10 (2008) 3834
PACS: 98. 80. −k, 98. 80. Es, 98. 80. Cq, 04. 20. Jb, 04. 50. Kd
Bulk viscosity can be introduced in a uniform perfect Our present model can be compared with the Brans–
fluid by replacing the pressure term p by an effective Dicke (BD) theory in which the gravitational constant
pressure, peff defined by 4 + 2ωD 1
is related to the scalar function φ as G = ,
3 + 2ωD φ
peff. = p − 3ηH, (12) where ωD defines a coupling between the scalar field
2+2ωD
and gravity.[13] Accordingly, one has a ∝ t 4+3ωD and
where η is the coefficient of bulk viscosity. This is −
2
normally modelled by the relation G ∝ t 4+3ωD . Notice that a comparison with BD
model reveals that
η = η0 ρn , n, η0 = const. (13) [ (2n + 2) ]
α=− 1+ .
2 + 3ωD
Applying Eq. (12) into Eq. (11) and using Eq. (8), one
obtains[7] This means that the BD model is equivalent to a bulk
8π Ġρ + Λ̇ = 9η(8πG)H 2 . (14) viscous model with a cosmological constant varying
as Λ ∝ ρ−α . Or conversely, our model is equivalent
We consider here the ansatz
to the BD model where the scalar field is given by
3 + 2ωD 1
Λ = 3β/ρα β, α = const. (15) φ= , where G is given by Eq. (24). Notice
4 + 2ωD G
α
−
Integrating Eq. (11), using Eq. (12), we obtain also that one can write Λ ∝ φ 1+α . It is therefore
interesting to see that our model is equivalent to the
ρ = Aa−3(1+ω) , A = const. (16) BD model with a cosmological constant of the form
shown above.
Using Eqs. (6) and (15), Eq. (14) reads Now we consider the following cases:
( ρ̇ ) Case 1. Now let n = α/2 where −1 < α < 0 and
Ġ 3αβ
− = 3η0 ρn (8πGρ + 3βρ−α ). (17) 1 + ω > 0. In this case, Eqs. (21) and (22) reduce to
G 8πGρ(α+1) ρ
a ∝ t−2/3α(1+ω) , ρ ∝ t2/α , (25)
Now consider the following functional dependence of
the gravitational constant and Eqs. (23), (24) and (13) yield
Eqs. (17) and (18) imply that where C > 3β > 0, i.e., G > 0. These represent
the viscous analogue of the dark energy model.[11] . In
3Cη0 (C + 3β) particular, a viscous cosmological model with Λ ∝ H 2
ρ̇ = N ρn−α+1 , N =− , (19) is equivalent to a viscous dark energy model with
C(1 + α) + 3αβ
3836 Arbab I. Arbab Vol. 25
Λ ∝ ρ−α if narb. = 1 + α/2, where narb is the in- (Λ), where the energy density stays constant. We no-
dex of viscosity in Ref. [7]. Moreover, we have shown tice from Eqs. (28) and (29) that the mass created (an-
that the variation Λ ∝ H 2 is equivalent to Λ ∝ ρ.[14] nihilated) during inflation is M ∝ ρa3 ∝ exp(−3Kωt).
Case 2. Now let α > 0 and n < α. In this case, However, since ω > −1, one has for −1 < ω < 0, a
Eq.(22) implies that one has a phantom energy so- positive mass creation rate. Hence, one would pre-
lution where the energy density increases with time. sume that all matter constituting the universe mass
However, since the scale factor is an increasing func- was produced during inflation.
tion of time, Eq. (21) with the condition n < α im- It is remarkable to notice that inflation is induced
plies that 1 + ω < 0. Since N > 0, one requires here by dark energy only. Thus, dark energy played an
C < 0 so that G < 0, and for β > 0 one has Λ > 0. important role by driving the early universe into an
This solution is found by Ref. [11] and the above so- exponential expansion, and the present universe into
lution represents its viscous analogue. It is clear here a accelerated expansion. Hence, the existence of dark
that though the energy density increases, gravity (de- energy is very crucial to the evolution of the universe.
creases) and viscosity (increase) conspire not to allow In summary, we have studied the effect of bulk vis-
the phantom energy density to dominate. cosity on the evolution of dark matter and phantom
We notice from Eq. (20) that when n = α > 0, we energies. We have shown that non-viscous dark matter
obtain models are equivalent to viscous ones. The increasing
ȧ Cη0 (C + 3β) 1 bulk viscosity and decreasing gravitational constant
=K= . (27) do not allow the phantom energy density to conden-
a C(1 + α) + 3αβ (1 + ω)
sate. During inflationary era the universe isotropizes
This implies that and the cosmological constant attained a vary large
value. After inflation the cosmological constant de-
a = Γ exp(Kt), Γ = const, (28)
creases with time quadratically (e.g., for n = α/2).
where K > 0, for 1 + ω > 0. Equations (16) yields This evolution provides a viable mechanism for the
smallness of the present cosmological constant, i.e.,
ρ ∝ exp[−3K(1 + ω)t], (29) why today the cosmological constant is vanishingly
so that Eqs. (15) and (18) become small compared with its inial value!
I am grateful to the Swedish International Devel-
Λ ∝ exp[3αK(1 + ω)t], opment Agency (SIDA) for providing financial sup-
G ∝ exp[3K(1 + ω)(1 + α)t], (30) port for my visit to Abdus Salam International Cen-
ter for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy, where this
and the bulk viscosity, Eq. (13), work was carried out.
η ∝ exp[−3αK(1 + ω)t]. (31) I would like to thank the referees for their critical
comments.
Notice, however, during inflation ω 6= −1 as evident
from Eq. (24). This is unlike the standard case where
inflation requires ω = −1. It is also remarkable that References
the cosmological constant during inflation increases
exponentially with time, whereas the energy density [1] Perlmutter S et al 1998 Astrophys. J. 517 565
decreases exponentially with time. Whatever the ini- [2] Reiss A et al 1998 Astrophys. J. 116 1009
[3] Caldwell R, Kamionkowski M and Weinberg N 2003 Phys.
tial value of the cosmological constant before inflation, Rev. Lett. 91 071301
its value at the end of inflation will be enormously Caldwell R 2002 Phys. Lett. B 545 23
large. This may explain why Λ was large in the very [4] Townsend P K and Wohlfarth M N R 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett.
early universe, as suggested from particle physics con- 91 061302
[5] Ohta N 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 061303
siderations. The universe exited from inflation due to
[6] Beesham A 1986 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 25 1295
the huge growth of the gravitational force that halts [7] Arbab A I 1997 Gen. Relt. Gravit. 29 61
the exponential expansion. Thereafter, the universe [8] Murphy G L 1988 Phys. Rev. D 8 4231
enters a radiation dominated phase. The large de- [9] GrØn Ø1990 Astrophys. Space Sci. 173 191
crease of the bulk viscosity during the inflationary era [10] Starobinsky A A 1980 Phys. Lett. B 91 99
has allowed the universe to isotropize, and eventually [11] Arbab A I 2007 hep-th/0711.1465v1
[12] Amarzguioui M, Elgaroy O, Mota D F and Multamaki T
led to the isotropic and homogenous universe we ob- 2006 Astron. Astrophys. 454 707
serve today. In the standard de-Sitter model the infla- [13] Brans C and Dicke R H 1961 Phys. Rev. 124 925
tionary expansion is led by the cosmological constant [14] Arbab A I 2003 J. Cosmos. Astroparticle Phys. 05 008