The Judiciary interprets laws enacted by the legislature and dispenses justice a ccording to those laws.

The judiciary must act independently without fear or fav or. The judges must be honest and men of courage and integrity. However, it must be remembered that the Indian legal system is a legacy of our colonial rulers a nd with the passing of time many evils have crept into it and it fails to satisf y the aspiration of the people. Hence there is urgent need of a complete overhau l of judicial machinery. Honesty and integrity of the Judges must be given too priority. The judges shoul d not merely be honest but also seem to be so. Beside being honest, fearless and independent, they must also be learned and wise. They must have sound legal kno wledge, and must also know how to apply that legal knowledge to the cases before them. They must be able to separate the grain of truth from the chaff of falseh ood. They must be firm and above suspicion so that they may decide a case fearle ssly and give their judgment without fear or favor. They must have a conscience so that they may tell themselves at the end of each day that have done their bes t according to the light that is within them. There is something in the very nature of the office of a judge and the function he performs that demands that he should be a person of high integrity, whatever may be the moral norms prevailing in other walks of life. The judiciary has neit her the power of the purse not that of the sword. Its most valuable asset in the confidence it inspires and the respect it evokes for this capacity to redress t he wrongs of those knocking at the door of the Courts and to keep the scales eve n in any dispute between the rich and the poor, the mighty and the weak, the Sta te and the Citizens, without fear or favor. This can only be ensured if the judi ciary is manned by persons who cannot be lured by pecuniary or other temptations or by rewards or undue power and authority. Once the image of the judiciary is tarnished because of the doing of some of its members and its credibility goes d own, the loss is not merely that of the judiciary, the nation itself is deprived of the most stabilizing element in the even flow of its life. Once an impression prevails that justice is a purchasable commodity and those wh o administer it can be tempted, the common man would be left with no forum to lo ok for redress of the grievances. There is nothing which rankles in the human so such as a brooding sense of injustice. We must remember that in the final analy sis the people are the judges and that every trail is a trail of our judiciary s ystem also. Its strength and weakness, its success and failure, its utility and credibility, the respect would depend ultimately upon the way it satisfies the h opes and aspirations of the people in quest of justice. The problem of delay and the accumulation of huge arrears of cases both in the l ower-courts, the High Courts, and the Supreme Court have assumed serious dimensi ons and invited a lot of criticism of the entire legal system. The causes of thi s delay are many. There are lacunas within the law itself of which clever lawyer s take undue advantage and seek adjournments on personal grounds, for the benefi t of their clients. Justice delayed is justice denied. The flaws in the legal sy stem give rise to unlimited frivolous suits, the purpose being not to seek redre ss but to cause harassment to the opponent. This is one of the most important ca uses of the accumulation of arrears. Lok Adalats are being held constantly in some one chosen centre or the other, bu t they touch merely the tip of the iceberg. The expansion of judiciary has not k ept pace in the lower courts, the Judges fail to assert themselves either out of lethargy or fear of tussle with the lawyers leading to strikes etc. The problem of delay must be faced boldly and quickly both by reforming the legal system an d by eliminating extraneous factors responsible for such delay. This existing sy stem must be improved to meet modern requirements. The Constitution of India provides for a very delicate process of consultation b

etween the executive and the judiciary in the matter of appointment of judges th rough Supreme Court and the High Courts. A qualitative improvement in judicial a ppointments can only be achieved of all the constitutional functionaries involve d in the consultative process strive to attract and find the best talent of char acter and dedication. Extraneous consideration such as caste, community, religio n, and politics must not prejudice the selection of judges. But we must remember that the judicial system and legal machinery do not work in isolation from society. They are integral parts of the entire social and politi cal system. Their working depends on the co-operation of other elements. We must have a non-political, efficient, dedicated honest and upright judiciary which m ust have a non-political, efficient, dedicated, honest and upright judiciary whi ch must be aware of its responsibilities and remain fearless. Only such persons should be appointed as Judges, who enjoy the confidence and trust of the nation. They must be allowed to function is such a manner that the country is assured o f fair and equal justice along with the achievement of political, social and eco nomic justice. If judges with special acquaintance or competence or those who have specialized in certain branches of law are allotted cases under that particular branch of la w, the time taken by judges who are not familiar with the branch, specially of i t is a specialized branch. Benches formed of competent judges should be allowed to function for a reasonable length of time and the judges constituting the Benc h should know well in advance when the Bench is to break, so that there may be n o part-heard cases left by the Bench after is it dismantled. This however requir es discipline on the part of judges themselves. They must sit in time. They must not absent themselves from the Court simply because there are certain rights to have some leave of absence. This a matter on which the internal discipline of j udges is very essential. They must realize that they hold a high and dignified p osition in society. The business of the courts should be so arranged as to avoid the situation of ol d cases getting older and of new cases receiving priority. Lack of proper listin g listing and proper notice of new cases and the given priority to old cases is a factor which contributes to the accumulation of arrears and to mal-administrat ion of justices. Matters involving common questions of law must be grouped and p osted together for hearing before the same Bench not only to save the precious t ime of court but to avoid conflicting decisions and ensure a uniformity in appro ach leading to certainly and continuity in the progressive development of law. The management of the court system should be modernized by taking advantage of n ew technology. While computers have invaded all fields of activity in the countr y and modern technological advances have radically altered the working in office s, the judiciary has remained outside the mainstream of this technological advan cement. It is, therefore, necessary that every High Court must have a computeriz ed system for keeping a catalogue of pending cases, a computerized library index of its decisions to avoid conflicting decisions, and adequate number of word pr ocessors, photo-copying machines and electronic typewriters, a computerized micr o-filming centre for maintenance of record and a telex system connecting the Sup reme Court with other Courts. This is essential for inter-communication and inte raction among different courts. Judges can help by strictly adhering to the hour s of work, by exercising the caution and restraint in allowing adjournments whic h are the bane of our present-day court proceedings, and restricting oral argume nts to the minimum by writing clear an concise judgments and delivering them pro mptly within a short periods after the conclusion of the hearing. Members of the legal professions can and should also help. They must discipline themselves in order to be effective ministers of justice. The arguments should b e prudent preparation before presentation in the court either in pleadings or th e advocacy. There is a tendency in our country to rust to the court at the sligh

test provocation. If lawyers could adopt a positive approach and strive to arriv e at reasonable out of court settlements, the time and expense of the litigants would be saved to a great extent and the inflow of cases into courts would be re duced, thereby facilitating expeditious disposal of pending cases. To-day a large number of litigation in superior courts is concerned with interim relief's and interim orders. If we go by the number of interim orders subsistin g for years together without the matter coming up for final hearing due to dilat ory tactics, one gets the impression that the majority in the profession have co me to regard interim relief as final reliefs. The number of frivolous and vexati ous petitions being filed is increasing by leaps and bounds. An overwhelming maj ority of special leave petition filed in the Supreme Court are dismissed and yet there are no sign of decrease in filing such petitions. Frequently adjournments are sough upsetting the schedule of work. The responsibility to comply with the instructions of delays. Lawyers frequently indulge in lengthy arguments before the court. There is need to reduce the quantum of oral arguments prepared with g reat caution and precision. Judicial time can be saved to a great extent and the settlement of cases expedited.