of Process 5) Venue 6) Removal 7) Waiver (where possible, note that smj can NEVER be waived)
I. Territorial Jurisdiction
A. Substantive Due Process:
1. Court has the power to act upon the PERSON or the PROPERTY through:
a) Minimum Contacts with the forum state. b) Long arm statute accepting such jx. B. Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Limits based on CASE TYPE.
1. Involves the courts AUTHORITY TO RULE on a particular type of case. 2. Subject Matter Jx NOT WAIVABLE:
a) may raise at any time. b) Court will raise sua sponte (as its own motion). c) Must be resolved before the merits of the suit.
(1) Without AUTHORITY all possible rulings of the case would be invalid. 3. State Courts are Courts of General Jx:
a) State Courts have CONCURRENT jx w/ Federal Courts EXCEPT for a few types of cases. b) Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, Antitrust, Securities can only be heard by Fed Court.
4. DIVERSITY JURISDICTION:
a) Constitutional Authorization:
(1) Art III 2: Provides for a forum where persons will be free from local prejudice. ONLY ESTABLISHES MINIMAL DIVERSITY (diversity must exist between ONE and ONE )
b) Diversity Statute:
(1) Two Prerequisites: 1) Diversity of Citizenship, 2) Minimum amount in Controversy. (2) Complete Diversity Requirement: No can have the same citizenship as ANY . (3) HOW IS CITIZENSHIP DETERMINED?
(a) For NATURAL PERSONS (including permanent resident aliens):
(i) DOMICILE
(b) For CORPORATIONS:
(i) Any state where it is incorporated AND (ii) Principle Place of Business (iii)IF UNINCORPORATED: Every state where there is a member.
(c) Class Actions:
(i) Citizens of the same state as the person represented. (28 USC 1332(c)(2))
(4) Time for Determination: At the COMMENCEMENT of the action. (5) Jurisdictional Amount: MORE than $75,000.00 must be in dispute at the COMMENCEMENT of the action.
(a) LEGAL CERTAINTY TEST: Amount claimed by is determinative UNLESS can show a LEGAL CERTIANTY that the minimum CANNOT be met. (b) Aggregation of Claims:
(i) All claims from a SINGLE against a SINGLE . (ii) SINGLE against SEVERAL ONLY if the s are jointly liable. (iii)MULTIPLE against SINGLE ONLY if s have a common undivided ownership interest in claims.
a) Art III 2 extends Federal judicial power to cases ARISING UNDER: (Broad Interpretation)
(1) The Constitution, (2) The Laws of the U.S. and Treaties, (3) Admiralty, (4) Where the US is a party, (5) Where Ambassadors are involved.
(i) ANTICIPATION OF DEFENSE INSUFFICIENT: (ii) Well-Pleaded Complaint rule applies to cases sought to be REMOVED from state to Fed. Court by a . (a) can elect NOT TO ASSERT federal claim to avoid Federal Question Jx.
(5) In most Federal Question cases there is NO REQUIRED MINIMUM amount. 6. Supplemental Jx:
a) When Fed Courts have jx, they have jx over ALL ISSUES in the case. b) Traditionally: Pendent and Ancillary Jx:
(1) ANCILLARY JX: Gave Fed Courts power to hear claims brought by parties OTHER than the but related to the s claim. i.e. counterclaims, crossclaims, interpleader claims and claims by intervenors. (2) PENDENT JX: Gave Fed Courts power to hear nonfederal claims against nondiverse as long as the claims arose from the same event as the fed claim. (3) In 1989 S. Ct. called into question the validity of Ancillary and Pendent Jx because there was no statutory basis for it.
(5) Limitation for claims asserted under supp jx is tolled while case is pending in Fed Ct and for 30 days after dismissal.
a) Rules of Decision Act: The Laws of the States are the rules of decision in Fed Courts, except where the Constitution or Fed Laws or Treaties provide otherwise. b) Traditionally: Swift v. Tyson Under Swift, the Rules of Decision Act did not apply to state common law, so Fed Ct could establish general common law. c) Overruling of Swift by Erie State common law should govern where Congress had not provided otherwise.
(1) Reasoning Swift had led to a lack of uniformity and resulting discrimination at the Fed Level. S. Ct.
(a) FOUND that the Rules and Decision Act had not intended to exclude state common law. (b) HELD that the Constitution did not give Fed Cts power to declare the substantive common law that would apply in a state. (c) Twin Aims:
(i) Discouragement of forum shopping AND (ii) Avoidance of Inequitable administration of the laws.
(2) Part of a Practice Revolution: Erie and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure adopted at the same time.
(3) Developing Erie Attempted to implement the general guideline that STATE SUBSTANTIVE LAW and FEDERAL PROCEDUAL LAW govern state law actions in the Fed Court.
(a) Guaranty Trust Co. v. York:
(i) HELD: State statute of limitations took precedence over more flexible fed laches approach. (ii) Presented the OUTCOME DETERMINATION test (a) A fed law is substantive if application of the fed law instead of the state law will significantly affect the outcome of the litigation.
(b) Interest Balancing Approach (Byrd)
(i) Relation between state rule and the underlying state right (ii) Interest of the fed judicial system (iii)Outcome determination effect.
(i) FEDERAL CONSTITUTION : Rules that are derived from the Constitution ALWAYS govern state law actions. (ii) ACTS OF CONGRESS: IF the Fed Statute is arguably procedural THEN the Fed Statute will govern.
Civil Procedure Outline Fall 2006 (iii)FEDERAL RULES : Will be applied if they are procedural (in accordance with the Rules Enabling Act) (iv)JUDGE-MADE FEDERAL PROCEDURAL RULES: Decisional rules present unguided Erie choices and are judged according to whether they meet the TWIN AIMS.
a) IN PERSONAM Jx:
(1) In Personam jx permits a court to enter a judgment that is PERSONALLY BINDING on the defendant. (2) Relates to the s personal liability to be satisfied by the s personal assets.
b) IN REM Jx:
(1) In Rem jx permits a court to adjudicate the rights of ALL POSSIBLE CLAIMANTS IN A SPECIFIC PIECE PROPERTY. (2) Do NOT determine personal liability of the , rather, they involve interests of persons in the PROPERTY.
Civil Procedure Outline Fall 2006 (i) Severely limited Due to Shafer now property acts as one of the minimum contacts required under the minimum contacts and fairness requirements.
E. Traditional Test
1. Pennoyer States jurisdiction was limited to persons properly SERVED or PROPERTY seized in the State.
a) Requires:
(1) PRESENCE IN FORUM STATE- Temporary presence in State unrelated to activity in lawsuit falls within providence of this test (2) SERVICE WITHIN THE FORUM STATE Even if is only there for a limited time, he may be served with process.
(a) NOTE: Service while on a plane flying over forum is VALID.
F. Modern Test
1. International Shoe Requires MINIMUM CONTACTS w/the forum State such that jx does not offend TRADITIONAL NOTIONS OF FAIR PLAY AND SUBSTANTIAL JUSTICE.
a) Minimum Contacts
(1) Do not offend Traditional Notions of Fair Play and substantial justice. (2) Systematic and Continuous (Helicopterous) (3) Purposely directed towards forum state (Asahi) (4) Purposely avail himself of privileges of the forum State (Hanson) (5) Possibility of Litigation must be FORESEEABLE (World-Wide Volkswagen). (6) Connection between Litigation, and Forum State:
(a) Mere presence of property not enough to establish Jx. Becomes another contact for the Minimum Contacts Test (Shaeffer)
b) Domicile
(1) Jx over persons domiciled within State even if temporarily out of state.
(a) RESIDENCE Current Dwelling Place (b) INTENT TO INDEFINITELY REMAIN:
(i) 1 Domicile at a Time (ii) Person must intend to make that place his home, for the time at least.
c) Consent
(1) Jx may be established by consent even without minimum contacts. (2) Consent can be established by:
(a) Filing an action By using the court for a counterclaim, give up right to question jx. (b) Advance Consent i.e. In a contract or Designating an agent. (c) Voluntary appearance in Court
G. Proper Notice:
1. Proper notice is required to invoke personal jx. 2. Notice has Statutory AND Constitutional dimensions (Due Process clause) 3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust: Notice MUST be:
a) Reasonably Calculated, under all circumstances b) To apprise interested parties c) Of the pendency of the action AND d) Afford them the Opportunity to be Heard
(1) Constructive notice by publication is INSUFFICIENT where names and addresses of parties are known. (2) Constructive notice by publication is ACCEPTABLE where identities or whereabouts of is unknown AND other parties will protect the interests of the absentees.
(i) Unilateral Act by INSUFFICIENT (ii) Entering into a long term relationship with forum resident may suffice. (iii)Seeking to Serve forum even a single act (McGee v. International Life). (iv)Stream of Commerce - Ends with the Retail Sale of the Product (WWVW). Asahi (OConnor) says that additional conduct might be necessary. (v) Targeting or intending Effects in a forum.
(b) Relationship between contacts to forum and Cause of Action:
(i) If cause of action arises out of the contacts in the forum Specific Jurisdiction will be found.
(c) Commercial vs. Noncommercial
(i) Not sufficient by itself to grant Jx but considered one of the contacts.
(e) Minimum Contacts trumps TNFPSJ.
10
(3) Factors:
(a) Interest in the state in providing a forum to the . (b) Interest in the state to REGULATE activity involved. (c) Burden on the . (d) Relative burden on the of prosecution elsewhere. (e) Is activity systematic and continuous? (f) Relation of claim to local activites (Specific Jx). (g) Avoid multiple suits and conflicting adjudications.
(4) Internet Activities: Purposeful availment is emphasized and Reasonableness is relaxed. 2. Property in the Forum: Establishes a relevant contact between and Forum.
a) Location of Property:
(1) Tangible Property If physically present then located in the state. (2) Intangible Property If a transaction regarding the Intangible property happened in the state then it is present in the state.
(a) State Law usually governs when Intangible property will be held In-State.
(2) Claim related to Rights and Duties arising from ownership. (Specific Jx). (3) Absence of other Forum.
11
3. General Jx:
a) Where the claim for relief does NOT arise out of forum contacts. b) More continuous and systematic contacts may support General Jx. (Helicopterous) c) Natural Persons:
(1) General Jx is available in the state of a natural persons domicile.
d) Corporations
(1) Subject to General Jx where:
(a) Corporation was INCORPORATED (usually Delaware) (b) Where the Corp. Headquarters are. (c) Its Principle Place of Business (d) Any state with minimum contacts that would not violate traditional notions of fair play and substantive justice.
e) As Opposed to Specific Jurisdiction: When the cause of action arises out of contacts in the forum.
(1) When the Cause of Action DOES arise out of the contact minimal contacts MAY support Specific Jurisdiction. (McGee v. International Life) 4. Consent
12
a) Traditionally: Service was presumptively sufficient. b) S. Ct. has up-held transient jx (wiggle room is transient jx was not voluntary.) c) If was brought into jx via fraud service is not proper and jx is not established. I. Statutory Authorization for Jx:
1. Long Arm Statutes
a) International Shoe only provided what was CONSTITUTIONALLY possible. States then enacted statutes to enact International Shoe. Most statutes LIMIT jx.
2. Federal Court Jx
a) In general fed ct exercise jx no broader than the state where the ct is located (via the long arm statute.)
II. Venue:
A. A Statutory limitation on the Geographic Location of litigation to prevent a plaintiff from suing where it would be burdensome for the defendant to appear and defend. B. Federal Venue Limitations:
1. Defendants Residence
a) In Fed Court: Venue lies WHERE ANY RESIDES if all s reside in the same state.
(1) A Corp. residence is any district where it is subject to personal jx (i.e. incorporation, principle place of business etc) (2) Unincorporated Business where-ever they are doing business.
13
d) Removed Cases: When a case is removed from state to Fed Ct, venue is in the Fed District encompassing that state ct.
2. Federal Transfer Provisions:
14