Anda di halaman 1dari 2

International Indexed & Referred Research Journal, May, 2012. ISSN- 0974-2832, RNI-RAJBIL 2009/29954;VoL.

IV *ISSUE-40

Research Paper - Education

A Comparative Study of The Effectiveness of Cai Programme and Traditional Method of Teaching accounancy Subject in Standard-11th
* Parulben Fuljibhai Patel
* Asst. Prof. D.K. Patel (Bhura) M.Ed. College, North Gujarat University A B S T R A C T
Present Study has been done to know the effectiveness of CAI Programme and Traditional method of teaching Accountancy Subject in Standard-11th in the study effect of Gender and Methods on Teaching Accountancy subject in Standared11th checked. Total 80 students were selected. On the basis of the score obtain by the students mean, S.D. & t-values were calculated. There is no significant difference found of Gender and on Method significant difference found.

May , 2012

Introduction : Formal education is yet of none other but the consistence of lengthy lectures and textbook centred activities, although, the teacher is called change agent. A teacher is expected to keep pace with the changing scenario of the society. The name of Socrates is inevitable when the matter of educational methods is being discussed. Are the present students as devoted as the students of Socrates? It's a matter of deep thinking. Students are free to ask questions but not habituate. So, the teacher should provide opportunities to the students to ask questions. In the present scenario the use of new teaching method and educational technology is growing which is good sign for education. Teacher's position is in danger in the periphery of learning because the concept of learning is developing or changing day by day. The meaningfulness of learning depends on the learner but the success of the learner depends on the teacher who is responsible for adequate class-room interaction. To fulfil this function the teacher should use the various methods and techniques of teaching Accountancy subject in the class-room. He should also use different instructional material and aids to make the content easy. The computer technology has brought a great change in the class-room teachinglearning process, and as a result, the researcher thought to study the effectiveness of computer Aided Instruction programme in Accountancy subject of the learner of a particular standard. Objective of the Study : (i) To construct and try out a computer Aided Instruc tion Programme for the students of std.11. (ii) To compare the educational achievement of the students of CAI programme and Traditional teach-

ing. (iii) To study the influence of sex on the educational achievement of the students of CAI programme and Traditional teaching. Hypothesis of the Study : (1) There will be no significant difference between the mean scores of the Students of experimental group and controlled group on achievement scores. (2) There will be no significant difference between the mean scores of the boys and girls of experi mental group on achievement scores. (3) There will be no significant difference between the mean scores of the boys of experimental group and the boys of controlled group on achievement scores. (4) There will be no significant difference between the mean scores of the girls of experimental group and the girls of controlled group on achievement scores. Research Method : In the present research the researcher used Experimental Method. Population and Sampling : 80 students studying in std. IXth of Prashant High School were selected randomly as a sample for the study. 25 boys & 15 girls were selected for an experimental group and 27 boys & 13 girls were selected for controlled group. Tools : (i) Construction of CAI programme. (ii) Self prepared pre -test and post- test. Method of Analysis : The statistical technique was used for examine, the total score mean, S.D. and null hypothesis for the clas-

Tabel-1 Mean Scores Obtained of CAI Programme and Traditional Method Group Students Average S.D. SED t-value Significant Level Experimental 40 20.50 4.76 1.03 2.18 0.05 Control 40 18.25 4.45

kks/k

leh{kk vkSj ewY;kadu

International Indexed & Referred Research Journal, May, 2012. ISSN- 0974-2832, RNI-RAJBIL 2009/29954;VoL.IV *ISSUE-40

Tabel-2 Mean Scores Obtained by the Boys and Girls of Experimental Group Gender Students Average S.D. SED t-value Significant Level Boys 25 20.32 4.58 1.57 0.25 N.S. Girls 15 20.08 5.19 Table-2 shows that the t-value is 0.25 which is not significant Thus HO2 is accepted. Ho3 : Tabel-3 Mean Scores of the Boys of Experimental and Controlled Group Boys No. of Students Average S.D. SED t-value Significant Level Experimental 25 20.32 4.58 1.23 1.99 0.05 Controlled 27 17.85 4.32 Table-3 shows that the t-value is 1.99 which is significant at 0.05 level Thus HO3 is rejected. Ho4 : Tabel-4 Mean Scores of the Girls of Experimental and Controlled group Girls Students Average S.D. SED t-value Significant Level Experimental 15 20.80 5.19 1.34 0.90 N.S. Controlled 13 19.08 4.76 sified data in he context of various variables. Findings : Testing of Hypothesis : (1) CAI Method found more effective than Traditional Ho1 : method Table-1 shows that the t-value is 2.18 which is signifi- (2) The boys and girls of experimental group possessed cant at 0.05 level. Thus HO1 is rejected. same degree in Accountancy subject achievement. Ho2 : (3) There was effect found of teaching method on the See Tabel-2 achievement mean scores of boys. Table-4 shows that the t-value is 0.90 which is not (4) The girls of experimental group and controlled significant Thus HO4 is accepted. group were found equal regarding Accountancy subject achievement mean scores.

R E F E R E N C E
1. Desai H.G. & Desai K.G. Psychological testing, University Granth Nirman Board, Ahmedabad,1989. 2. Desai H. G. and K.G. Desai, Sansodhan Paddhatio ane Pravidhio, University Granth Nirman Board, Ahmedabad,1989. 3. Parekh B.U.and Manubhai D Trivedi, Statistics in Educa tion (4th Edition), University Granth Nirman Board, Ahmedabad,1994.

SHODH, SAMIKSHA AUR MULYANKAN

Anda mungkin juga menyukai