the purpose of general guidance, however, it is recommended that structures exceeding 45 m in length shall be divided by one or more expansion joints. The structures adjacent to the joint should preferably be supported on separate columns but not necessary on separate foundations. The wind bracing is discontinuous across expansion joint and hence the bracing systems should be structurally independent in each segment of the structure separated by expansion joints.
140 is illustrated by means of an example worked out in full detail in Section 6. The design example illustrates completely the procedure to be followed in the design of purlins, cladding runners, the portal frame proper and also in the design of a suitable foundation and bracing system. For laying of asbestos cement sheets, recommendations of IS:3007(Part l&1964 shall be followed. 6. ILLUSTRATIVE DESIGN EXAMPLE
6.1 Basic Data
6.2.2.2 Wind load - The wind load acts in the horizontal plane. When the wind blows perpendicular to the ridge, the wind load on the cladding runner =0.75 x0.7 x2 xl.7 = 1.785kN/m 6.2.3 Design Forces -Effect of torsion is neglected as it is insignificant and only the effect of bending and shear is considered.
6.2.3.1 Design forces due to dead load - T&&n moment for limit state design or factored moment*
Plan area of the factory = building Span of the portal frame = Number of bay = Height of the column r above the foundation = Slope of the roof = Type of support at the base of the column = = Spacing of the frames = Location of building = Basic wind pressure Type of sheeting. =
18.0 m x 30.0 m 18.0 m 1 6.5 m 1 in 3 (18.435) Fixed 6.0 m Madras 2 kN/m AC sheeting Shear force due to factored loads V,
= 1.5 x 0.974 x 5.792 8 = 6.12 kN*m 1.5 x 0.974 x 5.79 = =4.23 kN 6.2.3.2 Design forces due to wind load (wind, blowing normal to ridge), Factored moment = 1.5 x 1.785 ~5.79~ 8 = 11.22 kN*m Factored shear force = 1.5 x 1.785 x 5.79 2 =7.75 kN
6.2.4 Design -Let the area of steel for the cladding runner is as shown. Then the moment of resistance under various load combinations is checked.
Assume building of normal permeability. 6.2 Design of the Cladding Runner - It is assumed that AC sheet cladding is provided. The sheets are supported on RC cladding runners spaced at 1.70 m centre-to-centre. The width of the frame is 400 mm. 6.2.1 Span - Effective span of the cladding runner = 6 000-10-10-95-95 = 5 790 mm. 6.2.2 Loads
1
300
Weight of roof material = 17 kg/m2 (including extra weight due to overlaps and fasteners) The dead load acts in the vertical plane. Assume Lshaped cladding =250 mm x 300 mm runner of size x50mm =0.17 x 1.7 = 0.289 kN/m Weight of the sheet Self-weight of the cladding runner =(0.2x 0.05 + 0.30 x 0.05) x 25 =0.625 kN/m =0.035 x 1.7 = 0.060 kN/m
7
Miscellaneous load
*The term factored moment means the moment characteristic loads multiplied by the appropriate partial safety factor.
due to value of
DEAD
LOAD
I
ro-0035 -t+
+t
r0.45
fck
at2
Factored
moment
200
= 1.78 percent
50 x 225 From Table 13 of 18:456-1978, design shear stress, 7~ = 0.78 N/mm* > 0.38 N/mm. Hence safe, Hence, minimu; web steel according to 25.5.1.6 of 18:456-1978 may be provided.
=o
~360 N/mm*
f St2
Using M 25 concrete, strength,
compressive 6.2.4.2 Dead and wind load - The section is designed for the simultaneous action of the dead and wind load. Two cases are considered. Case 1 : Cladding runner on the leeward side when the wind blows perpendicular to the ridge with internal pressure : Factored moment due to = 6.12 kN.m dead load, MUD Factored moment due to = 11.22 kN.m wind load, M, w Resultant factored moment, M,,
= ~6.122t11.222 = 12.78 kN.m
f ck
Compressive force in concrete, C =u.36 fckXub =0.36 x 25 x 25 x300 =67 500 N Tensile force in steel, T =201 x 360 =79360N>C Limiting moment of resistance, M, , Lim
=67 500 x (225 - 0.42 x 25) x 1O-6 ~14.48 > 6.12 kN.m
Inclination The section is designed for factored shear due to dead load neglecting the horizontal leg. Factored shear force, Vu = 4.23 kN 8
tan-l.
I )
(6.12)
11.22
= 28.61
323
=350
x 113 f
71 383
=39 550 + 71 383 =110933N Resultant tensile force, T =342 x 113 + 360 x 201 =38646+72360 =111006 = c
Hence, the assumed neutral axis is alright. Taking the moment of all the compressive forces about the top fibre, distance of centre of compression from top fibre, 64.2 F = 34 060 x -t 2 39 550 x 35 =115mm =104mm * t 110 933 = 54.76 mm
37 323 x (;
x85.8 + 64.2)
254-150
From strain diagram, (349 - 54.76) x lo = 0.002 7 150 Hence, the assumed section is alright. 0.003 5 x 104 tst1 = 150 0.003 5 x 199
est2 = =
= 29.0 kh/rn
0.0024 Case 2 : Cladding runner on the windward side, when the wind blows perpendicular to the ridge with internal suction: 0.004 6 Factored moment due to dead load, MUo = 6.12 kN/m Factored moment due to wind load, M,,w = 11.22 kN/m Resultant factored moment, Mu = d6.122+11.222 = 12.78 kN.m
150 From stress-strain curve for steel: Stress, fsc f St1 fst2
= 350 N/mm2
= 342 N/mm2 = 360 N/mm2 9
SP43(S&T):1987
Inclination of the neutral axis with the vertical f stl = 295 N/mm2 f st2 = 361 N/mm2 Force in the steel, = 28.61 Assume the depth of the neutral axis to be 90 mm Solving graphically, d,, = 90 - 33.9 = 56.1 mm Fstz=
d stl =129.7 - 90 = 39.7 mm d st2 =241 - 90 = 151 F SC
=
113 x335
=37 855 N
113x361
=40793N
Compressive force in concrete, ~0.45 x25 x?4 x96 x38.6 + (0.45 t 0.28) x A x 25 x ?4 x(162+96)x 28 t M x0.28 x 25 (23.4 x 56 + 102 x 23.4) = 20 844 + 32 960 + 12 940 =66744N
/
Resultant
compressive force, C
=37855+66744=104599N Resultant tensile force, 7 = 59 295 + 40 793 = 100088N-c c. Hence, the assumed neutral axis is ahight. Taking moment of all the compressive forces about the top .fibre, distance of centre of compression from top fibre, ~
_f=
Moment of the tensile forces about the centre of compression, M,, him = _[59 295 (129.7 - 29.8) + 40 793 (241 - 29.8)] x lo = 14.53 kN/m > 12.78 kN/m
Strain,
e,,
= 0.003 5 90
x 56.1 = 0.002 2
x 39.7 = 0.0015
x 151 =O.O058
Hence, the assumed section is alright for the combination of the dead load and wind load moments. The section is designed for the maximum factored shear due to wind load neglecting the vertical leg. Factored shear force, Vu = 7.75 kN IO
From the stress-strain curve for steel, Stress, f,, = 335 N/mm2
SP 43 (S & T):1987 Nominal shear stress, 7, = z-5_! _9 50 X275 = 0.56 N/mm2 Percentage artical leg, Pt = of steel nelgecting 113X IO0 50X275 =082 . Internal pressure Design shear stress of the concrete, from Table 13 of IS:45&1978, rc = 0.59 N/mm2 > 0.56N/mm2 =0.8X0.75x2 = 1.2 kN/m2 = 1.2 x 1.4 = 1.68 kN/m the steel in the Live load on the purlin = 1.4 x0.581 = 0.8lkN/m. 6.3.2.3 Wind load - Since the height of the entire structure is less than 10 m, the basic wind pressure = 0.75 p Wind blowing parallel to the ridge gives the maximum wind load on the purlin according to 18:875-1964.
according to
Assuming 6 mm diameter mild steel as single legged web reinforcement, spacing of the web steel, s,, = Aw xfy 0.4 b 28x250 z,z= 350 mm 0.4 x 50 spacing according to .: = 0.75 x 225 = 169 mm Therefore, provide 6 mm single legged web steel at 160 mm centre-to-centre in both the legs.
6.3 Design of the Purlins - It is assumed that the shed is covered with asbestos sheets supported by purlins placed at 1.40 m centre-to-centre. 6.3.1 span - Effective span of the purlin = 6000-10-10-95-95 = 5 790 mm 6.3.2 Loads
6.3.2.1 Dead load
Component
= 3.18 kN.m Component of tangential plane, the bending moment in, the
= 1.06 kN.m
x
Shear force in the normal leg, I/n = 2.32 XCos 18.4 = 2.20 kN Shear force in the tangential leg,
V Dt = 2.32 x sin 18.4
Weight of the sheet = 0.17 x 1.4 = 0.238 kN/m Self-weight of the purlin = (0.20 + 0.20) x 0.05 x 25 = 0.50 kN/m Miscellaneous loads = 0.035 x 1.4 = 0.049 kN/m = 0.238 t 0.50 + 0.049 Total dead load = 0.787 kN/m - 0.80 kN/m 6.3.2.2 18:875-1964,
Live load Live load
= 0.73 kN 6.3.3.2
Design forces due to the live load
according
to
(18.4 - 10)
= 3.39 kN.m
11
SP 43 (S & T): 1987 Shear force in the vertical plane = 0.81 x 5.79 2
Case 2: 0.9 DL t 1.5 WL
Factored moment in the normal plane, = 2.35 kN Component of the live load bending moment the normal plane,
ML,, =
M 2 = 0.9 x 3.18 - 1.5 x7.04 in = 7.70 kN.m Factored moment in the tangential plane,
= 3.22 kN.m Component of the live load bending the tangential plane,
ML, =
0.9 x 2.20 - 1.5 x 4.86 = - 5.31 kN shear force in the tangential plane,
Factored
Vut2 Case 3:
=
Factored moment in the normal plane, Shear force in the tangential plane,
VLt
Mun3
1.2x3.18+1.2x3.22-1.2x7.04
6.3.3.3
M ut3
= 1.68 x 5.792
-OS+?kN plane,
= 1.76 kN 6.3.4 Design - The purlin is reinforced as shown in the figure below: with steel
plane,
-P=t
plane,
ET
l-#lO
'l-#lO
50
l-#12
= 2.21 kN
= 10.12 kN.m
12
Inclination
13= tan
t40793
= 63 308 N 2: c Hence, the depth of the neutral axis assumed is alright. Taking the moment of all the compressive forces about the top fibre, distance of centre of compression from top fibre, x= 0.45 x 25 63 559 2 From the strain diagram, 0.003 5 esc = -x25 57 0.003 5 Est 1 = -x22 37 E
st2 =
dstr = 79257
= 22mm
80x24 2
2 x +x24+ 3
(158 + 80) 2
7 x41 J
+23305x32
Strain,
= 0.001 4
Moment of the tensile forces about of compression, M,, Lim = [22 515 x (79-34)
the centre
0.003 5 57x212
+ 40 793 (269-34)
= 0.013 0
= 295 N/mm2
1 = =
Hence, the assumed section is alright for the combination of dead load and live load moments.
285 N/mm2 361 N/mm2 6.3.4.2 Dead load and wind load 7.7 F---
+ o.952
F stl =79x285
13
226 - 55 = 171 mm
Strain,
esc =
Moment of the tensile forces about the centre of compression, MU, Lim = 28 519 (205 + 226 - 2 x26) = 10.8 kN.m > 7.76 kN.m x lo*
0.003 Estl = ~ 55
0,003 fst2
= ~
5
x
55
171 = 0.010 8
Hence, the assumed section is alright for the combination of the dead load and the wind load moment. The combination of the dead load, live load and the wind load does not govern the design. Shear in the normal leg is maximum for the combination of the dead load and the live load, Factored shear force, VU = 6.65 kN Nominal shear stress, 7, = 6.65 x 10 50 x 225
= 1 .OO nercent 50 x225 * Design shear stress of the concrete from Table 13 of 18:456-1978, n. = Tc = 0.64N/mm2 > 0.59 N/mm2 according to
113x100
F stl F st2
79x361
= 28519
Shear in the tangential leg is maximum for the combination of the dead load and the live load, Factored shear force, Vut = 2.21 kN 14
79 x 361 = 28 519 N
2.21 lo3 x
50 x 175
Mu
Referring to Table 3 of SP:16, for ~ Percentage of steel(p) = 0.55 0.55 x 400 x 765 pbd Ast= _ = 100 100 Provide six 20mm area of 1 885 mm2 diameter = 1 683 mm2
bd2
= 1.802 7
= 0.25 N/mm2 Percentage of steel neglecting the steel in the normal leg, 79 xl00 = 0.90 percent Pt = 50 x 175 Design shear stress of the concrete from Table 13 of 183456-1978, rc = 0.61 N/mm2 > 0.25 N/mm2 according to
bars, providing
an
M,
= 38 kN.m
= 0.162
Assuming 6 mm diameter mild steel single legged web reinforcement, spacing of the web steel, Asv x fy S =
0.4b =
= 628mm2
415
175 = 131 mm Provide three 16 mm diameter bars, providing an area of 603 mm2, which is nearly equal to the required. At Section E: Sagging, factored moment, M, = 236 kN.m Mu -=
bd2 236 x 10
Therefore, provide 6 mm diameter single legged web steel at 130 mm centre-to-centre in both the legs. 6.4 Design of the Portal Frame - The design forces at various critical sections of the frame are taken from Table 11. 6.4.1 Design of the Principal Rafter - Assume the cross-sectional dimensions = 400 mm x 800 mm. a) Design for flexure At Section C: Hogging, factored from Table 11. moment (M,) = 422 kN.m
= 1.008
400~767~
= 1.008
Assuming 20 mm dia bars, Fe 415 and M 25 concrete, Effective depth (d) = 800-25-l 0 = 765 mm Referring to Table D of SP: 16, Limiting moment of resistance (MU, Lim) = 3.45 bd2
Mu,
= 895.86
mm2
100
Provide five 16 mm diameter bars giving an area of 1 005 mm. b) Design for shear At Section C: Factored shear force = 147 kN
Since Mu, Lim > M,, the principal rafter has to be designed as a singly reinforced beam, M, -=
bd2
vu rv = -=
bd
= 0.48 N/mm2
= 0.55
d=40t d -=D P
Design shear stress of the concrete from Table 13 of IS:456-1978, rc = 0.51 N/mm2 Hence, it is O.K. Hence, nominal web reinforcement 25.5.1.6 of 13:456-1978 is provided.. according to > 0.48 N/mm2
50
800
-=
fckbD
M -=
fckbD*
= 0.066
According to 25.5.1.5 and 25.5.1.6 of IS: 4561978, spacing of the stirrups should be least of the following :
As+ fv
l)S,= 0.4 b =
P = 0.925 percent
A, = 2 960 mm2
Hence, provide 8 mm diameter, two legged stirrups at 260 mm centre-to-centre for the entire length of the rafter. 6.4.2 Design of the Column At Section B: Factored moment, M, = 422 kN.m Factored axial force = 191 kN Column height (H) = 6.5 mabove the foundation 1.5 H Slenderness ratio along major axis = ~
= -
Therefore, A,, = A,, = 1 480 mm2 Provide ten 20 mm diameter bars giving an area of 3 141 mm. Provide 8 mm diameter lateral ties. According to 25.5.3.2 of 13:456-1978, lateral ties is the minimum of: 1)4OOmm 2) 16 x20=32Omm 3) 48 x.8 = 384 mm Hence, provide 8 mm diameter 300 mm centre-to-centre. lateral ties at spacing of
= 12.19 2: 12
Slenderness ratio along minor axis = 0.75 x 6.5 = 12.19 = 12 0.4 Hence, the column is designed as a short column. along the minor axis accord6 500 800 ing to 24.4 of 18:456-1978 =t 500 30 =13t27=40mm Factored bending moment along the minor axis Minimum eccentricity
6.5 Design of the Foundation - The illustrative problem is the foundation for columns with fixed base and the forces for which the foundation is designed are taken from Table 11. These values are reproduced below: Foundation
Load
DL LL WL
156 26 20
167 41 31
58 15 15
= 191x 0.04
= 7.6 kN.m
This is negligible and the nominal reinforcement provided along the longer face can take care of this moment. Provide equal reinforcement on two opposite sides and assuming 20 mm diameter bars, 16
Typical design of the foundation is worked out considering the column to be cast in-situ and also to be precast.
SP 43 (S & T):1987 6.5.1 Case 1: Cast in-situ Construction - Assume the depth of the foundation to be 750 mm. Moment,M=(167 t41 t31)tO.75(58tlSt15) = 305 kN.m Totalaxialload,P=156+26-20=162kN Assuming the self-weight percent of the above load, of footing to be 10
P $=
Bx=p
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .(1)
+-0.4)=M
= 1.711 m
X = 0.594 m
D = 2.30 m
Since the eccentricity is very large and there is no possibility for reversal of moments, owing to small wind load moment compared to the dead load and live load moments, an eccentric footing is adopted. The size of the column is 400 mm x 800 mm. Safe bearing capacity of the soil = 400 kN/m2 (assumed) Maximum permissible edge pressure = 1.25 x400 = 500 kN/m
6.5.1.1 Structural design for bending moment From the forces given, it can be seen that the load combination governing the design is DL +LL. Under this loading condition, the net pressure distribution is as shown below. Ml 5 concrete and Fe415 steel are, used. Let cover to centre of reinforcement Moment, M-167 be 50 mm
effective depth = 750 - 50 = 700 mm t 41 t 0.70 (58 + 15) = 259 kN.m Total axial load, P = I 56 t 26 = 182 kN Let maximum pressure be p, then pxx 2 1.2=182ands $)=259
P.F_xl.2(2.3-0.4-
Solving the above equations, we, get P = 212 kN/m2 and x=1.43m
ELEVATION
ELEVATION
PLAN
PLAN
17
moment
about
section 1.43 3 )
BB,
Hence, the section provided is adequate. Since the bending moment in the other direction being very small, only nominal reinforcement is provided. 0.12 Area of steel required =-x 100 ( 200;750 2300x
MU
=I82
x105x(2.3-0.8--
= 279.4 kN.m
M
U=
bd2
279.4 x lo6
400 x (700)2
= 1 43
= 1311 mm2 1 Provide 12 bars of 12 mm diameter (A,, = b 357 mm2) Details of the foundation No. 155(a). 6.5.2
Foundation
Case 2: Precast Column and Cast insitu - A socket type connection is adopted. Such a connection is generally accepted as a good detail for flexurally rigid footings and is also simple to achieve. Overall plan dimensions of the foundation are arrived at as illustrated in Case 1 : cast in-situ construction. Hence, only the design of the socket is illustrated here.
2x3
) 1.5
Net factored shear force, Vu - 5 (39.1.1 of IS: 456-1978)= 219.9 = 135 kN Nominal shear stress, 7 = Design shear stress, rc = 0.438 N/mm 135 x lo3 1200 x 434
6.5.2.1 Depth of socket - The socket is designed for bearing stress due to the column on the inner and outer faces of the socket. Bearing stress on the faces due to moment is shown below:
= 0.26 N/mm2
k!!!
case, governing
load combi-
Assuming the depth of the socket to be 800 mm, the factored design bending moment, M, = (208 + 73 x 0.40) 1.5 = 356 kN.m Factored design horizontal force = 73 x 1.5
SP 43 (S & T): 1987 The two side faces are presumed to take the full moment acting as cantilevers as they are very stiff in the direction of bending. The outside face of the socket will crack and become ineffective. The inner face will be under compression but is neglected. This will make the design conservative. Total factored = 400 kN.m Width of cantilever = 2 x 250 = 500 mm Effective depth, d = 250 t 75 t 800 t 75 t 25 +y = 1350mm M -=
bd2
moment
on
cantilever
base
= (208 + 73 x 0.8) 1.5 = 1lOkN Permissible bearing stress = 0.45 fck = 0.45 x 25 = 11.25 N/mm2 (according to 34.4 of IS:456-1978) Equating resisting and applied moments, 400 x lo6 = 0.44 500x1350x1350 11.25x%.~4OOh/2 = 356 x lo6 Solving for h, h = 689 mm Hence,provide an insertion of 800 mm. For 800 mm insert, let actual bearing stress be fr . From Table 1 of SP: 16, pt = 0.129 However, nominal steel of 0.2 percent may be
x 1 350 x 500
= 1350mm. = 356 X lo6 N/mm fr = 8.3 N/mm Additional bearing stress due to shear force 110x1000 =----= 0.34 N/mm2 800 X 400 Total bearing stress = 8.3 + 0.34 = 8.64 = N/mm2 < 11.25 N/mm2 (permissible) 6.5.2.2 insertion of all sides of thickness for
Design of the walls - For grouting and
Use twelve 12 mm diameter bars (A, = 1 357 mm2) spread over both the faces of wall. . Also, the bearing forces on the socket face have to be transferred to the side walls. This will generate a separation tension at the joint. Adequate steel is needed to transfer this tension. Total tension at the joint 1 =-_x 8.64~400 2 lo3 =801 kN 1 Permissible stress in steel = 11; x 415 x_800 2 +llo
the column, a clearance of 75 mm on the column is given. A 250 mm wall the bore is chosen.
= 360.8 N/mm2 Area required to resist the tension = 801 x 1000 360.8 = 2 220 mm2 Provide twenty 12 mm diameter bars (A, = 2 262 mm) These can be dispersed on both inner and outer faces, as loops in the walls of the socket. Details of the foundation No. 151 (a). 19 are shown in Drawing
SP 43 (S & T): 1987 6.5.3 Design of Foundation for a Column with Hinged Base - Even though the problem taken as illustration is one with fixed base column, the design of foundations for column with hinged base is also illustrated. 6.5.3.1 Case 1: Cast in-situ construction Here, the foundation forces are taken from Table 81 for the frame with the same configuration but with a hinged base. Of course, in the case of column with hinged base, it is assumed that the footing as a whole will rotate relieving of the moments because of the compressibility of the soil. The case of structural hinge is not considered and it is not necessary to provide a structural hinge ai all. The problem illustrated assumes a safe bearing capacity of soil of 100 kN/m2 . Column size : 500 mmx 500 mm Foundation forces at service load stage taken from Table 81 are reproduced below:
Load AxiaZ Force (kN) fCompr&sion h Tension Shear Force (W
-ICAL
Adopt an overall depth of 250 mm. Therefore, effective depth, d = 250 - 40 - y =192mm Therefore, %bd2
- 12
DL LL WL
191 26 -
14
41 8 17
= 1.676
Assuming the self-weight of the foundation 10 percent of the above. 217 x 1.1 Area of bearing required = 100 = 2.4 m2 Adopt a square footin of size,
- 100 x500x
0.550
16OOmmx1600mm Upward bearing pressure on footing =217 1.6x 1.6 = 85 kN/m2 a) Flexural design Governing load case is (DL + LL) Bending moment at the face of the column =85x1.6 x o.552 2 = 20.6 kN.m Ml 5 concrete and Fe 415 steel are used. 20
= 0.73 percent
-12=183mm
SP43(S&T):1987 Punching shear = 176.9 x 1.5 x lo3 4x692 xl83 = 0.52 N/mm2
Permissible shear stress in punching = 0.25 Jfck = 0.25 Ji? = 0.97 N/mm > 0.52 N/mm Hence, it is O.K.
c) Flexural Shear pt =
0.73 percent
From Table 13 of IS:456-1978 Design shear stress rC = 0.53 N/mm Dimensions at the critical section: b=500+2
D =
Size of the column = 400 mm x 800 mm Assume the size of the pedestal to be 600mmx 1 OOOmm
Since
xl92=884mm
232.5 mm mm
design. Factored axial force, ~~=(l56tO.6xl.Oxl.2x25t26)1.5 =3OOkN Factored bending moment, M, = [167 t 41 t (58 t 15) 1.21 1.5 =443kN.m
4
d = 232.5 - 58 = 174.5
Flexural shear = 85 x 1.6 x 0.358 = 48.7 kN Nominal shear stress, v= 48.7 x 1.5 x lo3 884 x 174.5 = 0.47 N/mm2 < 0.53 N/mm2 Hence, it is O.K. The details of the reinforcement is shown in Drawing No. 156(b). A pedestal is provided since the development length in compression for 20 mm diameter bars is 905 mm.
foundation
PU
fckbD a=MU
f&D2
= 0.02
d=40+11=51mm
d -_ _ -51 = 0.5 D 100 From Chart 32 of SP:l6, P f ck
6.5.3.2 Case 2: Precast column and cast m-situ - Structural design of the foundation will be the same as that illustrated above. The walls of the socket is subjected to very small forces since there is no bending moment and hence only nominal reinforcement is provided. The details of the reinforcement for the foundation are shown in Drawing No. 151 (b). 6.5.4 Design of a Pedestal - Where embedment below ground level of the columns has to be more than 500 mm because of firm soil available at greater depth, a pedestal can be provided. A typical design of the pedestal for 1200 mm height is illustrated below. The maximum height of pedestal should normally be limited to 1 200 mm. 21
=0.015
Therefore, P = 0.015 x 25 = 0.375 percent Provide 0.5 percent of the cross-sectional area of the pedestal according to 33.4.3 of 13:456-1978. Therefore, area of steel required =0.005x600x 1 000=3000mm2
Provide eight 22 mm diameter bars, four on each face. Provide 2 bars of 16 mm dia on each of the longer face. Provide 8 mm dia links at 300 mm centre-to-centre.
66.1 Gable End Forces 6.6.1.1 Due to wind pressure on gable end. above base.
SECTlON
OF THE W.lESTAL
Design of Bracing - The following example illustrates the typical design of a bracing system for a factory building of span 18 m and length 30 m made of concrete portal frames having the following salient features :
6.6
Span of the frame = 18 m Spacing of the frames = 6 m Height of the frame = 6.5 m Roof slope = 1 in 3
Nodal forces: At point 1 = 1A(5.7 t 6.7) 3x: At point 2 = ?4,(6.7 + 8.2) 4.5x+4 1.4 At point 3 = ?4 (8.2 + 8.7) 3.0 x-= 2 6.6.1.2 Due to drag force on roof = 13.0 kN = 23.5 kN 17.8 kN
Nodal forces : At point 1 = At point 2 = The bracing design is worked out for a shed of 5 spacing with the arrangement of bracings as shown above. Basic wind pressure, P = 2 kN/m2 Pressure on wall = 0.7 p = 0.7 x 2 = 1.4 kN/m 22 30 2 3*16 x0.05 = 2.4 kN
x 0.85 = 3.6 kN 3o 4.74 2 30 x 1.58 x2 x 0.05 = 2.4 kN At point 3 = 2 Total nodal force, or =13.0+2.4=15.4kN
F2 F3 = =
JGFa
2C-2 kN -
274 kN -
x
A
T
154 _----- kN
X
X
1
6m
d
27.1 kN
a=Bm
i
1 P=27.1 dn 6 = 39.4 kN
Vertical bracing
a=6m
P= 15.4 &j.02+j.72
6 = 21.3 kN
SP43(S&T):1987 Since the rafter bracing and vertical bracing is not in same plane, therefore, some additional stresses will come on portal rafters which can be rechecked, if required. Two alternatives have been worked out for design of bracing, one using steel and other using concrete. 6.63 Case 1: Steel bracing a) Rafter bracing Diagonal length = J6.322+ Axial force = 8.72 m = 39.4kN
6.6.4 Case 2: Concrete Bracing- Use M 25 concrete and Fe 415 steel. a) Rafter bracing Axial force, P = 39.4 kN Factored axial force, Pu = 1.5 x 39.4 = 59.1 kN Consider cross-section of size 150 x 150 mm Self-weight acting vertically downwards 8.72 = 25 x 0.15 x 0.15 x 6.00 = 0.82 kN/m Bending moment at mid-height (span) due to self-weight =0.82 x 62 8 = 3.7 kN.m
.
The tension diagonal member is designed and the same section is provided for the other diagonal. Consider two angles ISA: 50 x 50 x 6 mm placed back to back, with a 10 mm gusset. Least slenderness ratio = L which may be allowed. Net area = 2 x 5.68 - 2 x 0.6 X 2.15 = 8.78 Cm2 * Net axial capacity = 0.6 x 25 000 x 8.78 = 131.7 kN > 39.4 kN
r
=-
872
= 354
2.46
Therefore, factored moment, M, = 1.5 x 3.7 = 5.6 kN.m The compression member is designed and the same section is provided for the other diagonal also. = 59.1 kN = 5.6 kN.m MU Effective length = 8.72 m Additional facto;d moment due to slenderness,
Pu (compression)
50X50X6
/YA
where
t . 4b) Vertical bracing Diagonal length = Axial force = dG2 21.3 kN = 8.28 m
PU= factoled axial road in compresslull, D = depth of cross-section at right angles to major axis, and 1 = effective length in respect of the major ex axis,
Mu =
8.72 ( 0.15 1
The tension diagonal member is designed and the same section is provided for the other diagonal. Consider two angles ISA:50 x 50 x 6 mm placed back to back with a 10 mm gusset. Net axial capacity = 131.7 kN > 21.3 kN Hence, it is O.K. The details of the steel bracing designed above are shown in Drawing No. 154. 24
= i5.0 kN.m = 20.6 kN.m 59.1 x 103 = 0.105 25 x150 x150 20.6 x lo6 25x150~150~ = 0.244
P=25xO.12 = 3 percent
At =
= 0.20
p = 25 x 0.20
fck '
= 5 percent
Ati= 5
= 675mm2 150 Therefore, adopt four 16 mm diameter bars as main reinforcement giving Ast = 804 mm. Adopt 6 9 links at 150 centre-to-centre as transverse reinforcement. The reinforcement and the connection details in the case of steel and concrete rafter bracing is shown in Drawing No. 154. 6.6.5 Gable End Columns
x150x
100 Therefore, adopt four 20 mm diameter bars as main reinforcement giving Ast = 1 256 mm2. Adopt 6 $?r links at 150 centre-to-centre as transverse reinfcncement. b) Vertical bracing Axialforce,p= 21.3kN
Factored axial force, I = 32.0 kN Consider a cross-section of size 150 X 150 mm Self-weight acting vertically downwards =25x0.15x0.15 = 0.78 kN/m Bending moment at mid-height (span) due to selfweight = 0.78 x ; = 3.5 kN.m Factored moment, M, = 5.3 kN.m The compression member is designed and the same section is provided for the other diagonal also. Pu (compression) = 32.0 kN i-5.3 kN.m WI = 8.28 m Effective length Additional factored moment due to slenderness, 8.28 2 M = 32.0x 0.15 ( 0.151 2.000 = 7.3 kN.m TotalM,, = 5.3 t 7.3 = 12.6 kN.m From Chart 34 of SF: 16,
P =
Height = 6.5 t f
x 6 = 8.5 m
r.
- 28.33
23 0
Total I&, = 113.8 + 4.6 = 118.4 kN.m Factored axial load, Pu (due to DL) =0.3 x 0.4 x 8.5 x 25 x 1.5 = 38.25 kN -= fckbD2
Mu
= 0.099
-= f&D
d = d D
=51
-=
0.15
f,k
P
0*07
1.75 300x400=2100mm2 100
A st =-x
Use six 22 mm diameter bars (At = 2 280 mm2) and 8 mm stirrups at spacing 0.75 d = 0.75 x (400-51) centre-to-centre = 260 mm
frames, three different roof slopes, two different support conditions for columns at the base (futed and hinged), three different wind zones with three possible wind actions and five different earthquake zones. Again the analysis has been worked out for single bay, two-bay, three-bay and four-bay portal frames. It has been found that because of the low rise of the buildings considered, forces in the members, even due to the lowest basic wind pressure of 1.0 kN/m were more than those due to the most severe earthquake zone forces. Furthermore, it was found that the governing design forces and moments in the members of the portal frames did not vary much with variation in wind zone or slope of the roof. Total number of possible designs, considering all the above variables, could be as high as 17 280; too large number to be accommodated in any practicable typification scheme. Hence, typified designs have been worked out taking into account major parameters like span, column height, spacing of frames, number of bays and type of support conditions as variables. Then the number of problems brought down to a reasonable limit of 140 cases. The other variables play only a minor role and their worst effects were taken into account. The analysis results in the form of design forces and moments at various critical sections of the portal frames and foundation forces at service stage are given. The design results have been presented in the form of detailed drawings to enable ready execution. For the purpose of completeness, detailed draftings for 6 and 12 m span purlins, cladding runners, and their fixing details are also furnished. For the benefit of those who prefer to adopt prefabrication technique to cast in-situ construction, possible location of joints and lifting points for all the cases have been given. Typical illustrative designs have been worked for purlins, cladding runners, frames, foundations bracing. Also the quantity of concrete and steel square metre of the plan area are worked out presented. out and per and
LOO
7. ESTIMATION OF QUANTITlES OF CONCRETE/ STEEL 7.1 Table 143 gives information about the material consumption according to the designs worked out for 140 portal frames, typified. For ease of comparison, the information is given in the form of volume of concrete per square metre of floor area and weight of steel per square metre of floor area. In any given situation the column-free span required and height of the building are more or less fixed by the functional requirements of the shed. One important parameter that can be chosen by the designer is the spacing of the frame in the longitudinal direction. In almost all the crses worked out, it has been observed that the 12m spacing is more economical than the 6 m spacing. The difference in the cost is about 40 percent. If one has to cover large areas, but at the same time if there is no restriction on the minimum column-free areas required, it is obvious that multibay portal frames will be cheaper than portal frames of single large span. From the data presented in the tables, it can be seen that the cost per square metre is less by about 15 percent when the large spins of 24 to 30 meters are sub-divided into 2 or 3 shorter spans. 8. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 8.1 Reinforced concrete portal frames without cranes have been analyzed for five different spans, four different column heights, two different spacings of 26
The following conclusions can be drawn from analysis and design results, and also from quantities estimated : a) It is found that in most of the frames the horizontal deflection at top of the column governs the design of members except for a few frames of large spans and smaller column heights. b) Frames with fixed base give more economical designs compared to frames with hinged base by about 1O-30 percent. c) Multibay frames are more economical than single bay frames if there is no restriction regarding the unobstructed floor area. d) Frames of spacing 12 m are generally found to be more economical than frames of 6.0 m spacing and the economy is about 40 percent.
SP43(S&T):1987
REFERENCES
1. IS:191 l-1967*Schedule of unit weights of building materials @st revision) 2. IS:875-1964t Code of practice for structural safety of building: Loading standards (revised) Criteria for earthquake 3. IS:l893-1984 design of structures (fourth revision) Code of practice for 4. IS:456-1978 reinforced concrete (third revision) resistant concrete reinforcement: Part 1 Mild steel and medium tensile steel bars. (third revision) 8. IS:6006-1983 Uncoated stress relieved strand for prestressed concrete (first revision) 9. AC1 Standard 318-1983 Building code requirements for reinforced concrete. American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA 10. IS:800-1984 Code of practice for general construction in steel (second revision) 11. 1334326-1976 Code of practice for earthquake resistant construction of buildings (first revision) 12. IS:3007 (Part 1)1964 Code of practice for laying of asbestos cement sheetsPart 1 Corrugated sheets 13. SP:6(1)1964 IS1 Handbook for structural engineers : Structural steel sections (revised).
plain
and
5. IS:1343-1980 Code of practice for prestressed concrete (first revision) 6. IS:1786-1985 High strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement (third
revision)
7. IS:432 (Part 1) 1982 Mild steel and medium tensile steel bars and hard-drawn steel wire for
27
SP 43 (S &T):1987
TABLE 1 DESiGNFORCES
E
Spar! Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Bending Moment
Compressive
Force
Shear Force
(kM m) 50 33 46
WJ
37 56 -
(WJ
-
45 23 12
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage :
Section Designation
Forces Due to
Bending Moment
Axial Force
Shear Force
%i&zrkz
(kN.mJ IkN) 47 13
(WJ
8
lkN,
9 5 17
DL A LL WL
10 9 29
29
SP 43 (S & T):1987
TABLE 2 DESIGNFORCES E
bt%l
9.0m
Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
EI
.IB E
u,
80
A 1m I 9.0 m
AI
9 1
r-
Bending Moment
Shear Force
(kN:m) 64 44 61
(kN) -
53 28 16
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage :
Section Designation
Forces Due to
DL A LL WL
20 9 29
30
SF43(S&T):1987
TABLE 3 DESIGN FORCES
E
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
9.Om
: 12.0 m : : : : :
5.0m 1:3,1:4,1:5 Fixed
All
Section Df3ignation
Compressive
Force
Shear Force
A B c D E
95 131 106 55 23
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage :
Section Designation
Forces Due to
Axial Force
DL A LL WL
4s
ia
51
31
SP 43 (S &T):1987
TABLE 4 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
9.0 m
8 : 12.0m : : : :
: 6.5 m 1:3,1:4,1:5 Fixed All I 9.0 m
,I3 E m
W
4 ,-
c
Compressive Force Shear Force
Section Designation
Bending Moment Hogging (kN.m) 231 153 153 50 23 Sagging (kN.m) 126 90 125
(kN)
63 80 -
/kN) 109 51 33
A B c D E
Section Desigrlation
Forces Due to
DL A LL WL
41 16 113
32
!sP43(S&T):1987 .
TABLE 5 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
: 12.0m : :
6.0m 5.0m
Bending Moment
Compressive
Force
Shear Force
(kN.m) 50 66 89
(kN) II 96 -
(kNJ
76 38 11
Section Designation
Forces Due to
Axial Force
.A
Compressive (kN) 71 18 -
Tensile (kNj _ 13
DL A LL WL
50 17 23
33
SP 43 (S & T):1987 /
TABLE 6 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
sectionDesignation
7&y-7&$ (kN.m) A B c D E 141 141 141 2s 13
Bending Moment
Compressive
Force
Shear Force
(kMm) _ 68 16 105
(kN) 88 96
(kN) 18 40
15
Section Designation
Forces Due to
DL A LL WL
46 16 48
34
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation r
: :
:
1.
El
L
01
: : : :
1
12.om -
1
%
Compressive \ (kN) 79 66 -
Force
Shear Force
(kN1 81 43 25
A B C D E
,
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage :
Section Designation
Forces Due to
I f kNl 91 18 -
fkNl
26
DL A WL LL
41 14 125
35
W43(S&T):W37
TABLE 8 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
: : : : : : :
Section Designation
Compressive Force
Shear Force
(kN)
A B C D E
137 68 23
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Forces Due to Ax&l Force A Compressive (kN) 106 35 25 Tensile
Section Designation
>
shear Force
(klv/
WI
40 17 27
DL A LL WL
86 35 46
36 .
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 9 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
: 12.0m : 12.0m :
6.5 m E
Section Designation
c
Bending hiomen t
1
Compressive Force
Shear Force
Homing
(kN.m) A B c D E 264 255 255 58 42
&c@ng
(kN. m) (kN) 125 174 152 137 190 (kN) _ 141 73 30
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Axial Force * Compressive (kN) 113 35 Tensile (kN) _ 21
Section Designation
Forces Due to
DL A LL WL
81 32 96
37
SP 43 (S 8c T): 1987
TABLE 10 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
: : :
Fixed : :
Compressive Force Shear Force All
Section Designation
Bending Moment
(kN.m)
f kNl 93
IkAY 146 77 50
113 _
Section Designation
Forces Due to
Shear Forces WV 20 8 79
_ DL A LL WL 71 28 251
38
: : : : :
:
18.0m
C
Cl
A 18-O m
A 7
:
Bending Moment h Hogging (kN.m) Sagging (kN.m) 38 179 236
Section Designation I
Force
Shear Force
(kN) 147 72 15
A B C D E
Section Designation
Fore es Due to
I f kN) 156 26 -
.I
DL A LL WL
167 41 31
39
SP43 (S&T):l!%Q
TABLE 12 DESIGN:~0RCES
: 18.0 m
Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation IHogging--(kN.m) Bending Moment Sagging (kN.m)
,,., 1
0I
18.0 m
Compressive Force Shear
4 1
7
E Y-1
Q
Force
(kNl
(kN)
A B
319
212 191 -
421 421 21
_
86 222
308
C
D E
154 19
21
Section Designation
Forces Due to
Bending Moment
DL
A LL WL
152
36
180
26
39 10 31
101
16
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation (
: 18.0 m :
6.0m
E
\
j
Shear Force
Compressive Force
(kN) .158
83 32
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) Axial Force (T&zYYz (kN) 204 26 43 Shear Force (kN) (kN) 28 I 49
DL A LL WL
139 33 204
41
: 18.0m Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
: 12.0 m :
6.5m
----r
C
C E
oi A
18-O m
Section Designation
Bending Moment
Compressive
Force
Shear Force 1
(Hoasinp W.4
A B C D E 419 681 681 52 36
(kN.m)
(kN)
236 116
30
,
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage :
Section Designation
Forces Due to
DL A LL WL
252 a2 62
42
8I
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
L
: 18.0 m : 12.0 m
: 9.5 m
: 1:3,1:4,1:5 : Fixed
:All I
I I
Bending Moment
Shear Force
Hogging
(kN.m)
sagging
(kN.m) 271 358 496 (kN) 268 307 -
A B c D E
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL 229 73 202 A&l Force V Compressive (kN) 234 52 Shear Force ikN) 32 lkN) 59 20 62
43
Sp 43 (S &T):1987
TABLJ? 16 DESIGNFORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Force
Shear Force
A B C D E
Section Designation
Forces Due to
Axial Force
A
Compressive lkN) 258 52 Tensile /kN) 86
DL A LL WL
210 66 409
44
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 17 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
1
I
Bending Moment
244m
Compressive Force Shear Force
Ho&w
(W
377 334 -
WJ
A B C D E
260 129 24
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL 405 71 77
.
Axial Force (Compressive Shear Force
@NJ
313 35 -
&YJ
-
WJ
90 18
26
24
45
SP-43 (S &T):1987
TABLE 18 DESIGNFORCES E
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
: 24.0m :
6.0 m
1 A
A
I I
Compressive Force
Shear Force
A B c D E
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kn! m) DL A LL WL 378 65 173 Axial Force (compressiveTensile (kN) 350 35 _ 22 Shear Force
(kN)
(kN) 73 13 40
46
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
: 24.0m : 12.Om
: 9.5 m
: 1:3,1:4,1:5 : Fixed
:AB
:
Bending Moment A
Hogging kg&
Sectiok Designation
1
Compressive
)
Force
Shear Force
40
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment Wm) DL A LL WL 553 141 155 Axial Force h r 1 Compressive Tensile (klvl (kN) 384 70 52
47
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 20 DESIGNFORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Des&don r
Force
Shear Force
A B C D E
1043
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage :
Section Designation
Forces Due to
Bending Moment
Axial Force
(
(kn! m) (kW
Ikf+!)
100
DL A LL WL
421 70 44
21 80
48
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
: 30.0 m : :
6.0m 9.5m El Hi i! A 30.0 m
: 1:3,1:4,1:5 : Fixed
:All
.T
; I
i
Bending Moment A Compressive Force
.-
Shear Fo%e
, Hogging
(kN. m) A B C D E 1 141 1 523 1523 -
>
(klvl 542 417 iklvl 313 150 43
sagging
Wm) 600 765
Section Designation
Forces Due to
(kfV
152 29 16
DL A LL WL
662 119 45
49
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces SectdonDesignation I
I
Bending Moment A
30.0 m
I
Shear Force
sagg+lg (kN.m)
(kN) -
A B c D E
321 164 28
959
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN. m) Axial Force 7 (kN) 398 44 32 /kN) Shear Force (kN) 117 22 34
DL A LL WL
50
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismiczones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation
: 30.0m : 12. Om
: 9.5 m
:I
E Ln 6, A
: 1:3,1:4,1:5 : Fixed
:All A 3o.um -i
Bending Moment
Compressive Forck
(&
Shear Force
(kN)
A B
732 214
880
459 219
611 -
C
D E
1 122
62
-. .
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage :
Section Designaiion Rvces Due to Bending Moment I (kN.m) (kN1 (kNl Axial Force Shear Force
(kN)
215 59 32
DL A LL WL
905 237 90
450 87 -
70
51
SP 43 (S &T):1987
TABLE. 24 DESIGN FORCES
.
E
: 30.0m Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones DesignUltimate F&es
A n I
30.0 m
Bending Moment
Compressive
Force
Shear Force
(kN)
480 240 52
A B
C
D E
Section Designation
Forces Due to
Axial Force
(kN)
64
(kN) 159 43 67
DL A LL WL
487 87 -
52
!P 43 (S & T):l987
TABLE 25 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones
:;j
90m
I I
DesignUltimate Forces
Section Designation
Compressive Force
Shear Force
(kN.m)
(kN) 40 53
(kN)
68 56 56 13 13 9 83 29 40 33 31 39 25 35
43 21 16 27 48 39 50 -
H I
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Des&nation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL 20 9 26 Ax121Force Shear Force (kN) (kN) 9 5 4 14 26 15
(kN) 46 12 -
DL I LL WL 21
14 28 -
53
. SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 26 DESIGNFORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation r
:
Bending Moment A Hogging (kN.m) 99 70 70 13 10 8 101 50 64 Sagging (kn! m) Compressive Force 1 (kN1 36 39 (kN) 48 56 78 23 19 33 58 Shear Force
40 40 49 39 29 -
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL DL Z LL WL 20 8 46 43 Axial Force wCompressive /kNl 57 12 19 26 Shear Force /kNI lkN) 7 3 21 19
93 28 -
54
SP43 (S&T):1987
TABLE 27 DESIGNFORCES
Span
Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
: 9.0m
: 12.0 m : 5.0m : 1:3,1:4,1:5 : Fixed : All :
Bending Moment rHogging_ (kn! m) 152 131 131 20 18 15 194 58 80 53 13 91 58 54 118 142 (kN.m) Compressive Force Shear Force I
s.om
9.0 m
FNI
100 48 31 62 113 -
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN. m) DL A LL WL DL I LL WL 49 18 52 54 155 55 51 29 Axial Force A Compressive (kN) 83 25 9 Tensile /kN) Shear Force (kNj 22 9 29
--
55
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Se&bon Designation (
9.0m
:All
:
Bending Moment A Hogging (kNm) 201 143 143 25 18 15 209 99 78 83 102 69 54
I I
Mm
I I
m.om
I ,
Shear Force
Compressive I (kN) 64 82
Force
Sagging (khJ.m)
(kN
A ,B C D E F G H
I
129
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section DesipMtion Forces Due to Bending Moment (kh? m) DL A LL WL DL I LL WL 86 42 16 92 162 56 Axial Force [Comprersive (klvl 88 24 Shear Force (klvl 31 52 (klv:, 16 6 42 31
56
SP 43 (S c&T):1987
TABLE 29 DESIGNFORCES
: 1:3,1:4,1:5 : Fixed
: AU L 1 120 m
12.Qm
:
Bending Moment A Hogging (kN. m) 127 137 137 13 10 10 174 29 60 76 48 35 199 223 _sagging (kN.m) Compressive Force ) (kN) a4 93 73 35 17 41 79 (kN) Shear Force
A B c D E F G H I
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kn! m) DL A LL WL 58 19 27 29 Axial Force Shear Force (kN) (kN) 25 9 8 14
(kN) 70 17
DL
149 36 -
34
15
LL WL
57
SP 43 (S & T):l!B7
TABLE 30 DESIGN FORCES
c
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designatioh
: 12.0m
: 6.0m :
6.5m
: 1:3,1:4,1:.5 : Fixed
:All
:
Bending Moment (Hogging (kN. m)
I
Compressive Force Shear Force
(kn! m)
(kN) 92
iklvl 13 36 20
A B C D E F G H Z
91 -
99
46 83
,130
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kn! m) DL A LL WL 51 17 44 Axial Force A Compressive /kN) 16 17 6 Tensile (klv! Shear Force fklvl 18 6 18
DL Z LL WL
46
129 31 -
34
19
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
: 12.0m : 6.0m
: 9.5 m
il
c
I 1 12.0 m
e
2
E.
: 1:3,1:4,1:5 : Fixed
:All
I
I 1. 120n i
&
:
Bending Moment (Hogging (kN.m)
i
73 36 27 51 89
Compressive Force
Shear Force
ikN) 71 65
(kN)
A B C D E F G H I
103
148
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kn! m) DL A LL WL 41 13 100 90 Axial Force 1 Compressive Tensile fkN) /kN) 88 16 24 Shear Force (kN) 11 4 31 35 27
DL Z LL WL
146 38
SP 43 (S&T):1987
TABLE 32 DESIGN FORCES
spa
Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation I
: 12.0m
;;j
I 1
12.0 m
12.0 m
I 8
Bending Moment A ffoslping fkN m) 232 241 241 32 29 25 314 51 a1 13 108 131 88 91 %giig (kN.m)
Shear Force
lkW
131 63
_I
34 14 142
154 118
,
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (klv.m) DL A LL WL 100 38 54 Axial Force 1 Corn presive (klvl 104 34 15 Tensile FW Shear Force IkN 43 18 28
DL I LL WL
58
193 12 61 30
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
12.0m B
: 12.0m :
6Sm
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL 89 33 88 91 Axinl Force I Compressive (kN) ______ 110 33 12 68 38 Shear Force (kN) (kN) 31 12 31 -
DL Z LL WL
203 74 -
61
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 34 DESIGNFORCES
C
E D a 4t
F GG F
E
0 C
Sean Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Des&nation
I
: 12.0m : 12.0m :
9.5 m
E.
I
1 12.0m
Bending Moment
A
,
Compressive Force
Shear Force
Hogging
(kN.m) 407 274 274 49 32 30 381 214 271
Sagging (kN.m)
iW 91 112 132
165
64
54 93 161 -
210
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN. m) DL A LL WL DL I LL WL 71 26 201 181 222 76 69 Axial Force v (kN) 121 32 (kN) 47 Shear Force (kN) 18 7 63 _ 54 -
62
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Des&nation
Hogging
(kN. m) 351 412 412 7 3 487 77 A B C D E F G H I
Sagging (kN.m)
lkN) 242
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN. m) DL A LL WL DL I LL WL 198 47 47 51 A.&l Force m Compressive (kN) 156 26 Shear Force IkN) 12 50 fkfl) 63 16 18 _ 20
262 54
63
SP 43 (S & T):1987
TABLE 36 DESIGNFORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Des&nation
: 18.0m : 6.0m
: 9.5 m
r;ir;rl
A B c D E F
G
H I
154 -
246 326
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN. m) DL A LL WL DL I LL WL 168 38 95 98 AzdalForce h ) Compressive Tensile lkN) (kN) Shear Force (kN) 40 10 9 21
I
111 25 -
--
291 55 -
-. 51
28
64
SP 43 (S & T):1987
TABLE 37 DESIGNFORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
: 18.0m :
6.0m
Hogging
(kN.m) 467 396 396 5 3
7 sagging
(kN.m)
(kN)
145 71 35 98 173 -
253 358
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN. m) DL A LL WL 144 32 168 _ 160 Axial Force (Compressive lkN) 199 24 Tensile ) Shear Force (kN), 27 7 40 36
lkN!
38 52
DL I LL WL
320 56 _
65
SP 43 (S &T):1987
TABLE 38 DESIGN FORCES
span
Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition
.on_
i fiy,lr5
r-T=-={
WOm
: All :
1 I
I*OIll
I 1
Bending Moment A Hogging (kN m) 591 664 664 45 28 31 784 &l (kN.m) 106 260 323 218 124
Compressive
Force
Shear Force
(kN)
--. -
A B C D E F G H I
628
154
380
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN m) DL A LL WL 299 93 95 Ax&l Force A c P~mnro.r;.,o T..,V,, J bS.Y,cY*,c 1 crws (kN) IkN 209 51 25 Shear Force (kW 95 32 35
DL I LL WL 103
369 107 -
_ -
IN
39
SP 43 (S &T):1987
TABLE 39 DESIGNFORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
: 18.0m : 12.0m :
9Sm A 1 I 1 IO.0 m 18.0 m A
: 1:3,1:4,1:5 : Fixed
:Au
l-i
:
Bending Moment lHogging (kN.m) Compressive Force Shear Force
(kN.m)
(kNl
234 113 58 144 264
A B c D E F G H Z
335 415
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL 254 15 189 196 Axial Force (Compressive (kNl 229 50 Shear Force (kN) (kN) 60 19 54 55
19 102
DL Z LL WL
401 110 -
67
SP 43 (S &T): 1987
TABLE 40 DESIGNFORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
_342 449
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designution Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL 217 64 335 320 Axial Force b 1 Compressive Tensile (kNJ (kN1 249 49 433 112 104 76 Shear Force (kN) 41 13 79 _ 71
DL I LL WL
68
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 41 DESIGNFORCES
SPan Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Des&nation c
: 24.0m
: :
6.0m 9.5m
A B C D E F G H I
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due t0 Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL 476 79 99 AxibI Force z&z/-TX (kN) 310 34 Shear Force (kN) _16 (kN) 105 19 26
DL I LL WL
106
510 72 -
67
28
69
SP 43 (S i&T):1987
TABLE 42 DESIGNFORCES
E E
SPan Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
c
: 24.Om
6.0m
a
E
;I
I
.:-t
2CQm
21.0 m
Compressive Force
j
Shear Force
Hwging
(kN. m)
sagging
(kn! m)
A B c D E F G H
815
908 908
476
598 346 _ -
497 662
286
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (khr.m) DL A LL WL DL I LL WL 170 420 68 164 Atil Force h I Compressive Tensile (kN) (kW 344 33 13 68 36 Shear Force (kN) 75 13 35
556 73 -
70
SP 43 (S &CT): 1987
TABLE 43 DESIGNFORCES E SPan Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones
Design E
: 24.0m
: 12.0 m :
9.5 m
.B E :
I
I 2b-Om
.;-
Ultimate Forces
Section Designation
(kN.m)
(kN) 471
(kN) -
A B C D E F G H I
319
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL 650 158 198 213 Axial Force * 1 Tensile Compressive (kN) (kN) 381 68 31 Shear Force (kN) 144 38 52
DL. I LL WL
654 144
134
57
71
SP43(S&T):1987
~ _~ ~~
L 0 Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wmd/seismic zones
Design F F
E
0
: 24.0m
GG H
c i
E (I)
24.0 m
2com
Ultimate Forces
:
Bending Moment Compressive Force Shear Force
Section Designation
Hogging
(kn! m) 1352 1331 1331 26 22 1908 359 511
sasging .
(kN.m)
(kN) 512
465
73 228 419
615 780
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL 574 135 328 Axial Force rCompressive (kN) 413 66 26 Shear Force FN) (kN) 103 26 71 136 73
DL I LL WL 340
702 147 -
72
SP 43 (S 8t T):1987
TABLE 45 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation r
: 9.0m
; ;;!:4,1:5
;j
:AIl
SOrn
:
Bending Moment A Hogging (kN.m) 69 60 60 13 13 10 17 36 45 33 25 31 . 30 29 39 24 33 Sagging (kN.m) -
s.0m
9.0 m
Shear Force
(kN)
A B
c
D
E
43 93 104 47 24 9 21 IS 25 41
F G H
Z
I
K L
18
9 10
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Dueto Bending Moment (kn! m) DL A LL WL DL Z LL WL 23 10 24 3 1 28 Axial Force (Compressive (kN) 41 13 5 . Shear Force W) /kN) 10 5 12
13 21 12
14
73
SF43(S&T):1987
TABLE 46 DESIGN FORCES E Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Des&nation t Hogging (kN.m) 93 66 66 11 10 8 94 51 62 99 I 21 32 38 35 39 50 31 27
A B c D E F G H I J
K
56
. 30 12
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kn! m) --DL A LL WL 23 9 39 Ax&l Force Shear Force fkN) a 20 90 27 12 16 3 17 -
Compressive (kN) 58 12
1
TensiIe (kN)
DL I LL WL
2 1 39
74
SP43(S&T):19t37
TABLE 47 DESIGNFORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
r
mm&1
I.0m
PO m
9.0 m
:
Bending Moment Hogging (kn! m) 155 139 139 20 18 16 180 73 93 182 14 14 Sagging (kN.m)
1
Compressive Force
Shear Force
A B C D E F G H Z J K L
102
48 69 91 56 51 50 56 73
126
226 250
. -
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN, m) DL A LL WL 56 21 47 Axial Force (Comprersive (kN) 85 25 10 Shear Force (kN) (kN) 25 10 24
DL Z LL WL
6 1 55
149 53 24 .
2 1 28
7s
SP43(S%T):1987
TABLE 48 DESIGN FORCES
E I. E
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Des&nation
: :
9.0m
: 12.0m
6.5m
(kN. m) 68 81 103 64 51
(kN! 62 80 -
A B c D E F G H I J K L
151 .z 50 66 79 . 259
146 61 24
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN. m) DL A LL WL 48 17 79 Aria1 Force A ( ) Tensile Compressive (kN) (kN) 90. 25 40 Shear Force
(kNl
17 7 35
DL I LL WL
3 1 79
157 54 24
33
76
, SP43 (S&T):1987
TABLE 49 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
: 12.0m : :
6.0m 5.0m
BBi
: 1:3,1:4,1:5 : Fixed : AU :
*
I 12-om I 12-om I 12.0m I
Compressive Force
Shear Force
(kNl 85
&NJ
13 36 16 38 16
B c D E F G H I J K L
30 55 73 50 33 -
95
168 210 -. . 76 36 10
33 41 63
10 3 36
119 35 16
3 1 17
77
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 50 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation v
: 12.0m : :
6.0m 6.5m
: 1:3,1:4,1:5 : Fixed
: I I lZ.OWl I 1 124m
All
I
I
12Qrn
:
Bending Moment (kN.m) 149 138 138 13 11 11 175 63 82 177 10 8 Compressive Force (kN.m) Shear Force
(kN) 92 93
(kN)
A B c D E F G H I J
K
_
34 67 88 54 34 -
75 37 20
170 201 _.
43 81
_ _
81 40 10
34 53 71
.-
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Des&nation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL DL Z LL WL 59 19 40 7 2 48 z&Gz-Qz (kN) 77 17 126 36 16 19 Axial Force Shear Force (kN) 7 (kN) 20 7 16
78
Spa
: 12.0m
Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
: :
6.0m 9Sm
: 1:3,1:4,1:5 : Fixed
:All
:
Bending Moment w (kN.m) (kN.m) 62 84 105 65 34 .113 34 66 19 * 211 81 41 19 Compressive Force Shear Force
(kN) 15 63
fklvl
A B C D E F G H I J K L
15 37 25 49 a7
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL DL I LL WL 41 15 85 3 1 80 142 36 16 23 Axis I Force r Compressive (kN) 89 16 (kN) 1 26 Shear Force /kN) 12 4 26 -
79
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 52 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation
;f+y-yyj
12.0 m
12.0m
12.om
Compressive Force
Shear Force
(Hoaging
(kN. m) A B C D E F G H Z J K L 256 262 262 33 28 28 286 (kN.m) (kN) lkN)
127
133 64 34
17
172
100 132 90 84
298
68 137 -
100
135
85 86 114
322
.
137 66 18
291
23 21
19
25
DL Z
LL WL
17
5 73
189
70 32
5 1
34
80
St43 (S&T):1987
T.4BLE 53 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition SVind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation
I I
12,Om
124m
I 1
Compressive
Force
Shear Force
(kN. m)
(kN)
ikN)
135 67 39 78 146 -
c
D E
I: G H I
J
146 14 22
K
L
DL
A LL WL
103
38 80
112
34 _
14
34
14 31
DL I LL WL
12 3 95
198 11 32
_ _
31
81
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 54 DESIGN FORCES E Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
L E
: 12.0m : 12.0m
: 9.5 m
( fht?iw
(kN.m) A B c D E F G H I J K L 311 256 256 38 32 30 352 206 248 380 24 25
axff~
[kN. m) 138 151 190 120 90 88 124 143
1
(kN) 81 108 203 351 157 85 37 135 67 51 89 157 ikN) -
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Sect&n Designution Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN. m) DL A LL * WL 81 29 171 Axial Force A Compressive Tensile (kN) (kN1 123 33 _ 52 Shear Force (kN) 20 8 52
DL I LL WL
4 1 161
214 72 32
47
82
SP 43 (S i&T):1987
TABLE 55 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
: 18.0m : :
6.0m 6.5m
: 1:3,1:4,1:5 : Fixed
:All
:
Bending Moment LHogging (kN. m) Compressive Force Shear Force
(kN. m)
(kN1 246
/kN)
A B c D E F G H I J K L
143 66 26
126 163
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL 228 54 51 (kN1 158 26 Axial Force shear Force lklvl 12 lkN) 69 18 17
DL I LL WL
37 8 73
259 52 24
8 2 25
83
SP 43 (S &T): i 987
TABLE 56 DESIGN FORCES \
Span llrame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition zones Forces
: 18.0m : 6.0m :
9.5m 1:5
I I
_
II.0 m
I 1
18.0 m
180m
I I
Wind/seismic
Design Ultimate
Bending Momerzt
Compressive Force
Shear Force
(kN.m)
(kN) 219
(kN) -
159 159
148 208
* -
79 15
Load Stage
Section Designation
Forces Due to
Shear Force
WV
179
/W
-
iklvl
44 11 23
DL A LL WL
195
43 87
25 -
11
DL I LL WL
24 3
104
289 53 24 -
3 28
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE - 57 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation f
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kNm) DL A LL WL DL I LL WL 165 36 143 13 1 149 312 54 24 Axial Force 1 Compressive lkN) 201 25 41 -_
~__._.
/kN)
85
SF43 (S &T):1987
TABLE 58 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wmd/seianic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
: 18.0m : 12.0m :
6.5m
(kN) 258
A B C D E F G H I J K L
669
307 540
595 -
41
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL DL I LL WL 344 108 103 56 15 145 Axial Force A Compressive (kN) 212 52 365 105 47 Tensile (kN) 25 Shear Force fkN) 104 35 33 12 3 51
86
SP 43 (S &T):1987
TABLE 59 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
: 18.0m : 12.0m
: 9.5 m
: 1:3,1:4,1:5 : Fixed : All : -Bending Moment A Hogging (kN.m) sagging FN.ml Compressive j (kN) 283 298 123 313 412 256 124 547 621 123 248 331 . .238 117 56 136 256 256 126 31 (kNl Force Shear Force
I
l#.Orn
18.Orn
IBQ
A B C D E F G H I J K L
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL 295 86 173 Axial Force r Compressive FNJ 232 51 Shear Force (kN) 21 (kN) 61 21 42
DL I LL WL
37 I 208
393 106 48
5 1 55
87
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 60 DESIGNFORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
:
Bending Moment Compressive Force Shear Force
(kN. m) A B c D E F
G
, 68
150
361 658
H I J K L
_ -
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Des&nation Forces Due to Bending Moment Wm) DL A LL WL 250 12 286 Axial Force I Compressive (klv! 252 50 Shear Force (kN) 81 (kNj 46 14 66
DL I LL WL
20 2 298
420 108 48
1 _
64
88
SP 43 (S i&T):1987
TABLE 61 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
:
Bending Moment (Hogging (kN. m) Compressive Force Shear Force
Section Designation
(kN. m) 28 28 38 25 32 33 23 30 23 30
(kN) 41 54
(kNJ 44 22 15 24 46
A B C D E F G H I J
K
72 62 62 12 13 11 14 38 49 II 8 10 10 75 22 30
93 104 46 23 8 23 43 98 61 -
L M N 0 P
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN m) DL A LL WL DL LL WL DL LL WL 25 12 23 6 2 26 20 Axial Force I Compressive (kN1. 41 13 73 21 12 71 26 16 Shear Force (kN) 5 (kN) 11 5 11 2 1 13
10
89
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 62 DESIGNFORCES
Spa Frame pacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wmd/seismic zones
: : :
9.0m
. x ;;I
: 1:3.1:4.1:5 : Fixed
:All
I 0th I SOm I .0_0m I S.Om
:
Bending Moment Hogging (kN.m) 92 66 66 11 10 9 92 49 61 98 I 8 8 94 36 45
Sagging
Shear Force
PV
35 38 49 25 18 31 55 _ _ 55 29 12 28 51 -
A B c D E F G H I J K L M N 0 P
-, 114 87
SectionDesignation
Forces due to
DL LL WL DL LL WL DL LL WL
26 10 36 5 1 35 30
90
SP 43 (S &T): 1987
TABLE 63 DESIGNFORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
I
;I$
1 9.h I 9.on I 9.0m I 00m
: 1:3.1:4.1:5 : Fixed
:All
:
Bending Moment Hogging (kN.m) 162 144 144 19 18 16 173 18 101 181 13 14 15 173 59 51 52 71 52 46 u 43 66 89 58 49 225 249 251 162 Compressive Force Shear Force
sagging
(kN.m)
(W
103 127 -
A B c D E F G H Z J K L M N 0 P
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kh! m) DL A LL WL DL LL WL DL P LL WL 62 23 46 15 4 53 39 Axial Force Shear Force (kN) 26 10 22 5 1 26 20
A
Compressive (kN) 85 26 149 53 23 146 52 Tensile (kN) 10 31
91
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
cam
s.om
.+Om
COm
Section Designation (
Shear Force
(kN)
A B c D E F G H I J K L M N 0 P
59 78 101 64 50 51 61 80 60 47
80
227 258
.
236 170
24 58 106 -
:
Bending Moment (kN.m) Axial Force A b t Compressive Tensile (kN) (kN)
91 -
Section Designation
Forces Due to
DL A LL WL DL
I
53
19
25 _
158
41
-
7 31
2 1 28
73
10
LL WL DL
2
71
54
23
60
LL WL
154 51 _
31
_ 25
92
SP 43 (S &T): 1987
TABLE 65 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition kind/seismic zones
DesignUltimate Forces
Section Des&nation
:
Bending Moment (Hogging (kN. m) Compressive Force Shear Force
(kN.m)
(ki; 87
(kN) 74 36 17 36 74 74 36 14 34 70
-
A B C D E F G H Z J K L M N 0 P
213
:
Bending Moment (kN,m) Axial Force Shear Force (kN) 29
10
Section Designation
Forces Due to
A
Compressive (kN) 72 18 Tensile (kN) 8
119 -
DL A LL WL DL LL WL
DL
73 25 29
19
12 6 2 17
-
6 38
35 16
117
LL WL
23
34
-
21
11
93
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
lZ.Ofll
I
I
V&OR?
I
I
1ZOm
1ZOm
:
Bending Moment IHogging (kN.m) Compressive Force Shear Force
(kN. m) 30 63 85 56 33 _ 35 49 68 51 32 -
(kN) 75 31 20 41 79 79 40 10 38 75 -
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N 0 p.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL LL WL _. I DL LL WL DL LL WL 16 4 46 34 127 36 15 124 34 21 4 1 17 13 66 21 39 Axial Force (compressive (kN1 78 17 (kN) 7 (kNj 21 I 15 Shear Force
94
Frame Span spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Des&nation
: 12.0 m
;_: : 1:3. 1:4.1:5
;;I]
: Fixed
I lZ.OWl I 12.Olll
1lOrn
12.0m
I I
:
Bending Uomen t m (kN.m) Compressive Force Shear Force
(kN.mJ 53 81 103 65 33 34 62 81 62 32 *
(kN) 75 37 25 48 86 86 46 19 44 79 -
A B C D E F G H Z J K L M N 0 P
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Duet0 I Bending Moment (kN.m) DL LL WL DL Z LL WL DL LL WL 52 16 78 9 2 71 63 Axial Force A ( Compressive Tensile (kN) (kN) 89 17 142 36 15 137 34 27 20 18 Shear Force (kN) 12 4 23 1 20
95
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 68 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones
: 12.0m : 12.0 m :
5.0m B I :
P I lI.Om 12.Om
I.
*J4
1 12.Om
DesignUltimate Forces
Section Designation
Bending Moment
Compressive
Force
Shear Force
(kn! m)
79 93 127 94 19 86 1% 102 83 77 -
291 321
134 65 34 65 133
- *
342 207
133 65 25 61 127
-------------------------_------------___
Section Des&nation Forces Due t0 Bending Moment (kN.m) DL LL WL DL LL WL DL P LL WL 127 49 51 34 12 75 45 e (kN1 108 35 190 70 31 189 69 Axial Force
Tensile (kN) 16 42
96
SP 43 (S &T): 1987
TABLE 69 DESIGNFORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
: 12.0m
:
Bending Moment lHogging (kN. m) Compressive Force Shear Force
Section Designation
(kN.m)
(kN)
136 170
(kN)
A B c .D E F G H Z J K L M N 0 P
76 114 154 97 86
136 68 39
300 331 -
75 143 -
143 73 21 69 135 _
90 91 123 92 82
* 313 215
:
Bending Moment (kN.m)
Section Designation
Forces Due to
(kN)
37 14
DL
114
LL WL DL LL WL DL LL WL
42 79 28 8 92 67
34 198
14
29
I
71 31
194
2 34
_
69 -
41 26
97
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones :AB
I
;_t
;I;]
ll.OUl
120m
120m
110m
I I
:
Bending Moment Hogging (kN. m) Compressive Force Shear Force
s7ggihg
(kN. m)
/kN) 86 (kN)
A B c D E F G H Z J K L M N 0 P
368 252 252 34 32 28 346 194 237 375 24 25 26 359 151 188
106
304 349
90
315 231
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Mbment (kN.m) DL A LL WL DL LL WL DL LL WL 89 32 156 16 3 142 Axial Force rCompreJaive_ /kN) 124 33 215 73 31 207 69 41 Shear Force IkN) 54 (kN) 21 8 47 2 1 40 36
126
98
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 71 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
: 9.0 m
:
Bending Moment Compressive Force Shear Force
Hogging
(kN. m) A B c D E 126 126 19 -
s11&ping
(kN.m)
(kN) 124 77
(kN) 81 44
65 86 114 -
22
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL Axial Force z&EzfTz (kN) 82 13 1 Shear Force (kN) (kN) 9 2 17
99
W43(S&T):1987
TABLE 72 DESIGNFORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
90m
:
Bending Moment (Hogging (kN. m) Compressive Force Shear Force
Section Designation
(klv m) -
(kN 132 87 -
(kW a2 50
A B C D E 171 171 33 -
113 99 127
34
.a
Section Desigwtion
Forces Due to
DL A LL WL
91 13 6
7 2 3
100
SP 43 (S &T):1987
TABLE 73 DESIGNFORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
: 9.0 m
E
1
(klvl 199 143 162 212 128 -
Ho&$%
(kN.m)
sagging
W.m)
A B C D E
227 227 51 5
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN m) DL A LL WL _ Axial Force b Tensile Cbmpressive (kW (kY 123 26 2 Shear Force
iW
15 4 34
101
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section De&nation
9.0 m
: 12.0m :
6Sm
fklvl 144
A B c D E
319 319 80 -
90 66
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designarion Forces Due to Bending
Moment %G&z?7a
Axial Force
Shear Force
(kN m) DL A LL WL -
IkW 133 26 12
(W
-
W)
10 3 46
102
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 75 DESIGN FORCES
SDUl
12.0 m
Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Suppbrt condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
I
4.4
I
12.0m
Hogging
(kN. m) 205 205 9
Sagging (kN.m)
FN) 120 63 19
A n c D E
48 140 190
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL -
103
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation
Compressive Force
Shear Force
(kN) 122 66 29
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Des&nation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL Axial Force Tmrile Compressive (kN) 135 18 2 Shear Force (kN) (kN) 16 3 21
104
sP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 77 DESIGNFORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Suppoit condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation f A B C D E
: 12.0m : :
6.0m 9.5m
: 1:3,1:4,1:5 : Hinged : AU :
Bending Moment * Hogging (kN. RI) -388 388 38 218 248 307 Sagging (kN.m)
12.Om
Compressive Force 7
Shear Force
(kN)
252 164
(kN) 144 91 55
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) Axial Force n 1 Compressive Tensile (kN) (kN) 186 18 12 Shear Force (kN) 11 2 40
DL A LL WL
105
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 78 DESIGNFORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
: 12.0 m
0
E 0
C e C e
: 12.0 m :
5.0m t !I
c .*I___!
12.Om
Section Designation
Compressive
Force
Shear Force
fkN) -
A B c D E
340 340 41 -
203 108 39
Section Designation
Forces Due to
DL A LL WL
106
!P43(S&T):1987
TABLE 79 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
: 12.0m : 12.0m : 6.5m : 1:3,1:4,1:5 : Hiqqd : All : Bending Moment h 7 c &gging Hogging (kN. m) FN.m) 426 j 426 71 226
291 -
Section Designation
Compressive Force
Shear Force
WV 303
192
WV
A B
c
207
111
D E
386
57
Section Designation
Forces Due to
DL A LL WL
35 4
6 43
107
SP 43 (S & T):1987
TABLE 80 DESIGNFORCES
ban Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wiid/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designution
: 12.0m
: 12.0 m :
9.5m
Compressive Force
(kN) 360
Shear Force
(kn! m)
(kNJ
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment v (kN.m) (kNl 249 35 25 (kN) Axial Force Shear Force
WJ
15 4 38
-DL A LL WL
108
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 81 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
: 18.0m : :
6.0m 6.5 m
18.Om
I
(kN.m) (kN) 289 234 51 324 439 192 100 23 (kN)
A B c D E
480 480 -
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL -
109
SP 43 (S & T):1987
TABLE 82 DESIGNFORCES
: 18.0m Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation (Hogging (kn! m) A B C D E 593 593 5
:
:
6.0m 9.5 m
18-O m
1
Force Shear Force
Compressive
(kN 211
113 44
Section Designation
Forces Due to
DL A LL WL
_ -
110
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
18-O
m
Force
1
Shear Force
Section Designation
Compressive
(kN. m)
(kN)
401 226 -
(kJJ)
243 138 69
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Des.@ation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN m) Axial Force h j ( Tensile Compressive (kN) (kN) 301 26 9 _ Shear Force (kN) 21 3 44
DL A LL WL
111
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation r
: 18.0m
1
1 sagging
(kN.m)
18-O m
1
Shear Force
Compressive
Force
Hw@g
(kN.m)
(kN) 425
A B c D E
367 _
DL A LL WL
_ -
260 52 -
60 16 35
112
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 85 DE~IGNGORCES
: 18.0m Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation
(
: 12.0m
: 9.5 m
1
I
18-O m
1
Shear Force
Force
Hoi&w
(kN.mj
(kN) 493
fkN)
A B 918
339 182
84
319 -
c
D E
978 111
Foundation
Section Designation
(kN)
_ _ 9
(kN)
DL A LL WL
_ _ -
322 52 _
40
10
63
113
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 86 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation
1
1
18.0 m
-7 Compressive Force
1
Shear Force
(kN. m) -
(kNl
589
(kN) -
A B
1370 1370
135 -
411 7
387
224
c
D E
132
(kNl
_ -
(kNJ 30 6 89
DL A LL WL
_ _ __
114
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 87 DESIGN FORCES
: 24.0 m
: :
Wind/seismic
Design Ultimate
*
Bending Moment
24.Om
Compressive
I
I
Force Shear Force
Section Designation
I
A B C D E
Foundation
:
Bending Moment (kN. m) fkN) 365 35 Axial Force VCompressive Shear Force
Section Designation
Forces Due to
lkN)
_ _ 17
(kN) 67 10 27
DL A LL WL
_ _
115
SP43 (S&T):1987
TABLE 88 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
: 24.0 m
6.0m
!
Bending Moment rHogging (kN. m) (kN.m) 146 1002 1335
21.Om
Compressive Force
!
Shear Force (klvl 593 381 (kN) 363 195 * 60
Section Des&nation
A B c D E
1288 1288 -
Section Designation
Forces Due to
DL A LL WL
116
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation
I
: 24.Om
B
: 12.0m :
9.5 m
:
Bending Moment Hogging (kN. m) Sagging (kN. m) _
)
24.Om
Compressive Force Shear Force
(klvl
708 448 _
_
A B
485
256 73
1571 1571
32 _
329
1181 1588
C
D E
(klvl
460 70 -
@NJ
_ 33
WI
90 19 54
DL <. A LL WL
_ -
117
e
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation
24-om
Compressive Sagging (kN.m) Force
l-
I
Shear Force
Bending Moment
Hogging (kN.m)
A B c D E
_ 2024 2024 _ -
846 560 .
115
(kN)
583 70
-
DL
A
_ 13
71 13 82
LL
WL
118
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation t
: 30.0m : 6.0m
: 9.5 m
Hogging
(kn! m) 2153 2153 -
&x&7
)
(kN) 165 5% (kN) 482 248 30
A B c D E
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN m) DL A LL WL Axial Force A Compressive (kN) 530 44 21 Tensile (kN) Shear Force (kN) 130 17 22
119
t
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation r Hogging (kN.m) _ 2341 2347 _ _
B-E m z A 0 J 30.0m A
Shear
Force
A B C D E
1676 2212
918
606 _ _
_
563 297 53
111
12 36
120
Wind/seismic
30.0 m
I
I
Design Ultimate
Section Designation
(kN)
1050 873 _ _
lkN)
_ 707 365 64
Foundation
: ___--Bending Moment (kN.m) (kN) Axial Force -----xz Compressive (kN) (kN) Shear Force
Sectiotl Des&ration
Forces Due to
DL A I.[. WI,
_ _.. _
694 87 _~
54
182 32 44
11
SP 43 (S & T):1987
TABLE 94 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation
c
3tSOm
(kN) (kN)
A B C D E
1207
796 _ -
_. 795 420
101
..
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage :
---Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment fkN m) _ _ (kN) Axibl Force I Compressive (kN) _ _ ikN) Shear Force
DL A LL WL
832 87 -
146 23 74
122
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition zones Forces
: : :
Wind/seismic
Design Ultimate
I
Force Shear Force
Section Designation
Hogging (kN. m)
Sagging (kN.m)
lkN) 71 35 20 55 92 _ -
_ 40 75 85 49 _ _
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage Forces Due to
: -.
Rending Moment (kN. m) Axial Force r CompresSive Shear Force (kN) . lkNl 8 2 14
Section Designation
_ DL A LL WL -
lkN1 71 li2 -
-._
DL I LL WI, 145 29 6 _
_ 13
123
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLI: 96 DLSIGN FORCES
E E F GG F D C
Span I,rame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition zones Forces
9.0m B
: 6.0m :
6.5 m 15
H I-t
B E $1
: 1:3.1:4. : Hinged
Wind/seismic
I
I I 9.0m I 9.0m
: :
AU
;--I
Design Ultimate
/
Shear Force
Bendirrg Moment
Compressive
Force
(kN)
(kN) _ 70 41 26 58 95 _ _
.
f:oundation Forces at Service Load Stage Forces Due to
:
Bending Moment (kN.rn) (kN) 85 11 5 Axial Force lCompressive (kN) _ 5 1 11 (kNJ Shear Force
Section Designation
DL A LL WL
_ _ _
DL I LL WL
_ _ -
157 30 5
_ -
_ 17
124
SP 43 (S &T): 1987
TABLE 97 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wmd/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
9.0m
: 12.0m :
5.0m
I r
Mm
I 8
SOm
Compressive Force
W) 178
Siear Force
lkW
Hogging (kn! m)
sasging (kh?m)
118
122 62 40 98 164
211 408
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL A&l Fc~ce r w 113 23 1 (AN) shear Force 0 12 3 26
DL I LL WL
231 59 11 28
125
SP 43 (S &+):1987
TABLE 98 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation
9.0m
: 12.0m :
6.0m
Compressive
Force
Shear Force
(kn! m)
lkW
(klv/
A B
240 240 34
-
c
D E F
28 345 243 _
G
H
10
DL I LL WL
245 60 8
35
126
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 99 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
: 12.0m
y;: ;;I
: 1:3,1:4,1:5 : Hinged I I
Bending Moment
12.0m
12.Om
I
Shear Force
sa@ing
(kN.m) _ 20 127 152 84 208 353 (kN) 109 53 21 76 133 A B c D E F G H I 192 192 313 80 _
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN. m) -____ DL A LL WL DL I LL WI, _ 38 Axial Force (Tensile Compressive (kN) 117 16 Sheqr Force (kN) 4 _ _ (kN) 20 4 13 15
215 38 9
127
SP43(S&T):W87
TABLE 100 DESIGNFORCES
span
Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wmd/seianiczones
: 12.0m
: :
6.0m 6Sm
DesignUltimate Forces
Section D&gnation
BendingMoment m W.m)
Compressive
Force
Shear Force
(kN.m)
(kN1 183
(kN)
210 210 1
54 143 165 94
111
108 53 25 81 138
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces be to Bending Moment (kN. m) DL A LL WL Axial Force A 1 r Compressive Tensile (kNl (knrl 127 16 1 Shear Force (kNl 14 3 17
DL I LL WL
231 39 8
18
128
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 101 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
: 12.0m
: :
6.0m 9.5m
f&W
(kn! m)
saaping
(kN.m)
>
lkN) 229 139 121 71 47 103 168 277 467 fkN)
16 465 255
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL Axial Force A > t Tensile Compressive /kN) (kN) 174 15 9 Shear Force /kN) 8 2 16 25
DL I LL WL
308 40
129
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 102 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
: 12.0m : 12.0m :
5.0m
: 1:3,1:4,1:5 : Hinged : AU :
A
I
I
I
Bending Moment
12.0m
12.Om
!-I
A
I
Shear Force
-_
Section Designation
Compressive Force
320 580.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN. m) DL A LL WL DL I LL WL Axial Force * Compressive Tensile , (kN) (kN) 169 32 332 76 18 8 Shear Force (kN) 30 8 26 29
130
SP 43 (S & T):1987
TABLE 103 DESIGN FORCES
E E
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation r
: 12.0 m : 12.0m :
6Sm e
1
(kN) 214 177 /kN) -
356 356
._ 329 603
24 10 572 255 -
.
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage :
Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN. m) DL A LL WL (kW Axial Force wCompressive lkN) lkN) 25 5 Shear Force
180
31 -
1
-
35
DL I LL WL
_ -
352 78 16
36
131
!%43(S&T):1987
TABLE 104 DESIGN FORCES
I
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
: 12.0m
: 12.0m
: 9.5 m
section Designation
t Hoggihg
(kN. m)
Compressive
Force
A sasgins
Wm)
Shear Force
7
(kN) 320 W)
Foundation Forces at service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment Wm) DL A LL WL Ax&l Force n I Compressive Tensile ikh!) (kN) 228 30 19 Shear Force P) 12 3 51
DL I LL WL
438 80 9 40
132
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 105 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
: 18.0m
: :
6.0m 6.5 m a
El ! A7
Shear Force
(kN.m) -
A B c D E F
G
443 443
346 558
142 141
H I
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section DesigMtion Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL DL I LL WL _ _ Axial Force z&zP-xz (kN) 183 24 Shear Force (kN) 8 (kN) 38 I 17 19
340 56 14
133
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation (
: 18.0m : :
6.0m 9Sm
I
Shear Force
Bending Moment
Compressive
Force
(kN) 309
(kN) -
(kNl
23 4
25
DL I LL WL
_ _ -
409 58 12
_ -
_ 16
134
SP 43 (S &T): 1987
TABLE 107 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones
Design Ultimate Forces
: 18.0m :
6.0m
Compressive Force
1
Shear Force
A B c D E F G H I
491 772
69 174 285 -
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL _ Axial Force h Compressive Tensile (kN/ (kN) 278 22 8 _ Shear Force
(kNl
16 2 34
DL I LL WL
_ -
514 60 9
_ -
_ 34
135
943
(S&T):1987
108 DESIGN FORCES
TABLE
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones
;ji
:
Bending Moment
I I
Compressive Force
1bOm
I
Shear Force
A
Hogging (kN. m) Sagging (kN. m) -
fkNl
-
A B
681 681 22
-
256 _ -
C
D E F
13 1179 282 -
G
H
472 851
334 _ _
DL I LL WL
483 113 28
_ _ _
_ _ 39
136
slopes condition zones Forces Bending Moment Compressive Sagging (kN. m) Force All
I 1lQm I lO.Om
Support
Wind/seismic
Design Ultimate
I I
Shear Force
--Section Designation
( Hogging
(kN. m) A B c D E F G H I _ 7 1399 548 _
A (kNJ 445 293 _ 513 992 fkNl _ _ 293 141 II 234 390 -
812 812 9
Foundation
:
Bending Moment (kN. m) (kNJ 298 46 Axial Force P% Shear Force lkNl 33 I 2 51
Section Designation
( Compressive _ _.-_ DL A LL WL -
Tensile (kN) -
______.
DL I LL WL _ _ 592 118 23 _ -
~_______.___
53
137
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
ZZGZZ5e~nation
18 om
IlOm
(kN. m)
-
1026 1026
-
C
D
E
F
_ 56 1810 909 -
_ 715 1177
G
H
DL
I
741 121 15
_ _
67
LL
WL
138
Sf 43 (S &T): 1987
TABLE 111 DESIGN FORCES
E E F GG F 0 C
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation
: 24.0m : :
6.0m
B C
a :1 E : I .I
I IL.Om
9.5 m
: 1:3,1:4,1:5 : Hinged : AU :
PI
,
Compressive Force
IL.Orn
1
Shear Force
!*
Bending Moment
A B
Hogging /kN. m)
Sagging
(kN. m)
_
\
-
(kNJ 304
145 54 213 371
1021 1021
_ _ 1157 294 -
C
D E F G H I
-.I
DL I LL WL
638 76 18
_ -
28
139
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 112 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation
C
Compressive
>
Force
Shear
~Force
(kN. m)
(kN.m)
_
40 886 999 506 _ -
DL A LL WL
DL I LL WL
742 78 16
_ -
35
140
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE - 113 DESIGN FORCES E
F GG F 0 C
: 24.0 m : 12.0m :
9.5 m 5T *
C B
a E
Wind/seismic
Design Ultimate
I
Bendirlg Momerlt
2L.Orn
2LJJm
Section Designation
c
Force
Hogging (k&V. m)
_
1470 1470 2574 587 -
_
_ 130 1069 1246 664 _ _
Foundation
:
Bending Moment (kN. m) (kN) 435 64 _ Axial Force (Compressive (kNJ _ 18 (W 81 16 49 Sheor Force
--__
Section Designation
DL A LL WL
DL I LL WL
_ _ _
839 152 36
_ 56
141
SP 43 (S &T): 1987
TABLE 114 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation r
: 24.0m
G
,
(kN. m)
-
(kN)
111
(kN)
A B
1676 1676
_
510 _
c
D E F
_ 1068 1678
G
H
3171 954 -
10 3 67
70
DL I LL WL
_ -
1054 157 30
_ -
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation I
9.0m
SOm
9.0m
I ,
Shear Force
(kN) 13 35 18 53 90 _ 90 48 16
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN m) DL A LL WL DL I LL WL _ Axial Force ccompressivehensi;a (kN) 78 12 __ _ 12 Shear Force (kW 2 (knl! 9 8 11
--_-138 27 11 1
143
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 116 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition zones Forces
9.0 m
B
Wind/seismic
Design Ultimate
Section Designation
C
Compressive
Force
Shear
Force
)
(kN) (kN)
A B c D E F G H I J K L
56 84 96 58
112 73 _ _
_
72 39 23 55 93
_
-
115 238
_
93
54 62
_
_ -
52 22
Foundation
:
Bending Moment (kN.m) (kN) 86 12 1 Axial Force A Compressive Tensile Shear Force (kN) 6 1 14
Section Designation
(kN)
-
DL A LL WL
DL I LL WL
148 28 11 -
14
144
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation c
1
1
9.0m
9.0m 1
9.0 m
(kN)
182 115
(kN) _ 126
A B c D E F G H I
_ 75 140 161 89 21
61 37 94
159 _ 159
85 32
134
199 383 1( -
288
7 -
21
86
J
K L
109
(kNJ
115 24
DL I LL WL
216 55 23
1
24
145
Span
Frame
: 9.0m
spacing
Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
:
Bending Moment Compressive Sagging (kN.m) Force Shear Force
*
Hogging (kN. m)
1
(kN) 189 (kNJ
A B c D E F G H I J K L
210 210 19
122 -
125 69 46 98 163
26 310 204
163 93 43
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment Wm) DL A LL WL Axial Force Shear Force (kW 9 2 29
A
Compressive (kN1 124 23 3 Tensile (kN) -
DL I LL WL
131 55
22
29
146
SP 43 (S &I?&1987
TABLE 119 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
ai
199
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL Axial Force Shear Force (kN) (kN) 22 5 4 11
DL I LL WL
14
147
SP 43 (S &T):1987
TABLE 120 DESIGN I:ORCES
Span brame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition zones Forces
: 12.0 I
L!$4,1:5
y;.i
Wind/seismic
Design Ultimate
I 1
1?.0m
I /
lI.Om
11om
Compressive
Force
Shear
Force
I
(kN! 186 110 _ 175 353 _ _* (kNj _ 111 54 24 18 135 135 71 21
A B c D E F G H I J K L
_
206 206 _ _ 304 115
_
40 142 171 96 -
316 _
_
89 123
Foundation
:
Bending Moment (kN.mJ Axial Force A Compressive Tensile Shear Force
Section Designation
Forces Due to
)
(kN) 15 3
ikN)
129 16 _
(kNJ
3
DL A LL WL
_ _
14
DL I LL WL
_ -
222 36 15
16
148
SP 43 (S &T): 1987
TABLE 121 DESIGN FORCES
E L E
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation c
li.0 m e
12 om
12.0m
12 Om
Compressive
Force
Shear
Force
(kN)
234 136 205 438 * _ _
(kN)
125 69 38 99 163 _ _ 163 991 35
A B c D E F G H I J K L
_
259 259 _. I 415 206
_
102 202 228 135 _
423 -
_ 118 143
(kN)
_ -
(kN)
9 2 21
DL I LL WL
293 31 14
_ _ _
21
149
SP43 (S&T):1987
TABLE 122 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation
:
Bending Moment Compressive Force Shear Force
sagging
(kN.m)
A B c D E F G H I J K L
(kN) 213
(kNJ 187
319 319 10
173
160
_
6 496 165
494 6
15 142 204
551 * -
(kI4
33 8 22
10
DL I LL WL
318 72
1 28
31
150
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
5
:
Bending Moment Hogging (kN.m) Sagging (kN.m) Compressive Force Shear Force
(kNJ 281
A B C D E F G H I J K L
342 342 12
175 293
11 520 130
168 11
541 6
12 159 210 z
569 -
42
sectlon Designation
Forces Due to
DL A LL WL DL I LL WL
_ _ _
_ _
336 73 30
2 1 32
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation
Bending Moment
Force
Shear
Force
( HOggw
(kN.m) A B C D E F G H I J K L 109
(kN)
_
445 445 8
319 209 -
41 680 420
323 651 _ 4 -
_
263 150 61
25 -
212 232
DL A LL WL
_ _ _
DL I LL WL
413 74 29
1 41
152
SP 43 (S % T): 1987
TABLE 125 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designationi
10.0 m
Il.0 m
la.om
lkN)
443 535 -
205 104 20
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL Axial Force, A Tensile Compressive (kN) (kN) 187 25 329 54 23 9 Shear Force /kN) 42 8 14 20
DL Z LL WL
153
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
: 18.0 m
I I
l&O m
:
Bending Moment lHoaging (kN.m) (kN.m) Compressive Force Shear Force
WJ
A B c D E F G H I J K L
495 495
58 387
191 92
39
198
451 245
306
137 235 -
244 809
218 311
608
255 122 33
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL A LL WL DL I LL WL Axial Force A b Compressive Tensile (kN) (kN) 224 24 5 Shear Force (kW 26 4 21 2 1 25
390 55 23
154
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 127 DESIGN FORCES
Sean Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
:
Bending Moment I\ t , Hokping Sagging (kN.m) (kN.m) Compressive Force Shear Force
(kN)
1010
_ 264
360
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces he to Bending Moment (kNm) DL A LL WL DL I LL WL Axial Force (Compressive (kN) 283 23 2 487 55 22 Shear Force (kN) (kN) 18 3 27 2 1 28
155
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 128 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation
10.0 m
18.0 m
lB.Om
.h
(kN.m)
(kN) 406
(kN)
_
708 708 24
90 465 575
319 36
35 303 444
+ -
A
Compressive /kN) 252 49 _ Tensile /kN) 18
>
DL Z LL WL
466 108 47
1
40
156
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition zones Forces
: 18.0 m : 12.0 m
: 9.5 m
Wind/seismic
lI.Orn
II.Om
Design Ultimate
Section Designation
A B c D E F G H I J K I.
_ 786 786 _
456
291
Foundation
:
Bending Momeit (kN. m) Axial Force A 7 Compressive Tensile (kN) 304 47 (kN) -_ _ 9 Shear Force (kN) 36 8 42
Section Designation
Due to
DL A LL WL
DL I LL WL
_ _
562 110 46
3 1 47
157
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 130 DESIGN FORCES
Wind/seismic
I 4
18.0 m
Design Ultimate
Section Designation
_
_ 553 1094. _ * -
Foundation
:
Bending Moment (kN. m) Axial Force A Compressive lkNl 383 46 4 Tensile /kN) Shear Force
Section Designation
IkN)
25 5 56
DL A LL WL
_ _ _
DL I LL WL
_ -
696 111 44
_ _
4 1 56
158
SP 43 (S &T):1987
TABLE 131 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition zones Forces
Wind/seismic
Design Ultimate
Bending Moment
Compressive
Force
Shear
Force
(kN.m)
(kN) 116
(k-w)
_
99 99 _
26 14 87 49
69
_
13 35 18 52 90 _ 90 48 16 46 81 -
__ _
153 63 161 1
_ 44 63 47
_ 180 231
s _
186 215
boundation
:
Bending Moment (kN.m) Axial Force A Compressive Tensile ) (kN) 79 12 Shear Force
Section Designation
(kN)
2
(kN)
9 2 10 11 10
139 28 11
_ _ -
132 26 18
159
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 132 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces
Section Designation
9.0 m
)
(kN) 122 (kNl
A B c D E F G H I J K L M N 0 P
41 83 94 56 -
71
12 38 22 55 93 _ 93
51
65 54 _
115 241
51
22 50 84 -
2 168 84
_ -
179 222
Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN. m) DL A LL WI, DL I LL WL _ _ (kN) 86 12 150 26 Axial Force Compressive (kN) _ (kNl 6 Shear Force
1 13
12
10 141
26 18
DL
P LL WL
_
-
12
160
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 133 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate-Forces
Section Designation *
yJ;-$
I
I
Born
I
I
s.om
I
I
s.om
!
I
s.om
Force
Shear
Force
WV
182
WV
126 61 36 94 159 159 84 32 82 142 -
_
169 169 9
4 8 270 7
64 i3i
114 _
159
88 21
355 387 _
_ 21 83 111 85 21 ,
207 357
104 -
)
(kNl
116
24 _ 220 56 21 207 51 36 5
14
4 20 _ _ 21 19
Support
Wind/seismic Design
All
9,Om
1 I
9.0 m
9.Om
I.
9.Om
Ultimate
:
Bending Moment e-soaninn (kN.mJ Compressiw Force Shear Force
Section Designatiorl
(kN.mJ
IkNJ
189 119 199 400 _ -, _ 311 366
WJ
_ 125 67 44 98 164 _ 164 91 43 89 149 -
A B c D E F G H I J K I. M N 0 P
Foundation
:
Bending Moment (kN.mJ Axial Force (Compressive Tensile Shear Force
Section Designation
WJ
124 23 1 233 56 20 216 51 37
SW
_ _ _
WJ
9 3 26 -
DL A LL WL DL I LL WI DL P LL WI,
_ _-
_ _ _ _
25 _ _ 23
162
Span I;ramc spacing Column height Root slopes Support condition zones I:orces
n E *
I 12 Om
0
P I 1 12.0 m
H
I
-ka El 01
6A y
Wind/seismic Iksign
12Om
12.0 m
Uttimatc
:
Bending Moment A Ilogging (kN.m) &xing (kN.m) Compressive Force Shear Force
Section Designation t
1 (kN)
180 (kN)
III _
113 56 20
_ _ 273 340 _
71 128 -
128 66
284 324
15 64 118
I%undation
:
Bending Moment (kN. m) Axial Force A I Compressive Tensile (W 120 17 208 36 115 201 34 23 W) _ 6 _ 3 10 Shear Force (W 23 5 10 2
Section Designation
DL A LL WL DL I LL WL DL P LL WL
_ _ _ -
_ -
163
SP 43 (S & T):1987
TABLE 136 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation
: 12.0m : 6.0m
C 0
L F C J II
NN 0
L K J G N
E D C B
8t
A
12.0 m I
In ti I
I 12.0 m P 12.Om I 12.0m I
0-c
Bending Moment A
Hosing
Compressive Force
Shear Force
sagg~g
(kN.m) 30 139 169 96 . 85 126 92 _
1
/kN) 187 110 277 356 --* 274 335
IkN)
112 5.5 24 77 134 134 71 22 68 121 -
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN. m) DL A LL WL DL I LL WL DL P LL WL Axi Compressive (kN) 130 16 223 37 14 213 34 23, Force A Tensile Shear Force
(kN)
(kN) 16
._.
3 13 1 14 12
164
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones
Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation I-
;;:;
12Om
12.Om
12 Om
12.0m
! /
:
Bending Moment /r Hogging (kN. m) _ &zing (kN.m) Compressive 1 (kN) lkN) Force Shear Force
A B
C
D
242 242
-
_
125 67 33 98 164 _ 164 91 37 86 147 _ _
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
w N 0
P
384 175
-
(kN) 9 2
19 1
_ 17 _ 17
165
: 12.0 m
: 12.0m :
5.0m e *
I 1 12.0 Ul
I
I I 12.0 m
PA I 12.0 m
2 I 12.0 m ! l-
Wind/seismic
Design Ultimate
Compressive
bi)rce
Shear
Force
,
(kN. m) (kb, 216 (kN)
174
c
D E F G H I J K L M N 0 P
496 555
*479 524
30 110 199 -
Foundation
:
Bending Moment Axial Force A > Compressive Tensile (kNJ 174 33 _ 320 13 29 306 68 46 (kNJ 11 _ 26 21 Shear Force (kN) 34 9 21 2
Section Designation
(
(kN. m) DL A LL WL DL I LL WL DL P LL WL _ _ _ -
166
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support conditibn Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Designation (
: 12.0m : 12.0 m
C
I.
NW 0
1 K J G H
E F D c e E
s
A I;1 Il.0 m I 12.0 m P lY.Om I 1EOm i
: All :
Shear Force
A B c D E F G H Z J K L M N 0 P
94
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment (kN.m) DL LL WL DL Z LL WL DL LL WL Axial Force n Compressive Tensile (kN) (kN) 184 32 338 74 29 300 68 47 I _ Shear Force (kN) 23 6 26 1 28 25
167
SP 43 (S& T):1987
TABLE 140 DESIGN FORCES
Span Frame spacing Column height Roof slopes Support condition Wind/seismic zones Design Ultimate Forces Section Des&nation c
: 12.0m
: 12.0m
: 9.5 m
y%T:]
12 On,
11.0m
Worn
lZ.Om
A B c D E F G H I J K L M N 0 P
Foundation Forces at Service Load Stage : Section Designation Forces Due to Bending Moment C (kn! m) DL A LL WL DL LL WL DL P LL WL _ (klvl 232 31 4 417 75 26 387 68 49 /kN) _ /kN) 13 3 37 1 35 33 Axial Force Shear Force
168
SP43(S&T):1987
TABLE 141 LOCATION OF JOINTS AND LIFTING POINTS DURING TRANSPORTATION AND ERECTION (REFER FIG. 150) (a) For Gable FZames with Rxed Bases
Spcln
(ml
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 18 18 18 18 18 18
Sprrdng
(m)
6 6 6 6 6 6 12 12 12 12 12 12 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 6 6 6 6 6 6
Slope I IN
3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5
a (mm)
1436 1403 1388 1452 1419 1403 1468 1434 1419 1468 1434 1419 1942 1898 1817 1942 1898 1877 1942 1898 1877 1942 1898 1877 1942 1898 1877 1942 1898 1877 2923 2857 2826 2923 2857 2826
b (mm)
1760 1720 1700 1950 1950 1980 2140 2180 2250 2140 2180 2250 2690 2720 2190 2690 2720 2790 2690 2720 2790 2690 2720 2790 2690 2720 2790 2690 2120 2790 4170 4270 4420 4170 4270 4420
Note - Distances a and b are same in single bay and multi-bay frames.
(Contfnued)
169
hJ
18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
(mJ
6 6 6 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 6 6 6 6 6 6 12 12 12 12 12 12 6 6 6 6 6 6 12 12 12 12 12 12
(ml
12.5 12.5 12.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 12.5
I IN
3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 +
2923 2857 2826 2923 2857 2826 2923 2857 2826 2923 2857 2826 3903 3815 3774 3903 3815 3774 3903 3815 3774 3903 3815 3774 4852 4743 4692 4852 4743 4692 4852 4743 4692 4852 4743 4692
4170 4270 4420 4170 4270 4420 4170 4270 4420 4170 4270 4420 5650 5810 6040 5650 5810 6040 5650 5810 6040 5650 5810 6040 6750 6890 7110 6750 6890 7110 6750 6890 7110 6750 6890 7110
Note - Distances a and b are same in single bay and multi-bay frames.
(Continued)
170
SP 43 (S & T):1987
TABLE 141 LOCATION OF JOINTS AND LIFTING POINTS DURING TRANSPORTATION AND ERECTION (REFER FIG. 150) - Contd fb) Span fW For Amble Frames with Hinged Bases Spacing (ml Column Height W Slope 1 IN a (mm) b @ml
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 12 12 12 13 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 18 18 18 18 18 18
6 6 6 6 6 6 12 12 12 12 12 12 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 6 6 6 6 6 6
5.0 5.0 5.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 *
3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5
1436 1403 1388 1436 1403 1388 1436 1403 1388 1436 1403 1388 1926 1883 1862 1926 1883 1862 1926 1883 1862 1926 1883 1862 1926 1883 1862 1926 1883 1862 2815 2810 2180 2875 2810 2780
2430 2510 2740 2430 2570 2740 2430 2570 2740 2430 2570 2740 3010 3130 3290 3010 3130 3290 3340 3560 3810 3340 3560 3810 3340 3560 3810 3340 3560 3810 4280 4430 4620 4450 4640 4880
Note - Distances a and b are same in single bay and multi-bay frames.
(Continued)
171
!P 43 (S & T):1987
TABLE 141 LOCATION OF JOINTS AND LIFTING Span Spacing Column Height POINTS DURING TRANSPORTATION a @ml b (mm)
(ml
18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
@,
6 6 6 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 6 6 6 6 6 6 12 12 12 12 12 12 6 6 6 6 6 6 12 12 12 12 12 12
(ml
12.5 12.5 12.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 12.5
3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 .
2815 2810 2780 2815 2810 2780 2815 2810 2780 2815 2810 2780 3040 3754 3713 3840 3754 3713 3840 3154 3713 3840 3754 3713 4812 4704 4654 4812 4704 4654 4812 4754 4704 4812 4754 4704
4780 5060 5400 4450 4640 4880 4780 5060 5040 5280 5700 6180 5740 5950 6230 5910 6160 6490 5910 6160 6490 6410 6800 7270 6870 7060 7330 7210 7480 7850 7210 7480 7850 7210 7480 7850
Note - Distances u and b are same in single bay and multi-bay frames.
172
142 DETAILS OF TYPE (1) JOINT IN THE RAFTER (REFER FIG. 152) Number of MS Rods in Each Half
mm
MS Plate Size
Diameter of MS Rods
mm
Number of Rows
Iv0
(Width mm
200 250 300 400 400 500 500 500 500 500 600 600 600 750 750 750
Row
mm mm mm mm mm mm mm
mm 400 500 600 800 1000 800 900 1000 1200 1500 1100 1200 1500 1100 1300 1500
mm
1 2 3 4 5 6 I 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
6 8
16 18 18 22 2s 25 28 32 32 36 32 36 42 42 42 42
4 6 9 12 12 12 10 9 12 42 12 12 10 9 12 12
2 3 3 4 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 4 5 3 4 4
2 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3
30 35 40 50 50 50 60 70 IO 15 70 15 80 80 80 80
50 60 60 60 60 60 70 80 80 85 80 85 90 90 90 90
100 100 100 120 120 120 120 120 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
300 x 520 x 10 400 x 620 x 12 400 x 640 x 16 500 x 640 x 12 500 x 560 x 14 500 x 780 x 16 500 x 810 x 18 500 x 870 x 25 600 x 810 x 18 600 x 870 x 18 600 x 750 x 25 750 x 970 x 18 150 x 970 x 20 750
X
970
25
e
Frames with Hinged Bases
G * 3 ;; I 3
Bays
Span
Spacing
Column Height
Quantity ofSteel
(kg/m)
A
Frames HY~ Purl&, etc.
(m) 12 12 12 12
(m) 6 12 12 12
(m) 9.5 5.0 6.5 9.5 6.5 9.5 12.5 6.5 9.5 12.5 5.0 6.5 5.0 6.5 5.0 6.5 9.5 5.0 6.5 9.5 0.1538 0.0613 0.0665 0.0769 0.0327 0.0688 0.0717 0.07748 13.810 5.039 5.669 7.882 8.883 11.571 15.605 5.556 8.776 10.546 7.958 9.199 4.604 5.313 7.823 8.837 13.132 4.679 5.797 8.319 4.444 5.396 5.625 6.079 3.472 3.694 3.917 5.108 5.412 5.716 2.153 2.273 2.514
18 18 18 18 18 18 4 9 9 9 9 12 12 12 12 12 12
6 6 6 12 12 12
0.0250 0.0268 0.0240 0.0652 0.0690 0.0729 0.0285 0.0300 0.0741 0.0770 0.0270 0.0281 0.0301 0.0659 0,0681 0.0724
6 6 12 12 6 6 6 12 12 12
0.0480 0.0923 0.0513 0.0562 0.0985 0.1069 0.1497 0.0602 0.065 1 0.0878
3.953 4.120 5.810 6.039 3.781 3.906 4.156 5.168 5.339 5.681 2.033 2.123 2.304
2.306 2.426
-d Bases
Fro
__-
~
of Concrete (n Quantity ;ht c In n In Frames Column Hei&& SP Span bYS
f SAeel (kg/m: :c P.S.Steel -2.589 2.818 2.782 3.023 sd Purlins, e\s &
n3/m2)
r HY
I __c-
Cm)
30 30 30 30 1
J9
59
i
I 1 3
4.2: 4.6: 6.1! 6.7( 4.61 4.9 6.7, 7.1 4.2 4.5 5.0 6.2 6.6 1.3 3.7 4.c 4.t 5. 5.! 6.4
9.5
12.5 9.5 12.5 5.0 6.5 5.0 6.5 5.0 6.5 9.5 5.0. 6.5 9.5 6.5 9.5 12.5 6.5 9.5 12.5
fj
6 12 12 6 6 12 12 6 6 6 12 12 12 6 6 6 12 12 12
$3
JO
18 81 41 99
6 5 5 2
92 2.545 2.126 3.083 2.222 2.461 2.701 42 49 .78 I22 i13 55 I88 iO6 195 354 112
7 2 9 8 0 0 !8 !8 7 19 11 19
3.911.0315 4.72~0331 7.13~0381 2.7%0801 3.661.0845 5Jw.0933 8.03.0274 99.5:x0303 11.43.0332 5.w.0701 6.7b.0759 8.%.0817
0 0 c ( (
12 12 12 12 12 12 18 18 18 18 18 18
( 0.0336
t ( ( 0.0851 0.0984 0.1118 0.0426 0.0492 0.0559
Continued)
% 8
TABLE 143 ESTIMATION OF QUANTITIES - Confd 8 r@
ti3
.L
( ,
A
Frames Hysd c Hysd Purlins, etc A
)
P.S.Steel
(m)
(ml 9.5 12.5 9.5 12.5 0.1373 0.1529 0.0687 0.0765 0.0273 0.0295 0.0698 0.0742 12.385 16.351 17.880 9.578 3.743 3.993 5.577 5.818 4.198 4.414 6.123 6.429 3.954 4.125 4.458 5.815 6.046 6.507 2.306 2.421 2.664 2.466 2.623 2.226 2.406
24 24 24 24
6 6 12 12
3
2
9
9 9 9
6
6 12 12 6 6 6 12 12 12 6 6 6 12 12 12
5.0
6.5 5.0 6.5 5.0 6.5 9.5 5.0 6.5 9.5 5.6 6.5 9.5 5.0 6.5 9.5
0.0239
0.0420 0.0269 0.0303 0.0483 0.0533 0.0633 0.0241 0.0266 0.0316 0.0819 0.0937 0.1056 0.0409 0.0469 0.0528
0.0306
0.0326 0.0781 0.0820 0.0286 0.0301 0.0330 0.0742 0.0772 0.0830 0.0250 0.0269 0.0289 0.0652 0.069 1 0.0730
3.265
4.574 2.290 3.176 3.676 4.481 6.292 2.789 2.847 5.148 7.599 9.145 11.528 4.823 6.116 8.163
12 12 12 12 12 12 18 18 18 18 18 18
(Continued)
- Co&d
(
In Purlines, etc Frames Hysd
>
purlins, etc
(ml 4 9 9 9 9 12 12 12 12 12 12
(ml 6 6 12 12 6 6 6 12 12 12
(ml 5.0 6.5 5.0 6.5 5.0 6.5 9.5 5.0 6.5 9.5 0.0233 0.0408 0.0262 0.0294 0.0472 0.0519 0.0613 0.0236 0.0260 0.0307 0.1007 0.1096 0.0611 0.0688 0.1154 0.1290 0.1868 0.0700 0.0778 0.1088 0.0287 0.0301 0.0742 0.0772 0.0271 0.0282 0.0304 0.0713 0.0735 0.0779 0.0483 0.0541 0.1160 0.1276 0.0398 0.0440 0.0525 0.097 1 0.0105 0.123.1 3.153 4.296 2.431 2.870
3.968 4.134 5.815 6.046 3.788 3.913 4.163 5.583 5.757 6.102 6.315 6.981 9.102 10.019 5.278 5.778 6.674 7.625 8.313 9.681
2.306 2.424
3.490 4.410 6.003 2.701 3.184 3.906 19.611 12.519 6.546 7.056 9.514 11.792 21.375 6.104 7.257 11.236
6 6 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
3.954 4.426
6 6 6 12 12 12
(Continued)
ESTIMATIOI
TABLE 143
-@)
steel
Purlins, etc +
c
P.S c Hysd
Frames HY~
j es, etc .
hmn
Height g
cc
Spa&
Span
Bays
In I
(ml
(m) 6 12 12 12 6 6 6 12 12 12 6 6 12 12
(m) 12 12 12 12 18 18 18 18 18 18 24 24 24 24 9 9 9 9 12 12 2 2
:.392 1.573 !.934 ..222 !.463 !.701 2.227 2.406 2.466 2.627 nrinued)
$1 16 39 16
0.03Il621 0.070635 0.0710693 0.080965 0.02:1107 0.03(1373 0.03,1792 0.07!0608 0.07.0807 0.08.1093 0.02.1664 0.02.1968 0.06.0900 0.07.1201 0.03.0858 0.03.0947 0.01.0524 0.08.0576 0.0a.1004 0.03.1094
0. 0.
0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0 0 0
9.5 5.0 6.5 9.5 6.5 9.5 12.5 6.5 9.5 12.5
3.750 4.079 4.412 5.488 5.944 6.398 3.740 3.986 5.469 5.809 4.173 4.395 6.114 6.420 3.949 4.111
9.255 12.861 15.912 5.877 7.972 10.264 15.865 18.025 9.646 11.734 8.265 9.086 4.781 5.565 7.769 9.120
0 0 0 0
a a
u C
, , ! , i 5
6
6 li li
C (
t t
(Co
Y_
Ye-
-y
--
--_
TABLE 143
Frame
--Cn2) (7 Frames HY~ (m) (m) 6 12 12 12 6 6 6 12 12 12 6 6 12 12 (m) 12 12 12 12 3 IS, etc Ioncrete (m3 /n Quantity of C /L-------d In hWmmes olumn HeW cIn Ig G Spacir Span Bays
A
P.S
.Steel
153 ,273 .5 14 2. 2. 2
4.444 5.396 5.625 6.079 3.472 3.694 3.917 2 2 2 5.108 5.412 5.716 3.953
13.810 5.039 5.669 7.882 8.883 11.571 15.605 5.556 8.776 10.546 7.958 9.199 4.604 5.313 7.823 8.831 13.132 4.679 5.797 8.319
,7 ;8 7 48
0.0321538 0.06%613 0.07b665 0.0770769 0.02f1071 0.02tl318 0.021710 0.06t0590 0.06!0776 0.07:1045
9.5 5.0 6.5 9.5 6.5 9.5 12.5 6.5 9.5 12.5 5.0 6.5 5.0 6.5 5.0 6.5 9.5 5.0 6.5 9.5
lb 18 18 18 18 18 9 9 9 9 12 12 12 12 12 12
0.02.0840
0.03.0923 0.07.0513 0.07.0562 O.Oq.0985 0.04.1069 0.01.1497 O.OkO602 O.OkO651 0.0:).0878
0 0 0 0
t.306 1.426
, 4
, i 5 5 2
2 2
a
C C C
c t f
1: 1: 1
( ( --
--
---
--
sP43(S&T):1987 General Notes for Figures 1 to 15.6 1. Notation a) 4-16 101 indicates four 16 mm diameter. HSD bars, type 01; b) 26-6 $03-250 indicates twenty six 6 mm diameter, MS bars, type 03 at spacing 250 mm centre-to-centre; c) $_ indicates centre line; and d) Cp indicates diameter. 2. 3 All dimensions are in mm. Maximum size of aggregates shall be : a) 12 mm for structures thickness less than 150 mm like purlins and cladding runners, and b) 20 mm for other members. 4. Clear cover to reinforcement to IS : 456-1978 shall be according 9. 8. 6. Reinforcement details are symmetrical about the centre line of portals. Bars shall be suitably joggled at the junction of column and beam and at crown of portal to avoid clashing of bars with each other. The column height specified includes 0.5 m length of column which is assumed below ground level. However, if firm strata is not available at this depth, then a pedastal can be designed and constructed as indicated in 6.5.4. For other details, refer to IS:4561978 for RCC members and IS : 1343-1980 for Frestressed concrete members.
7.
10. If exact size of bars is not available, they may be suitably replaced keeping the total area of reinforcement same. 11. Where extra width of column is available, the maximum spacing of corner column bars may be restricted to 75 mm (as shown in given figure below) so as to reduce the number of ties.
5.
Anchorage length, lap length, splicing, spacer bars, etc, shall be provided according to IS:456 1978.
7-32 # BARS
..
180
-----Z-16103
--~
1.16102
--17-
8107.
$ECTlON-BB
I - 16w1
Z-16*03
l-169021
)3-164FOl
3-16*01
12%8*06-200 SECTION-AA
t A
DRAWING
No.1
(REFER
TABLE
I )
No. OF BAYS
SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT coNolTlo(I FOR AU WIN0 AND I SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
:un
: Fo MI .. . -
1inS
1 51641
1636
660
1099
Z- 16+04 1-16M3
tFk
SECTIDN-AA
DRAWING
No.
(REFER
TABLE
2)
No. AN0 SPACING OF PURLINS SLOPE tit Ii2 R PRINCIPAL ;;Rf;s 1 in 3 lin 4 6680 6695 6705 6320 6305 6295 1417 1063 850 5 S S RAFTER 2. SPACING llS1 1124 1111 . 3. FOR FOUNDATION TABLE OF THE FORCES :2 NEAREST PURLIN LUG (K) REFER TO ANALYSIS DISTANCE FROM THE NOTE: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS IN mm
: : : :
a. EXTERNAL b. RIDGE
COLUMN
FACE: 100
1 in 5
: 300
1
: M 25 : Fe 415
-350
,246fOL
~,W6-360
2-16@03 2-168021
2-12*07 IL-m01
c
I
44-16~01
21-6806-250
-----h-6: SECTION-AA D6- 250
4
A
lin lin 1
(REFER
No. SLOPE Ii1 ii2 R
IABLE 3)
0:
:
DIMENSIONS FOUNDATION TABLE OF THE b. RI DCE ARE H mm REFER TO FORCES :3 NEAREST PURLIN LUG(Q)
No. OF BAYS
SPAN SPAC INO COLUMN HEIOHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND I SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
PRINCIPAL p2$:Ns
: FIXED
3 C
b734 4766
5 5 5
THE a.EXTERNAL
COLUMN
FACE:100 :36a
: N 2S
tin5
Fa LIS
SECTION-
BQ
2-12,07
SECTION-AA
_II 600 1
DRAWING
MO.
No.
(REFER
TABLE
I)
:
DIMENSIONS FOUNDATION TABLE OF ARE IN mm REFER TO FORCES
PRINCIPAL
No. OF
PURLINS 6284 1400 5
:4
NEAREST PURLIN LUG($) COLUMN FACE:100
THE
6266
6254
1050
640
5
5
: 360
OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CON(JlTlON FOR ALL WIND AN0 SEISMIC ZONES 1 MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
: M 25 ; Fe 415
t
2-16403( 12-12607
L-1690(
t
TOP DF FOUNDATION 11100 -
DRAWING
No. AI UO SPACING OF PURL11 SLOPE II, H2 R ~~ 5217 , 1 11.m_, ! _.._ 4764 x.__ i75L 1900 ,,,_._ } 1140 ! i 1 PRINCI IPAL RAFTER F P%iiLqNs 6 6 6 j 1 2. SPACING 1246 1219 1205 I 3, FOR FOUNDATION TABLE OF THE F&ES : 5 NEAREST PURLIN LUG(P) REFER TO ANALYSIS DISTANCE FROM
No.
(REFER
TA ELE 5)
1.
ALL DIMENSIONS
ARE
IN mm
lHEo.EXTERNAL b.RIDCE
COLUMN
tin 5
1 S2lSl
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AN0 SEISMIC ZONES I MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
: ONE
I12.0m : 6.0m : 5.0m : FIXED
: M 25 : Fe 115
-350
SECTION-U
SECTION-AA
.
1
-__
I
~ \
DRAWlNO No. 6 (REFER
:
TABLEBI
I
R
1900 1425 1140
FORCES 6 NEAREST
zRf;6
6 6
SPACING 1246 12 19
PURLINS
a. EXTERNAL b. RIDGE
COLUMN
FACE:
1205
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACINO COLUMN HEIOHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND ~ElSMlC ZONES I M-ATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
I : : :
:M 25 : Fe 415 ._
SECTION- BB
l-201021 SECTION- AA
In-eilo-300
DRAWING
Na No. AN0 SPACING OF PURLINS SLOPE Hl H2 R PRINCIPAL pNuokfks tin 3 9717 9264 1900 lh4 1hS
L
No.
(REFER
TABLE
7 )
1. 2.
FORCES
9734 9746
9266 9254
1425 1140
a.EXTERNAL b.RIDGE
COLUMN
OF GAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPP OR1 CONDltlON FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES 1 MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
: w 25 I Fe MI
SECTION-AA
TOP OF FOUNDATION
IDR*WIHO
(REFER
TABLE
8 )
. . 1.
2.
No. OF BAYS
SPAN SPACINO COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC 2DNES 1 MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
NOTE:
ALL FOR DIMENSIONS FOUNDATION TABLE: 6 ARE IN mm REFER TO FORCES
SLOPE
Ii,
i,$Rp&s
lin 3 5217 4764 1900 6
ANALYSIS
FACE : 100
1 in 5
: 360
: M 25
: Fe 415
SECTION-
88
: :1
21-8~09-300 2l_OClO-300 01 S-201
21.8+09-300
I
L
A' TG
-
DRAWING
No. AND SPACING OF PURLINS SLOPE H, H2 R PRINCIPAL RAFTER 2. FOR FOUNDATION TABLE OF THE FORCES REFER TO SPACING 1236 1207 1193 ANALYSIS 3. DISTANCE FROM NOTE
No. 9
(REFER
TABLE
9 1
:
OIMENSIONS ARE IN mm
. 1, ALL
$;Ry;Ns
1 in 3 lin lin 4 5 6717 6734 6746 6284 6266 6254 1900 1425 lli0 6 6 6
:9
NEAREST PIJRLIN COLUMN LUG (0 FACE:100
OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOft ALL WIND AND
SEISMIC ZONES I
: 360
:w 25 : Fe LtS
2-32*01 I I
2-1z*m ,L-32*01
T OP OF FOUNDATION lWO0
II 1 1
I 600
No. 10
( REFER
:
TABLE 10)
*
1
No. OF PURLINS
FORCES
in 3
lin 4
a. EXTERNAL b.RIOGE
1in S
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEl&T SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES I MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
: Fe
:u
25 415
-36-.3tll-i
!60
I-lV1
J!! ,)--#j2l-)b 2140 s-20*0, .' j_ TOP OF FOUNDATION 800 L 1 _____ 112"" 12 - 320 13 - 320
2l-ev12-320
i21_rJbT3-320
SECTION-AA
L 1
0""
i 1
DRAWING
No.
11
I REFER
TABLE 11)
No. AND SPACING OF PURLINS SLOPE Ml 2 R PRINCIP*L pNuok& lin lin lin 3 4 5 6789 6813 6828 6212 6180 6172 2867 2150 1720 8 8 e RAFTER SPACING 1358 1327 1312
NOTE: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS FOUNDATION TABLE OF THE aEXTERNAL b. RIDGE ARE IN mm REFER TO
2. FOR
PURLIN FACE
LUG(c) : 100
COLUMN
: 300
ND. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AN SEISMIC ZONES I MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
:M 25 :FeblS
VI
._ ..
._ _. . . .. .- _
,I:
*I
0
260
iEClION-
Be
l-2bod
a
:wl :c1iON-AA SE 17200 No. PRINCIPAL No. OF PURLINS 6 6 e
io-6w-2-320
LO-9*12-320 $
Leo0
L 1
DRAWING No. OF
AND SPACING OF PURLINS RAFTER SPAcNG 1356 3. 1 in 4 1 in 5 12913 12828 12166 12172 2150 1720 1327 1312 DISTANCE FROM THE OF THE NEAREST PURLIN LUG(P) aEXTERNAL b. RI OGE COLUMN FACE:100 ;300 NOTE, a 1. ALL 2. FOR DIMENSIONS FOUNDATION TABLE ARE IN mm REFER TO SPAN
No.
13
(REFER
TABLE
13)
BAYS
SPACING
COLUMN SUPPORT FDR ALL SEISMIC MATERIALS
SLOPE
Hl
R2
HEIGHT
CONOlTlON WIND : AND
FORCES : 13
ANALYSIS
1 in 3
12709
12212
2667
ZONES
CONCRETE STEEL
i.EC~lOlu.
3-16M
2-:5*03,
!=r-,,_,,,,,
s-25*01
-l&ee13SECTION-AA
,360
TOP OF FOUNOATlON
DRAWING
NaAND SPACING OF PURLINS SLOPE Ii, 2 R PRINCIPAL RAFTER No. OF PRLINS]SPACING 1 in 3 6769 6212 2667 6 1350 3 .DISTANCE FROM OF THE NEAREST PyRLlN FACE LUG (cl THE a. EXTERNAL b.RIOGE COLUMN
No. 14
(REFER
IABLE
IS)
FORCES
: 10 : 100 : 360
FOR ALL
SEISMIC MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
: FIXED
: Fe
415
SllY
a a
0
I
9061
9906
U! 1
stn
3oaIu
lVNL131X3 lS3UV3N
EfZZ
176Z
9016
, SE16
?U!l c U!L
3Hl
NOIlVONllOd
13316 313mNO3 :slvlY31v SW02 31ns13s I ONV aNlM 1lV M NOlllaN03 1llOddf llml3H Nwnlc 9Nl3Vc NVd do C SAW Sl ON BNIMVC
NOIlVONflOllr)O d01
'SUCSL-E
sBNal133s
r-,--2-
32903
2-32+04
&ClION-
B@
3-16905,
kI ,36-6?14-260
l-32*02 k:m I-
SECTION-A&
,
1 DRAWING
Na AN0 SPACING OF PURLINS NOTE : 1. ALL - 2.FOR DIMENSIONS FOUNDATION TABLE ARE IN mm REFER TO
No. 16
(REFER
TABLE
161
SLOPE
tl,
H2
PRINCIPAL
pFi;;s
lin lin 3 L 12799 12613 12626 12212 12166 12172 2667 2lS0 1720 6 6 3
OF THE
THE
a.EXTERNAL b.RIOGE
COLUMN
1 in S
idi
No.OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES I MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
12.5m FIXED
: M25 :_.Fe415
3-25cO3-
2-16X10 59-Lwl32-16+09
a-25+08
2%6#12-36d
2sw12-
360
II
TOP OF FOUNDATION
SECTION-AA
23000 7
1000
1 7
I
SLOPE
DRAWING
No.
17
[REFER
TABLE 17)
I -
1 in 3 1 in L tin 5
9861
9691 __ 9910
3633
11
1276
3.DISTANCE FROM
OF THE THEa.
NEAREST
PURLIN
LUG(c)
:::,/I
f
EXTERNAL b.RIDGE
COLUMN
No.OF GAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
: :
M25 Fe416
SECTION.iB
2-16+07 ,59-6*12-210
34-Wll34-6+11-
360 360
i SECTION-AA
TOP OF FOUNDATION
I
I
?
1000
L 1
23000
1 1
1000
DRAWING
No. 18
(REFER
TABLE 18)
No. AN0 SPACING OF PURLINS SLOPE Ml 2 R PRINCIPAL pN;I;(fks 1 RAFTER SPACING 1276 1307 1372 2. FOR FOUNDATION TABLE: OF THE FORCES 13 NEAREST PURLIN LUG (PI REFER TO NOTE 1. ALL
:
ARE IN mm
DIMENSIONS
ANALYSIS
in 3
11 10 10
I in 4 lin 5
a. EXTERNAL b. RIDGE
COLUMN
FACE :lOO
: 300
No.OF GAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONMTION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES I MATEMALS: CONCRETE STEEL
FIXED
: :
M25 Fe415
3-32X04
Z-16*09 4-20#00
SECTION-BB
2-25Y
0 7 I I ,5.3-6*14-210
25-8*13-
360
SECTION-AA
DRAWING
No. AND SPACING OF PURLINS SLOPE H, Hz R PRINCIPAL R*FTER SPACING 12 72 1360 1365 NOTE 1. ALL Z.FOR
No.
19
(REFER
TABLE
19)
:
ARE IN mm REFER TO FORCES 19 NEAREST PURLIN LUG (Q,
p;$;s
lin lh 3 4 9661 9691 9910 9063 9026 9004 3910 2958 2366
11
10 10
COLUMN
FACE
: 100 : 360
1 in 5
No.OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
: M25 Fe b15
SECTION-BB ,S6-6113210
I--
;6--%tOl -33-6112-360
rt-t
SECTION-AA
I DRAWING
No. AN0 OF SLOPE Hl Hz I4 SPACING 1. 2. . NOTE : ALL FOR DIMENSIONS FOUNDATION TABLE OF THE ARE IN mm REFER TO PURLINS RAFTER FORCES SPACING 1272 1360 1365 ANALYSIS 3. DISTANCE FROM THE PRINCIPAL
No.
20
(REFER
TABLE 20)
pzi&
lin 3 12661 12691 12910 12lLO 12 110 12090 3633 2675 2300 11 10 10
: 20
NEAREST PURLIN LUG(E) FACE: 100 COLUMN
No.OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WlND AND SEISMIC ZONES I
MATERIALS: CONCRETE
FIXED
1 in 4 lin 5
a. EXTERNAL b.RIOGE
: 360
STEEL
: :
M25
Fe415
__--__
I
SECTION-BB
1
.CL~C
B
1 74-W13-210 /, i 2-l6,11 ,2-161)ll
2S-8W12-380
,
-2%8W2380
~---I@ +!Lo!
1 7 SLOPE lin 3
SECTION-AA I
TOP 0FFO"NOATlON
2gooo
7
too0 1
1 .
DRAWING
No AND SPACING OF PURLINS 1. Hl 2 R NOTE. ALL DIMENSIONS FOR FOUNDATION TABLE: OF THE ARE IN mm REFER TO
No. 21
(REFER
lAGLE.ZI)
. PRINCIPAL
::,,:,,
RAFTER 2. ISPACING ANALYSIS 3. DISTANCE FROM THE 21 NEAREST PURLIN LUG(c) FORCES
1 in 1.
a.EXTERNAL
COLUMN
FACE : 100
1 I 5 L
.-
No.OF GAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES I MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
: :
M26 Fe415
3-32XOL
Z-161(09 3-2W08
SECTION -88
33-8ei2-380
SECTION-AA
1 DRAWING
No
22
(REFER
TABLE
22)
1
H,
I
/ H2
/sLopEI 1
1 in 3 lin L 12861 12891 12910 12063 12028 1200* 1 in 5
wj:,
13 13 12
FORCES
: 22
NEAREST PURLIN FACE LUG(Q) : 100 COLUMN
THEaEXTERNAL b. RIDGE
: 300
No.OF GAY S SPAN SPAClNG COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITK)N FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
: ONE : 3QGm
: :
M25 Fe b15
S6El 09c: 001:33Vd In1 NWnl03 NIlkInd 3z)ait( lVNt131X3 lS3UV3N EZ 01 t(333tl JU S3JtlOd N, 3tlV 3Hl q 0 40 3Hl WOtld EZEL 3NIJVdS M31jVM SNOISN3Wla 1lV :310N 1 ELZL 33NVlSIaE SISAlVNb tlad Z
21 EL EL :;o, 1VdlSNltJd
9862
LOLE
417=zd :
szw :
0167
: 31811
NOIlVONIIOd
1331s 313XJN03 :slvlY3lvw S3NOZ 3lWSl3S aNV aNlM lit tlOd NOlllaN03 1YOddllS lH013H NWfll03 ONl3VdS NVdS
tl
IH
3dOlS
3NO :
SAVB40-N
L
c
00062 NOllVONflOj 30 L dOF[174 1 0001
0001
1
II
l_
1 L
UI
2-16SO9 -4-32: 06
II
I I
33-6012-380
SECTION-AA
----
.
7
1000
1 DRAWING No. 24 (REFER TABLE 20 No.OF GAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR AU WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL : -ONE : 30.0m : 12.0m : 12.5m
-T-r
SLOPE Ii1 H2
FORCES 24
: FIXED
NEAREST COLUMN
PURLIN FACE:
1
: :
M25 Fe415
-17-64C&270
SECTION-BB
SECTION-CC
2-16tO3
2-16403
I-lCe0 2-1610
I-
2-w
03
25-6607-200
TdP
OF FCUNOATI0N
6600
jl!y -r
SECTION-DD fi -z;l LOO Ic DRAWING No. SPAN ARE IN mm 10 (c) I SPACING COLUMN SUPPORT FOR AU HEIGHT OF No. BAYS WIND
I_ ____... . ___
400
25
(REFER : :
25)
I
SLOPE
I
II,
I
li2
I
R
I
,,,,F$S
NaANo EXTERIOR
NOTE
1 ___1, DIMENSIONS Ai
-*----* 2.FDR rwmmr~u~~ ANALYSIS TABLE
:
: CONDITION AND
SPACING 1361
C : I,
FORCES REFER
:
I
lh
3 I
5144
4656
1433
3.DISTANCE DF THE NEAREST PURLIN LVC FRC, TE a. EX1FDLI.I Pfil ,,.I PIPF
I.
1 lk4
jSlS6
I4644 14636
11075 1 660
1
1
5
5
1
1
1111 IO&
1
1
4 4
1 1346 !
1 1330 1
. _.... * ndGE Ll
c.VALLEY
tnn
.
SEISMIC
MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
ZONES
: 300 : 300
: M25 : Fe
1 1 in 5 I5164
415
902
!?2
w
N-
L86 I $1 B S) Et dS
l-16*02,
r-Z-16*05
2-xeo3
Z- 16602
3-16s
03
t
14-6*10-350
SECTION-B8
2;16.041
--v?.o ,
SECTIDN-CC
~.~CITRA
%16*D31 l-16*02\ (
2-12*06 ,3-16L03
-m 09 -250
SECTION-AA Til
SECTION-DO
DRAWING
No. BAYS
27
(REFER 1 ABLE
: : TWO 9.0m lZ.Om 5.0m FIXED
27)
No. OF
No SLOPE Hl H2 R AND SPACING RAFTER SPACNG 1150 1?22 OF PURUNS INTERIOR &::NS L 4 RAFTER SPACNG. ?361 1326 -. 1 in 5 5246 415L 640 5 1109 4 1310 NOTE 1 ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN mm REFER TO 2 FOR FOUNDATION ANALYSIS TABLE. 3 DISTANCE FROM THE FORCES 27 SPAN SPACING COLUMN SUPPORT FOR ALL SEISMIC EXTERIOR ,,,&S 111-13 IIll 5217 5234 4704 4766 lLO0 1050 S 5
: :
OF THE NEAREST PURLIN LUG ($1 100 o EXTERNAL COLUMN FACE b RIDGE : 360 c VALLEY : 300
; :
hi25 F,?
415
2-16603
-2-16602
3- 16+03
-11-6#10_3!jO 2- 16.07
2-16*07
:E
LIw
RA
-16# 1, - ,300
LONG ZlbO6
!-lZO6
_ .____
2-16% 2- 16
SECTIONTOP OF FOUNDATION
AA
SECTION-00
DRAWING No. AN0 SLOPE H, H2 R EXTERIOR SPACING RAFTER SPACING 1150 1122
1 I
No. BAYS
28
(REFER
: TWO
TABLE
28)
NOTE 1. ALL
No.
OF
pv;;&
!,n3 6717 6734
/
626L 6266
I
1400 1050
I
FORCES : 28 NEAREST
5
5 5
I,5
1
.
1326 6251 B&O 1169
FROM
COLUMN
FACE:
SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES
MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
1
: : M25
lin5
6746
Fe US
c--l-l6XO5
2;16*03
Z-16#02
2-16902-
2- 166 03
H Z-16*07
1&8*10-350
2-16(;07 B ,
300 SECTION-BB
2-16@cy
r I II I Ii I
I12-16?02
SECTION-DO
J r No. AND sp*tlNG RAFTER SPACNG 1248 OF PURLINS INTERIOR P%LtlFNS 6 RAFTER SPACNG 1146 600 .
No. BAYS
29
(REFER ; : : TWO
TABLE
29)
k
_ NOTE: ,.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN mm REFER TO SLOPE II, Ii2 R EXTERIOR Pk~:NS linl 5217 4764 1900 6 2.FOR FOUNDATION ANALV5,S ,ABLE 3 .OISTANCE FROM FORCES : 2S NEAREST
12.0m
6.0m FIXED
SPACI
: 5.0m
:
I
OF THE b. RIDGE
PURLIN
LUG ($1
THE 0. EXTERNAL
COLUMN
FACE
Im4
tin5
5234 5246
C766 4754
IL25 1140
6 6
1219 1205
5 5
1396 1360
c.VALLEV
SEISMIC
MATERIALS CONCRETE STEEL
ZONES
i : :
M25 Fe 415
,l-16WO2
2-16603
---Z-16,02
Z-16lIO5
--3-16*03
18-8#10-350
lb8#10-350
Z-16*07
2-16W7
16911 -lx)0
LOW
SECTION-AA
aO-RLm-l)
SECTION-
00
r No. SLOPE Ii1 H2 R AND SPACING RAFTER SPACING 6 6 6 !248 1219 1205 OF PURLINS RAFTER SPACING 1145 1396 1380
600 I
DRAWING
No.
30
(r
EXTERIOR $;;;5 lin3 lin4 1 in5 6717 6734 6746 6284 6266 6254 1900 14 25 1140 INTERIOR ,,,,f,, 6 S 5
(REFER : : : : TWO
TABLE
30)
:
DI MEWIONS FOUNDATION TABLE ARE IN mm REFER TO FORCES
: 30
(Q)
OF THE NEAREST PURLIN LUG THE a. EXTERNAL COLUMN FACE b. RIDGE c.VALLEV
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
12.Om
6.Om 6.5m FIXED
; M25 : Fe (15
,----l-16*03
3-16#03
2- lC+OC
2- 16tO6
3-16804
16-8~13-350 2-16809 t
8 w
Y)-m13-350
2-16eO9
-6+12-350
,
SECTION- AA TOP OF FOUNDATION J r 600 .I r 11400 -_.DRAWING PURLINS RAFTER SPACING 1145 3 1lnL 9734 9266 1425 6 12 19 5 1396 No. NOTE : 1 ALL 2 FOR DIMENSIONS FOUNDATION TABLE OF THE ARE IN mm REFER TO SPAN SPACING COLUMN OF No. BAYS SECTION-DO
h-16-3
31
(REFER
TABLE
31)
OF
INTERIOR prRL$ 6
: :
TWO
FORCES 3, NEAREST
PURL!N
COLUMN
: 300
lin5 L
97L6
9154
1140
?205
!380
HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
I : :
I.425 Fe 415
2-16906
SECTION-BE
2-16905,
a
-4
H,
SECTION-DO
TOP OF FOUNDATION
DRAWING
No.
32
[REFER
TABLE
32)
.
SLOPE H2 R
SPACING
No.
NOTE : 1. ALL Z.FOR DIMENSIONS FOUNDATION TABLE ARE IN mm TO SPAN FORCES REFER : 32 PURLIN LUG (Q, 100 : 360 : 300
OF
BAYS
RAFTER /SPACING
COLUMN
FACE:
SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
1
: M 25 : h 615
2-20103
--
3-20402
iz 3-166 10
--lo-Pal&350
SECTIct4-BB
*A
JE3-3-1610
SECTION-CC
lrni
_._-._
3_2M02,
SECTION-AA
SECTION-DO
I
1. ALL 2.FOR DIMENSIONS FOUNDATION TABLE THE OF THE ARE : 33 NEAREST PURLIN LUG (cl : 100 COLUMN FACE IN mm REFER TO FORCES ANAVSIS 3,DISTANCE FROM a. EXTERNAL c.VALLEV
DRAWING
No.
33
M 25 Fe 415
SECTION-BB
TdP
OF FOUNOAlIOh 11400 600 I DRAWING No. NCTE : l.ALL 2.FOR 4 DIMENSIONS FOUNDATION TABLE ARE IN mm REFER TO SPAN SPACING COLUMN SUPPORT PURLIN COLUMN LUG &, FACE : 100 :360 : 300 FOR ALL SEISMIC MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL HEIGHT CONDITION WIND AND ZONES I FORCES : 34 NEAREST OF No. BAYS 34 (REFER : TWO 12.0m 9.5m FIXED TABLE 34 1
+I
600
J rkr
SPACING
: 12.0m
:
:
SPACING 1133
ANAVSIS 3. DISTANCE
lin3
9117
9284
1900
OF THE
1 in4 lin5
9736 19766
9266 13254
1425
6 6
1207
1361
FROM
THE
1 1140 1
I 1193 I
1365
: :
M25 Fe 415
2-2oto2
3-1006
I
.
..M
L-ll!_l
II
-(#13-320
__.._.. _ .
17200
, r
800 Ir
,E
DRAWING
No BAYS
35
(REFER : TWO : :
TABLE
35)
SPACING RAFTER
No. OF
SPAN SPACING COLUMN SUPPORT
NOTE 1. ALL
: DIMENSIONS FOUNDATION TABLE: OF THE b. RIDGE ARE IN mm REFER TO FORCES 35 NEAREST PURLIN FACE LUG cc)
18.Om
6.0m FIXED
ISPACING
SPACING FOR 2. 1
I
WEIGHT CONDITlDh
: 6.5m
ANALYSIS 3. DISTANCE
FROM THE
o.EXTERNAL
COLUMN
: 100
SECTION-BB
.oms-390
DRAWING
No
36
(RiFER : : * I
TABLE 36)
1. ALL i.FOR
ARE
IN mm REFER TO
FORCES : 36 NEAREST
PURLIN
COLUMN FACE
No. OF BAYS SPAN >PAClNG COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR AU WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES I MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
TWO
19.Om 6.0m 9.Sm FIXED
: w25 :Fa41s
36-B(t16-260
SECTION-B8
Z-25.903,
\._
.6614-360
4-25801
800
1
r SECTION-DO
lz-2S.02 SECTION-AA
J-I=
--
17200
600 Ic
a-
DRAWING Na SPAN
No
37
(RiFER
TABLE
37)
OF GAYS
: TWO
:
No. AND SLOPE Hl n2 1 1 h3 lb,4 72799 12613 12212 1206 2667 2lSO 9 6 R EXTERIOR &&
RAFTER ISPACING r
INTERIOR &;;s
ARE
IN mm REFER TD
FORCES 37
ANALYSIS
3, DISTANCE OF THE NEAREST PURLIN LUG (c) . FROM THE aEXTERNAL COLUMN FACE : 100 b.RIDGE c.VALLEY : 300 : 300
(in5 L
12629
12172
1720
1312
122s
SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR AU WIND AND I SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
: : :
: :
M25 Fe L15
SECTION-BB
llB-erlr:3Bo SECTIONDO
SECTION-AA
10-p OF FOLINOATION
DRAWING
No. AND SLOPE Ii, H2 R EXTERIOR puck,;; 1 in3 lid 6709 6813 6212 6lBB 2667 2150 8 a SPACING RAFTER SPACING 1350 1319 OF PURLINS RAFTER SPACING 1206 NOTE: 1. ALL Z.FOR DIMEN!WNS FOUNDATION TABLE OF THE ARE IN mm REFER TO LUG. (6)
No
38
(AEFER
TAGIf
38)
No. OF BAYS
SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR AU WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES I MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
INTERIOR p;;LT;S 8 8
: TWO : thorn
FORCES
; y-g
: FiXED
ANALYSIS 3. DISTANCE
: 30
NEAREST PURLIN COLUMN FACE
1254 6172
I
FROM
TKE
lin5
L
I
6828
1720
I I
8
I
1304
I
B I
1239 I
: M2S : h us
3-251rD6
SECTION-BB
z-u*12 I-.lzm
3-2Dwo
%:;::;:yffi
,2_~,c_r___,
3-25803--
t*
-YlbMO
SECTION-AA OP
OF FOUNDATION DRAWING
No. AND SPACING RAFTER ]SPACING I OF PURLINS INTERiOR p;;;;s I RAFTER SPACING NOTE 1. ALL 2 FOR
No
39
(REFER
TABLE
39)
:
DIMENSIONS FOUNDATION TABLE ARE IN mm REFER PURLlN TO LUG (&) FACE: 100 FORCES 39
SLOPE
H,
H2
EXTERIOR p$LqLs I
THE (1 EXTERhAL
COLUMN
: 360
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES I MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
: M25 : Fe Cl5
s1t %I :
SLW :
oss :
09t :
CEZL A3llVA 33ak4 lVN~31X3 1S3ClV3N 3 9 0 3HL 3HI JO WOtiJ 33NVlSla SISAlVNV kfod 1lV.L Z ,N,aVdSI M3ldVM E 99Zi I 7SZl
8 8
20EL 6lEl
8 8
OZL OSLZ
ZLLZL 88lZL
8Z8ZL ELBZL
8 ,o;r t10lL431NI 40
L98Z
ZIZZL
68LZL
07 : 31911
S3JtlOd
NOIlVONflOd SNOISN3WIO
: :
:
UW NI 3tlV
zH
I4
3dOlS
: 310N
SNllti,-,d
J
.I
^A.. NOIIVONnOd 40
b1333bl)
008
OOZLL
00 - Nau33S z-y .I
#V-N011935
33NO11235
/ 09z-Ow9-9E
90991
-E
aa-No11335
u*oz-E
co*sz-E
701sz-1
mez-i LOYSL-E
Z- 16613 3-lb*10
-6616-380
T
r DRAWING .
NOTE: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS 2. FOR FOtiNDATlON ANALYSIS ARE IN mm REFER TO
SECTION00
No. 41 (REFER TABLE 41)
SLOPE H, H2 R
pGRR,9,s SPACING
10 1311
FORCES
7in3
lin4 lid
9661
9691
9140 9110
3833 2675
11 10 10
COLUMN
1387 1372
10 10
1280
: 300
: 550
9910
9090
2300
1265
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND I SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS : CONCRETE STEEL
: :
M25 Fe415
l-32606\
3-32#0
2-32aos
59-Ml62-16Cl4 210
-Z-16,14 O-161)11
,&_
DCL _c Iwn-LL
12-32*05 11-32#06
(
14-6116-360
%=+34-6.16-3&l
r
I-
1000
1 h-32fOS
SECTION -
- 00
rp
1000
DRAWING
No.
42
(REFER
TABLE421
IG
No SLOPE H, H2 R EXTERIOR
AND
p;;l&
lin3 12661 12891 12910 12140 12110 12090 3633 2875 2300 11 10 10
2. FOR
FORCES 42 NEAREST
PURLIN
LG FACE
1inL
lin5
--
f ROM THE
COLUMN
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND I SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
: TWO : 2L.Ot-n
1 6.0m
: 12.5m : FIXED
; :
hi25 Fed15
.Ml4-3BD
I
P
5-32*01
-1
2-32b03 SECTION-AA
~25-&5-uy) SECTION - DD
,I
q-_
I-
1000
TdP
OF FOUNDATION
1
No. AND EXTERIOR pNuod$,s
29000
SPACING RAFTER SPACING OF PURLINS RAFTER SPACING . NOTE: l.ALL DIMENSIONS 2,FOR FOUNDATION TABLE: OF
_ 1c Jo0
I
DRAWING
No. 43
(REFER
TABLE 13 1
,.
II:
I%
SLOPE
k,
INTERIOR pNud$
ARE
mm REFER TO
FORCES 13
ANALYSIS 3,DISTANCE
11 10 10
10 10 10
1304
FRO,., THE
1273
1250
aEXTERNAL
THE NEAREST PURLIN LUG (8, COLUMN FACE :I00 : 360 b. RIDGE
c VALLEY
: 550
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPAC!NG COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND 1 SEISMIC Z0NE.S MATERIALS : CONCRETE STEEL
: M29 : Fe415
-2-32*03
1-32*077-J-32#02
SECTION-BB
3 -20*06,
SECTION-CC
SECTION-00
J r OF PURLINS RAFTER NOTE l.ALL DIMENSIONS 2.FOR ,3GL , FOUNDATION TABLE: OF THE a THE 44 NEAREST .ANALVSIS 3 DISTANCE FROM
1000 I_ 1-t
IL
TO
DRAWING
No.
44
(REFER
TABLE
441
AND
SPACING RAFTER .-
<LOPE 11n3
EXTERIOR p~RL~f;S I. 11
No. OF
BAYS
: TWO
: 24.0m : 12.0m : 12.h : FIXED
ARE
IN
mm REFER
FORCES
PURLIN
LUG FACE
($1
llnL lin4
12891 12910
12110 12090
2675
EXTERNAL
COLUMN
2300
b RIDGE c. VALLEY
SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND I SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS : CONCRETE STEEL
: M2S : Fe415
SECTION-88
SECTION-CC
ISECTION-
EE
17-6*00-270
2%6407-
200
256b
07- 200
SECTION-
00
DRAWING No. AND SP*CING OF PLIRLINS INTERIOR pFifi;s L * 4 RAFTER SPACING 1361 1346 1uO
No.
55
(REFER
TABLE
05)
H--l-SLOPE II, H2 R EXTERIOR P%KS S 5 lin3 5144 4656 1633 1075 660 S
NOTE:
1.ALL
2.FOR
ARE
FORCES NEAREST
ANALYSIS 3,OISTANCE
FROM
EXTERNAL
FACE
: loo
b. RIDGE c. VALLEY
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND 1 SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
: M 25 : Fe 415
,l-16)03
l-16*06
-l-16+03
Z-16*04
2- 16k4
Z-16*08
SECTION-B
SECTION-CC
8 D
l-16#03 --, 7 l-16*06 -2-
-_14-8#11-360 16#06
-F-t
SECTION-EE
\2- 164 04
2-16*o7
,14_oW1_JLo~~
tf
SECTION-DO
r
I1. ALL 2.FOR DIMENSIOPJS FOUNDATION TABLE OF THE a. THE ARE IN mm REFER TO FORCES : 46 NEAREST AL PURLIN LUG ANALYSIS 3,OISTANCE FROM
DRAWING
N,,.
46
(REFER
TABLE 46 1
COLUMN
FACE:
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACI NO COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
1
:M 25 :Fe LIS
l-16*0+
r-l-
16CO6
l-16*02,
--l-16*06
Z-16*02
--l-16*02
2-16*03
l-16*05
Z-16M9-
IL-6@12-3S0
14-6912-350 2-16*09
-2-16109
SECTION-BB
SECTION-CC
SECTION-EE
250
2-16KI21
.
5ECTlON-AA
.F_^..
-20.Wll1-16~05
250
SECTION-CID
!w 1 ? 600 1 1
lx iv ~_f-600
II -_c DRAWING No. BAYS 47 I REFER : THREE : 9.0m : !2.0m HEIGHT CONDITION WIKD AND ZONES I :S.Om : FIXED TABLE 471
No SLOPE ti, H2 R
AN0
No. SPAN
OF
. EXTERIOR p;,$&
SPACING COLUMN SUPPORT PURLIN FACE LUG (c! 100 360 300 FOR ALL SEISMIC MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
FORCES 47 NEAREST
1in3
1in4 1 in5
COLUMN
VALLEY
: M 25 : Fe 415
2 - 20*)4
2-16111.
8 B
w
l-20803
2.
SECTION
88
SECTION
CC
SECTION
EE I
TOP OF FOUNOATION
SECTION
DO
____E!__.__
-__
-+--+
DRAWING
No. 48
(REFER
TABLE 48)
No. OF BAYS
R -__+ 2. FOR FOUNDATION TABLE OF THE FORCES REFER TO
: LB
NEAREST PURLIN LUG (cl loo COLUMN FACE
THE (1 EXTERNAL
SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND I SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
: M25 : Fe415
tlOhO3
Z-16602
2-l-03
SECTION-86
SECTION-CC
SECTION-EE
2-16606
.250
1
,
600 1
I?100
1 1
600
1 DRAiING No. 49 (REFER TABLE 49) No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES 1 MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL : THREE : 12.Om : 6.0m :S.Om : FIXED
SPACING RAFTER
OF
PURLINS RAFTER
1 INTERIOR
ARE
IN mm REFER TO
FORCES L9 NEAREST
OF THE
PURLIN
COLUMN
FACE:
:M 25 : Fe Ll5
1 SECTION-EF
TOP OF FOUNDATION
No. 50
BAYS
(REFER
1ABLE
51))
OF
No.
. NOTE: 1.ALL 2.FOR DIMENSIONS FOUNDATION TABLE OF THE ARE IN ,-,,,,, REFER TO SPAN
OF
I THREE
INTERIOR p$;$s 6
:12.0m
SPACING COLUMN SUPPORT PURLIN LUG (f) FOR ALL SEISMIC MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL HEIGHT CONDITION WIND AND ZONES I
FORCES : 50 NEAREST
:6.0m :6.5 m
6717
6284
1900
ANALYSIS 3.DISTANCE
: FIXED
1in4 IinS
6734 6746
6266 6254
1425 1140
6 6
1219
FROM
THE
COLUMN
FACE:100 300
1205
1380
: : 300
:M
25 115
: Fe
s[7~4: Sz w:
1331s 313tKIN03 :S7VIM31VK4 [.;3%;/$%%, NOlllaN03 1H913H lNCZddfIS NW f1703 3 N13VdS NVdS SAVE M3+3H) IS ON 30 9NIMV80 ON
Ooc
Ooc 001 (t) 33V.4 NWn102 ~fll NiltKd
9 [ 9 I 9 SNllkJnd 40 ON t101t13LX3 N
9S26
1
97(.6 !
VI, ;
99z6
7U!L
1S38V3N
319V1
98Z6
/ CU!I
MO+ t ,]v .~
[U(AJ N,
ii
z~
3dOlS
: 31ON
SNll Lllld
ONV
L 009 1 QJ 90491-2 ob91-z VV-N01133S L 7 ,... 120491-2 .ojz-zlq-~ .. . !lElr aavtt NallvaNnod40 KM
L 1
L. 009
: i
ao9
L 1
asz-t14wat-
70#91-z
[~.11 VM 1,, . .
. .,-.
....
:Z
-
vo491to*9tZO*91-Z
11 *21-Z
1s04);1-2 704)91-2
Osf
SECTION
88
SECTION ___-
CC
SECTION
EE
17-8111117-8X12-
300 300
TOP OF FOUNDATION
i REFER
TABLE
52 1
-NOTE 1 Ati FOh DIMENSIONS FOUNDAT:ON 7ABLE OF G b c THE ARE IN mm REFER TO FORCES 52 NEAREST PURLIN COLilMN
-!
No. OF BAYS
SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISM!C ZONES MATERIALS. CONCRETE STEEL
1
M25 : Fell5
SECTION
88
SECTION
cc
SECTION
EE
w w
_~___
ll-3oa j iizll
7
1 /2_$~;--3-2Ol l-25*03
21.wfo-
300
00 r
1600
No.
53
(REFER
TABLE
53)
R
2007 1536
EXTERIOR
INTERIOR ,zjKN 6 5 5
mm. REFER To
poplin c
lin3 lh4 lin5 6717 6734 67f.6 6177 .615L 6130 6 6 6
OF TNE
NEAREST
PURLIN
SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND
SEISMIC ZONE s I
COLUMN
FACE : 100
1256
: 300
: M25 : Fe416
Slf Y
SEW
:
;
saNO2 ONV CINIM lW313H
1332S
h3llVA
5961
313113103 : SlVIY31V
3lWSl3S nV lmddns NWil103 9N13VdS NVdS
lOE1
EC11 . 3Nl3VdS 1 . U31dVU
S
9 $?$ UOlki31NI JO
llO3
NIlMIld
lS3YV3N
a3xld
Wtj.6 UOLL UJoIx 3WWl
NowaN
NOIlVONflOd SNalSNlWla
1 M31dVY
9NIJVdS
zn
3dOlS
: : : :
SAW JO ON
7s ON CJNIMVYO
L 1
SNIlMnd
(7S318Vl
ki3331)
Is
009
009
33NOl133S
3YNOllmS
+--T-4
OIY 91
-z
05t-7119-v1
-e1
7onsz
20*9z-z
EO#SZ
-,
mnsz -z
IIII
90+sz
-z
LOru-I
iiiz
l-20*02,
r1.20U04
-2?*021
-I-20*04 - 2-20903
SECTION-W
SECTION-CC
SECTION-EE I
J-1DlP
I
2.11 r13 21-8wL-320 21-8.15320
I
REFER TO
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR AU WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES I MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
OF
INTERIOR pi&
ARE
IN
mm.
pNuqj&
lin3 lin4 lin5 6789 6813 6828 6212 6188 6172 2867 2150 1720 8
FORCES
: : : :
: 55
PURLIN LUG CC, COLUMN FACE
:
:
OF THE NEAREST
: M25 : Fe415
SECTION-FIR
SECTION-CC
PECTION-EE
.6#14-320
?I1 1 1 II$Topw_ToNSECnON-U.
,EL*
No. AND SLOPE H, H2 R EXTERIOR &$;;S lin3 lillb lin5 9769 9613 9626 9212 9108 9172 2667 2150 1720 6 6 6 17200 SPACING OF PURLINS INTERIOR p$Ly;s 6 6 RAFTER SPACING 1270 1240 1226
!z
i 000 , NOTE: 1. ALL 2. FOR DIMENSIONS FOUNDATION TABLE OF THE ARE IN mm
FORCES : 56 NEAREST
REFER
TO
PURLIN COLUMN
: : :
M25 Fe 415
THE
: 300
36-8*18-260
SECTION.BB
SECTION.CC --
,36-BWO-260
AWJ
,36-S*lO;zco
3-Zao,,0.8#17.j20 _ ^^....^
4 ml
__.___~__
17200
.__
~-~-
SECTION-DO
DRAWING
No. 57
(REFER
TABLE 57)
No
AN0
SPACING RAFTER
OF
INTERIOR &Rp;Fs
ARE
IN
mm. REFER lo
p;kp,Ls
SPACING 1358
: gF:CES
DISTANCE FROM
OF THE
NEAREST
PURLIN
LUG&
COLUMN
I 1 in5
12828
12172
1720
1312
1225
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES : CONCRETE STEEL
1: MATERIALS
: w2s . hblS
SECTION-BB
SECTION-CC
SECTION-EE
II
SECTION-AA TOP OF FOlNOATlON 17200 L9oo 1 OF PURLINS RAFTER SPACING l2l46 1254 1239 1. 2. 1 KcToN-op GDR*WIWO N o. 58
(REFER
TABLE58)
No. AND SLOPE H, H* R EXTERIOR $i& 1 in 3 6789 6813 6135 6109 2916 2232 9 8 0
INTERIOR P$i& 9 6 8
FORCES
: 50
NEAREST PURLIN LUG ($1 loo : 360 :550 COLUMN FACE:
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR AU WIN0 AN0 SEISMIC ZONES CONCRETE STEEL
: flXED
1 MATERIALS:
: w25 : Fe 415
lin 5
6826
6086
1006
2-n 811
36Wl7.
SECTION-CC
SECTION-EE
-,..,.I
Top ff
1
FOUNOATION
SECTJON-AA
17200 1 1 NOTE 1 7 , 7 ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN FORCES mm REFER TO 800 i
1%25+ 04 SECTION-LID
1 ?
wo
1 1
DRAWING
No.
59
(REFER
TABLb 59)
TABLE : 59
DISTANCE OF THE NEAREST PURLIN LUG (E) FROM THE (1 EXTERNAL COLUMN FACE 100 b RIDGE c VALLEY : 360 550
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND I SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
: :
M2S Fe Llf
2-32803
>ECTION.BB
SECTION-CC
SECTIONJIE I
3-2OW9
17200 No. AND SLOPE H, H2 R EXTERIOR pNuodf:NS lin3 1 in4 12769 12613 12212 12168 2667 2lSO SPACING RAFTER SPACING 1350 1319 OF PURLINS RAFTER SPYCING 1, 2.
1 1
600
1 i,
SECTION-DQ
DRAWING
No.
SO
(REFER
TABLE 60 I
INTERIOR pN;rRffNs
FOUNDATION TABLE
OF THE NEAREST
COLUMN
FACE: 100
12826
12172
1720
1304
1239
E. VALLEV
.360 : 550
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIN0 AND 1 SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
: :
n25 Fe415
m2-16*06 2-16606
-516+06 1 2-16#0L
l - 16*03
270
2-16*07
SECTION-
CC
SECTION-
EE
SECTION-FF
DISTANCE OF THE NEAREST PIJRLIN LUG cc) FROM THE a. EXTERNAL COLUMN FACE: 100 b. RIDGE c.VALLEV : 300 300
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND 1 SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS : CONCRETE STEEL
:
:
rIi
! : :
: M25 : Fe Cl5
fa
1-16902~ l- 16802 Z-16.03 ICMlO-34O 0 2-16407 r!16W9 l-16*05 I -, yl-16@02 e 2-16*03
SECTION-W
iB
2- 16*03 l4-8dlO-3CQ 2-16*07 SECTIONCC 1
5t
SECTION-EE
Jw
\ IL-8WO-340 tl6*07 SECTION-FF
SECTION-DO
NOTE 1. ALL : DIMENSIONS ARE FORCES : 62 M mm REFER TO 2. FOR FWNDATION ANALYSIS TABLE 3. DISTANCE FROM THE I in L 1 in 5 6695 6705 6305 6295 1063 650 5 5 112L 1111 4 L 13b6 1330 OF a
THE NEAREST PURLIN LUG (cl EXTERNAL COLUMN FACE: 100 : : 300 300
b.RIDGE E. VALLEY
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND .AND I SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
: :
Y26 Fe416
SECTION-BB
SECTlON-CC
SECTION-
EE
SECTION-
FF
600 t
SECTION-GG
$U.IL_LU$TOP
1
OF FoUNDPIT~O~~~~~~~-**
-4 6oo:
NSIONS
ARE IN
mm REFER TO
OATION FORCES
OF THE NEAREST PURLIN LUG (6) a EXTERNAL COLUMN FACE: 100 b.RIOGE c.VALLEY
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
: : ;
1
: :
M25 Fe415
,*I?? -
-2-16tm
8 m
I
L
.-14-Ml7-350
SECTION-88
.5ECTION-
CC
SECTION-E<
&ECTIJN-FF
,/
2- 16.09, n_rF..nG
II-16(103
600
9400
1 11 DRAWING
Na 64 (REFER,
1ARLE 64 1
.
ho.ANO SLOPE H, bi2 R EXTERIOR SPACING OF PURLINS INTERIOR p;;L:;S 4 RAFTER SPACING 1361 NOTE : 1. ALL DIMENSIONS TABLE ARE IN mm FORCES REFER : 64 TO RAFTER SPACING 1150
,sd;Ls
1in3
i in 4 1 in5
6264 6266
1400
3. DISTANCE OF THE NEAREST PURLIN WG (%I FROM THE a. EXTERNAL COLUMN fACE: 100 b RIDGE : : 360 300 .
1050
5 5
1122 1109
4 4
1326 1310
I
6254 940
c. VALL EV
No.OFGAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR AU WIND AND I SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
: :
M25 Fe415
SECTION-CC
SECTION-EE
SECTION-FF
II
E
NO. AND
DRAWING
No.
65
(REFER
TABLE
65
SMCINC
SLOPE # lin 3
H,
W2
EXTERIOR $$
RAFTER lSPAClNG I
: FOUR : 12.0m
: 6.0m
5.0m
FIXED
TABLE : 65
5217 5234
4764 4766
1900 1425
9 6
1248 1219
3. DISTANCE OF THE lEAREST PURLIN LUG @, FRW THE a.EXTERNAL COLUMN FACE: 100 h RIDGE c. VALL EV : : 300 300
1 in 4
1396
: M25 : Fe415
1 in S
52;6
4754
1140
1205
1390
2-16,OC
2-16004
Z-16009
SECTION-B8
SECTION-
CC
SECTION-EC
SECTION-
Fe
16-8*13-250
/
ii!dq=-=
600
L
1 SECTION-GG
600
DRAWING No.
~66
(REFERTABLE
661
No AND SFCING SLOPE H, H2 R EXTERIOR PziLZS lin3 6717 6264 1900 6 RAFTER sPabui 1248
FORCES
3. DISTANCE OF THE NEAREST PURLIN LUG &I FROH THE a. EXTERML COUIMN FACE: 100 hRlDGE c.VALLEV : : 300 300
li,,4 lin 5
6734 6746
6266 62S4
1425 1140
6 6
1219
I
5
I
1396 1390
1205
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
1
: :
M25 Fe&l5
l-l, 416W6
I
rl-16003
l-16603E16UO3 2-166 01
,l-rsror
El
l6-6+15-350 216+ 11 SECTION-E.9 socTloN-cc
2- 16UO3 2-169 04
1C6*15-350 2-16#11
SECTION-EE
SECTION-
FF
,$$h@
2_16)05 2-16604 1
I.--
----I
,l6-6615-350 __d / w
w
DRAWING No. 67
No. AND SPACING SLOPE II, Ii, R EXTERIOR &LgS I
1
2-16916-1300
LONG 03 l 04 6tO7
(REFER
:
7ABLE
67
NOTE 1. ALL
in3
9717 9734
9264 9266
1900 I625
6 6
WRLIN 3. DISTANCE OF THE NEARIST LUG CC, FRDM THE a. EXTERIAL COLUMN FACE : 100 h RIDGE c. VALLEY : : 300 300
I in
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FM AU WIND AND I SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
1 in 5
9766
9254
UC0
l2OS
t360
: M 25 : FeL15
SECTION-BB
SECTION -Cc
SECTION-EE
aCTION-FE
2-16905 (
,194*13-35Ll
/By
600
1 1
11400
1600 T
1 .
11bOo
1600 1 k
DRAWING
No.
68
(REFER
lABLE68)
I
/SLOPE Ii1 H2 R. I
I ARE IN mm REFER TO
.$&$
1in3
5217
1764
in L
5234 5206
1766 67%
6 6
1207 1193
5 S
1361 1365
3. DISTANCE OF TtiE NEAREST PURLIN LUG (Q) FROMTHE a. EXTERNAL COLUMN FACE : 100 : 360 b. RIDGE c.VALLEV : 300
1 in 5
OF GAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
No.
1
: M 25 : Fe 415
SECTION-BE
SECTION-CC
SECTION-EE
SECTION-FF
SECTION-GG
DRAWING
No.
69
(REFER
TABLE 691
3. DISTANCE OF THE NEAREST PURLIN LUG cc) FROM THE a. EXTERNAL COLUMN FACE : 100 h RIDGE : 360
-----:3w
c. VALLEY
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND I SEISMIC ZONE s MATERIALS: CONCRETE STEEL
: :
M25 Fe115
2-25*04 l&6*16-350
3-164t12
+,pq,
_c:uw+
SEClION-BB
SECTION-CC
SECTION-EE
SECTION-
FF
11100 1 1 ,
1600
11400
1 1
DRAWlNO
N..
70
(REFER
TABLE703
WWRG 1133
lin3 , in4
I
9717 9734
1
9264 9266
I
1900 1425
1
6 I 6
1207 I 1193
I
5
136l 1365
~3. DISTANCE DF THE NEAREST PURLIN LUG ((1 FROM THE a. EXTERNAL COLUMN FACE: 100 . IL,? * P,RtT:C aw
-...a_
1 in5
9746
925b
II-40
c. VALLEY
300
No. OF OAYS SPAN SMCINO COLUM HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR AU WlND AND SEISMIC 2ONES MATERIALS : CONCRETE STEEL
S.Sm
: FIXED
1
: M25 : Fe 415
Z-?Zti6 3-16#05
2o#amto26-250 20.@09@26250
20-6+m9)026
-250
f
7
OFtAWING
No.
71
71)
NOTE
1 ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN mm REFER PURLIN WG (6, FACE : 100 .300 .2 3 FOR R)lJNOATDN FORCES TO ANALVSIS TABLE: 71 DISTANCE FROM TME OF 1% a. EXTERNAL b. RIDGE
SLOF3!
Hl
tQ
RAFTER S~A,-NG
CONOITION
WIN0 : AN0
NEARL?LT
llnf 1n4 1 I 5
5 5 5
COLUMR
SEISMIC
MATERIALS
ZONES
:
M25
STEEL
: Fe415
16-6W9-260 ._
*
I---#-2-11ucJ
i -16163
2-lwO7
!iis!L I
J-WI06 __.__. -_ ,3-
I 3-lW5
3-t&2Tp~
AA
7-16M 26-6*lotJS-250
DRAWING
No. 72
(REFER
1ABLE 72)
No.AND SPACING
R OF FURLINS RAFTER 2 No. 04 PURLINS, SPACING 1 1197 ,3 11 PRINCIPAL
No.OF BAYS
NOTE ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN mill REFER PWRLIN UlG(c) FACE :x)0 :300
FOR FOUNOATION FORCES TO ANALYSIS TABLE -71 DISTANCE OF WE NEAREST FROM TttE .a EXTERNAL b. RIDGE
, m 3
! 6762
/ 6212
, 1367
COLUMN
SPAN SPACING COLUMN WEKaT 5WPCUT CONDITION FOR AU WIN0 AN0 SflSMIC ZONES MATERIALS STEEL
: I425 : Fe415
Z-lZ#S 2-W.07
-~
)(o.AYO 9mcIls Of WRUMS
lvOn
~RAWNO
~_
r40. 73
(REFER
TABLE
73)
No. OF BATS
1 I2 3 ALL
: ONE
: 9.0m : 12.0 m : 5.0m : HINGED
SLOPC /,
I 1nJ
nr
53~5 5376
nr
;46LO 4610
I)
- PRlRclPAL PURLINS!
m
nls
omm9lous
ARE IN mm rOCLS
TAu6-73 rwl)cuG cuuJwer*cr (6) 100 :360
l&or !v*c*o
) 1333 5 5 5 i
RE?ER
a
R
xlsMlc
ZONES
: M25 l--,.e
tm4
r
tm5 5399
I
6590
1 1000 1 I I
j 1166 i 1173
I 900 1
J. . r
l-I?*,3
___---
1400 1
n&o0
DRAWING la.74
No.ANO SP*uNC OF PWLIWS SLOPE tit n2 A PRINCIPAL WRY?% p:::;* 1m 3 I I6849 6140 1333 5 SPY% 1212
No.ofBAvs
)(oIL
. 1 ALL OIYCNShONS ARE IN 1)11) .2 3 FOR ~UNOATIDN FORCES REFER TO ANALISIS TAOLE-74 OISTANCC OF lift! NLUEST FROM lliE WRLIN LUG cc) a. EXTERNAL COUIMN FACE : 100
SPACING
SerN
. ._-
4-16902--1
N2W 9LC7K)N * *
e-l@01 20-4Q9(029-250
DRAWING
No.
75
(REFER
TABLE 75)
Of THE NEAREST
WRLIN
0. EXTERNAL QKLJun
No.OF BAVS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEGHT SUPPOM CONOITION FOR ALL WIN0 AN0 KISMIC ZONES MATERIALS STEEL
:
L
M25
: Fe415
l-l@03
Z-l&m
26-81+(~-2~2E4J l-wo3,
OUNOATION
i5WL
TABLE 76)
1
1m3
v 1 WlL
No. AN0SPACING
nC DIIDI#UC
NOlE
p;;;;s
6764 6809 6625 6212 6166 6172 1667 I400 1120 6 6 6
TABLE-% WRLIN LUG t%, FACE :lm 300 a. EXTERNAL b. RIDGE COLUMN
I SPACING m
COLUMN FOR ALL
HEIGHT
CONDITION
AND
: 6.5m : HINGED
:6.0m
M25
OF THE NEAREST
WIND
SEISMIC
MATERIALS CDNCRETE STEEL
ZONES
:
1 tn s
d
: Fe415
2-l-7 ii S-l-06
No.
77
(REFER
TA0lE
77)
BAYS
n,
&
pR,NC,p*
R*m*
PURLIre lam 3 1lnC 1m 5 98% 9885 9906 9l40 9110 9090 1633 I 1375 1100 6 6 6
N0.o~
SP*CWG
SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SWf=ORT CONOITION FOR AU WIN0 AN0 SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS STEEL
: : : :
: M25 : Fe415
--_I___.-___-.
..-
.____
___-___
,298426-210
SECTION 69
3-Qo5
, !
<.I ~2sstt26-210
k, _n
Z-1%407 _ 2- IBOB_
.. .
11 MO
L
I
soot
.
ORAWWG
hb.
78
78)
NOTE ALL DIMENSIONS AkE IN mm REFER PURLIN COLUMN LUG ($ FACE :100 :36O )
w.oFBAvs SPAN
SPACING COLUMN nElGHl SWWRT CONOlTtON FOR AU WIND AND SEISMICZONES MATERIALS STEEL
HINGED
THE
6 6
1257 124p
:M25 : Fe 415
.2-2am
2-l&09
1 500 t
7
11 500
1 1
500
DRAWING
No. 79
(REFER
TABLE 791
!
I
No. AN0SPACING
OF Ill n2 R PURLINS 1 RAFTER -.2 Iii. OFTpACING PURLINS I 3 6 1265 PFiNClPAL
NOTE ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN mm REFER WRLIN LLIG (t) FACE : 100 : 960
SLOPE
1 I 3
1 I j 6651
i / 6140
FOR A)UNOATION FORCES TO ANALYSIS TABLE -79 DISTANCE fROM THE OF THE NEAREST a. EXTERNAL b RIDGE
/ ; 1.933
COLUMN
No OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPOf?T CONOITION FOR ALL WIN0 AN0 SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS CONCRETE STEEL
! 6.5m : HINGED
: M25 : Fe.416
6-lta07
--
SECTION
BB
29-w-210
CRAWIN I R
M.
80
REFER 1ABLE
:
80)
No. AN0SPACING
OF --;--Ars PURLINS 1 2 13
NChOFBAVS SPAN
rr)WOATION FOOCES ANALYSIS TABLE_60 of TNL NEAREST a. E#lERNAL b. RIDGE ME
ONE
i
1m 3 lur4 tm6
No.G~cw PURLINS!
to
WA
DISTANCE FROM
Q)
SuPwmm F0R
: KK)
:3W
o[)NcRElE
STEEL
: M25 : Fe415
SECTION
81
DRAWING
No. AND SPACING OF PURLINS SLOPE Hl N2 R PRINCIPAL p,;;;LS llnl ImA 1 8 S 6617 6646 6664 6176 6149 6131 28x) 2136 1710 6 6 6 j j RAFTER 1 SPACING I 1369 1338 1323 3 . 1 2
No.
81
(REFER ONE
TABLE 81)
FOR FOUNDATION FORCES TO ANALYSIS TABLE-61 DISTANCE FROM THE OF THE NEAREST (1. EXTERNAL b. RIDGE
(Q)
100 300
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS CONCRETE STEEL
: : :
: M25
Fe415
SECTION
BEAti
4celw-210
!
I
82
(REFER
IAeLE82)
: ONE
: 1tkOm
FOR fOUNOATION F(YICES 70 ANALYSIS TABLE - 82 DISTANCE FROM TME a EXTERNAL b. RIDGE
coLuMNNf3Gm -oo(lomQl
FORALL SEISMIC MATERIALS 1
REEL
: 9.5m
: 60m. _._..
~HINGED
%tfiE?
:M25
: Fe415
(REFER
lb. SLoPe n1 IQ R AND SPACING OF PURLiNS 1 RAFlER -w 1392 1361 1346 2 3
TABLE 83)
Non
ALL 0IMENSloNS ARE IN mm
r
SPAN
~~
SPACING C0LuhtNHEKiCn
~CONDlltGN
FoRALLwlNOAm
: ONE : 18.0m
: 6.0m :12.5m
: HINGED
lIlt3
6 6 6
SEtSMlC ZONES
MAfERlALS STEEL : : : M25 Fe415
In4
llnl
l-2om2 I.-,-(
2i-.3tm032-~20-J
SECT,DN
&A
\\
I I II
84
IREFER
TA8LE8i)
NOTE 1 ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN mm REFER PURLIN COLUMN LUG(c) FACE : 100 360
___.__.-__
SLOPE
HI
Ii2
- PRINCIPAL --m--r-----PURLINS
RAFTER
No OF
8
1SPACING /
I 1369 133; 1323
FOR FOUNDATION FORCES TO ANALYSIS TABLE. 84 OF THE NEAREST a. EXTERNAL b. RIOGE FROM THE
3 DISTANCE
lm 3
11nZ 1 0 5
--
6851 6883
1 6140 6110
,f
e
---I
6903
-6o*
OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SuPFORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIN0 AND SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS : ONCRETE STEEL
4-iQaO2
C-2OW3 Z-1210
,REE EXTRA
LINK5
Pm06
2-12909 2-12 a0
4-7.0#2 4-2ono3 I-
OF
L
I
OUNDATION
i
4
DRAWING No. 65
TABLE 05)
No AND
SPACING
NOTE
STEEL
: Fe 415
j;i
z-ml0 6-2w ai3 J-=--JSECToN BB>+\ -_ ._
2-12itll
2-12Ar.09
3~25m5 ,,&
I pW7-210
r-2104
3)_Btll41046-3 336+tl4to46-3
_. AA I
P OF k
1 500-l
86 )
r
ISLOPE
I
i I
I
1 H2
I
1 R
i Nc.ANO SPACING 1
f-&&f~%&i/
NOTE ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN mm REFER PURLIN COLUMN LUG (c) FACE :l@l :360
FOR FOUNDATKIN FORCES TO ANALVSIS TABLE _ 66 DISTANCE / 1m3 i ,n 4 113026 j 13074 13105 ill960 / 11915 11605 2750 2063 ; 1650 , i 6 8 e i : 1409 1377 1362 FROM THE OF THE NEAREST a EXTERNAL b RIDGE
I In5
No OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEtGHT SUPFCRT CONOITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS : CONCRETE STEEL
: :
M25 Fe415 I
l-2-2 3-25.#03
--_.--_ --.--
. .--.-_-__ll_~
I_
3-25dO8
SECTION
BB
2-lam5 \
1 Li
\72-8938170
2S+tl31e37-M0
1600 1
23400
1 500 1
DRAWING No. 87
(REFER
TABLE 87 1
NOTE
1
3
ALL
DIMENSlONS
ARE
OF TM
NEAREST
(c)
300
a. EXTERNAL b. RlOGE
FACE : loo
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN WEIGHT SUPPCRT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS ONCRETE STEEL
: M25 : Fe415
--_a...-+-_
._-.-._.
.,
li-Mbb-l/O
SECTION
BB
1600
23400
NOYE ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN mm REFER PlJRLIN COLUMN LUG tt) fACE :lKl 300
FOR fOlJNOATK)N FOFfCES TO ANALYSIS TABLE -88 DISTANCE FROM THE Of 1tIE NEAREST Q EXTERNAL b RIDGE
1 In 5
I12987
I12006
2260
10
1366
ND. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SlPPtXT CONOITION FOR ALL WIN0 AN0 SEISMK ZONES MATERIALS CONCRETE STEEL
M25 : Fe 416
1-32UO2 1 -, .,-.
EXTRA
z-32&3
Y_j
1600
23400
DRAWING No. AND SPACING OF PURLINS --.- 1 PRINCIPAL RAFTER 2 p;.j$;s 1 SPACING . 3 I9923 9961 9985 9068 i3600 1 1302 13% NOTE ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN mm REFER PURLIN COLUMN LUG(c) FACE NaOF BAYS
No.
89
(REFER : ONE
TABLE
89)
SLOPE
Ii1
n2
SPAN SPACING
COLUMN HEIGHT
24.0m . 12.Om
: I 9.5 m
FOR FOUNDATION FORCES TO ANALYSIS TABLE -69 DISTANCE FROM THE OF THE NEAREST a. EXTERNAL b. RIDGE
1m3
__c_-
--.
1 In4 1 8 5
9032
i 2850 cm
i
2280
11
10
/
j
: 100
:360
: : :
M25
9000
10
,399
STEEL
Fe415
Z-321103 3-3&04
3-6~14lob6_
360
DIMENSIONS
ARE IN mm REFER CONOlTlot4 PURLIN LUG(t) FACE : 100 SEISMlC ZONES : COLUMN :
FOUNDATiON FORCES NALVSIS TABLE- 90 STANCE FRO,,, WE OF THE NEAREST a EXTERNAL b RIOGE
M25
3-32&M
SECTION
BB
-l 750!
29 250 DRAWING
Wo. AN0 SPACING OF FURLINS SLOPE Ml N2 R
NO.
91
.&FE!4
TABLE
91 1
~ I-O& BATS
NOTE 1 2 3 ALL DIMENSION5 ARE IN mm REFER PURLIN COLUMN LUG CF.) FOR fOUNOATK)N FORCES TO ANALYSIS TABLE _ 91 DISTANCE OF THE NEAREST a. EXTERNAL b. RIOGE
1 ONE : 3G.Om
PRINCIPAL RAFTER
N~F~~~ACING PURLINS,
1 WI 3 1 mc
I
9991 9925
9104 9071
4817
I ( 3613
13
13
/
/
1334
1304
FROM THE
I Ill 5
I9947
i go4g
! 28got~l
SPACING COLUMN HEKjnT SIJPf@4T CONOITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS CCNCRETE STEEL
:
:
: :
M25 Fe415
4-=4---i
OCIAWING No. 92
, I Ii1 H2 No. AND SPACING OF PLIRLINS --~-p-PRINC!PAL RAFTER
(REFER
TABLE 92)
NOTE
1 ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN mm
SLOPE
I
,
-----~~~.~~~~-~~..~~~_~~~____
1 8 6
1in 3
FROM THE
COLUMN
I
lx)28 11967
1 I 5
2870
12
1416
No.OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HElGHl SUPPCRT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES MATERIALS : CONCRETE STEEL
M25
1 Fe415
uz
I---
_-.-.
L86T :(.L T S) EP dS
_ 4-32qo4 2-16~tl3 -
2-32aO2 4-32-1(o)
2 -16M2
1 DRAWINGNO.
I I I I
1 NO AN0 SPACING t NOTE ALL OIMENSIONS ARE IN mm REFER WRLIN COLUMN uIG( FACE a) x)0 360
94
(REFER
TABLE 94)
FOR FUUNOATIGN FORCES TO ANALYSIS TABLE-94 DISTANCE FROM THE OF THE NEAREST a EXTERNAL b RIDGE
No. OF BAVS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES
MATERIALS CONCRETE
STEEL
M2S Fe415
3-16M6
Z-123107
SECTION
BB
SECTION
CC
L4oa 1
7
6600 DRAWlNG . No. AND SPACING OF FURLINS ,. ExTEAlOR RAflER MoF FumIN5 SlaCING 1196 1170 1156 INTERIOR FUFTER pt$p: L 4 4 4 S SPACING 1361 1346 1330 NOTE Al_LOlMENSlONS ARE IN mm 2 3 R)R FOUNOATKW FORCES REFER lU ANALYSIS TABLE -95 PURLIN LUG(q) GI5TANCE OF ME NEAREST FRO&, THE o. EXTERNAL COLUMN FACE 100 No. SPAN SPACING COLUbw HElWl No. 95 (REFER : TWO : 9.0 m TABLE 95)
Of BAYS
W=I
Hz
R-
,6.0m
1 Ifn4 rn5
5 5 5
SEISMC
MATERIALS
ZONES
RIDGE VALLEY
:3m :300
: M 25
:Fe415
l&81137-260
,18-t3@7-260
3-16406
26-Bpllto#-250
26-Bdlto36-250
__ __..~___
___
-4
Na.ANO SLOR n, Hz R EXTERtOA SPACIW OF FVALINS RAFm RAFTER 1 IMERLYl NmE ALLOtMENY0((5 IOR FCUNMYDN MALI sts TheLt ln3 tm4 1-S 6782 61307 66% 6212 6188 6172 l36f 1025 820 5 5 S 1197 1168 1155 4 4 4 1381 13b6 1330 3. OISTAMCE FROC THE OF lnE a. c ARE IN I)LI1 FORCES - 96 mEAmEs EXTERNAL *ALLET REFER 10
ORAWNG No. 96
No.OFBAYS SPAN SPACING
(REFER
TABLE
966)
axuM
MElerr
b. RIOGC
MAlEmMs:
STEEL
: M25 : :ee415
,
, lSat3l260 ,lb#31-260
4
x
-250
-250
ZO-lwttc !30-250
SECTION
AA
20 +mlb 30 2@-6aFllto30
-I
MON
MLIN
5 5
1166 1173
M25 : Fell15
:
51!7%i:
stw:
009 09c
001:
: :
2 P 0 M m
S3Niz
a3FXJIH : NolAm
w5.g :
u4v
(,,Slll
Ni-lMfld lS~T3N 3bU d0 3~NVlSlO t 86- 319~1 snrtwu m3d3Y S3~Uod NouvaNnoJl YQI 2 a SNOISNPPllOllV 1
w 021
WO.6
:
:
Iii
SC@t-1 COW-~
I II
osL-9cwlLsuz
OSz-9E~llD10-9z VV NOll3k
I
2-12NOl
c
-250
El%@
4-l6?m2 L-l&403 2~&mY3O-EO 2(t6mn03e2x~
=JkB
T 77
ORAWNG No. 99 [REFER TABLE991 m
2ck5*nto30-2sl 20-wlto30-250
+&OO
11600
WTE
1. ALLDIMENYOt6 2 *RE IN 1)(11 IOA fOIJNMTIoII FORCES REFU ANALYSIS TABLE _ 99
,r3 1m4
: TWO
:lZ.Om : 6.0m : S.Om
: HINGED I
:M25 :Fe415
WUREST RLRLIN L&u 3. DISTANCE OF M fRCM lHE o. EXTERNAL aDLW AQ: 100 : 300 b. RISE c VALLO :3M)
zkk&MATERIALS
,,ns
EF
.29-8057-210
4-16?!04
-16lbn
SECTION DO
SECTION
cc
THREE EXTRI
LINKI
II
l_lbtloz_2661tlllo36-250
4-l&04 26-&Fllto36-250
2-1m sLtZTIW DO
i-s@4
5ool
1 7
,f 500
1500 1
TABLE IKJ)
1 SLOPE n, n2
6212 61% 6172 1867 1400 ltZ0 6 6 6 1272 1243 1229 6 5 5 J 1145 13% 1360
HlNGEC
,,,a 6704
lnnb 1-S
6609 6825
I
: :
r/
c VALLEV
: a00
M25 Fe 415
32cw3 Z-121109
-3 -201103
SECTION
88
I!+milo7
3-20#03.
30-.9*IZto+32U 2-QeO9
I-
c2ow2 3Pm3
*6a2to4l-320 3oai2Io41-3 T4
~OLJNMllON
1 9nlY 1 1 11500
----r-r
1 5cb 1
L -
NO. 101
(REFER : TWO
TABLElOl)
No. OF BAvf
COLUMN SUFPORT FOR ALL SEISMC MATERIALS
&$
1*3 lll~ 1ins 9854 9865 9906 9140 91x) 9090 1633 1375 1100 6 6 6
sbwclffi
1295 12 64 izso
,,$F&
6 5 5
HEIGHT
CZf4DlTION WIND ZONES : nK) I
3. DISTANCE OF THE NEAREST PIRLIN LlJGh) FROM THE a. EXTERNAL COLUMN F*= ! 100 : 300 b RIDGE c VALLEY .300
: :
M2S FeLlS
\w
l-2oRO3
3-2CWO3
3-20004
15001
1
11
so0
so0 a
1
DRAWN6 b. 102 (RERA TABLEIOZ)
No.oFmA*s
SPAM
-QNG
: TWO
:Q.Om
1. *LLIMEW~~~ 2
*AE
:i2.Om
3. DISTANCE
PWLIM
b. RIffiE
wwsmI
: 5.Om : HINGED
: M25 f fi415
29-303-210
29-w33-210
l-20+03
3-mu04
fioPO3
z-ma9
z-l2mo
l-2wQ 3-MO3
2W44z(032-3M SECTION AA
- --..-- i
1
NOTE 1. ALLDIHENSION5 2 ARE IN mm
OLWOATtON
DRAWING
No.
103
(REFER
TABLE1031
No. AND SPACING SLOPE n, nf R EXTERIOR a GLy* 6 6 6 RAFTER SPACING 1285 1254
OF FURLINS
SPAN SPACING
6851 6663
6140 6110
1833 1375
R)R FOUNMTION FORCES REFER 10 TABLE. 103 ANALYSIS OF ME NEIRST PLMLIN 3. DISTANCE FRW THE a. EXTERNAL b. RIOCL c VALLEV COLUMN
couJMh(H!EIGHl
SUPPORT ConQLUG(E) : tw : 360 : 300
FA=
FoxRLkw&MATERIALS :
6903
6090
1100
1241
L=d-
2981w-2x),
4_2oxos
-1300
LONG
16-66tCb29320
II
.t~ewt14to29-320
2-12*3 %lPcIY
B-2owl __ __ L.-.-._.__.
16-E#l4(029-320 16-Wl4to29-320 t
IN
mm
REFER
FORCES
10
-lob
US(~)
100
b. RtD8E
s vAuEv
C3-2WO2 3-2wo3
44-6#36-210
2-12+t.l2
21-WlSk66-320 1 2l-6tk15to35-321
I
y)[)
17 500
I 001 I -
DRAWMG
No. 105
RXFER
TABLE1051
No. AND SPACING !vDR nt n2 R Ex7ERlOR RAFTER L &yH ,nf 6617 664s 6664 6176 6149 6131 2650 2136 1710 6 B 8 SmCINt 1369 1336 1323.
I
OF RlRLlN!
I MERK J!.?i
tan4
ln5
1225
VALLEV
: 300
No. W GAYS SPAN SPACING cDuJw HElwl SUPfoRT FOR ALL WIND A)9 SEISMC ZoNa I MATERIALS : rrmcI= c&..nrlr STEEL
. M25 Fe415
,44+lK6-210
,+4- 6#66-210
3-2W4
S-16fMl -
l-25*02 1-gBt.O3;12-l2tn,
256;(16bLO-360 I rHZ*2
AA
Ncm 1. ALLDIMENS10(6 ARE IN mm 2 R)R FOUNMllON FORCES REFER 10 ANALYSIS TABLE-106 3. DISTANCE OF lWE NEAREST FXRLIN LUG ($1 FROM THE a. LATERNAL COLUMN FACE :lOO :300 b. RIDGE
1225
VALLEV
: 300
MATERIALS : 1: CONCRETE
STEEL : MZ5 Fe415
SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CDNOlTIm t=oRAUwlNo 4\19 KlSr4c zws
3~25zfx
2-12#15
3
IO0
2-lt117
3fkr
12 D 7 l-25lm3 l-2%04
336dmoM-380
33-tWW3-360
SECTION
AA
33-wn6bso-360 33-6ss1i063-38
1. ALLDIMENSIONS
ARE IN mm
2 mfl FOUNMM)N FORCES REFER 10 ANALYSIS TABLE. 107 3. DISTANCE OF THE lmAfiES1 PIRLII( Lu; (%) FWbl IWE a. EXTERNAL COLUMN FAQ: loo c VALLEV
,44-Ml-210 i ,~
4L-tUtSl-210 / c_ ___
THREE EXTRA
LlNRf
x;
-.+--
/i.
i
TO~~OUNOATION 17 500 * .
DRAWING
k No.ANO SPACING OF FWRLINS EXTERIOR RAFTER I HIERIOR R4 F TER pu%LT;S 6140 6110 2833 212s 8 SPACIM; 1369 ;,&F):S SPACING NOTE 1. ALLDIMENSIONS 2 3 ARE IN mm REFER RI LUG tt, 100 : 360 550
No. 08
(REFER TABLElOB)
: TWO
SLOPE
n,
H2
! ,fi 3 jS8Sl
/ ton4 6883
I :--KS
_-7
_? .____ ; 1378
FCR FOUNDATION FORCES ANALYSIS TABLE -100 DISTANCE FROM THE a. EXTERNAL VALLEY
PURLIN
t,,
%_+
COLUMN
FACE
6903
6090
1700
1323
No.OfBAVS SPAN SPACING COLUMV HEIGHT SUPPORT CONf3TlON AKI FOR ALL WIND SEISMIC ZONES I MATEf?iALS : CONCRETE STEEL
: 18.Om 12. Om 6. 5m
: HINGE-J
: M25 ! Fe415
I
2-25to2, 2-12Sl3 1:2:010-3*0
Z~BR16MO-380
,3-25%iO5
2-12zd5
2-1zms
2-12M32-129122-lwl
WI
'
.r
5-240,
~~
III I Ill
LF?!Y
-DRAV#lfJG No.
25-8~6161~40-380 2WN4lto65-380
109
(REFER
TABLElOg)
1. ALLDIMENSIONS 2
2. DISTANCE OF WE Nl!A&W PLRLIN LUG(k) fWM THE e. EXTERNAL DDCIJMN F*Q: 100 b. RIDGE c VALLEV : 360 : 550
-No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMY HElGw SUPPORT CONDlTION FOR AU WIN0 ANJ SEISMIC ZONES I MATERIALS :
: :
M25 Fe415
, 43-8042-210
. , 43 -&42-
210
l-2wO3 2-ma6 -
3-2%04
-8042 -;
il
I I I I II
33-6m9to41-380
IcttoN
DO
11G (REFER
TABLE 110
&yw
I,,,) IIn I IInS l3109 11605 1650 8 13028 a074 11960 1191s 2790 2063 8 6
SPKING
1409 1377 1362
&$&
6 7
SPACING 2 mR
122s 1395 1 1376
3. DISTANCE OF lHE NEAREST PURLIN LLG (%I FROM THE 0. EXTERNAL COLUMN FACE: 100 b. RtDCE 4 c VALLEY : 360 : 550
: M25 :
Fe415
--72-8343-170
2% 6ul9toL2-
25-BDIBio 62-3
DRAW,,&
No.111
(REFFR
TABLEIll)
G 7
SLOPE Ii, H2 R
NOTE 1. ALLDIMENSIDNS 2 ARE IN mm REFER TD R)R FOUNDATION FORCES ANALVSIS TABLE -111
GLSS
,mJ lo4 9889 9924 9946 9104 9071 9OA9 3617 2963 2290 11 10
;;Ly;s 10 10
:
]
HINGED
3. DISTANCE DF l?iE NEAREST PURLIN Lffi&) ., FRoL( THE a. EXTERNAL CX)LUMN FACE: tf3, b. RIDGE c VALLEY : 300 : 550
r,EISMC
MATERIAL%
i0NES
:
1 tins
10
1380
10
1265
CONCRETE STEEL
M25 : Fe415
33-6wto4~360
SECTION
AA
i6Ob
t -
1 Q_ No. AND SPACING OF PURLINS NOTE EXTERIORRAFTER IMERlOR RAFTU_ L 1. ALLOIMENSIONS ARE IN mm $g& SFwlNG ,$T& SPA.(NG 2 RIR FOUNOATIONFORCES REFER 10 11 10 10 1290 1401 1366 0 10 10 1311 ANALYSIS TABLE -112 3. DISTANCE OF THE I(EAREST PtMLIN LUi cc) FRo*( THE a. EXTERNAL QDLUMN FA!!: 100
LREFER :
TABLElIZ) I
SLOPE
n2
*m 3
lm4
1260 1265
b. RICCE VALLEV
: 300 : 550
1I5
12967 12008
SPAN SPACING COLUMY kw3GMT : SUPPORT cotanow : FOR ALL WIND L\H) SEISMC ZONES I MATERIALS : CCBICRETE : STEEL :
M25 Fe 415
*&6k40-360 25-bL~tiO-BO
II I I I II
I DRAWING No 113
(REFER
TABLE 1131
SLOPE
n,
Ii2
IMENSld
ARE
mm
, ##)3 19923
9066
3600
10
_p 13%
O 10
1 ;;3cJ
OF WE
NEAREST
No. OF Bc\YS SPAN SPACING COLIJMY MIGHT SUPPORT I~MTION FOR ALL WIND AMI1
KISMC
MATERIALS
ZONES
141~4
9961
9032
2850
/ 1
: : :
M25 Fe415
7 10 / lZS9
1 m9
9985
9008
2280
IO
1360
%F=
71-6Ftso-li;
71-8450-170 /
SECTION
BB
\,,
33e.+u7w+9-360 2-?.it$d6
1-321103, 1 2-lq6
J-32&33
.I-37atO SECTION AA
i-32&
2-i6Ul6 SECTION DO
33-Bn17!049-380 -k600i
23 400
, SLOPE n, n2 R-
No. AND SPACING OF PURLINS I MERIOR MFTER Sp*cwks 1302 1414 1399 ,$j,$ 10 10 10 SPACING 1304 1273 1259
NOTE 1. ALLDIMENSIW ARE IN mm REFER 70 t%) 100 360 550 2 R)R FOUNMTKIN FORCES ANALYSIS TABLE_114
tm3 1, 4 1mS
13027
11960
11 10 10
3. DISTANCE OF lME NUREST PLRLIN LLG FROM THE 0. EXTERNAL COLUMN FACE: b. RIDGE : c VALLEY :
NO. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLuMfu HEIGHT SUPPORT CONl3TlON FOR ALL WIND ANY SEIS)UPC ZONES MATERIALS : CONCRETE STEEL
: :
M25 Fe415
SECTION
00
01
8600
DRAWING
No
115
(REFER
TABLE
115)
I)
1367
I
,*;
zk
5
SRLCING &p,,
1198 1170 ll# 4 4 4
SPACING
COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORlCONUTKWJ
ANALYSIS DISTANCE
TABLE _ 115
1-4 1ms
MATERIALS
CUKRETE
STEEL
: fed15
~Eclla4
Be 1 _.C..n,
SECTION S%e#37-2601
CC 3-mm3 I IJ-lwO3
SECTION
EE
/k
.3-lm4,1
(Dlll(o36-250
3 -1ws 3-164
250
t
8 600
~4bo L
--
OFumnC
No.oF8*K
Na
16
---
(REFER :
TABLE 1161
FogRA;: wc&~
: CONCRETE STEEL
: HINGED 1
: L(z5
b. RIDGE c.VALLET
:3w :300
u*TEm*Ls
! Felts
.
SltY szw ; :
OOE : 09E :
1317VA'~
33aIu xi
0
30
001 : 334
(-$I 0ll-l
now
f 2 I
LL,-3-levl ol
Nol1*0Nllw SNOISN3WIO
: : : : :
73315 3A3Ymo3 : s7*w31*w s3NOt JlWSl3S QIJV ONlUI 77V UOci NollloNo3 ModdlK lH9lNI NWITlO3 9Nl3VdS NMS sA*Bdow
ZODSI-E SceSL-L
00
~011332
&Z
3
33 NO11335 33 NO11335
s
ah40
got191 10# 21 eoXLIEOU91-
09z-we-et /
fr.
33
,ialt
NOIL33b
iE=d-t
33
NOIl33S
33t!Hl ,_ --.
uJo+g:
._; .-__.
wl)*g : : :
Oili?NlH rug9
29-w31-210 2-16#05
1
~tCllON BQ
500
L
cc
l-=--L
SEcnOM EL
SECTIOW
L5co 1
11500
1 500 !
DRAWING _~--
No
119
(REFER ---
lABLE119)
I /
THREE
: 12.0 m
RJIKES REFER
TABLE -119
DISTANCE OF TN IE*RLSt PuRLIN l.l.6 tE) FRCU WE a. EXTERWL CmJYll f&E : 100 c. VALLEY
SECTION
18
SECTION
CC
SECTION
EE
z-12*08 2-12tt.07
2+ 6#tllto36
- 250
26-(Is11to36-250 26-Wllto36250
D(umNG
Iyo. AND SPACING OF WRLINS RARER lm9 6784 6.909 6825 6212 6166 6172 1667 1400 1120 6 6 6 1272 1243 1229 6 5 5 1145 J. FRoLl ME DISTANCE 1396 13 80 0. EXllIRML FYL UG &) OF TIE NEAmT QWUN PlJRIN b. RIDGE :3M) C.VALLlV : 300 RITE 1. ALL 2 Foil DIYENSIOWS FWNMltQI TAME ARE IN mm RmC?ZS REFER _ 120 10 -.ofMrs CRLU _. -.-
______-
(lo
120
(REFER : :
TABLE 120) I
THREE
n.nm
WE
n,
n2
II
-*Cl=
SPACING
COLUMN liEGrIT
6.0m
AJULVSIS
: Kx)
1ml
1 Ins
1
: wzs
!SlELL
! has
ECTION
BB
SECTION
CC
SECTION
EE
lxx,!
,
Saw NI 2 R EXTERIOR thOF
I! 500
L 500 1
{REFER
TABLE
121)
: THREE
:
No. AN0 SPACLNG OF PURLINS RAFTER I,,,,, INTERIOR RAFTER No.OF 1 .zn.r,..-
SPAN
6 6 6
6 5 5
i ~ I
SPACING -1 ,,U ,1&I_ I 1 YC,IIYT WLY,. UlPPORT CONMTIDN FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES I MATERIALS : CONCRETE STEEL
: :
: H25 : Fe415
29-W27-210
I 2WO4
29-8*27-210
p-6W7-210
-l-2am3 3-2004
-2-2OW3
3-2Olko4
2-2OSO3
2-12W7 S-16UO6
2-12809
z-12rrg9
-5-l6$06
?-2OaO5_
w
0 h)
320
11500
L500 1
ORAWING Na
NaoFBAvs
(REFER : THREE
Ins
5402
4590
1100
1243
1365
c.vALLET
STEEL
: kbl
Q
2-12k07 S-16#06
, -rr+Tit 8\ -_i
29-6#2-210 -3-2WO3 3-2OEO4
1B
SECTION
2-12r(o9
-5-16#06
~CllON
lQ
cc
SECTION
EL
I//
,3-2OW3
I&
mREf 123 b. RIDGE
/ii
A02 _owE? -2oax !l
-WC . H, N2 I)
Ho.WeAK
nolL
s 1. ALL DIYENSK*(S 2 1 fen fowm411ou *WL*SlS TAMEARE IN mm twfcR m
: THREE
112.0 Ill
,im
6651 6683 693 6140 6110 6090 1633 !375 1100 6 6 6
m Of W&N5 5 5 5
SPA?4 SPACING
Wl.UMNtfElGHt SUPPORlCONUTO(S
lnt
(~4 llns
c.VALLIFT
CONCRETE REEL
: M25 : Fe415
SECTION
88
SECllrn --
cc
SECTION
EE 29-wu-210
1 500
11500
I so0 1
DRAWING
No
-.___
124
(REFER
TABLE 121)
No. AND SPACING EXTERIOR SLm;, I 1n 3 9922 H) w2 L I 9068 R $$,Fm I SP*ClWG I RAFTER
NaoFR4vs
NOTE ALL OIM~NSIONS ARE IN WRCES mm REFER TO
TABLE -124
-i&l!
, en, rrns 9959 9032 9cm 9984 +y/
1262
1365
C.VALLLV
: 300
SPAN 5PACI NC COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONOITION FOR ALL WIN0 AN0 SEISYIC ZONES I MATEFWALS CaKREtt REEL
,m2s
: Fe411
3-2oa.03
l-
2-ZOnO6 z-11*12
zwos
l-&9141034-320
___
DRAWING No 125
___._._~_
(REFER _~~
TABLE
125)
No.
3. DISTANCE OF THE NEAREST PURLIN LGt%) FRCU THE a. EXTERNAL CClllMN FACE : 100 b. RIDGE c.VALLEV : 300 : 300
CONCRETE
STEEL
: I425 : Fe415
2-2OaO3 -3-2OttO4
2-1216 3-2OM3
SECTION LE
ORAWIMG
Ma
126
(REFER
TABLE i26)
No.oFGAK SPAN SPACING COLUMN HElGHf S&PFORlC0NoIT~ FOR ALL WIN0 AN0 SEISMIC ZONES I hwEm*Ls :
CoNCAElc STEEL
: Yzs ! ro4n
I
i SECTION Bk
41
m3-
210
44-BOB3
210
44-W3-210
3 25W3 2- 12m4
l--=-L
SECTION CC
3-2511051
w.3 i
EE
SECTION
Z-2*6-,
2-12sl6,
,2&5/Z-12,tl6 33 BnsOa82- 80
-SECTION
00
DRAWING
No AND SPACING OF FURLiNS . NOTE NO.
No. 27
(REFER
TABLE
127)
SLOPE1 n,
Ii:,
R -------I?
i. ALL D$%E%S!ONS
2 WR KMdXTI~ON l&t)LE OF IHC
IN
J&ii\:515
j! 3 i i 3!:>Ta%CE
In3
8 8 9
1 /
NEAR&T
: 130 : 300
c iLii..F\
~.*_ ____
3%
_: __...
Of BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONMTION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES I MATERIALS : CONCRETE STEEL
HINGED
: M25
: Fe415
.:. _.._
_-_-_-___
z- 2-03
3-25402 z-l2ull
q oaus
-
3-251103
+ -
2-1*12
3- 2lmo9
Z-12UlD
__2-12rt12
>ECllon
08
SECTION
cc
lzi
,L2-2
I,--2
&-e850-?10
2-2Fsra
_*E3
DRAWING No.
128
(REFER
lABLE128)
No. AND
SPACING
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGMT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMK ZONES I MATERIALS : CONCRETE STEEL
: THREE
:lB.Om : 12. 0 m : 5.5m
: HINGED
: M25
-259 -25s
SLcTIom EC
\
2-12#14 1,2-12#14
---
__
,25-9W6b40
-380
I25-08A1le65-360
-25 I
i
1500 1
25-~b40-3iO 2b384lla65-
360
(REFER
TABLE 129)
MmoFM*5
mTE 1. ALL OIYERYOIS 2 H IY mm fmmmoAnaCDllQIRtNR1ID AWL1515 TULE -129 08STANCE Of TN RIBREST PUUW fRoMwE 0.u7ERMLmiJwMHft:nx, c. RIDGE 1376 c.VALLEV LUG(k) :360 : 5SO
: THREE : iaom
Sp*M SPACI NC
oDun*r
Iwail
: l2.0 m : 9.5m
,mS
9922
9066
2800
1366
1225
I 7
1mS
9964
9008
1660
1339
A---L---1-25M4 l-25*07
43-8052-210
SECTION
cc
SECTION
EE L,an52210
DRAWING No
ACING OF PURLINS a RAFTER _.._& I
!e
1
130
(REFER
lABLEl30)
, 2 3
NOTE 1. ALL OIMENSIOWS ARE IN mm FOR FwNDATIcN DISTANCE OF TN FORCES REFER NEAR=1 TO ANALYSIS TABLE _ 130 PURLIN IJJG tq, FACE : lfi : 360 : 550 FROM THE a. EXTERWL b. RIDGE c.VALLEY CUIMN
1377 1362
I 7 7
1m4 1 InS
13074 13~)s
11915 116&5
2063 1650
8 6
No. DF BAYS SPAN SPACI NC COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CDNMTIDN FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES I MATERIALS : CONCRETE STEEL
: HINGED
: H2s : Fe415
60
2 -12so9 3-l-6
SECTION- CC
SECTION -EE
SECTION
- FF
2-l61u2
-130
LONG
1 4a@ 66w
-..-.,
LOO!
No. AND SPACING OF PURLINS
250. 6600
zo-silliao-290
I 1 400 lo
DRAWING
NO.
131
(REFER
raeLEl3i)
llTC
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR AU WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES I MATERIALS CONCRETE STEEL :
HINGED
: M25 : Fe415
60 I-Hyo5
,lkW137-260
,18-W7-23l
l-W&05
z-lZW9
2-12909
2-llqlO9 3-16W.O6
2-12@09
2-lwO9
SECTION - BB
SECTION-
CC
SECTION -EE
SECTION
- FF
DRAWING
No. AN0 SLOPE n, Ii2 R EXTERIOR SPACING OF PURLINS RAFTER SPACING 1381 1346
No. 132
-
NOTE 1. ALL OlMENSlONS ARE IN mm REFER PURLH TO LlG(E) FACE I 100 : 300
RAFTER
1 INTERIOR $iLES
2. FOR RXINOATION FORCES ANALYSIS TABLE-132 3. DISTANCE FROM THE OF THE NEAREST a.EXTERiJAL b. RiOtE c.VALLEY
11 3 1 en 4
6782 6907
6212 6169
1367 I 1025
5 5 1
1197 1166
4 4
COLUMN
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONMTION FOR AU WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES I MATERIALS :
_ZFCTlON - B &
SECTfc?ti-
cc
SECTION -EE
SECTION - FF
w c w
.I_,
IWW
.--
YI
111
20-wno30
SECTION-OD 8600
-250 SECflON-GG
1 460 1
OffAWING
NO. 133
(REFER
TABLET:
1. AU 2. i01 OlMEMSlW
No.OFBAVS -__ _.
5FAN
:Rx#
:
ARE IN mm 70
LUG CC) I 100 : 360 : 3co
:
:
1 061Awx
RJRLH
?*Q
: HliGEe
: M25 : Fe 415
19-897-260
l-16605-
l-16*5
SECTION -EE
SECTION
- FF
No.
13&
(REFER
TABLE1341
-r*
nz
A AREIN mm REFLR TO
p$&
4 4 4 .
spACNC
1361 t326 13x)
ln3 lm4
tmS
6M9
1333 IO00 MO
S 5 S
wm
69op
3. DISTANCE OF THE MUREST PURLN LUG ($1 FROM THE o.EXTERNAL CCUJMN FACE I 100 b. RIDGE c.VAULV : 360 : 300
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDlflON FOR ALL WIND AND SELSMIC ZONES I MATERIALS : CONCRETE STEEL
: M25
Fe415
2-16~~05
~2-16005
z-16*05
c-16#03 z-12tto9
2-l/p09
_j__sm-&
SECTICN - BB
SECTION-
CC
SECTION --EE
SECTION
- FF
(I!!+
2O+MlhdO-250
20-Wllto30 1
-250
-4-u-
.----7 2O-Wm30-250
SECTION-DD
2~*1,,030_250
2O+l11o30-250
DRAWING
No.
135
(REFER
TABLE1351
3. DISTANCE OF THE NEAREST PURLIN LUG ($) FROM THE a. EXTERNAL COLUMN FACE ! 100 b. RIDGE c.VALLEV :300 : 300
1m 5
4672
1120
1230
1380
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FOR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES 1 MATERIALS : CONCRETE STEEL
: :
M25 Fe 415
29-8#37-210 2-let05
4-16tlO3
t
m
12406
2-12+07 ClW6
1
SECTION - 0 0
8 If7
0
,2+6@7-210
29-M7-2D
4-16803
z-16QO5
4-16X33 2-12809
SECTION-
CC
SECTION -EE
SECTION
-FF
SECTION- AA 500 :
I 11500_ I son 1 ll500
I.---w
5&l
26-6&36-250
SECTION-GG
r-NG
No AND SPACIffi SLOPE 4 M2 R EXTERIOR _ RAFTER OF PURLINS INTERIOR RAFTER -
p(o. 136
(REFER
TABLE136)
ERRLoINF5 SPACM tan 3 1 rn L , 6764 I 6803 6212 6186 1867 1400 6 6 1272 1243
3. OISTANCt OF THE NEAREST PURLIN LUG cc) FROM WE n. EXTERNAL COLUMN FACE I 100 b RIDGE r.VALLEI : 300 : 300
tnS
6625
6172
1120
12 29
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONOlTlON FOR AU WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES I MATERIALS : CONCRETE STEEL
: :
M25 Fe415
)-2CW6
I-2ollOs
2-12all
2-l2m1
2-121111
SECTION - b 0
SECTION-
CC
SECTION -EE
SECTION
- FF
xl-&Lj3tc42
-320
II
3&W3tc42-3X
DRAWING
No. AND SLOPE nl Ii2 R EXTERIOR ;iLcs lm3 10 4 ! 96~4 I 9865 j 9140 I 9110 / 1633 I 137s 1 I 6 6 SPACIIG OF PURLINS RAFTER NOTE 1. ALL OlHENSlONS ARE IN mm REFER PURLN TO LUG (Q FACE ,100 : 3al : : 3ljO
No.
137
137)
1 INTERIOR
1 EL$
1 I 6 .S
1 SPACING
1 I 4s 1396 1
2. F[)R FWNDATION FORCES ANALYSIS TABLE-137 1. DISTANCE FROM THE OF THE NEAREST a. EXTERNAL b. RIDGE c.VALLEV
COLUMN
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONMTION FOR AU WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES I MATERIALS CONCRETE STEEL
HINGED
I 9906
9090
I 1100
I
6
I
12SO
I
5
I
1360
: : :
M25 Fe415
1ns
3-2fXI4 f
3-20#4
2-12*07
S-16ttO6 I
SECTION - 8 0
SECTION-
CC
SECTION -EE
SECTION
- FF
16-&11C26-3x)
kMo26-320
f
166*11$26-320 J_soo
16-8ttllto26- 320
t Es!' zMo& r
320
500
11500
15-&ttlto26-320
I
I
SL)PE Y( tt2 R No. AND SPACING OF PURLINS EXTERlOR RAFTER &L~s 11n 3 1 I L 1ms 5348 5360 5402 4640 4690 4590 1833 1375 1100 6 6 6 SPACNG 1287 1257 1243 INTERIOR RAFTER GLES 5 5 5 SPACING 1416 1361 1365 NOTE 1. ALL OWENSIONS ARE IN mm 10 2. R)R FWNOATION FORCES REFER ANALYSIS TABLE.. 138
MAWING
N~J. 138
3. DISTANCE OF WE NEAREST PURLVt LUG (El FROM TNE a. EXTERtiAL COLUMN FACE , 100 b. RIDGE c.VAUEV :361) : 300
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONMTION FOR AU WIND AND SEi!%lC ZONES I MATERIALS : CONCRETE STEEL
: :
M25 Fe415
--
-i--Q--l
500
SECTION-
CC
SECTION -EE
SECTION
- FF
IL
fY
3
1- w?vJ-
.-.
2l*llto
31-320
rJ_r_yL r--T
I
21-f~WtcJl-320
SECTION-AA
11600 lSOO1 11SO0
SECTION-
GG
1 s&l 1
i_ mAWING
21-64Hlfo31-320 21-Wlto31-320
No. 139
DLSTANCE OF THE NEAREST RlRN LUC (c: FROM WE a. EXTERi4AL COLUMN FACE I 100 b. RIDGE c.VAUEV :360 :300
No. OF BAYS SPAN SPACING COLUMN HEIGHT SUPPORT CONDITION FDR ALL WIND AND SEISMIC ZONES I MATERIALS : CONCRETE STEEL
: FOUR
: 12.Om : 12.0 m
: 6.5m HINGED
: M25 : Fe415
2-2cntOs
2-2CUO5
Z-2005
2-lWJ7
6-16ttO6
2-l?UlO
.6-16#06
L
SFCTION - b &
l-.=--A
SECTION-CC
500
-l---d
SECTION FF -
SECTION -XE
2-12WI-
DRAWING MO. AJm R ExlERloaR*FlER i%%S 1600 1350 6 6 sPACw; 1306 1276 SPACING OF PURLINS INlERIoa ZL:, 5 5 RAFTER %xw'~ 1416 1301 (. z. a
No.
: HWGEO
1oao
1262
1365
aMmETE
: M25, : Fe41$
_--
321
(VARIES
WLy-WIND
PERPENDICULAR
TO RIDGE WITH
INTERNAL
SUCTION
(VARIEti
o*sp.
+o.zp
+ --c
o*sp
WL2-WIND
PERPENDICULAR
TO R@GE WITH
INTERNAL
PRESSURE
p-BASIC
WIND PRESSURE
+0*2p
WL3-WIND
PARALLEL
TO RtDGE WITH
INTERNAL
PRESSURE
DRG.
142
WIND
LOAD
ON PORTAL
322
FRqMES
Handling
SECTION
A-A
SECTION
8.8
Z-16*6
extra D-0
SECTION
6 extra
SECTION
C-C
(a) 6m
SPAN
CLADDING
RUNNER
a =Width
of
the
Maximum spacing of purlin IS 1.4m that of cladding runner is 1.7m M25 Concrete&Fe 415 and Fe 250 steel
and
SPAN
OF 6171 SPAN
position
k of rafter Note: 1 2 3 4 All dimensions wind lin3 are and in mm seismic and lonet lin5 is
For all
For slopes
,lin4
Maximum spacing of purlin 1.4m and that of cladding runner Is 1.7m Concrete Steel MC0 I. Fe 415 and Fe 250
ILUUU
_. f
II. HTS (stress relieved strands) lS:6006-1983 lnitiol prestressing force in each strand =30.6 kN 6 Handling should vertical position finally placed be in the as it is to be
!iffenor 1
++-
SECTION
A_A
SECTION
B_ B
SECTION
C_ C
+tandliqpoint
;I
!
*
a = Width
of
the
rafter/
column
I, I+
loo 100
, iii+= t ; i5
y 3mmHTS
c_c
DRG. No.144 DETAILS OF 12m SPAN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE(PRETENSlDNED) CLP rDDl ING RUNNER AND PURLIN
ti20 ,140
SECTION
A-A
(a)
For 6m
Span
20
Purlin
LUG DETAILS
LUG DETAILS
\\,A4
DRG No.145
FIXING
DETAILS
FOR PURLIN
88
holdtart welded
I
SIDE VIEW
I
SECTION A- A
(a) (Showing holdfast detail&j n
I
I
BRACKET FOR 6-DM SPAN DETAIL
SHEET CONNECTON
6.1. Nut-----------_, G.1. Flat worher, Bitumen washer A.C.ShWw
N!&
/fto
1
,-ISA
/ I:
et
ldfost nut __X_t
2-O# 3-M+
Links
ucoSIDE VIEW
SHEET CONNECTION
L3-8s L nllr
SECTION
DETAILS
__.-.-.-.
;;I P
L86 I :(10
S) Et dS
po*1*1-20#2
r2-
20#
1 ++
ff--j..
G-+.1-2oil2 ~32ameo 1 d!BA
bA
2-20#1
! I ) 13w Column
2-25*1 SECTION A A
SECTION
A A _A--_
(a)
CAST - IN12000
SITU t
(a)
CAST - IN - SITU
I I
SECTION
B B
:;b,.,
_~Iu
?I
P
u1 i
M.S.,Plate 3LOm5~Om12
DETAIL DETAIL P (b) (i) PRECAST FOR 6.0 M SPAN ORG. No. iP8 DETAILS OF EAVES
(b) (ii)
SPAN
BEAMS
sP 43 (S & T):1987
/--6*ST
Cm + d/L
GREATER
$1
B#ST .-TOP
GREATER
OF FOUNDATION
DEPTH
OF SECTION
LENGTH IN TENSION
DETAILING
FOR DUCTILITY
REQUIREMENT
329
1 0 2 0
TOP OF
FOUNDATION
OP OF FOUNDATION
ORG. No.150
LOCATION
OF JOINTS
AND
DURING
TRANSPORTATION
P / _ SINGLE
OR
PIN
M
LIFTING EYES AND CAST IN STUDS
LIFTING
EYE
4
_.
.
.
:/
,-
-;
6 :_
--
4
0 ,
.. .,
STUD
crl
.-i
. . . . . ,
;.
LIFTING
EYE
SCHEMATIC
DETAILS PRECAST
331
OF FIXTURES MEMBERS
FOR HANDLING
SP 43 (S &T):1987
800
1 PRECAST COLUMN
L--12-12*2 3125
42-12
#l
! 1
i
1 T
LEAN CONCRETE
ELEVATION
PLAN
a) FIXED BASE
DRG.152
DETAILS
332
GROUT
L9-10#1
ELEVATION
4-10#3
-.
-l6-10#2 I
4-1 cl#4: Q w
-9-lO#l
/
L
-,
9-lO#F/ I
I
1600 b) HINGED
PLAN
I
BASE
AN0
CAST-IN-SITU
M.S.rod woldod to
Cohn
BEFORE
ASSEMBLY
dta
of mftor
SECTION TYPE 2
A- A
No.%2
RAF.TER
BRACING
IN THE
END
BAY-
I
ABLE
END COLUMNS
DRG. No.154
SCHEMATIC
ARRANGEMENT
OF
BRACING
!843(S&T):1987
7
ISA 50X513X6 SA 50X50X6
400
AAr
SECTION
A A
-/ \
DETAIL
COLUMN
COLUMN
f -,
6000
DRG. No.155
DETAILS
OF BRACING
(CONTII
336
SP43(S&T):1987
F@-
LOO
I 1
I
0
Q (@ 150 -2O#
u?
150
COLUMN
COLUMN
/ jvyI
FIG. 155
DETAILS
OF
BRACING
(CONID.1
337
SP43(S&T):1987
S. PLATE
150X70X10
TO BACK 6
ELEVATION
ISA 50X50X6
PLAN
P (CONiD.,
OF BRACING
338
SP 43 (S 8KT): 1987
-M.S.
PLATE
150X50X10
.S. PLATE
150X150X10
ELEVATION.
PLAN
R (CONlO.)
OF BRACING
SP43(S&T):1987
340
SP 43 (S & T):1987
LLEAN
CONCRETE
ELEVATION
12-12s 27
2300
PLAN
CO) FOR FIXED BASE (FOR omm4 REFER CLAUS 6.5.1 1
f3RG. 156
FOUNDATION
DETAILS
FOR CAST-
IN-SITU
COLUMN
341
1600
9-10 a 1
CLEAN
CONCRE
ELEVATION
P4-lO#l
plO#l
/-6%~@3 (,,a#2
1
I
500 600
1 i _ 1
PLAN
(b)sFOR HINGE0 BASE (FOR DESIGN REFER CLAUSE 6.5.3.1)
FOUNDATION
DETAILS
342
FOR CAST-IN-SITU
COLUMN