.
.
Table of Specifications:
A table of specification (TOS) is the technical term given to the plan for writing items for a test. A table of specification should reflect what has been taught in the instructional sequence. In other words, the testing mode is a mirror of the instructional mode. Since the instructional mode has basically two dimensions content matter and intellectual process, the TOS should likewise reflect both content and process. By process we mean the intellectual level with which the students engage a specific content or unit of information. We can use the categories of Blooms taxonomy to help define the process. In developing the TOS proceed with a plan which reflects not only what has been taught, but also at what intellectual level the students are functioning. Furthemore the test is designed to test achievemenet. All Achievement tests should be content-process valid. Lets take time out to explain content-process valididty. Validity is a term which can be best explained by the question: Does the question measure what it is supposed to measure? The term validity can also be equated somewhat with the term purpose. The content validity of a test means that the test items should be representative of the materials taught in the class. In other words , tehere should be an adequate sampling of the domain of information presented in the instructional mode. How about an example? Suppose you teach a course called History of Civilization and your test consists of one essay question: Describe the evemnts leading up to the first world war. That one question does not seem to represent the content of the course. This problem of adequately sampling is a disadvantage of the essay question and this is one reason why a test paper requires a varied format of testing questions. The process part of content-process validity means that the level of intellectual reasoning that we use in the instructional mode should find its way into the testing mode. Seenu Atoll Education Centre Phone: 6885048 Fax: 6886773 email: info@saec.edu.mv 1
For example, if you never ask a synthesising question in class (instructional mode), its probably inappropriate to include a synytheisng question in the testing mode. If you require students to memorize facts most of the time (level 1, knowledge of Blooms taxonomy) its unfair to to require students to apply information (Application, level 3 of Blooms taxonomy) or to intergrate information (level 5, synthesis of Blooms Taxonomy) on a test. The TOS is a two dimensional array (sometimes called a matrix). That sounds terribly technical but its actually very simple. Look at the sample TOSs given at the end. One dimension is dedicated to the content and the other dimension is dedicated to process. You will have noticed that a TOS contains just one page that has a clear lable. The TOS specifies what items that the teacher must construct. Each cell of the matrix can specify a test item or test items. In other words, cells in the matrix get interpreted into test items identified by particular level of intellectual reasoning (process) Its a good idea for teachers to give a copy of the TOS to stduents. It is an outline of a sort which delineates what has been going on in the class instruction. Students can use the TOS as a study guide as well as a testing guide.
Phone: 6885048
knowing common terms such as the list of ten minerals given. A matching test containing eight to ten of these items could easily be he way to test for the information in that cell. The significant point is that the teacher develops test items to meet the requirements of each cell. Now the question at hand is which of these styles is the teacher required to stick to in preparing the TOS for the teerminal examination for this year, 2009. For the purpose of this examination you may stick to TOS structure given in appendix 4 and 5. And in preparing the TOS think of the following points. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The various concepts that have been taught. The concepts which may be intergrated for the purpose of testing. The conact time assigned for various concepts as per the curriculum design. Is there any guidance in the curriculum about weightage for topics. Is there guidance in the curriculum about weightage to be assigned in terms of level of testing. For instance some curricular assign 50% to knowledge and comprehension, 30 % to Application and analysis, and 20% to synthesis and evaluation.
I hope this document is of some help for the teachers. Mohamed Haleem SAEC 13 th October 2009
Phone: 6885048
Appendix 1
Table of Specification for senior high school home economics Objectives Knows specific concepts Solvability naming
Content area
Knows common terms Vitamin A Vitamin B Vitamin C Vitamin D Vitamin E Vitamin G Vitamin H Vitamin K Calcium Iron Iodine Phosphorous Potassium Sodium Chlorine Flourine Magnesium Copper Monosaccharides Disaccharides Polysaccharides oils
Vitamins
Minerals
Function
Carbohydrates
Fats
Proteins
Amino acids
Conversions Digestion Energy value Consumption Energy value Blood fats Nutritive value Kwashiorkor Solvent Rentention Distribution in body
Water
roughage
Sources Recommended Allowances Sources Recommended Allowances Sources Recommended Allowances Sources Recommended Allowances
Classification of carbohydrates Percentages of fats in typical foods Essential amino acids Water balance of an average person
Phone: 6885048
Appendix 2
Table of specification for a junior high test in weather Objectives Understands Influence of Use of each factor measuring on weather devices formation 3 Observe pupils 8 using 2 measuring 2 devices 1 (rating 16 scale) 32
Content
Skills in Constructing Interpreting Total weather weather number maps maps of items Evaluate maps constructed by pupils (check list) 3 2 2 5 12 24 11 16 8 10 5 50 items
Appendix 3
Table of specification for a third grade social studies test (in percentage) Objectives Content area Knows common terms 2 2 4 4 4 4 20 Knows specific facts 6 6 2 2 2 1 20 Understands principles and generalizations 2 2 2 2 5 6 6 25 Applies principles and generalizations Interprets charts and graphs Total
Food Clothing Transportation Communication Sheltor City life Farm life Total
2 2 5 8 8 25
5 5
10
10 10 15 15 10 20 20 100
Phone: 6885048
Appendix 4
Table of Specification for grade 8 physics Content area Length and time Linear motion Mass and weight density Forces Moments Scalars and vectors Energy Work Power Pressure Kinetic molecular model Evaporation Heat transfer Wave properties Sound Light Total objectives knowledge Q M comprehension Q M application analysis Q M Q M 2 2 3 2 4 1 2 1 4 1 2 3 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 3 6 3 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 4 2 2 4 2 1 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 synthesis Q M evaluation Total Q M Q M 1 2 3 4 5 3 3 7 2 3 4 4 4 5 5 7 5 4 13 2 3 4 4 6 7 8
2 1 2 2 1 2 2
1 2 2 2 1 22
1 2 2 2 1 22 1 2
2 2 2 4 1 2 1 4 2
2 4 7
3 6 12
1 10
3 20
2 13
4 21
1 10
2 15
12
10
2 2 5 10 68 100
Phone: 6885048
Appendix 5
Table of Specifications for Diagnostic Test grade 7 Dhivehi
m 20 7 6 5 6 8 6 12 30
s 12 1 1 1 6 2 4 1 2
m 3
s 1
m 4 7
s 2 1
m 8
s 4
m 5
s 5
6 5
1 1 6 4 3 1 1 4 1 3 3 6
/ /
12 30
1 2
10 0
Phone: 6885048
Appendix 6
Blooms Taxonomy
Category
Knowledge: Recall data or information.
Comprehension: Understand the meaning, translation, interpolation, and interpretation of instructions and problems. State a problem in one's own words.
Examples: Rewrites the principles of test writing. Explain in one's own words the steps for performing a complex task. Translates an equation into a computer spreadsheet. Key Words: comprehends, converts, defends, distinguishes, estimates, explains, extends, generalizes, gives Examples, infers, interprets, paraphrases, predicts, rewrites, summarizes, translates.
Application: Use a concept in a new situation or unprompted use of an abstraction. Applies what was learned in the classroom into novel situations in the work place.
Examples: Use a manual to calculate an employees vacation time. Apply laws of statistics to evaluate the reliability of a written test. Key Words: applies, changes, computes, constructs, demonstrates, discovers, manipulates, modifies, operates, predicts, prepares, produces, relates, shows, solves, uses. Examples: Troubleshoot a piece of equipment by using logical deduction. Recognize logical fallacies in reasoning. Gathers information from a department and selects the required tasks for training. Key Words: analyzes, breaks down, compares, contrasts, diagrams, deconstructs, differentiates, discriminates, distinguishes, identifies, illustrates, infers, outlines, relates, selects, separates
Analysis: Separates material or concepts into component parts so that its organizational structure may be understood. Distinguishes between facts and inferences.
Phone: 6885048
Category
Synthesis: Builds a structure or pattern from diverse elements. Put parts together to form a whole, with emphasis on creating a new meaning or structure.
Examples: Select the most effective solution. Hire the most qualified candidate. Explain and justify a new budget. Key Words: appraises, compares, concludes, contrasts, criticizes, critiques, defends, describes, discriminates, evaluates, explains, interprets, justifies, relates, summarizes, supports.
Phone: 6885048