1 (1989) 159-174
159
MODIFIED BOUNDARY INTEGRAL METHOD FOR PRESSURE DRIVEN MHD DUCT FLOW
B.D. AGGARWALA and P.D. ARIEL Department of Hathematlcs and Statistics University of Calgary, Calgary, K1berta, Canada
(Received January 15, 1988)
ABSTRACT.
In this paper,
of the
ve
Incompresslble,
field
is
fleld,
when one
boundaries
partly
(li) flov
arbltrarily
through a rectangular duct vhen the conducting part is symmetrlcally situated, and
(Ill)
flow
through
rectangular duct
vhen
the
conducting
part
is
positioned.
Such problems have been studied before by asyptotlc means for large values of H,
Method renders the proble coputatlonally efficient and provides a rellable ntmerlcal
all
values
H.
For
large
M,
our
coputatlon
tlme
decreases
slgnlflcantly.
INTRODUCTION.
The MHD flov of an electrlcally conducting fluld through ducts in the presence of
a :agnetlc fleld is of ipotance in various areas of technology and engineering such as HHD power generation, HHD flow-eters, HHD pumps etc.
Since the classlcal orks by
Hartmann [I] and Shercllff [2], many investigations have been carried out in vhlch various combinations of boundary conditions have been considered [3-14]. Speclal attention has been paid in these investigations to large values of M, the Hartmann
number, to study the formation of various boundary layers in the fleld at large H.
160
Hunt
and
Williams
the
effects
of
discontinuity
in
the
recently extended this Idea and investigated the MHD flow through ducts in which one
perpendicular
to
the
magnetic
had
mixed
electromagnetic
In the present paper, we investigate the MHD flow through ducts, when one of the
boundaries perpendicular to the magnetic field has a portion of the boundary perfectly
conducting
Method.
and
the
remaining
boundaries
are
Insulated,
by
the
Boundary
Integral
duct when the conducting part is symmetrically situated, and (Ill) a rectangular duct
when
is
arbitrarily positioned.
of
r.
method has been modified to develop an Integral equation for the value of the magnetic
field
on
the
conducting
part
the
boundary,
which
integral
equation
has
An
and the results presented for various values of the Hartmann number.
Such problems
2.
incompressible,
through a duct.
be
fully
developed,
steady
and
laminar.
A unlform magnetic
is
applied
The equation of motion and the curl of Ohms law in the dimensionless form are
B v2v + M-if -,
(2.,)
V2B + M "x
is the Rartmann number defined by
(2.2)
Here V is the velocity in the z-dlrectlon, B is the induced magnetic field and M
M
where
PeHoL,(o/p)
1/2
(2.3)
and p,
L,
is
characteristic
length
o and
Pe
respectively
denote
the
is
primary
flow
as
corresponding
to
perfectly
insulated
walls,
its
solution is given by
v0 (x)
ch
2M
shMa
,..Ma
ch M
(,..
x)
(3.
161
B0(x)
=W (-
x)
M(a
sh Ma
x) (3.2)
0 and x
a.
v0(,y)-and
m--I ,3
v (x) sin
m
B0(x
where
y)
>.
re=l,3
b (x) sin m
v (x) m
16b
m
[I
b (x) m
and
m
1
16b
shPm (a-x)
Pm
2 + M 2 4b
m n
22
sho mx ch
shp a m
-sh
O, x
a and y
+/-
mr cos
m_
2b
(3.3)
cos
2b
(3.4)
M(a-x)+shPm(a-x)c
Sx
(3.5)
Mx-shPmX
sh
M(a-x)
shp a m
(3.6)
(3.7)
a, y
0 and y
O, x
b, the
We shall examine the effect of the perfectly conducting part of the boundary on
the flow in the following sections.
B
where V
and B
B0
velocity
+
B
and
(3.8)
magnetic
field
induced
are
the
by
the
electrical
4.
are
V2V
3B
+ M
(4.1)
V2B
V
V
+
0
(4.2)
on the boundaries
(4.3a)
(4.3b)
---ffi
3B o 3n
(4.3c)
162
Vl(X,y)
and
Bl(X,y)
shch- f(x,y)
M f
2
f(x,y)
(4.4) (4.5)
V2f
_!
(4.6)
(4.7) (4.8)
f (0 y)
--0 x
y)
f(P)
=-- f
point
{f(Q)
interior
G(P,Q)
to
G(P,Q)-Q} dSQ
the
(4.9)
is
Here
is
any
domain
D,
any
point
on
the
/SnQ
4.1
at
Assume that the conducting part of the boundary x 0 is symmetrically situated c. y Because of the symmetry of the problem, we need to consider the solution
0 only.
The boundary condition at y
in the region y
0 becomes
(y
Choosing
x, o)
(4.10)
C(x,y;,n)
(-I) m
{Ko[
V(Xm-)2+(y-n)2
(4.1 i)
+K
where
M [ /(Xm -)2+(Y+r )2
Xm
equations
(m +
)a
+ (-1) m (x
a)
(4.12)
Bl(X,y)
and
V l(x,y)
Notice
that-v
8G
to differentiate it.
-- ch
163
G f BI(O,) x,y;O,)
O
dq
(4.13)
sh-
Mx
c
O
BI(O,) x,y:O,)
_I
r
at x
(4.14)
q, and we still need
0, y
4.2.
MODIFI ED
[NTEGRJ
EQUATION FOR B
x+O o
where G is given by
B
n) d
2n--x
(0 y)
(4.15)
-(x,y;g,n)
+ K
Since
[ /(Xm-)2+(y-n)2]
2
(4.16)
the
function G also
satisfies
the differential
equation
(4.6), equation
x+O
Bl(O,n)
(x,y;O,q)
82
(x,y;0 n)]dn
2n-x(O, y)
(4.17)
vanishes
Integrating the second term in the integrand by parts and noting that B
at
c and
--vanishes
4
at
lira
x+0
f
o
Bl(0,)(x,y;0,)+Bl(0,n
(x,y;0,)]d
(0,y)
(4.18)
.
(4.19) (4.20)
Assume
g(n)
which implies
f B l(O,y)dy O
0
g(0)
and
g (r)
B l(O,q)
(4.21)
lira
x+0
-1 f [! 2 g (n)(x,y;0,n)
dn
2 n_O(o Y)
ox
(4.22)
164
[ M2g(c)(x,y;0,c)
f
o
h(q
y(X,y;0,)dn]
-x (0,y)
Bo
(4.23)
G(x,y;,n)
{K
o["
(Xm-)Z+(y-n)21
(4.24)
-K
and
[ /(Xm-) 2+(y+U) 21
g"(rl)
h(r)
Integrating equation (4.23) with respect to y from 0 to y and taking the limits,
we finally obtain the following integral equation for h
M2g(rl)
(4.25)
f
o
h(q)G(0,y;0,v)dq
where
P(y)
and
Q(y)
g(c)P(y) + Q(y)
(4.26)
(O,rl;O,c2)d n
Bo
(4.27)
--x(O,r)dr o
n
(4.28)
One should note that
Also, equation (4.26) needs to be solved only on the conducting part of the boundary, and not over the whole boundary, and this leads to
saving in computation.
Let
g(c)h I() +
h2(
(4.29)
where h
and h
2
c
o c o
satisfy
.f hl(rl)
G(O,y:O,r)dr G(0,y;0,n)drl
P(y) Q(y)
(4.30)
(4.31)
f h2(n)
respectively.
Also let
g(n)
where
g(c)gl(r)
g2(rO
(4.32)
gi(n)
165
gi"(n)
with
2gi(n)
O,
i(n)
(i
(4.33)
gi(O)
gi(c)
(4.30)
1,2)
(4.31)
for
By solving equations
equation (4.33).
and
hi(n),
one
can
obtain
gi(n)
from
Now g(c) can be obtained from equation (4.32) by using the condition
g(c)
g(c).
We have
g(c)
g2 (c)
gl(c)
and
(4.34)
gi(n), Bl(0,n)
4.3.
NUMERICAL COMPUTATIONS.
Equations (4.30) and (4.31) were solved numerically by descretizing the interval
(0,c)
into a mesh and using an analog of Eulers mid-point rule for integration
j+l
h(n)G(0,y;0,n)dn
h(nj+i/2)
j+l
G(0,y;0,n)dn
(4.35)
Thus the values of h were calculated at the mid-points of the mesh-points rather than at the nodal points.
The
resulting linear algebraic system of equations was solved on the Cyber 860 at the
University of
Calgary,
Calgary,
Canada
(IwMr)
when y
first integrated by parts resulting into an integrand without a singularity but which
0.
This was,
were evaluated using the three point Gauss Legendre formula, which was sufficient to
BVP
(4.33)
was
functions
(rather
mid-point formula was used to calculate the integrals and this enabled us to compute
the values of
The
BI(0,) at the nodal points of the mesh. values of Bl(0,n) were calculated using 50 and
accuracy
of the
i00 mesh-points.
was
To further
used. The
improve
the
results,
Richardsons
extrapolation
improved values of
Bl(0,n)
field were
calculated
for c
0.2
and
various values of M.
using the Fourier transform technique, and the present results for these cases are in
good
agreement
with
the
results
obtained
there.
166
encountered
here.
Also worth mentioning is the fact that using the present method the execution
time reduced with increasing values of M as fewer terms are needed for coputatlon of
BI(0,)
For M- I0, it took 1.950 seconds of CPU for a single run, but for M 50 it took
I00.
further reduced by using the Gauss-Seldel method instead of Gauss elimination, as for
I00.
As expected, boundary
layer formation takes place for large values of M near the non-conductlng boundaries
Also shear layers [16, 17, 19] given by
which
emanate
from
the
points
of
discontinuity
in
the
electromagnetic
boundary
In Figure 3, the current lines (constant magnetic field lines) are presented for
M
I00.
Again, one can notice the formation of the two boundary layers for large
values of M.
demarcated
by dashed lines.
It may be
magnetic
4.5.
0 is symmetrically
placed at
ly
4 c.
C(x,y;,n)
mffi-
G(x,y;,n)
..
(-I) m+n K
nffi-
(-1) n
G(x,y;,)
where
m----
>
(-1)
n----
n"
Ko[
"
(4.37
(4.38)
,/(Xm-)2+(yn-n) 2
(4.39)
yn
and
n
(n+
(4.40) (4.41)
(n + 1.) 2
()
velocity
lines
and
current
In
Figure
and
5,
equal
lines
are
presented
respectively, for c
0.2 and M
I00.
167
4.6.
In
i.e., c
cases.
this
case
c
2.
the positioning of the conducting part is taken arbitrary The analysis now is slightly different compared with the previous
V l(x,y)
and
Bl(X,y)
where
=--
G(x,y;,)
x
and
Yn
- -sh- c Bl(0,n)
c
Mx
(x,y;O,) dn
(4.42)
ch-_
Mx
Bl(0,n)
(x,y;0,n) dn
(4.43)
m=- n=-
l)m+n Ko[ M
(Xm-) 2+(yn_n)2
(4.44)
Defining
g()
C
Bl(0,y)dy
(4.45)
and proceeding as in Section 4.2, we obtain the following integral equation for h()
c c
h(n)G(0,y;0,)dn
where
p(y)
Q(y) =-2r
and
C
M2
g(c2)m(y)
+ Q(y) + A
(4.46)
(0,;0,c2)d
y
(4.47) (4.48)
f
Cl
--x (0,n)d
Bo
f h()G(0,Cl;0,)d c
(4.49)
(_ i)
and
(4.50)
(4.51)
Let
2)
h()
where h I, h and h 2 3
g(c2)hl(n)
are given by
h2()
Ah3()
(4.52)
i2 hl() G(0,y;0,n)d
C
P(y)
(4.53)
168
2 h2(n
c,j2
c
G(O,y;O,n)dn
(4.54)
()
G(O,y;0,rl)drl
(4.55)
Further assume
g(r)
where
g(c2)g
the BVP
(n) +
g2(n)
Ag3(n)
(4.56)
gi(n)satisfy
gi()
M2gi ()
0,
hi()
0 (i- 1,2,3)
with
(c gl )=
constants
g(c 2 )=
and g(c
(4.57)
be
obtained
The
2)
can
now
by
using
the
condition g(c
I)
A
2)
g(c2).
We have
and
(4.58)
g(c2)
In
by
Figures
g2(cl)g3(c2)-g3(cl)g2(c2 ) g3(cl)[gl(c2)-l]-g3(c2)gl(Cl)
and
(4.59)
and
current lines
7,
2
equal
note
velocity
lines
are
shown
respectively, for c
0, c
One
dashed
lines.
should
interaction
of
various
layers
in
these
figures.
Finally in Figure 8, the values of B(0, y) are plotted on the conducting part for
the geometries considered in this paper.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Financial support of
169
Ho
c
INSULATED
CONDUCTING
O
Figure
I.
FiLwe 2.
Equal velocity lines in infinite channel (y)_ 0) I, c 0.2. The parabolic boundary I00, a for M layer is indicated by dashed lines.
170
FiEure 3.
channel Equal magnetic field lines in (y >. O) for M : I00, a : I, c : 0.2. The parabolic boundary layer is irticated by dashed lines.
iinite
Figure 4.
Equal
ines
171
Figure 5.
Equal magnetic field lines in the rectangular duct I00, a b (symmetric case) for M I, c 0.2. The parabolic bour layer is imlicated by dashed
lines.
Figure 6.
Equal velocity lines in the rectangular duct (non-symmetric case) for M I00, a b I, 0.9.. The parabolic botmdmry layer is 0, c c, indicated by dashed lines.
172
Figure 7.
qual agnetic field lins in the rectangular duct {non-s,mtric case) for M I00, a b I, 0.2. The parabolic botmdary layer is c O, c by dashed lines. indicated
173
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
N-lO0
0.01
H- 10 N- 20 H- $0, H
0.00 0.00
Figure 8.
0.04
0.08
0.12
7
0.16
0.20
Values of B on the conducting part of the boundary 0 for various values of H. The curves x represent B for infinite channel, the curves represent B for rectangular duct (symmetric-case} and represent B for rectangular duct the curves (non-syuetric case).
174
I.
HARTMANN,
J. ,Hg-Dynamlcs-l,
Theory
of
the
Laminar
Flow
of
an
Electrically
Math.
Fys. Medd.,15 6
under Transverse
(1937).
2.
SHERCLIFF,
I.
Steady
Motion
of
Conducting Flulds
in Pipes
3.
Magnetic Fields, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 4if, (1953), 136-144. Mech. HUNT, J.C.R., Magnetohydrodynamlc Flow in Rectangular Ducts,Jour. Fluid 21 (1965), 577-590.
4.
Nonconducting Walls,
and
two
(1961), 1024-1034. 5. GRINBERG, G.A., On Some Types of Flow of a Conducting Fluid in Pipes of Rectangular Cross section, Placed in a Magnetic Field PMM, 26 (1962), 80-87. 6. HUNT, J.C.R. and STEWARTSON, K., Magnetohydrodynamlc Flow in Rectangular Ducts II Jour. Fluid Mech. 23, (1965), 563-581. 7. CHIANG, D. and LUNDGREN, T., Magnetohydrodynamlc Flow in a Rectangular Duct rlth Perfectly Conducting Electrodes, ZAMp, 18, (1967), 92-105. 8. LAVRENTEV, I.V. and SHISKO, A. YA., Electrodynamlc Processes in MHD Channels with High Magnetic Reynolds Number, MHD, 16 (1980), 88-311. 9. SINGH, BANI and AGARWAL, P.K., Numerical Solution of a Singular Integral Equation Appearing in Magnetohydrodynamlcs, .ZAMp, 3_5 (1984), 760-770. I0. SINGH, BANI and LAL JIA, Kantorovlch Method in Magnetohyd rodynaml c Flow Problems through Channels, Ind. Jour. Pure Appl. Math. 15, (1984), 1048Magnetic Field, PMM, 25
1063.
II. AITOV, T.N., KALYUTIK, A.I. and TANANAEV, A.V., Numerical Study of ThreeDimensional MHD Flow in a Duct of Complex Configuration, Using the Stokes Approximation, MHD, 20, (1984), 288-293.
12. KASHEVSKII, B.E. and NOGOTOV, E.F., Non-Linear MHD Effects Found in the Channel
Flow of a Magnetic Liquid, MHD,
13. ANTIMIROV, M. YA., Solution of MHD Problems with Mxed Boundary Conditions, MHD
21
14. SLATINSKI,
V.I.
FEDONENKO, A.I.
and
TARAPOV,
I.E., Flow of
MH____D,
22 (1986), 155-161.
15. HUNT, J.C.R. and WILLIAMS, W.E., Some Electrically Driven Flows in
Magnetohydrodynantlcs, Part I., TheoryL J. Fluid Mech., 31, (1968), 705-722. 16. SEZGIN, M., AGGARWALA, B.D. and ARIEL, P.D., Electrically Driven Flows in MHD
With Mixed Electromagnetic Boundary Conditions,
ZAMM, (1987),
Driven
to appear.
17. SEZGIN,
M.,
ARIEL,
P.D.
and
AGGARWALA,
Partially
B.D.,
Pressure
and
MHD
Flows
in
Channels
Conducting
Partially
Insulating
(1971), 37-62.