ENG ABORTS MISSION. Justice for Sweden.

for something good, read JUSTICE FOR SWEDEN by marten schultz, stockholm university law http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/justice-for-sweden note international distro: http://view.koreaherald.com/kh/view.php?ud=20120628001029&cpv=0 http://www.scotsman.com/news/analysis-assange-has-nothing-to-fear-from-justice-delivered-insweden-1-2375221 http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2012/06/26/justice-for-sweden/

this is a legal war, across many lines. please also read http://jeremyduns.blogspot.com/2012/06/perils-of-googledemia.html jeremy duns v. glenn greenwald can politics trump women's basic human rights to bodily integrity and autonomy? NO. can assange consistently ignore international law regarding rape and gender-based violence? NO. can he convince the entire British Media to do so? NO

what about Ecuador? NO Ecuadorian Rape Victims, how do they like the implication of the insignificance of their human rights under the Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against Women???? ecuadorian rape victims, how does this make you feel? military rape victims, how does it make you feel? is nation state sovereign or is the European confederation of client states? N/A embassy, is now both police, and press agent pro tem.

annoying things: why was a document i put the name on "ENG" scanned for Mr Assange put on a justice4assange.com and swedenversusassange.com site with Swedish Nazi Murderer Tony Olsson's legal opinion on Swedish Law from a blog he writes from prison? i am not a nazi. i resent this. i resent that his supporters are such good germans about a nazi-recomending rixstep who also stalks the victim in sweden. why are they so easily duped?

why would assange put a document i had autographed on a website with a swedish nazi murderer???? why would assange cite a nazi? why would assange continue to cite rixstep who recommended the nazi? would this fatal failing not fatally disqualify him? would glenn greenwald blithely cite justice4assange.com if he knew i had to send a battery of letters to get the NeoNazi Murderer recommended by Rixstep removed? why would glenn greenwald promote this blog? why did the justice4assange.com site stubbornly adhere to a feminist conspiracy which gradually made itself a laughing stock among an enlightened few?

why would assange continue to cite rixstep who has stalked accuser/potential victim 1. AA as recently as May 27, 2012on twitter? why is assange promoting bloggers who stalk his victims? has he not heard of Rape Shield Law in concept? does he not care for how he is perceived? this is how he is perceived: objectifying, low-brow, low culture, deranged, porn-obsessed, rape-trivializing, victim stalking. legally illiterate. one could call it men's rights activism, or rape culture, or pro-rape activism. attack women who make a complaint of one count of unlawful coersion, two counts of sexual molestation, one count of rape. (note: in swedish prison, you can have porn and internet.) deny all complaints. attack accusers. ruthless. i have not thoroughly investigated the extent of rixstep of justice4assange.com his stalking victim 1. why does assange cite a blogger who stalks his accuser in sweden? why has the website continued to promote the tremendously insulting "saudi arabia of feminism" cliche? dear.

why does the blog link to noli, who expresses racism and sexism and homophobia and personal attacks for various women in sweden, refugees, and rape victims who suffer post traumatic stress disorder? why does anyone take it seriously? the blog itself is IN-justice for assange. all accused deserve adequate legal representation, which would protect them from sabotaging their own best interest in prejudicing media and courts against them. the best defense for assange would have included the number one imperative: not to attack his accusers or un-related women, or any swedish people on basis of their genetic make-up. racializing and genderizing his case makes him look both racist and sexist. it will come back to haunt him, as it does now, as the tide turns and many people realize a level of duplicity, and intellectual dishonesty, or vapidity, they did not want to admit in the mishandling of his defense. even if assange were guilty as hell, he deserves lawyers who tell him not to engage in petty, mean-spirited, victim-attacking, defamatory hate campaigns against the women of sweden. the website prejudices me against him. it gives the impression of someone who 1) is willing to lie to save his own skin, or 2) is genuinely delusional and uneducated. does, swedish radio reporting raped ethiopian refugees deported from sweden seem to be a conspiracy against assange? his twitter @wikileaks thinks maybe. it would be better if he said nothing at all. or something clean, legal, academic. something about consent law and international law. i mistakenly thought i could influence the team to include respect for the rights of women in their media campaign. now it has been nothing but vulgar attacks on unrelated swedish women, the accusers. it's like nobody ever cracked a law book on rape. rape has been illegal in sweden for almost 1000 years. it reads like parody. like MKULTRA wanted to have some behind the scenes jokes about massive hypnosis of a twitter mob. sometimes i think assange is subconsciously trying to help women, by impersonating the worst kind of misogynist.

so he becomes an example, and all the ian dunts and david allen greens and jeremy duns line up to say NO WAY! to be clear, we are not michael moore or your regular polansker. did you ever lie to someone???? for instance tell them you are a scientologist? that is how justice4assange.com comes off to me. a big joke. a big lie. so then i read all the emails on cryptome, and i realize assange had a crude sense of humor, racial prejudice. he spoke of the age of consent in regards to child porn, with the age of consent being race relavant. 1996. das racist. of the jews. das racist. then in 2000's talk of big money from CIA or soros. no big deal. just cash. so in a way, maybe wikileaks is Big Brother. maybe big brother wants women's rights and is making Assange out as this example of what not to do. but then again, i don't really know. who wanted wikileaks to help generate the new sudan revolution, the endless uprisings? syria? it seems convenient, like a bought deal. what if all his fans had nothing to worry about, and this is all an act??????? all a big USGVT or rather world GVT thing? that's what i thought when i met him, oh he's CIA, and no one gets it yet. that's what i got, person to person. sort of in a "the entire internet is a giant CIA conspiracy" kind of way. he spoke of beating a woman Alice in his early emails. in a way, i dont want to think of someone so childish saying something so violent, even as a metaphor. i wouldnt trust him much after seeing his willingness to put vulgar incriminating e-evidence into print and circulation. a low level of professionalism. @wikileaks twitter account quality has gone down hill.

calling gillard's rhetoric "slimy." this doesnt translate in america. we try to be nice, at least to your face. diplomacy, for idiocracy, y'all. one can only maintain high intensity so long. why did barrett brown recommend i call israel shamir may 2011? i said: "the anti-semite?" i called him anyway, to see what was up, crash coursing on his deranged holocaust denial. i did. why did he want me to write an article for counterpunch on assange re: sweden? why did assange's supporters show me a Jewish Conspiracy document in London? why does ioerror fail to account for the Nazi on justice4assange or the feminist conspiracy or the "Never censor child porn" or "enough with gay marriage" tweets. as dear james ball pointed out: "Is wikileaks drunk?" or possibly just out of his mind with fear? i think of deleting all my hyperbolic wikileaks blogging. sometimes there might be a good moment here and there, but its all riddled with deception. i could be like cass sunstein and deny it all , forget it all, and move on into a brave new wikiworld. selfishly, i have a lot of mental rigor i have put myself through. bra.se, now ICJ annd ICC, all the rape law docs, swedish. i am starting to really understand more. the lawyers on swedish radio lamenting the way assange attacks their legal system, calls it a banana republic, saudi arabia of feminsim. law documents, research, new geniuses coming through. i realized: i can't stare at "OH SAVE THE GLORIOUS LEADER ASSANGE" tweets until the end of time. his flock incant their daily devotionals, and badger and bully the doubting thomas. everything was already meaningless to me anyway. we nihilists: we were the target market.

they just found the wrong kind of nihilist who is not so into porn and rape and victim-blaming and feminist UFO conspiracies. over all, one day outside court, someone asked me what's next? i said, probably yulia tymoshenko. and so then its also victoria nuland, and gudrun schyman all over again. i'm glad i let her know assange was attacking her on his anti-sweden website. i hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, but it was truly unjustified, cruel and defamatory. i think everyone is believing separate things, it's a wonder we even think we speak the same language. put your hands up for detroit. justice, stockholm

meeting people is easy. eng, mary rose lenore 30 june 2012