In the previous chapter, the push factors for Islamic accounting were discussed.
These factors were those that made conventional accounting unsuitable for Muslim
users and Islamic organisations. In this chapter, the first category of pull factors of
defines ‘pull’ factors as those factors that make Islamic accounting both a theoretical
and practical necessity and imperative. These factors literally pull Islamic accounting
into existence to meet the need of Muslim users and Islamic organisations.
Together with the push factors discussed in the previous chapter and the second
category of pull factors to be discussed in Chapter 5, they constitute the need for
The discussion on the Islamisation of knowledge starts from section 4-1. The second
category of pull factors, the practical imperative, is discussed in the next chapter
(chapter 5).
Chapter 4 Page 119
FIGURE 4-1:THE NEED FOR ISLAMIC ACCOUNTING: PUSH AND PULL FACTORS
ESTABLISHMENT OF
ISLAMIC BUSINESS
AND NONBUSINESS ISLAMISATION
ORGANISATIONS OF KNOWLEDGE
Pull Factors
THE NEED FOR ISLAMIC ACCOUNTING
Push Factors
INAPPROPRIATE NEGATIVE
OBJECTIVES OF CONSEQUENCES OF
CONVENTIONAL. CONVENTIONAL
UNSUITABLE CHARACTERISTICS
ACCOUNTING ACCOUNTING
OF
Chapter 4 Page 120
In the next section, (section 4.1), Islamisation of Knowledge, which forms the
theoretical basis of this project, is defined. The need for Islamisation of Knowledge
and the Burrell & Morgan (1979) paradigmatic framework in particular. In section 4.4
the implication of the suggested methodology for this research is discussed together
with how this research project tries to Islamise Accounting by redefining the
In this section, Islamisation of Knowledge will first be defined followed in the next
of Knowledge.
Islamisation of knowledge has been defined by Abu Sulayman (1989) as “the critical
examination of modern disciplines in the light of the vision of Islam and the recasting
of them under categories consistent with that vision” (p13). A broader, perhaps, more
humankind and the Universe” (p3). Al-Faruqi (1988) has outlined Islamisation of
knowledge as the process of mastering the disciplines (as they are) and then
integrating the new knowledge into the corpus of Islamic legacy by “eliminating,
Chapter 4 Page 121
amending, re-interpreting and adapting its components as the world view of Islam
and its values dictate” (p30). Al-Faruqi (1982) further elaborates that Islamisation
Islamisation of knowledge is seen as a first step to integrate and develop the Muslim
personality and outlook, which had become schizophrenic due to the dichotomization
received by Muslims (Brohi, 1988). It has been suggested to be the ideological and
intellectual backbone of the general Islamisation process (see below) in the Muslim
Islamisation can been seen as a reaction to the realities (and maladies) of the
Modern and Post-modern age by Muslims coming to realise that neither the Western
interpretation of Islamic law (Abu Sulayman, 1994a) solves the problems of the
petrifaction of Islamic thought and laws. Islamists who spearhead this movement are
basically educated in the modern secular system but have come to realise their
Islamic roots. Various Muslim countries in various degrees have adopted it. In some
Iran, Pakistan and Sudan, which have adopted Islam as the ideology of the state. In
has prevented the total Islamisation of the state. Hence, it has adopted a dual system
mainly in the economic area and cosmetic Islamisation through religious symbols. In
other Muslim countries (such as Turkey, Egypt, Algeria and Indonesia) it is a popular
Chapter 4 Page 122
movement with political overtones but is in many Muslim countries repressed by the
the Muslim Ummah’s social, political, cultural, economic, educational and other
aspects of life can be seen from the partial failures in Iran which took the quick
and oppression in the name of Islam. Abu Sulayman’s (1994a) warning that political
action and mobilisation without sound ideas or people capable of delivering them
4.1.2 The Need for Islamisation of Knowledge- the Malaise of the Muslim
Ummah.
It has been suggested that there is a need to Islamise Knowledge because there is a
‘crisis in the Muslim mind and thought’ (Abu Sulayman, 1994b) which has caused the
malaise in the Muslim Ummah. It is well known that Muslims had a great intellectual,
political and military civilisation in its earliest times until the 15th Century (see for
example, Sardar & Malik, 1994)). However, the Muslim civilisation today is
backward in its culture, politically degraded into disunited and often warring nation
states, and full of human suffering (wars, expulsions, genocide and poverty). This is
in spite of its vast human and material resources and in spite of its values and
principles. The editor of Abu Sulayman’s (1994a) book entitled “Crisis in the Muslim
fragmentation and utter disunity. However, Abu Sulayman (1994a) gives a novel
According to Abu Sulayman (1994a and 1994b), the roots of this malaise can be
Leadership during the Prophet’s (pbuh) time and the four ‘rightly guided’ khalifs were
with the pristine values and vision of Islam. After them it decended into a hereditary
monarchy in which the rulers did not personally practice Islam’s pristine egalitarian
When political leadership passed from pious and morally upright leaders to corrupt
monarchs, it gradually led to the separation of politics from the true spirit of Islam and
isolated the intellectual leadership (represented by the Islamic scholars) from the
political and administrative affairs. The divergence between the religious intellectual
and the leadership led to the former being removed from the practical and social
were restricted to “tomes of purely theoretical lore dealing essentially with descriptive
and lexical approaches to the interpretation of the Qur’an and Sunnah (Abu
The Companions of the Prophet (pbuh) and the early rulers had used ijtihad1 to flex
Islamic Law to meet the needs of space and time. The later scholars (‘ulemas),
however, in their zest to prevent the corruption and misinterpretation of the texts of
the Qur’an and Sunnah from being used to justify the actions of the political
leadership closed the ‘gates’ of ijtihad. New problems could then onwards be only be
solved through using analogy to the legal rulings of founders of the madhabs
their fallibility. This quickened the pace of stagnation of thought, although scholars of
high calibre such as Imam Ibn Taymiyah and Imam Al-Shatibi continued to exercise
However, such highly capable scholars were few and far between.
The political leaders, on the other hand, were deprived of a viable intellectual base to
meet the challenge of changing times and were short on ideas, policies and workable
essentially religious education. The sciences and arts to which Muslims contributed
much, decayed in the Muslim world.In addition to the internal decay in thought, the
colonisation of Muslim lands by the West, magnified the discrepancy between the
Islamic worldview and its thought by its imposed secularisation and its anti-religious
‘scientific’ stance. The separation of Islam from even marginal influence in politics,
law, economics and education led to the duality in thought that govern much of
Muslim intellectual activity today. The Muslim world, despite its nominal
independence from the West, retains and imitates the educational paradigm of the
1
A process of continuous exertion to deduce new laws from Qur’anic principles
Chapter 4 Page 125
West. In the modern Universities of the Muslim world, the curriculum is an inferior
copy of their Western counterparts without in the least considering the Islamic
According to Al-Faruqi (1988), this universal rush of Muslims towards imitating other
civilisations never reached its goal in any field but only succeeded in “de-Islamising
the top layer of Muslim society and demoralizing the rest” (p15). The result of all this
was:
Al-Faruqi (1998) concludes that the bifurcated educational system into Islamic and
Modern is the primary agent responsible for disseminating the alien view. Before
colonisation, the Muslims had a single education system i.e. the traditional education
or the madrasa system which produced ulemas who were learned in the religious
sciences. The primary view of the world was Islamic or ‘religious’, much like the
Middle Ages. However, after the advent of colonisation, the colonisers introduced
modern subjects spearheading the use of English, French and other modern
languished only through private endowment. The choice positions of the state went to
the graduates of colonial state and missionary schools. This bifurcated system of
education continued after independence and in time alienated the leadership and
civil service from the Muslim masses who were still religiously conscious through the
Chapter 4 Page 126
efforts of the Muslim preachers (‘alims) of the traditional schools who sought to keep
its curricula, ignorant of the fact that these subjects developed in ‘Modern’ Europe
were constitutive of an alien view. They assumed that the modern subjects were
harmless and could only strengthen the Muslim position. However, according to Al-
Faruqi (1998) “little did they realise that the alien humanities, social sciences and
indeed the natural sciences, were facets of an integral view of reality, of life and the
conventional economic thinking by Haneef (1995) the reactive elements among the
• Modernists who would like to re-interpret Islamic teachings to accord with the
notable exceptions, naively look for the solutions to the contemporary problems
The responses of the above three groups have been described by Abu Sulayman
(1994a) as follows:
• The Imitative Foreign solution- the modernists borrow solutions, which originate
from the cultural (secular and materialist) experience of the contemporary West.
Chapter 4 Page 127
capitalism or Marxism.
Chapter 4 Page 128
• The Imitative Historical solution - the traditionalists rely on solutions derived from
• The Islamic Asalah2 solution- Islamists seek to apply relevant solutions, derived
The Islamisation of knowledge movement seeks to use the third method, i.e. that of
providing solutions that are relevant to the contemporary needs of the Ummah by
following the original principles in the Qur’an but reinterpreting its laws in relation to
Churches in that, the Islamisation movement does not seek to delete or amend laws
seek a fresh interpretation to suit the present conditions of Muslims but keeping in
view the immutable principles of Islam found in the Qur’an and the Sunnah.
The Qur’an as a basic source of Islamic Law and values was discussed in Chapter 2.
Qur’an is the most reliable source for all kinds of knowledge and an authentic guide
for scholars in the humanities and the social sciences”. Unfortunately, earlier
generations had focussed on the formal aspects of the Qur’an and the hereafter and
thus revelation was only seen as a source of fiqh (derived Law) and legislation.
However, Al-Alwani & Khalil (1991 p12) notes that “the fiqh rulings account for only a
small part of the area covered by the Qur’an”. In order to redress this, the authors
call on Muslims to use their intellect to understand and meditate on all the verses of
2
“Asalah (pronounced Aah –saa –laah) is a comprehensive term denoting the innovative application of
original Islamic priniciples to changing circumstances. Not to be confused with fundamentalism. It is
derived from the Arabic root word ‘asl which means roots”. (Abu Sulayman 1994a)
Chapter 4 Page 129
the Qur’an, making it the primary source and basis of all knowledge in the area of
of the Qur’an that imprisons its meanings in a particular period or ties it to a given
generation” (Al-Alwani & Khalil 1991, p11). Thus, Muslims should comprehend the
Qur’an and Sunnah in a holistic way, minus the time-space bound interpretations,
which has somehow wrongly acquired infallible and immutable status alongside the
Muslim students studying in the Western Universities especially in the UK and the US
journals such as the Journal of Islamic Social Sciences to publicise their thoughts
academically. They also held International conferences (from 1977) and established
the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) in Virginia, United States in 1981.
In 1982 and 1988, the Institute collaborated with the governments of Pakistan and
Knowledge. They found political backers in the leaders of the two countries to
implement their educational projects in both these countries. Thus, the International
Islamic Universities of Pakistan and Malaysia were established. The IIIT also
The growth of the movement can be seen from the fact that in the 1982 conference,
1988 held in Kuala Lumpur, the conference went further into the Islamisation of the
individual disciplines themselves, although the papers presented showed that this
Chapter 4 Page 130
Kuala Lumpur as the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilisation which
granted Doctorates and Masters degrees in the Islamic Social Sciences and
Thought. The IIIT also published a substantial number of books, occasional papers,
Although the intellectual fortunes of IIIT have increased, its financial fortunes have
declined, at least in Malaysia because of its proximity to the sacked ex-deputy prime
minister of Malaysia. Its branch in Malaysia has since been closed. However,
least among Muslim scholars. Its practical reach is in Islamic economics and
banking. The researcher hopes that this research goes some way in at least thinking
much more than that. In fact, the process of Islamisation of knowledge may involve
more of a critical examination of the Muslims’ own history and method of thought
(1995) one of the foremost scholars involved in the project has warned against such
The methodology for the Islamisation of knowledge has been outlined by its various
proponents differently. For example, Abu Sulayman (1988) has outlined it in a three-
step approach involving epistemological and educational terms. Al-Faruqi (1989) has
process which takes place at two levels; theoretical and practical. These approaches
Abu Sulayman (1994) insists that there is a need to initiate a reform in three main
areas in order to reform Muslim knowledge, culture and civilisation and to invigorate
the Muslim character. Firstly, he calls for a rectification of the relationship between
between the social welfare goals on the one hand and the pursuance of personal
desires and interests on the other. “This is so because human reason alone is
incapable of attaining the ultimate truth about and full understanding of that is
problem. From an Islamic perspective, on the other hand, both Revelation and
defining and giving a concrete relationship between the two. In the past, Muslims,
have brought about deceptive and unreasonable conclusions. On the other hand,
reason has to be used cautiously within the defined purpose of existence and the
the market when requested by his compatriots to do so in times of rising prices. This
However, the Qur’an imperative of justice resulted in some ulemas such as Ibn
Taymiah (see Islahi, 1988) ruling that the government can intervene in the absence
of a truly free market to protect the masses from injustice, exploitation and fraud. In
such a case, a strict following of the Prophet’s Hadith to absolutely prohibit a pricing
system would undermine the cause of Islam, which preaches justice and equality. It
should be remembered that the Prophet (pbuh) had set up a ethically based free
market in Medina (Kallek, 1995) in the context of which his ruling was pronounced
correctly. Hence, in this instance, the Muslims arrived at a correct decision by using
reason and the ultimate principles in revelation, instead of abiding by the text of
“This shows that the mind has been used advantageously and
has proved capable of giving proper guidance in the light of
the total spirit of Islam. By realising the priority of justice in
Islam, it has not been distracted by technical theories and
considerations from accepting a system that might put a
minimum of checks and controls on economic transactions”.
(Abu Sulayman, 1994 b, p 13).
Secondly, Abu Sulayman (1994b) calls for redefining the Scope of Knowledge,
monopolizing the development of knowledge. He asserts that in the past, the faqih
directing his versatile intellectual abilities in the service of the Ummah. However,
specialists in a particular field but also equipped with a first hand knowledge of the
Qur’an and the Sunnah to give them proper insight into the morals, values and
Thirdly, Abu Sulayman (1994b) calls for the establishment of an Islamic infrastructure
through uprooting the dualism in knowledge found at the leadership level today. This
would involve a study of major Islamic texts in each field of specialisation to mould
and guide the mentality of the learner. Every aspect of the curriculum should meet
social participation in accordance with what is proper in each field. Presumably this
Al-Faruqi (1988), on the other hand, opines that both the traditional and modern
system of education should be united. He calls for instilling the vision of Islam in the
period to foster a sense of identity and awareness of the Islamic vision. However, he
contends that this is not enough and that Islamisation of modern knowledge (the
recasting of some twenty disciplines in accordance with the Islamic vision) is the
work plan to Islamise knowledge, which can be distinguished into five phases.
In the first phase, modern disciplines need to be mastered by breaking them down in
highest form. The discipline is then surveyed to reveal its genesis and historical
development, the growth of methodology and the main contributions to the discipline.
(Merquior, 1991 p36). This survey would allow Islamic scholars to touch base and
agree on the identity, history, topography and frontiers of the discipline, which is the
The second phase of the process would be mastering the Islamic legacy to discover
what the legacy of Islam had to say of the discipline. However, Al-Faruqi (1988)
notes that this is not easily accessible to the modern scholars because the
categories of the modern knowledge are unknown as such in the legacy. The
classification is not the same as the disciplines were not developed at the time or
they were treated under a holistic schema at the earlier times. For example, Zaid
economic and sociological matters are treated under fiqh and history by Ibn Taimiyah
Al-Faruqi, suggests that the traditional scholars who are masters of the Islamic
phase one and given the task of unearthing the Islamic legacy to search for Muslim
the legacy which will be used by the Muslim scholar to analyse the legacy in relation
to the historical background to crystallize the Islamic vision and to filter the time-
The third phase involves the establishment of the specific relevance of Islam to the
disciplines by posing three major questions; what was the Muslim contribution to the
discipline? How this contribution compares with the achievement of the discipline and
where the Islamic legacy has fallen short, in which direction should Muslim effort be
exerted to fill the discrepancy, reformulate the problem and enlarge the vision?
These questions envisage the critical assessment of the modern discipline including
the circumstances of its historical development, its methodology, its theory analyzed
and tested for consistency with the principles of Islam and an assessment of its
assessment of the Islamic legacy- not the normative nature of revelation itself but the
understanding of Qur’an and Sunnah together with the component of the Islamic
legacy which are the products of human intellectual endeavor. It would include an
suggests that a survey of the problems of the Muslim community and a survey of the
to bear on the Ummah’s problems and those of mankind for which the Muslims are
responsible.
The fourth phase would involve a creative analysis and synthesis between the
Islamic legacy and the modern disciplines to bridge the gap of centuries of non-
The final phase of Islamisation would be recasting the disciplines under the
framework of Islam. The output of this process would result in the form of a University
textbook in the discipline for the various stages of university and school education.
The textbook and other works produced during the process would be disseminated
without any intellectual copyright to all Muslim thinkers (in the discipline) and
combined readings of the two books i.e. that of revelation and the book of nature. He
opines that a society which ignores the Book of Revelation (i.e. the Qur’an) will lose
sight of its relationship to the Almighty and its stewardship, trust and accountability to
spins for itself a web of speculative philosophy, which is powerless to answer the
“ultimate” questions.
On, the other hand, those “religious” elements that take the first reading of revelation
ignore the existential reading of nature and create imbalances in the form of Comment [SH1]: Clarify with Prof.
innes
aversion to the world and worldly pursuits. This results in their losing their ability to
participate and contribute to society and the failure to undertake their responsibilities
as stewards and keepers of Allah’s trust. Such a loss of equilibrium will result in
readings of the two books and the establishment, on the basis of their similarity and
the identification and articulation of the relationship between revelation and the real-
two fundaments:
1. the conceptual activation of the articles of faith to a creative and dynamic and
questions and
and its school of thought to link those with the intellectual output of the past
This would include a review and re-organisation of the Qur’anic sciences and even
possibly excluding some traditional areas of study. This is to take account of spatio-
temporal differences to the understanding of the Qur’an from those of a simple and
limited social and intellectual formative Arab society to the nature of contemporary
civilisation. This would involve a shift from the traditional emphasis of descriptive and
The Sunnah of the Prophet (pbuh) serves a major source for clarification and
explanation of Qur’anic text. At the time of the Prophet (pbuh), this clarification was
done in the particular mental, linguistic and intellectual abilities of the people he
Muslims are expected to emulate the Prophet (pbuh) as he is the best example.
interpretation rather than one based on an understanding of how the Prophet (pbuh)
applied the teachings of the Qur’an (revelation) to real situations of his time. A
methodology is therefore required which takes into consideration the situation and
context in which his actions were performed and his commands issued.
the three present methods of dealing with it; total acceptance, total rejection and
arbitrary borrowing. Such an understanding would shed light on how the Muslim mind
had dealt with social and other phenomena in the past and how that mind may deal
with the present. Muslims would have to discern the objectives the Islamic heritage
sought to serve and then to evaluate the methods used and the solutions suggested
Western thought in order for the Muslim mind to liberate itself from it and to deal with
it. This does not mean total rejection or acceptance of the Western paradigm of
Khalil (1995) divides the process of Islamisation into two levels, the theoretical and
practical. The theoretical level “explains the dimensions, motives, aims and main
Chapter 4 Page 139
stages of the process and identifies ways of implementing them in all the different
areas of knowledge” (p1). According to him, this includes the collection and
consolidate Islamisation. The practical level is the task of reshaping every branch of
Khalil (1995) also call for an examination of the link between the Islamic intellectual
legacy and the Islamic view to derive an Islamic methodology. This material has to be
scrutinised and selected in order to improve accessibility of Islamic terms and details
to today’s Muslims (p9). What is truly Islamic must be distinguished from the
elements, which had been introduced from the outside from the Islamic legacy. He
calls for the need for a methodology to deal with the mass of knowledge in the
legacy. The obsolete material should be discarded. Such sifting, testing and
classifying the legacy entails clarifying the Ummah’s conceptual, civilisation and
historical roots in order to be able to eliminate the risks of starting from scratch or
operating in a vacuum. Khalil (1995) also asserts that it is vital to take modern and
with experience and thought. He notes the problem of surplus works in some areas
Khalil does not say much on the practical stage of Islamisation, the Islamisation of
disciplines except to suggest that it will require a long time and considerable effort.
He, however, proposes that broad outlines (or basic plans) be drawn for the
table 4-1.
Although the emphases placed by the authors are different (see table 4-1), they have
many common threads. The differences also reflect the evolutionary and gradational
nature of the Islamisation project, which reflects the evolution of Islamic thought over
knowledge seem to have different views, the process can be seen to be constitutive
of two elements:
The first phase involves a critical reexamination of the Islamic legacy of knowledge
its history, legal and thought process as well as a new hermeneutic for the
interpretation of its basic religious texts. This process is not easy, as it would be
(the modern Muslim intellectuals). However, this process is absolutely necessary and
has to be undertaken with the higher more mature and adventurous ulemas who are
not narrow-minded. There are such capable ulemas in the Muslim world who are
respectful of tradition without being unduly bound by it and are in turn respected by
The second element (which has been italicised in table 4-1), which this research is
the twelve-point plan (which has been summarised to five points in this chapter and
table 4-1). This is both strategic and integrative of both the two elements listed
above. Despite this, however, detailed methods have not been forthcoming from the
happened is that “short cut has taken place” by initial Islamisation of disciplines by
Muslim, Western educated scholars in each field, although Al-Alwani (1995) has
endowed with vast knowledge of the Qur’an and with it, a firm grounding in the social
Chapter 4 Page 141
sciences and humanities” (p13). This is a chicken and egg situation because very
few scholars (if at all) of such caliber exist. However, Islamisation of disciplines,
economic field. Hence as Nasr (1992) suggests, Islamisation has put the cart before
the horse by jumping over the theory (Islamisation methodology) and going straight
However, the researcher believes that this process is not too damaging, as long any
process stretching over several generations. Indeed, its proponents have recognised
the evolutionary nature of the project. The process of Islamising education is already
taking place in the Islamic and other universities in Muslim countries. Eventually, this
would lead to more Islam-cognisant University graduates who will take the process
further. Meanwhile the results can be fed to the broadminded ulemas mentioned
above, who, being the Masters of the Islamic legacy would rule on the Islamicity of
the results.
Chapter 4 Page 142
with a special emphasis on the concept of paradigms and its implication for
accounting research. The researcher then attempts to place and link Islamisation of
how this research attempts to Islamise accounting and the theoretical assumptions
The problem of what constitutes knowledge, from what sources it can be derived,
validated are still unsettled questions. For example, sceptics conclude that
knowledge is impossible as no one does know because no one can know (Dancy,
1996). These questions are the province of epistemology, which has been defined
possible scope and general basis”(p 242). It deals with the sources and methods
from and by which knowledge can be obtained as well as determining criteria for
Modern Western epistemology seems to have started from Descartes and developed
by Kant and others. Although Descartes and Kant, had a place for God, in their
epistemologies, after the age of enlightenment and the age of reason and science,
religion and revelation has been gradually been banished from the realms of Western
epistemology and methodology. For example, Locke argued vehemently that all our
ideas (but not all truths) arise from experience. Later, J. S. Mill extended the source
knowledge i.e. rationalism and empiricism (Ryan et al., 1992). The rationalist school
of knowledge tenaciously holds that certain (true) knowledge can only be obtained
through the use of reason. This school is attributed to Plato, the disciple of Socrates.
It emphasises the power of logic and mathematics in deciding the truth of competing
The development of trade guilds in the 17th to the 18th Centuries in Europe, where
knowledge and expertise were passed down from master to apprentice, required
observation and practice rather than any deep reasoning. This led to the counter
philosophy of empiricism. The empiricist school holds that truth can only be
acquired through observation and this was the only route to certain knowledge. This
school was suspicious of the speculative method and viewed logic and mathematics,
only as tools for exploring the implications of observed knowledge. Empiricism holds
that only through perceived experience can there be certainty of belief in what we
know. Sense perception is the basis of knowledge, which can be only obtained
meaningless.
2. Beliefs about the world cannot be justified by the use of unaided reason alone,
since all knowledge is derived from experience (Locke’s tabula rasa – everybody
is born a clean slate on which sense impressions are laid making him/her know).
Chapter 4 Page 145
145
3. The natural and social sciences should be value free (from beliefs and
study.
The pervasive influence of empiricism and with the scientific revolution has led to
positivism, which is the significant philosophical movement of modern times. This has
This positivism took root in the United States (and spread to other human science
researcher was therefore to discover how individual roles are related to the
However, the move towards positivism and structural functionalism did not go
unchallenged. Weber opposed the earlier move towards empiricism and natural
sciences. Weber (1949, as quoted by Giddens, 1971) emphasised that “in the social
sciences we are concerned with the mental phenomena, the empathic understanding
of which is naturally a task of a specifically different type from those, which the
schemes of the exact natural sciences in general can or seek to solve” (p146).
Thus, Weber contended that because the “interpretation of the actor cannot be
justifications, which are supposed to be the building blocks in the development of the
visible action or act of the social actor (Bar Yunus, 1988). Akin to this, the critical
theorists were in vogue in the 1960’s and 1970’s and have increasingly influenced
sociology and accounting. This school, a product of German idealism and Marxist
theory of class conflict was the vanguard of the Marxist attack on conservative
It can be seen that Western epistemology, especially in the human sciences has a
continuum (Burrell & Morgan, 1979; Hopper & Powell, 1985; Boland, 1989). Even in
the natural sciences, Kuhn has put forward the theory of scientific revolutions and
The concept of paradigm, according to Kuhn (1970) represents a way of viewing the
interpretations of the empirical world are paradigm (or theory) laden. This theory
on our theoretical constructs. Kuhn asserts that the world goes through scientific
revolutions or paradigm shifts where not only are there different explanations of a
given reality but a fundamental shift in the way scientists view reality. This puts the
Chapter 4 Page 147
147
bold claim of objectivity and truth of scientific facts and testability of scientific
theories, somewhat shaky even in the natural sciences, and more so in the human
unbiased.
In the human sciences, the work of Burrell & Morgan (1979) on sociological
research thus:
Burrell & Morgan (1979) conceive social theory in terms of four key paradigms based
and the nature of society. They assert that these four paradigms are founded upon
mutually exclusive views of the social world and thus generate distinct analyses of
social life. Thus different theories and perspectives in each paradigm are in
Radical Radical
Humanist Structuralist
Interpretive Functionalist
SUBJECTIVST OBJECTIVIST
EPISTEMOLOGY
Anti-Positivism Positivism
investigation i.e. the nature of reality. In the objectivist dimension, is the realist view
Chapter 4 Page 149
149
that there is a reality external to the individual imposing upon the consciousness from
without. This is the ontology of realism. The Ontology of nominalism in the subjective
how the world could be understood and be communicated to others. From the
hard, real and capable of being communicated in a tangible form. From the
soft and more subjective, spiritual and transcendental kind based on experience,
insight of unique and personal nature, which can only be personally experienced.
The human nature assumption is concerned with the relationship between human
nature and the environment, which respectively forms the subject and object of
research enquiry. From the objective dimension, the school of determinism holds that
external world. This implies that human beings are products of the environment
behaviour toward organisational objective (Hopper & Powell, 1985). On the other
hand, the voluntarism school in the subjectivist dimension, holds that man is the
creator of his environment (he has free will), he is the controller and master and not a
The above ontological, epistemological and human nature assumptions have direct
research. Methodology can be seen as the way in which one attempts to investigate
and obtain knowledge about the world. Realist ontology combined with positivist
measurement.
subjective world being capable of manipulated and interpreted by the subject. This
individual creates, modifies and interprets his world. The objective of research here is
the explanation and understanding of what is unique and particular to the individual
rather than what is general and universal which is the concern of a realist, positivist
The above four sets of assumptions provide a powerful tool of analysis of social
theory and have led to different schools of thought in the social sciences. These
include (i) sociological positivism which attempt to apply the models and methods
derived from the natural sciences and (ii) German idealism which holds that ultimate
reality lies in subjective, spiriit/idea, rather than on ultimate data of sense perception
on the nature of society to develop their four paradigms. The two sets of assumptions
regarding the nature of society arise from the order-conflict debate of 19th century
Pareto viewed society as an ordered and cohesive system while Marx viewed society
behind social change. Burrell & Morgan (1979) develop these two views into the
expresses a concern for the regulation of human affairs. Every society is a relatively
persistent, stable and well-integrated set of elements. Each element has a function,
preserve the status quo and believes that the consensus in society is due to shared
values.
The sociology of Radical Change views society as subject to ubiquitous change due
change. The semblance of unity is only achieved by coercion of the poor by the rich
through financial and political power. Value orientations and normative structure are
human affairs to maintain the status quo, the sociology of radical change seeks an
explanation for the radical change in the deep-seated structural conflict, modes of
limits its potential. The objective is to emancipate man from the structures of society
Burrell & Morgan (1979) combined these two dimensions of society into the
The four paradigms introduced by Burrell & Morgan (1979) (starting from the bottom
right corner) are termed the functionalist, interpretive, radical humanist and radical
structuralist paradigms.
According to Burrell & Morgan (1979), most of academic sociology has been
(and from an objective point of view). Chua (1986) also opines that most research
This paradigm seeks to provide rational explanations of social affairs. Its pragmatic
regulation because of their subjective analysis of the social world. Here the concern
this paradigm, the researcher sees the social world as an emergent social process
is for fundamental meanings underlying social life rather than causal relationships in
from a subjectivist viewpoint. The social science assumptions are the same as the
However, in contrast to the interpretive paradigm, radical humanists view the world
as full of social conflict due to class conflict and domination. As such theorists
domination and hegemony and the ideological superstructures, which cause the
alienation of man. The object of this exercise is to emancipate the human subject
from these alienating superstructures, which drive a cognitive wedge between man
and his true consciousness. The theorists in this paradigm provide a critique of the
status quo. Unfortunately, because this paradigm is essentially founded upon Marx
and his historical materialism, the radical humanists point a finger at the spiritual
(religious) bonds as one of the superstructures which fetters the human beings into
the existing social patterns and prevent them from realising their full potential. Due to
Chapter 4 Page 153
153
their subjectivist leanings, the radical humanists place emphasis on the human
consciousness and therefore seek to change the social world through a change in
the mode of cognition and consciousness rather than attacking the structures.
The Radical structuralists, on the other hand, represent the objectivist version of
the radical humanists. Both the radical humanist and structuralist view the world as
one of conflict, deprivation and domination. However, whereas, the radical humanist
seek to change the world through change in the internal consciousness, the radical
structuralist attacks the dominating and alienating external structures of the realist
social world. The theorists in this paradigm hold that contemporary society is ridden
with fundamental conflicts, which generate radical change through political and
economic crises. Theorists seek to explain the basic interrelationships (e.g. internal
contradictions in society, while others stress the importance of structure and power
relationships in society.
According to Burrell & Morgan (1979), although, each of the paradigms shares a
common set of features with its neighbours on the horizontal and vertical axis, the
fact that it is differentiated on the other dimension implies it is separate from the its
located in each paradigm have a different frame of reference, mode of theorising and
modus operandi but those located within the same paradigm share all these and this
binds them to the same problematic. Although theorists within a paradigm do not
share complete unity of thought, their shared “taken for granted” assumptions
Chapter 4 Page 154
154
separate them, in a fundamental way, from other theorists working within a different
paradigm. They might not even recognise an alternative view of reality existing
particular way. It also provides a “map” for locating and negotiating one’s subject
area.
The different paradigms may also serve as explanations for the different and
problem but from different paradigms. Chua (1986), for example, shows how
methodologies and focus on different matters when researching on the same area.
Chua compares the work of Chandler and Daems (1979) and Tinker et al., (1982) on
the historical development of accounting theory and practice. Chandler & Daems
rational control mechanism which are part of a concrete reality and which evolves in
a rational manner to meet the need for efficient organisation. The firm is viewed a
rational, single-minded organic system which adapts its accounting system to ensure
its survival. There is no consciousness (by the researcher) of intra and inter-
exposed and argued to be a tool actively involved in social control and historical
Chapter 4 Page 155
155
conflict. The development of accounting, in their view, is not a rational evolution in
the quest for the firm’s efficiency and survival but a tool whose dominating discourse
evolves in line with the interest of the dominating groups in society during a particular
period.
social sciences, the claimed mutual exclusivity of each paradigm has been critiqued
in the literature. Hopper & Powell (1985) argue that although analytically distinct,
there are often strong relationships between the positions adopted on each
continuum, which has been integrated by Burrell & Morgan (1979) in the subjective-
objective continuum. However, in order to create their four paradigms, Burrell &
& Powell (1985) only recognize three paradigms; the radical, interpretive and
functionalist. They combine the radical humanism and radical structuralist paradigms
into one radical paradigm because they argue that this is a mistaken position taken
between the earlier and later works of Marx on which the two paradigms are based.
They point to the work of Giddens and Habermas who have made considerable
efforts to incorporate both strands. Hopper & Powell (1985) hold that maintaining the
division set up by Burrell & Morgan (1979) carry the risk that the concern of the
stressing consciousness, rather than seeing both as dialectical aspects of the same
reality.
Chua (1986) also finds the dichotomous division of the assumptions into subjective
and objective (the division of human nature into free will versus environmentally
determined) as problematic. She also criticises Burrell & Morgan for embracing a
strongly relativist position of scientific truth and reason through a misreading of Kuhn
(1970). Chua (1986) also points to a fundamental tension in Burrell & Morgan’s
Chapter 4 Page 156
156
(1979) framework. While accepting Kuhn’s argument that there is no trans-historical,
neutral, permanent language (set of criteria) for evaluating scientific theories, Burrell
& Morgan (1979) adopt an inconsistent, non-evaluating stance and thereby attempt
the use of a completely neutral language within which the rival paradigms can be fully
expressed.
While acknowledging Burrell & Morgan’s (1979) contribution in breaking the hold of
dichotomy between the subjective and objective realms. He asserts that, although
both the subjective and objective are legitimate concerns, it is a mistake to suggest
that there are two different kinds of researchers. He points out that they have laid a
discourse. This has resulted in the replacement of an old mind set with a new one,
Boland (1989) suggests that there is a need to appreciate the nature of their
researchers. Each requires the other for context to be completed and to stand out as
apart and separate. Thus the “objective fact is socially constructed and the symbolic
studies, which form part of the hermeneutic turn in the social sciences. Taking a
approaching the social world as a text that is alien and unfamiliar: a text with
significance and meaning that will emerge only through interpretation. The
researcher is a reader of the text or a reader of the way social actors read that text to
themselves.
Chapter 4 Page 157
157
4.3.4 Theoretical assumptions of this research
This researcher takes the position of Hopper & Powell (1985) that there is no such
thing as a totally objective and value free investigation and that certain fundamental
and assess the underlying theoretical and philosophical assumptions “ behind their
research to are consistent with of their own beliefs (Tinker et al., 1982; Hopper &
include the researchers’ own values and beliefs concerning the nature of society and
The reason behind this call is that the researchers assert (and this researcher
agrees with them) that the method and interpretation of results of any piece of
value free. The confusing results of research on the same area, under alternative
paradigms would become clearer if the assumptions underlying the research were
made explicit.
Hopper & Powell (1985) assert that, failure to take account of the researcher’s
theoretical and philosophical assumptions, would make commonly held views and
taken for granted ‘facts’, which rest upon such assumptions, to be unquestioningly
Tinker et al. (1982) assert, that two such myths in accounting are that of pretensions
normative assumptions, they assert, masks the “social allegiances and biases of
theories of “what is” as more realistic and factual and relevant than normative
theories of “what ought to be”. Tinker et al. (1982) contend that even these so called
positive theories which claim to be objective and value-free are themselves value
Chapter 4 Page 158
158
laden and normative. They appear to be factual and value-free because, the non-
This research, however, cannot be located within any of the paradigms proposed by
Burrell & Morgan (1979) because the underlying assumptions of the study do not
coincide with their social science and nature of society assumptions. The theoretical
framework and assumptions for this research is the Islamisation of knowledge, which
from the above discussion on epistemology and paradigms can be seen as a search
According to Izetbegovic (1984), there are only three integral views of the world; the
religious, the materialistic and the Islamic each reflecting three elemental
possibilities; conscience, nature and man and each manifesting itself as Christianity,
Materialism and Islam. The religious worldview takes only the existence of spirit into
account, whereas the second worldview takes into account only the existence of
matter. Islam takes into account the simultaneous existence of spirit and matter.
Chapter 4 Page 159
159
Injustice
Subjective
ISLAMIC
Materialist
Justice
located in a third dimension. The front face of the box represents the four paradigms
view is the unity of spirit and matter, then it has to be located in another dimension.
For a theory of the nature of the social world, Islam views it as one of cycles; order to
disorder and order again; the conflict between good and evil. The class conflict can
be seen as one particular manifestation of this conflict between good and evil. The
equilibrium state is justice and the conflict state is injustice. An Islamic view would
seek to remove injustice by following its principles in the conduct of social and
individual affairs and constantly monitor empirically the state of affairs to seek to
move towards justice when there is conflict and to maintain the status quo of justice
Another point of note is that Islamisation of accounting can be seen as part of the
critical accounting sub-project within this interdisciplinary project. The problem with
the interdisciplinary accounting project has already been highlighted by Roslender &
Chapter 4 Page 160
160
Dillard, as being too narrow a confinement within the Marxist critical paradigm which
Although, Islamisation may have the same concern for emancipation from the status
quo to a more just system, the atheistic and overtly radical orientation of Marxism
presents a problem for the researcher to locate this research within the critical
paradigm. Islam has its own assumptions of society and social science. However,
from the example of the Prophet (pbuh) and the methodology of gradual revelation of
the Qur’an, an evolutionary strategy for changing society from inwards to outwards is
indicated. This is also the strategy of Islamisation of the Muslim Brotherhood (one of
the earliest radical but reformist Islamic movement) which is change through
personal and family spiritual reform extending to the local and national community
and then on to the world at large. This is also the strategy adopted by Gray et al.
One problem which Western academics might have with the Islamisation of
Secularisation has pervaded Western society to such an extent that this looks like it
is a yearning for the past, a backward, retrogressive step. The secular mind finds it
difficult to understand how knowledge that should be objective and neutral could be
The first answer to this is that Islam should not be thought of in a Western sense of
religion. The importance of both perceptual knowledge and reason is a Qur’anic and
is in fact imbued with its own “religious” values- that of fundamental secularism which
separates revelation from reason. According to al- Faruqi (1988), this separation of
revelation and reason is utterly unacceptable, as “it is opposed to the central appeal
of the Qur’an to reason, to weigh rationally all matters and to favour the more
reasonable, more median course” (p35). Al- Faruqi (1988) further claims that:
Chapter 4 Page 161
161
“Unlike those religions which sought to overwhelm man’s
understanding – to overpower his conscience so that he would
surrender to the irrational, or even the absurd – the call of
Islam was rational and critical. Invariably, it invited men to
use their intelligence; to apply their critical faculties to all
claims;......and always to seek correspondence with reality.
Such exhortations, injunctions and commands are found in
practically every page of the Qur’an. Without reason, the
truths of revelation cannot be appreciated”. (Al- Faruqi,
1988, p 35)
Further, knowledge from the Western perspective is not entirely value-fee and
empirical. Tinker et al. (1982), shows even positive theories are embedded in
Sardar (1999) alludes to the fact that that knowledge at present is not only value
neutral but also Eurocentric. He asserts that “ Eurocentrism is inherent in the way we
conceptualise” (p 49). This was brought about because at the time, the various social
formulating its world-view and “virtually all (these disciplines) were geared to serving
the needs and requirements of Western Society and promoting its outlook. Sardar
(1999) further asserts that this Eurocentrism was overt and obvious during the period
of colonisation but became deeply embedded and covert in their modernist and post-
dichotomised) as physics and sociology, law and ethics, and religion and politics and
opines that this is not due to any universal axiom but a product of the Western
worldview. Thus:
removing the parts from the context and then studied it as an artificial construction.
This also echoes the call of Gray et al. (1996) to use a General Systems Theory
perspective.
evident in sociology and anthropology as pointed out by Sardar (1999). For example,
when the West wanted to study its own society, it termed this discipline “sociology”.
It is often said that in an age of globalisation, the Western scheme of learning and
knowledge is validated by its adoption throughout the world. However, Sardar (1996)
opines otherwise. Comparing the disciplines to burger and coke, he asserts that the
presence of the latter does not demonstrate their universal acceptance as food, but
the power and dominance of the culture that produced them. Similary “ disciplines too
are like burgers and coke; they are made not in heaven nor do they exist out there in
some ‘reality’ but are socially constructed and develop and grow within specific
Hence, according to Sardar (1999 p 60), the problem of Eurocentrism – the power to
define categories and knowledge is thus the problem of knowledge itself. This
(Merquior, 1991). In this work, Foucault asserts that power relationships in history
determined and defined what is knowledge. Hence at one time natural history,
alchemy and astrology were considered knowledge, whereas the different epochs or
Chapter 4 Page 163
163
‘epistemes’ as Foucault called them led the development of biology, chemistry and
astronomy. Whereas in the Middle Ages, it was the power of the Church who defined
This definitional power of societal –elitist structures is also evident in the definition of
value-free and therefore there is no reason to fear Islamisation of knowledge will lead
sees the Islamisation of knowledge, as not a contradiction in terms but part of the
process of discovering “Other ways of knowing, being and doing- a problem of how
epistemology, the possibility of religious and moral knowledge has not been excluded
altogether. Audi (1988), for example views that moral and religious knowledge is
possible, thus:
Thus, the Islamic world view of unity of mind and matter, the Eurocentric nature of
current knowledge posing as objective and value-free and the possibility of religious
Chapter 4 Page 164
164
and ethical knowledge makes Islamisation of knowledge a logical and
From the previous section, it can be seen that Islamisation of knowledge or even
take several decades and the efforts of hundreds of scholars. Further, the process,
as suggested by the researcher is iterative where the output will be refined as time
goes on with more experience of the process. Therefore, it is not possible, in this
institutions and the efforts at Islamising the economic systems of some Muslim
countries.
From the Islamisation seminars held so far, (IIIT, 1988 and 89; Muqim, 1997)
anthropology and psychology. The papers presented show the process at a very
early stage being very general in their suggestions. To the researcher’s knowledge,
no papers have been presented on the Islamisation of Accounting. This may be due
to the general perception, that Accounting is a technical subject and like the physical
and natural sciences not susceptible to Islamisation. The researcher has argued
The analysis of the Islamic legacy of knowledge which has been suggested by the
proponents of Islamisation is beyond the scope of this research although some work
has been done in this area (Zaid, 1997). What this research aims to do is to critically
examine conventional accounting (which has been done to some extent in chapter 2
and 3) and incorporate the Islamic vision discerned from the overall worldview and
Chapter 4 Page 165
165
economic objectives of Islam as explained in chapter 2. This will be mainly in the
and accountants in Malaysia. Further research can be extended to other groups and
countries, which hopefully arrive at a general framework under which the Islamisation
4.5 CONCLUSION
Knowledge which has been categorised as one category of pull factors necessitating
the researcher portrayed the need for the Islamisation of knowledge in the crisis of
knowledge affecting the Muslim community. A short history of the movement for the
Islamisation of knowledge was then outlined. This was then followed by a discussion
various methodologies were categorised and tabulated by the researcher. Next the
epistemology and the sociological paradigms of Burrell & Morgan (1979). The
researcher concluded that although Burrell & Morgan (1979) did have some
relevance to the Islamic paradigm, it could not be placed in any of the four paradigms
they suggested. Hence the researcher located his work outside their paradigms in a
third dimension to take into account the ontology of the Islamic worldview. Although,
this limited research project, this research is seen as a humble initial attempt to
Chapter 4 Page 166
166
Islamise knowledge in the field of accounting, by taking into consideration some parts
The researcher will discuss, in the next chapter (chapter 5), the second category of
pull factors i.e. the establishment of Islamic organisations which provides a practical