of
Contents
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ORGANIZATIONAL
PROFILE
OVERVIEW
MISSION
GUIDING
VALUES
PREPARATION/PLANNING
LIBRARY
MANAGEMENT
TEAM
PLANNING
FACTORS
CURRENT
REALITY
ENVIRONMENTAL
SCAN
SWOT
ANALYSIS
ORGANIZATIONAL
PERFORMANCE
GAP
ANALYSIS
NEW
PRIORITIES
STRATEGIC
PROFILE
FUTURE
VISION
STRATEGIC
INITIATIVES
ACTION
PLAN
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
6
8
8
8
10
10
12
12
12
12
15
GOAL 1 15 INITIATIVE A: INCREASE ONLINE ACCESSIBILITY. 15 INITIATIVE B: INCREASE DIGITAL RESOURCES. 16 GOAL 2 19 INITIATIVE A: REPURPOSE SPACE WITHIN THE LIBRARY. 19 INITIATIVE B: CREATE A POSITIVE CORRELATION BETWEEN LIBRARY SERVICES AND STUDENT LEARNING. 22 GOAL 3 25 INITIATIVE A: INCREASE THE NUMBER OF LIBRARY STAFF. 25 INITIATIVE B: EXPAND THE EXISTING LIBRARY. 26 BUDGET LAST YEAR NEW PRIORITIES CONTINGENCIES CONCLUSION REFERENCES 29 29 29 31 32 33
APPENDIX A: SUMMARY REPORT APPENDIX B: MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 16, 2011, 1:15 PM SEPTEMBER 25, 2011, 8 PM OCTOBER 16, 2011, 8 PM OCTOBER 23, 2011, 8 PM NOVEMBER 13, 2011, 8PM NOVEMBER 20, 2011, 8PM NOVEMBER 27, 2011, 8PM NOVEMBER 29, 2011
36 38 38 39 40 42 43 45 45 46
Executive Summary
We are pleased to present this Strategic Plan for the Kathleen Redfield Library at The College of Mid-Cascadia. The college was created at the will of the voters. As such, we would not be here if it were not for the foresight and determination of Grant County, Emerald Lake, and many myriad collaborators to bring quality education to a sector of the state that has long been underserved for higher education. In reaching out to the broader community, we were able to speak to local students, faculty, community partners and a wide range of business members. In an extensive analysis of needs, potentials and trends were identified in order for the Library to offer truly up-to-date technology and appropriate support to faculty of a wide variety of program offerings, from life sciences to forestry to more traditional coursework in writing and mathematics. The themes we have found and are focusing on include being a force for bringing students into the college, providing them with the very best in access to all library resources, giving them space in which to meet with fellow students, and making sure that all future library spaces can accommodate the growth in the three planned campuses. The following are the recommendations from the Strategic Plan team:
Goal 1 Maximize access to information for the students and faculty of the college, no matter where they are. Goal 2 Create a collaborative library space that accommodates multiple learning styles. Goal 3 Accommodate the needs of our rapidly growing student population.
Organizational
Profile
Overview
College
of
Mid
Cascadia
(CMC)
is
a
public
community
college
located
in
Emerald
Lake,
Washington.
It
serves
the
Emerald
Lake
metropolitan
area.
CMC
began
regular
classes
on
January
20,
2009.
With
a
first
year
enrollment
of
over
1,100,
the
second
year
saw
a
greater
than
100%
expansion,
which
continues.
The
college
is
seeking
to
advance
its
physical
locations
to
three
campuses,
from
the
current,
single
Emerald
Lake
location.
The
two
other
sites
will
be
in
Cascade
Valley,
and
between
Emerald
Lake
and
Wylie.
Emerald
Lake
has
the
following
demographics:
Population:
14,475
Racial
breakdown:
White,
non-Hispanic:
11,
537
(70.9%)
Hispanic:
3,800
(25.4%)
African-American:
253
(1.7%)
Asian/Pacific
Islander:
214
(1.4%)
Native
American/Alaskan
Native:
152
(1.0%)
Just
like
many
community
colleges,
CMC
seeks
to
provide
technical/professional
training
to
a
variety
of
industries,
workforce
development
support,
adult
basic
education
foundations,
and
community
education
potentialities
-
from
yoga
to
computer
skills
to
modern
political
discourse.
There
is
additional
vision
to
offer
farrier,
animal
husbandry,
large
animal
veterinary
technician
and
forestry
management
programming
to
address
the
needs
of
largely
rural,
agricultural
communities
in
and
around
Grant
County.
In
all
these
programming
needs,
the
library
lay
at
the
heart
of
it
all.
Thus,
the
library
system
at
CMC
will
need
to
grow
and
expand
at
even
greater
rates
than
rest
of
the
campuses
in
order
to
fulfill
the
vision
of
Grant
County
voters
when
they
passed
the
referendum
to
establish
the
community
college
district
in
2007.
At
this
time,
the
planning
is
underway
to
have
two
more
campuses,
each
with
their
own
libraries.
As
such,
this
strategic
plan
is
meant
to
assist
in
preparing
for
three
full
campus
libraries
within
the
next
5
years.
With
current
enrollment
projections,
the
plan
is
to
consolidate
all
three
campuses
on
their
own
sites
by
2016.
In
the
first
stage
of
planning,
there
were
aggressive
measures
taken
to
ensure
that
the
college
campus
locations
will
be
able
to
be
placed
on
their
envisioned
land,
which
has
already
been
acquired
with
these
goals
in
mind.
The
purpose
of
the
strategic
plan
at
this
juncture
is
to
allow
the
planned-for
growth
of
the
CMC
libraries
to
be
undertaken
in
a
systematic
approach.
There
will
be
a
need
to
incorporate
technology
advancements,
digitization,
archiving
space,
as
well
as
a
wide
variety
of
capital
needs.
Further
planning
will
also
include
the
local
communities,
in
order
to
maximize
the
use
of
the
campuses.
Currently, two full time librarians (one of them the head librarian), two part time library assistants, and three work-study students comprise the library staff at the CMC Emerald Lake Campus.
Mission
The
College
of
Mid-Cascadia
Library
supports
quality
teaching
and
learning
opportunities
at
the
College
by
providing
access
to
relevant
information
resources,
offering
services
to
enhance
student
and
faculty
use
of
those
resources,
and
advancing
information
literacy
instruction.
Guiding Values
In January of 2011, the CMC Library conducted a community needs analysis, which included an open-ended user survey to determine what CMC students valued in their library and what they wanted to see continue as the college grows and matures. The survey was distributed to students and faculty by e-mail. We received back approximately 130 responses, or about a 5.4% return rate. Here are a few of the answers we received back that are indicative of the overall range of responses: Free books, free information. Internet access. The library needs enough space that it can be used by both noisy learners and quiet learners. Learning. E-books and stuff are cool, but I like real books too. I like that the website points you to different learning tools like databases, but theyre a little hard to find sometimes. The website sucks. Join the 21st century, guys. Friendly, helpful staff. An intellectual home for the college. Computers! Of the responses we received, there was one theme that surprised us: the desire for an intellectual home within the college. On reflection, it makes sense. The college is now two years old, and is growing too big too rapidly to be able to be accommodated by one building. We already hold classes in several locations in Emerald Lake, including Emerald Lake High School for nighttime classes. The desire for one central college, with one heart at its center, is one we at the library understand and agree with; and that we wish to include with the aims voiced in our mission statement as part of our guiding values moving forward.
Preparation/Planning
Library
Management
Team
Kathleen
Perry
Vice
President
of
Instruction
Liaison
between
the
Strategic
Planning
Committee
and
the
CMC
board.
Crystal
Grimes
Planning
Consultant
Professional
engaged
in
helping
to
keep
the
Strategic
Planning
process
on
track
and
accountable
to
the
library
vision.
Patrick
Wohlmut
Student
Liaison
Offers
the
perspective
of
CMCs
students,
a
major
user
group
for
the
library.
Maureen
Redfield
Head
Librarian
Leading
from
the
library.
Holly
Freewynn
Faculty
Representative
Offers
the
perspective
of
the
faculty,
a
major
user
group
for
the
library.
Kimberly
Stephen
Library
Assistant
and
Technology
Specialist
Brings
two
vital
perspectives
to
the
work:
That
of
the
library
staff,
and
the
vision
for
future
technology
requirements.
Planning Factors
The CMC library is a significant part of a fast growing institution. It is expected that the growth of the student population will exceed current capital requirements, until the land and buildings for the school and its three planned for campuses are fully realized by 2017. However, the challenge for the Library will be to offer the wide range of programming, instruction, technology and access to other resources to all who need them. To offer these significant services over three campuses and in relatively uniform ways will need a rollout plan that takes these concerns into account. There is significant concern by the College, which is shared by the Library, of the perception of the school and its image within the broader community. This can be traced to two factors: 1. The community levy that began the funding base for the CMC is one that was hard-won. As such, CMC is cognizant of the need to be able to offer value to the community that was promised when the funding was voted on. CMC expects to be able to prove, over time, the educational needs that will be supported by the vision laid out for CMC. 2. There are a number of programming goals that not are traditional within community colleges in other parts of the country. These include farrier credentialing, forestry management programming, and other agricultural educational needs.
We must consistently seek to meet our community needs by understanding the external partners that we serve.
Current
Reality
Environmental
Scan
The
school
is
growing
so
fast
that
space
is
coveted.
The
library
shares
space
with
the
tutoring
and
writing
centers.
This
could
be
a
positive
partnership
in
an
ideal
setting
as
a
learning
commons,
but
space
is
so
limited
that
the
library
needs
that
space
to
develop
an
efficient
baseline
service
center.
Because
the
school
is
so
new
and
going
through
accreditation,
administration
is
very
concerned
about
their
image.
There
are
strict
rules
about
marketing
and
anything
shown
at
the
school.
Everything
must
comply
with
the
visual
outlines
and
be
approved
by
the
school
before
it
is
used.
This
applies
to
the
web
presence
as
well.
Additionally,
the
strategic
profile
must
be
in
line
with
the
accreditations
suggestions
and
future
plan
for
the
school.
One
possible
threat
to
the
strategic
profile
is
conflict
with
school
staff
members
over
competition
for
space,
or
not
complying
or
following
the
steps
for
marketing
and
outreach.
Another
possible
threat
is
not
keeping
up
with
the
growth
of
the
school.
There
are
classes
held
in
multiple
areas
around
Emerald
Lake.
Access
for
all
students
and
growth
of
the
school
needs
to
be
considered
and
implemented
into
the
plan.
Also,
because
the
school
is
new
and
growing,
the
budget
is
not
established
and
proved
to
work
for
the
long
run
yet.
The
library
has
come
out
in
the
black
so
far
due
to
the
fact
that
we
have
kept
budget
allocations
flexible
in
order
to
meet
unexpected
needs,
but
our
revenue
is
dependent
upon
the
schools
revenue.
SWOT
Analysis
Strengths:
Passionate, dedicated, creative staff. Good cultural preparation for faculty. Shared mission with the college. Comprehensive Strategic Planning process reflects the values of a locally owned and controlled community college. Engagement of the college community in processes for planning and priority setting. Knowledge of industry standards. Strong partnerships with high-school systems and senior colleges. Commitment to community outreach. Regularly assesses its performance and progress (including exit assessments). o Decisions are data-driven and ensure equity in educational persistence and attainment across all student groups. Student needs drive class development. Credit curriculum, certificate classes, workforce training and adult basic education. Day, night and online courses. 8
Key institutional documents (e.g., mission and vision statements, college catalogue, program descriptions) reflect the focus on student success. Established policies that call for closing the gap in educational attainment between low-income students and students of color.
Weaknesses:
White, non-Hispanic student population is slipping. o Ethnic makeup of staff doesnt reflect commitment to diversity. Budget cuts. o The budget for the current fiscal year supports 1,500 full time students. In fiscal year 2012, 2,800 full-time students are projected, which leaves an unfunded gap of 1,300 students ($3.7 million gap). o No cap on class sizes, even with budget cuts. Enrollment growth over a geographically diverse campus. Though willing to do student and institutional assessment (on enrollment persistence, students meeting personal goals) the school is too new to identify areas for improvement. Not participating in the Community College Survey of Student Engagement. Not the primary information provider for the community. Washington is facing work force shortages.
Opportunities:
Economic downturn leads people to community college. o Including students who fit in the categories of first-generation, low- income, and veterans. Communitys high-school graduation levels are higher than ever before. o Entire school district is committed to increasing college graduation levels. The Washington Division of Professional-Technical Education gathers follow- up data annually, by survey, for graduates of the colleges professional- technical programs. Frequent reports of educational outcomes for different populations (gender, race/ethnicity, income level). Established Foundation with the goal of raising money for the college. College experienced recent increase in the percentage of full-time students. Will soon be centralizing to three main branches. Recent increase in the American Indian or Alaskan-Native student population. New, so it may be easier to implement changes (No instance of "this is the way we've always done it"). Teaches immediately marketable skills in the Center for Workforce Development. Could brand itself as more liberal than the public library.
Threats
Pre-established Universities to contend with. o New, so less brand awareness, recognition. Few models for culture of evidence because local higher-education institutions are resistant to justifying themselves through assessment. Developments in technology may change this market beyond their ability to adapt. A small change in the focus of a large competitor might wipe out any market position they achieve. Future funding reductions.
Organizational Performance
Currently, the staff of the Kathleen Redfield Library at College of Mid-Cascadia has been doing extensive collection development for a variety of programs for the college. Along with this, the reference collection is being built from the ground up, including appropriate databases and electronic journals to support the faculty and student needs. These efforts have been facilitated by an early injection of funding from savings created the previous year, and the collections are following the guidelines of the Resources for College Libraries Recommendations. The two librarians provide comprehensive reference services, both in person and virtually. Librarians also work with faculty to highlight the resources available in the library to supplement student experience. In the past semester, both librarians have created a new curriculum that addresses specific new student essentials one in accessing and assessing information from the Internet, and the other designed to show how databases are searched. The three library assistants and two work-study students prepare interlibrary loan requests, manage group-study rooms, check out reserve collections, and assist students in finding material. The use of the library has been expanding, as evidenced by the increase in cardholders, the increase in interlibrary loan requests, and the fact that group study rooms are busy enough to require a time limit for their use at peak times. Looking forward, the hope is to offer full 24/7 reference assistance, and provide adequate, comfortable space for all library patrons.
Gap Analysis
CMC has come a long way in the short time that it has been active. The library has a very committed staff that wants to outreach to the local community as well as the college student population. Our website has a high profile presence on the colleges website and has access to many databases, e-books, and research guides. The college is experiencing a growth of students due to the economy and as a by-
10
product our library is increasing in traffic. We also have an opportunity to work with the public library to help with the use of computers and internet stations. As of right now one of the highest priorities is to bring in more foot traffic and usage from students and the local community. In our latest analysis we found that white, non-Hispanic population is falling in usage statistics. We would like to increase usage in the white, non-Hispanic population by 50% in the next year. On the other hand, the college itself is experiencing a growth of students and the library needs to meet the needs of these new students as well as continuing students and faculty. To do this we will need to budget for more needed materials for these new students. The library is also looking at expanding and/or moving into a different building to cope with the student influx. In our first year we have made good use of the space we started with; however, in this next year we would like to have moved, or be in the process of moving, into a new building with more space for our growing student population.
11
New
Priorities
Strategic
Profile
Following
its
mission
statement
and
future
vision,
the
Kathleen
Redfield
Library
has
the
potential
to
make
a
positive
impact
in
the
education
of
students
and
faculty
at
the
College
of
Mid-Cascadia.
The
library
will
evolve
with
the
changing
information
landscape.
It
will
embrace
new
technological
innovations
and
continue
on
a
growing
path
of
alignment
with
social
media,
24/7
access,
mobile
services,
an
electronic
presence,
and
any
future
innovations.
The
library
staff
will
continue
to
actively
understand
and
cater
to
its
patrons.
The
library
will
offer
services
individualized
to
its
student
and
faculty
population.
The
College
of
Mid
Cascadia
is
in
a
stage
of
rapid
development.
The
school
is
trying
to
keep
up
with
its
growing
student
and
faculty
population
and
continue
to
offer
an
outstanding
education
to
all.
The
library
is
at
the
center
of
this
whirlwind
of
change.
It
will
remain
flexible
and
ready
to
embrace
change.
The
library
will
continually
improve
to
consistently
offer
the
best
services
possible
to
its
patrons.
The
following
strategic
thrusts
are
inspiring
progression
at
the
library:
Provide
quality
service
catered
to
the
students
and
faculty
at
the
College
of
Mid-Cascadia.
Create
a
student-centered
space
that
is
welcoming
and
inspires
learning.
Offer
access
to
materials
that
enhance
education.
Integrate
policies
that
are
inline
with
the
standards
of
the
current
library
and
information
world.
Future Vision
The Library will become the heart of the College of Mid-Cascadia. We will create a bridge between the academic and public worlds for our students by providing them with community space; acting as a go-to point for student and faculty research, curriculum support, and information and technological literacy; and facilitating point-of-need access to information, both online and in person. The Redfield Library will create lifelong learners by offering services and programs that enable connection between each student's intellectual pursuits and their interests and lifestyles.
Strategic Initiatives
Goal 1: Maximize access to information for the students and faculty of the college, no matter where they are. Initiative A: Increase Online Accessibility. o Objective I: Re-vamp the library website to improve usability, including one-stop access to databases, the library catalog, digital collections, and virtual reference help.
12
o Objective II: Partner with Ask-WA, Washington's virtual reference collective, to provide 24-7 reference service to CMC students and faculty, including IM and text reference. Initiative B: Increase Digital Resources. o Objective I: Research the adoption of a demand driven acquisitions model for e-book procurement vis-a-vis PCC and the Orbis Cascade Alliance, where users can visit a web portal that allows them to borrow e-books that then get added to CMC's permanent collection. o Objective II: Begin digitization of select print materials and consolidation of electronic materials in order to create a digital collection for the school that can be used in teaching courses, and make them available via the library catalog and subject research guides.
Goal 2: Create a collaborative library space that accommodates multiple learning styles. Initiative A: Repurpose Space Within the Library. o Objective I: Create more group study space by re-structuring and moving shelving to create discrete study areas as well as designated quiet areas. o Objective II: Revisit the food and drink policy to allow food and drink while maintaining respect for the space and resources. o Objective III: Integrate a caf. Initiative B: Create a positive correlation between library services and student learning. o Objective I: Establish departmental liaisons who participate in departmental planning and meet with faculty to customize and offer course-specific literacy instruction. o Objective II: Provide interactive, monthly programming that structures games and workshops around course content and course- related material in the library collection.
Goal 3: Accommodate the needs of our rapidly growing student population. Initiative A: Increase the Number of Library Staff. o Objective I: Hire a full time assistant librarian at the main library to meet the needs of our new initiatives. o Objective II: Deploy staff at other school campuses to maintain a reference/resource presence. Initiative B: Expand the Existing Library. o Objective I: Move from our current, one-room space in the main college building to an adjacent building with more room. o Objective II: Create a partnership with the technology department to share space and resources with the on-campus computer center.
13
o Objective III: Continue to allocate funds to collection development and technological infrastructure.
14
Action
Plan
Goal
1
Maximize
access
to
information
for
the
students
and
faculty
of
the
college,
no
matter
where
they
are.
This
goal
will,
for
the
next
year,
take
the
form
of
increasing
just-in-time
remote
access
to
the
Kathleen
Redfield
Librarys
collection
and
services,
and
expand
our
growing
digital
collection.
We
have
spent
the
previous
year
building
our
print
collection,
and
will
continue
to
make
this
one
of
our
priorities;
but
with
a
currently
de-centralized
campus,
remote
access
is
just
as
important
as
face-to-face
access.
Initiative
A:
Increase
Online
Accessibility.
Objective
I:
Re-vamp
the
library
website
to
improve
usability,
including
one- stop
access
to
databases,
the
library
catalog,
digital
collections,
and
virtual
reference
help.
To
realize
this
objective,
Kimberly
will
enlist
the
help
of
interested
students,
who
will
aid
in
the
work
of
realizing
this
goal
by
enrolling
in
a
two-term
web
design
course.
Term
one
will
focus
on
common
problems
in
web
design;
term
two
will
focus
on
solving
them
using
holistic
web
architecture.
Participants
will
earn
class
credits,
learn
about
the
practical
applications
of
information
architecture,
gain
valuable
work
experience
for
their
resumes,
and
will
be
credited
on
the
library
website
for
their
work.
Care
will
be
taken
so
that
students
clearly
understand
what
they
are
contributing
to,
how
they
are
contributing,
that
they
are
collaborating
with
library
staff,
and
what
non-monetary
compensation
they
will
receive
for
said
work.
Timeline
Measurable
Outcomes
Costs
Complete
usability
Increase
in
traffic
Promotion
of
testing
of
the
to
the
new
library
Kimberly
Stephen
website
by
the
end
website.
to
full
library
staff:
of
Winter
Term
$23,500
above
90%
reported
user
2012.
current
staffing.
satisfaction
with
Students
submit
the
website.
Purchase
of
four
proposals
for,
and
new
digital
video
90%
reported
collaborate
on
cameras
for
ability
to
easily
finalizing,
the
usability
tests:
locate
resources
on
website
layout
and
$550
x
4
=
$2200.
the
website.
the
architecture
of
Independent
Increased
citation
the
site
in
Spring
contractor:
$2500.
of
library
resources
Term
2012.
on
student
work.
Projected
overtime
Independent
costs
up
to
60
contractors
to
hours:
$2000.
build
the
new
15
website for Fall 2012 rollout. Objective II: Partner with Ask-WA, Washington's virtual reference collective, to provide 24-7 reference service to CMC students and faculty, including IM and text reference. Kimberly will employ the aid of our other library assistant, Jen Richards, to complete this objective. Timeline Measurable Outcomes Costs Negotiations with Increase in chat Projected overtime Ask-WA complete reference use by costs up to 40 by end of Fall Term students and hours: $1400. 2011. faculty. CMC reference Increase in text staff, including our reference use by head librarian, students and ready to put in faculty. hours with Ask-WA Periodic as part of their assessment of CMC weekly reference reference staff for duties by beginning reference of Winter Term transaction quality. 2012. 90% reported Link to Ask-WA satisfaction with chat reference on the service. the website by beginning of Winter Term 2012. Initiative B: Increase Digital Resources. Objective I: Research the adoption of a demand driven acquisitions model for e-book procurement vis-a-vis PCC and the Orbis Cascade Alliance, where users can visit a web portal that allows them to borrow e-books that then get added to CMC's permanent collection. This part of the plan is still in the research stages. We first heard about Orbis Cascade Alliances DDA e-books plan via colleagues at Code4Lib Northwest. While we are not yet ready to join the Alliance, we are interested in adopting a plan like this that would allow our users to have a direct say in our collection development. A research team will have to be assembled. Kimberly Stephen and Maureen Redfield, our Head Librarian, will head up this task.
16
Timeline Measurable Outcomes Costs Research team Recommendation Increased salary assembled by plan is specific, for three January 2012. measurable, committee attainable, realistic, members for five Teams findings and timely. months: $71,250 and total. recommendations Recommendation on DDA adoption plan can be presented by April implemented within 2012. one year of final decision to move Budgetary analysis forward. and recommendations Recommendation presented to plan requires no school accounting more than 15% of department by total library budget May 2012. to move forward, not including salary for Final decision to committee members. move forward by June 2012. Objective II: Begin digitization of select print materials and consolidation of electronic materials in order to create a digital collection for the school that can be used in teaching courses, and make them available via the library catalog and subject research guides. The entire library team will be responsible for this objective. It is understood that this will be an ongoing project, extending beyond the timeline of the current strategic plan possibly for several years. Timeline Measurable Outcomes Costs Faculty requests First digital Digitization for titles to be collection ready for Vendor: $17,000 digitized received student and faculty from grant money no later than the use by Fall Term for FY2011/12. end of Winter 2012. Server Tower: Term 2012. Meets faculty $4000. Digitization plan requirements for MySQL licensing complete by the information per year to end of Spring Term material necessary maintain database: 2012. to effectively teach $5000 (ongoing). courses of study. Server formatted and databases 90% reporting that prepared no later digital collection is Strategic Plan: College of Mid-Cascadia Library
17
than the end of Spring Term 2012. Digitization process completed over Summer 2012.
18
Goal
2
Create
a
collaborative
library
space
that
accommodates
multiple
learning
styles.
Creating
an
intellectual
home
for
the
college
starts,
in
many
ways,
with
space.
Until
the
college
builds
us
a
full-service
library,
we
have
to
work
with
the
space
we
have.
These
initiatives
aim
at
creating
a
comfortable,
community
space
that
stimulates
learning.
Initiative
A:
Repurpose
Space
Within
the
Library.
In
the
continual
quest
to
improve
student
outcomes
and
experiences
we
must
be
open
to
looking
at
our
physical
library
space
as
another
resource
to
be
manipulated
and
revised
as
student
needs
dictate.
In
the
next
year,
as
we
focus
our
efforts
on
meeting
the
needs
of
students
with
various
learning
styles,
needs,
and
abilities,
we
will
look
at
repurposing
the
existing
library
space
in
three
ways.
Objective
I:
Create
more
group
study
space
by
re-structuring
and
moving
shelving
to
create
discrete
study
areas
as
well
as
designated
quiet
areas.
More
and
more
classes
and
courses
of
study
are
requiring
students
to
work
together
on
collaborative
projects.
As
a
commuter
campus,
CMC
students
must
carve
out
precious
on-campus
time
and
space
to
work
on
these
projects.
The
librarys
limited
group
study
areas
are
nearly
always
full
and
students
are
asking
for
more
group
space.
Balancing
this
need
is
the
traditional,
and
yet
still
relevant,
need
of
students
for
quiet,
individual,
areas
in
the
library
to
study
and
work.
With
these
needs
in
mind,
the
CMC
Library
will
work
to
create
more
group
study
spaces,
including
spaces
equipped
with
the
technological
tools
to
help
facilitate
the
students
collaborative
projects.
Timeline
Measurable
Outcomes
Costs
Complete
physical
30%
decrease
in
Software
to
survey
by
February
student
requests
facilitate
1st.
for
more
group
collaborative
study
space.
projects:
$1000
Distribute
physical
mock-ups
by
March
Staff
time
to
1st.
manipulate
mock- ups
and
discover
Submit
proposed
new
designs:
$250
new
design
to
Library
Board
for
Student
worker
approval
by
April
time
to
conduct
st.
1 physical
survey:
$180
Employ
new
19
arrangement by June 30th. (Consider CMC finals schedule to minimize student disruption). Distribute feedback survey by October 15th. Compile budget requests for additional furniture purchasing in time to submit to Budget Committee for the 2012-2013 budget.
Student worker time to create paper mock-ups: $180 Staff time to create and collate responses to feedback survey: $500
Objective II: Revisit the food and drink policy to allow food and drink while maintaining respect for the space and resources. Library staff is conflicted in being cast in the role of the police upholding the librarys current Food and Drink Policy. The Strategic Planning Committee also realizes that many students find snacking and drinking conducive to studying and learning. The current policy prohibits all food and beverages with the exception of closed water containers. The current policy originated out of a desire to keep the library and librarys resources free from damages caused by inevitable spills and potential pests attracted to crumbs and wrappers. It has been suggested that this no-tolerance policy is outdated, interferes with the creation of a welcoming environment for the community, and inhibits the development of relationships between the staff and students. With this in mind, the strategic planning committee suggests that this policy needs to be re-evaluated and revised. The Library-Student council (a board composed of three students appointed by the Student Body President, the library director, and a member of the faculty that informs general library policies) will be charged with this task. It will be important for the Library-Student Council to consider ways in which the conflicting needs can be addressed. It is of utmost importance that our Library resources be protected and respected and that the library staffs concerns are addressed and full staff buy- in is obtained during this process. Timeline Measurable Outcomes Costs Policy draft Reduction in staff Printing costs of completed and time enforcing the new temporary submitted to the Food and Drink signs for Summer Library Board no Policy by 75%. term: $50
20
later than March 30. Interim policy implemented for Summer 2012 term. Any Policy adjustments discovered and addressed during Summer 2012 term. Final policy implemented for the start of Fall term 2012.
Printing costs of new permanent signs for Fall term: $ 430 4 hours of graphic design work to design new signs: $ 300 New About the Library Pamphlets reflecting new policy: $350
Objective III: Integrate a caf. The CMC Library recognizes that students have needs for caffeine and nourishment while they study. As a commuter school, in which students do not live on campus, the students must either pack food with them or leave the library area in order to satisfy those needs. CMC has food service in the cafeteria on the opposite side of campus from the library. There is also one coffee shop off-campus within walking distance of the library. Students are observed attempting to study in both of these locations. Visitors to the library often ask at the circulation desk where the closest coffee shop is located. The Strategic Planning Committee has seen the successful collaboration between small cafs and libraries at other community and public colleges in our region and believes our students would find an adjacent caf space beneficial to their work of learning. Luckily, the area immediately adjacent to the entrance to the library is appropriate for a freestanding coffee-cart-type-establishment providing limited ready-made food. There are ample power and water hook-ups available in this location while still allowing enough room for a clear passage into and out of the library. Ideally, in the future move to a larger library space, a larger caf space can be integrated into the design to allow seating for students to relax and enjoy their beverages as well as expanded food offerings. Timeline Measurable Outcomes Costs Research options Student patronage Advertising in the allowed under of caf sufficient Emerald Lake existing contracts for operator to Chamber of
21
by January 25th. Propose caf to the College Board at January 30th board meeting. Collect proposals by March 1st. Submit to Library Board for decision making at March 15th board meeting. Limited serving hours in effect beginning August 1st.
Commerce Newsletter: $450 Staff time to collect and submit proposals: $ 1500
Initiative B: Create a positive correlation between library services and student learning. Objective I: Establish departmental liaisons who participate in departmental planning and meet with faculty to customize and offer course-specific literacy instruction. The library staff plans to meet with departmental heads to establish faculty/library relationships for the purpose of tailoring services to specific learning outcomes and courses of study. Timeline Measurable Outcomes Costs June 2012: Demonstrated student Materials Introduce ARCL proficiency in budget: standards at a information searching $2500. regular faculty and use based on Basic meeting. Begin to individual classroom podcasting draft a statement of rubrics. and information Faculty fidelity to library smartphone competence as a skills learning targets in apps from required learning conjunction with Liberated outcome. classroom benchmarks. Syndication July/August 2012: for 1 year, to 90% reported student Finalize statement. use in satisfaction with Library staff meets creating instruction. with departments online Track amount of time to plan tutorials: spent in instruction with
22
Objective II: Provide interactive, monthly programming that structures games and workshops around course content and course-related material in the library collection. In addition, we plan to offer learning opportunities that are curriculum-related, but outside the classroom. Timeline Measurable Outcomes Costs Summer 2011: Current gaming Materials: $500. Communicate with systems engage New software faculty about students while in packages: $1500. providing the library. programs that tie 75% reporting into their greater enthusiasm curriculum. for library services. Fall Term 2011: Students Design a resource demonstrate scavenger hunt and greater
collaboration and specialized instruction for Fall Term 2012. September 2012: Fall Term begins. Library staff push into the classroom. Instructors conduct classroom studies to gauge effectiveness of individualized library instruction on student achievement. December 2012: Library conducts user survey to gauge student satisfaction, triangulated with grades to assess information literacy learning. Rinse and repeat.
faculty. Qualitative/Quantitative data from classroom studies show a positive effect on student learning.
23
other offerings for freshman research/writing classes. After Fall Term: Design a survey to assess how the program helped students in their studies and research. Assess results to see if programs need to be re-worked for Spring semester. Before Winter Term: Install research games onto library computers for upcoming programs. Winter Term: Test run new computer programs on new classes. Re-design offerings as needed. Repeat offerings Spring Term. After School Year: Review both Fall and Spring Assessment surveys to see how students worked with programs, and re-work budget for next years programs. Talk to faculty about expanding classes to sophomore classes.
24
Goal
3
Accommodate
the
needs
of
our
rapidly
growing
student
population.
This
is
essential
to
our
continued
success.
We
are
not
here
to
keep
up
with
the
school.
We
are
here
to
keep
up
with
our
users:
the
faculty
and
students
of
CMC.
Initiative
A:
Increase
the
Number
of
Library
Staff.
Objective
I:
Hire
a
full
time
assistant
librarian
at
the
main
library
to
meet
the
needs
of
our
new
initiatives.
The
library
director
will
complete
job
descriptions
and
begin
the
hiring
process.
Timeline
Measurable
Objectives
Costs
Ad
placement
for
Increase
in
number
One
FTE
employee:
three
weeks
in
of
staff
available
$57,000.
October
2011.
for
needed
work
Candidates
hotel
hours.
stay
for
two
nights:
Telephone
interviews
with
ten
Increase
in
$1000.
candidates
in
available
staff
Fly
candidates
to
November
2011.
working
on
library
Emerald
Lake
projects.
In-person
panel
round
trip:
$3000.
interviews
with
Ad
placements
for
five
candidates
in
three
weeks:
$225.
November
2011.
One
candidate
notified
of
selection
in
December
2011,
begins
work
in
January
of
2012.
Objective
II:
Deploy
staff
at
other
school
campuses
to
maintain
a
reference/resource
presence.
Because
our
school
is
partly
de-centralized
right
now,
maintaining
a
visible
presence
at
other
learning
sites
is
essential
to
both
marketing
the
library
and
reaching
out
to
students
who
may
not
be
aware
that
we
are
here
for
them.
Our
library
assistants
will
complete
the
action
items
for
this
objective,
and
the
librarian
on
duty
will
carry
them
out.
Timeline
Measurable
Outcomes
Costs
Summer
2011:
75%
reported
Banner
to
Identify
learning
positive
student
advertise
library
sites
that
will
feedback
on
services:
$250.
Strategic
Plan:
College
of
Mid-Cascadia
Library
25
benefit most from library presence and choose a consistent three hour time slot for the librarian to visit each week. Summer 2011: Advertise library presence at on school and library websites, and submit digital signs to be shown at all learning sites. August 2011: work with building managers to select and reserve space on a weekly basis; compile items staff will use, such as banner, table cloth, laptop, book cart, and library swag to hand out to students.
service at remote locations. Increased usage of service over time. Increase in library website usage. Increase in digital reference questions by students. Increase in faculty requests and inquiries about library services in classroom.
Initiative B: Expand the Existing Library. Objective I: Move from our current, one-room space in the main college building to an adjacent building with more room. This objective, headed up by the entire library staff, is currently in the planning stages. Though the college has promised us a full-service library building in time, we feel it would be beneficial to explore options for moving into a larger space now. The more space we have, the better we can serve everybody who needs it. Timeline Measurable Outcomes Costs July 2011: Meet Increased space Estimated eventual with building that can be used to budget: $50,000. committee at house books, college to discuss computers, and option of work rooms. relocating; discuss Strategic Plan: College of Mid-Cascadia Library 26
budget and benefits to patrons and staff in expanding our space now, rather than down the road. First Quarter: Start library building fund and research grants for buildings. Second Quarter: Feel out possible donations from local businesses and private citizens. Third Quarter: Propose costs for expanding collection and equipment for new building. Fourth Quarter: Review and revise with school board and staff.
Instructional space for literacy programs that will help students and faculty on and off campus.
Objective II: Create a partnership with the technology department to share space and resources with the on-campus computer center. Timeline Measurable Outcomes Costs End of Winter Ability to share Hardware ad Term: Appoint a resource load software updates: liaison from the between these two $5000 all told, at a staff to departments. 50/50 split - communicate with $2500. Build relations the technology and with technology computer center. department and Both departments computer center. meet to discuss sharing resources and common space.
27
Objective III: Continue to allocate funds to collection development and technological infrastructure. The Redfield is still a new library. Collection development continues to be a top priority if we are to keep up with student and faculty needs. Timeline Measurable Outcomes Costs Ongoing: Read new Collection up to At least $300,000 reference material date with newest yearly for reviews. publications. acquisitions. December 2011: Technology up to At least $10,000 Construct an date with newest yearly for updating schedule updates and hardware and for our technology. patches. software updates.
28
Budget
Last
Year
Total
College
Budget,
FY2010/11:
$38,800,000
Total
Library
Budget,
FY2010/11:
$1,164,000
Like
many
Washington
community
colleges,
CMC
gets
its
funding
primarily
from
state
allocations:
about
59%.
Tuition
and
fees
cover
about
17%
of
revenue,
with
money
from
private
donors,
grants,
and
the
CMC
Foundation
covering
about
19%.
Finally,
CMC
receives
5%
of
its
funding
from
federal
sources.
The
following
chart
represents
the
Librarys
budget
allocations
for
the
previous
fiscal
year:
Technical
$698,400
Services/Acquisitions
Staffing
$171,000
Technology
$116,400
Circulation
$100,000
Maintenance/Fees
$78,200
The
following
chart
represents
the
Kathleen
Redfield
Librarys
projected
revenue
for
the
2011/12
fiscal
year:
Revenue
from
$1,164,000
School
Budget
Remaining
$80,000
Revenues
from
FY2010/11
Alan
C.
Albright
$20,000
Grant
(earmarked
for
Digital
Upgrades)
Total
Library
$1,264,000
Budget,
FY2011/12
New Priorities
The adoption of this strategic plan necessitates new priorities with regards to funding. The following chart outlines our projected additional costs for the fiscal year 2011/2012: Staffing $151,750 Overtime $6000 Technology $16,260 Contractors $19,500
29
Materials $4630 Advertising $925 Other $4000 Total Additional Costs for FY 2011/12: $203,065 The projected additional costs are almost half-covered by the amount saved over the past two years of operation: New FY 2011/12 Library Budget: $1,060,935 Technical Services/Acquisitions $567,821 Staffing $171,000 Technology $143,911 Circulation $100,000 Maintenance/Fees $78,203 We have been able to maintain our staffing, circulation, and maintenance & fees costs, while keeping our tech services/acquisitions budget at an acceptable functioning level. We have also increased our technology budget, which will come in handy for the increased online access we are planning to implement.
30
Contingencies
One contingency that weighs heavily on the minds of everyone at the college is the Washington State Legislatures recent decision to cut $84 million from two-year colleges over the next two years. Even though CMC was created with great support from, and at the request of, the community, these cuts affect all two-year community colleges in the state of Washington. Like most of these colleges, CMC relies on most of its revenue coming from the state. We survived the first round of cuts, but more may come down the road. There is a very real possibility that two years after we started offering classes, we will have to cut offerings in order to focus on higher demand courses and services. The cutting of classes and services could cause a drop in enrollment, particularly as the tough economic times continue apace, and potential students worry about not having enough money for college. This could translate to less support for the college overall, which would threaten the librarys existence as well. Combined with this contingency is that of the continued need for space by several departments at the college. The Redfield Library already shares space with the tutoring and writing centers, and with the small space we currently inhabit, thats stretching our services thin, not to mention our resources. To continue forward with our vision of becoming the intellectual heart of the College of Mid-Cascadia, the library must have dedicated space from which to operate. One possible solution that has been discussed is a partnership with the Emerald Lake Public Library. During preliminary, informal discussions, they have indicated that following a consolidation of space at their downtown branch, they would be willing to open up a little bit of space for us to operate out of. Though there would actually be less space open to us in terms of collections display and storage, we would be able to share resources with them as well as make use of their conference rooms for instruction and programming. While it is not our first choice, it is one that we are willing to consider as it would boost our visibility in the community, and it would give the college the time to build and prepare our eventual full-service library space to our needs. Another possible solution is to re-prioritize our strategic initiatives to focus on repurposing existing space within the library, increasing online accessibility and access to digital resources, and increasing the existing number of library staff. We would then postpone the remaining initiatives to the following year. This is an even less attractive proposition than the other one, but with many community colleges looking to see where the axe is going to fall in terms of vital services, we recognize the need to be patient and work steadily toward our goals, over an increased timeline if need be.
31
Conclusion
The
Kathleen
Redfield
Librarys
primary
responsibility
is
to
support
and
enhance
the
education
offered
at
the
College
of
Mid-Cascadia.
We
envision
that
the
library
can
go
beyond
expectations
and
become
the
heart
of
the
college
and
play
a
key
role
in
the
intellectual
growth
of
our
patrons.
We
strive
to
offer
the
best
services
possible
for
the
students
and
faculty
at
the
College
of
Mid-Cascadia.
Libraries
are
responsible
for
staying
relevant
and
providing
innovative
services
to
their
patrons.
It
is
essential
to
assess
the
needs
of
an
individual
librarys
population
and
evaluate
how
to
best
meet
those
needs.
This
strategic
plan
has
enabled
us
to
take
a
detailed
look
at
our
library
and
where
we
would
like
to
take
it.
The
strategic
initiatives
have
been
selected
as
critical
steps
to
align
the
library
with
our
mission
statement
and
future
vision.
The
staff
at
the
Redfield
Library
is
passionate
about
their
work
at
the
library.
Everyone
is
on
the
same
page
of
understanding
what
needs
to
be
done
to
offer
the
best
services
to
our
patrons.
The
staff
is
committed
to
their
roles
in
the
librarys
strategic
plan.
Our
team
has
considered
the
librarys
strengths
and
weaknesses
and
we
are
prepared
to
take
action.
While
there
are
internal
and
external
threats
to
the
success
of
our
proposed
plan,
we
are
confident
that
we
can
improve
our
services
to
the
student
and
faculty
population
at
the
College
of
Mid- Cascadia.
Our
strategic
initiatives
will
facilitate
Redfield
Library
in
creating
the
best
library
possible,
focusing
on
creating
an
intellectual
space,
providing
access,
and
enabling
growth.
32
References
Butts, M. (2010, March 16). CWI faces financial shortfall - Idaho Press-Tribune: News. Idaho Press-Tribune: Local News and Information for the Treasure Valley. Retrieved October 13, 2011, from http://www.idahopress.com/news/article_cf1bd720-30c5-11df-93c2- 001cc4c03286.html College of Western Idaho: Strategic Plan 2011-2015. (n.d.). Official Website of the State of Idaho. Retrieved October 13, 2011, from http://dfm.idaho.gov/Publications/BB/StrategicPlans/SP2011/Education/C WI_SP.pdf CPS HR Consulting. (2004). State of Minnesota department of employee relations SWOT analysis. SWOT Analysis Examples. Retrieved October 13, 2011, from http://www.cps.ca.gov/workforceplanning/documents/SampleCompletedS WOTAnalysis.pdf Donlan, R. (2006). How much does biology really need, anyway?: Determining library budget allocations. Library Issues, 26(6). Retrieved from http://www.libraryissues.com/ Eide Bailey, LLC. (2010, November 16). Financial statements: June 30, 2010 and 2009, College of Western Idaho. College of Western Idaho: Audits. Retrieved October 13, 2011, from https://cwidaho.cc/finance/downloads/Report- College%20Of%20Western%20Idaho-Financials%202010.pdf Green, N. (2011, October 04). College of Western Idaho students seek careers through hands-on training - Idaho Press-Tribune: News. Idaho Press-Tribune: Local News and Information for the Treasure Valley. Retrieved October 13, 2011, from http://www.idahopress.com/news/college-of-western-idaho- students-seek-careers-through-hands-on/article_93086d44-ee4b-11e0-9a30 Long, K. (2011 June 2). Washington budget cuts trim college classes that lead to jobs. The Columbian. Retrieved from http://www.columbian.com/ McClenney, K. M., & McClenney, B. N. (2003). Community college inventory: focus on student persistence, learning, and attainment. Community College Survey of Student Engagement. Retrieved October 13, 2011, from http://www.ccsse.org/publications/Community%20College%20Inventory.p df NINCH. Price of digitization symposium report [Web Page]. Retrieved November 30, 2011, at http://www.ninch.org/forum/price.report.html
33
Orbis Cascade Alliance. Demand driven acquisitions pilot [Web Page]. Retrieved November 30, 2011, at http://www.orbiscascade.org/
34
Appendix
Summary
Report
of
Team
Project
Activities
35
During the process of creating of the strategic plan for the Kathleen Redfield Library at the College of Mid-Cascadia, we learned a lot about what it takes to create and implement initiatives; but we also learned a lot about group dynamics. We proved that we could overcome setbacks by being flexible about group rolls and viewing Tuckman's stages as cyclical rather than linear. Forming: The formation of the project group took place before we had formal meetings. We were told to form into groups on the Blackboard website. One of our members signed up, and the rest of us joined. We waited until the instruction during the first class weekend to discuss our project. As suggested by De Bonos White Hat, we were anxious to get more information about what our group would be doing what was expected of us, and what the finished product might look like. Once we came together face-to-face, we offered up some ideas for what kind of library we wanted to create a plan for as well as some ideas for group names, but ultimately decided to hold off on those decisions until our first independent meeting. We did quickly decide that we would conduct weekly meetings via Skype, and discussed protocols for attendance. We decided that we would create a wiki to collect all the pieces of the plan as we completed them. One member volunteered to be the group secretary and collected everyone's contact information, which would then be put on Google Docs so we could all see it, and also maintain the wiki. Another member volunteered to act as group leader, and committed to create an agenda for each meeting, and we decided on protocols for suggesting changes to the agenda. Storming: We had quite a bit of discussion at the beginning about what kind of library we wanted to model ours after. We also stormed a bit during many of the meetings while we were deciding on initiatives. In an example of Red-Hat thinking, people had gut reactions about initiatives but werent able to articulate their feelings exactly. There were differences of opinion with regard to how quickly we were moving through the process, what was the most logical order in which to complete the pieces of the plan, how they would fit together, and how closely to mirror the school we chose as our model. Because we began by researching independently, we had a bit of storming each time we came together because we had each independently read about other strategic plans and brainstormed changes to implement; we had to get used to incorporating others ideas, accept the group roles they wanted to take on, and how they wanted to get work done. As Storming bled into Norming, there was evidence of Green-Hat thinking when people threw out ideas they had with a genuine interest in what others thought about them in an effort to come together as a group. Norming: The norming stage began once we had decided on what kind of library to create initiatives for; because we largely worked separately between meetings, there were
36
several coming-together periods where we touched base on what we had accomplished that week and where we saw our tasks going next. We spent some with our Blue Hats on, thinking about why we had come to the conclusions we did, and communicating that to each other. We settled into different leadership roles than we had started in, as well as settling into a more comfortable rapport for meetings. Decisions were made, and it was clear that some people were willing to acquiesce to the will of the majority, which was a lucky thing for our dynamic and our progress, and a good example of Yellow-Hat harmony-seeking. There were periods when group members had to be absent from meetings, and because this happened largely during the norming stage, we were able to pick up slack, make progress, and keep them in the loop. There was evidence of this stage happening right up until the project was turned in, as we were touching base to make sure everyone was confident about what we were turning in and presenting. Performing: This stage started with the creation of the wiki, when the skeleton of the plan was put up. It was helpful to see what we had left to do, and see things take shape as more parts went up. We were working autonomously and confidently at this point, making decisions about our pieces and were able to address each others questions about our progress. Coming back full circle to the White Hat, we were focused exclusively on the organization of the project and making sure we had all the pieces. In the beginning, we stuck very well to our meeting agendas, though this efficiency was superseded somewhat by wanting to touch base more with each other on a personal level when various personal issues occurred with different members. Whenever member needed to be absent from meetings, we all touched base with each other, took good notes and left records in Skype and on the wiki so that, when people were able to rejoin the group there wasn't a huge recurrence of forming - everyone was pretty good at hitting the ground running. Members were able to play on their strengths, e.g. knowledge of the library system, the strategic plan process, and technology use to contribute.
37
38
Using a different colored text for the new info, or Adding your name to any additions you make.
We also decided that before changing or deleting another persons information, we will ask permission of the original content creator. We can see content ownership by looking at the recent changes page in the wiki navigation. Project focus: Kate, as team coordinator, suggested a focus for our project: Where our organization stands now, where we want it to go, and how to get there. On the where we stand now front, we agreed that we should review the information Kimberly has compiled on the wiki regarding her library at the College of Western Idaho, as well as the documents Rajesh sent out with examples of strategic plans. We also all committed to looking up a different community college strategic plan, and bringing salient points about it to the next meeting to discuss. Wiki Structure: Holly brought up a desire to structure the wiki along the lines of Rajeshs in-class outline, filling in information as we get it done. Maureen agreed. Patrick expressed reservations, as in his previous experience the structure of the project changed throughout the process, which meant that some pages didnt get filled in, making for chaotic navigation. However, he concluded that if such a thing happened, the team could delete the unused pages. Holly and Maureen agreed. Community Needs Analysis Component: Those of us taking 811 this term noticed a connection between this strategic plan and community needs analysis, particularly in the realm of studying individuals in the community. We agreed this would be valuable information to have in the creation of our strategic plan, though we all
39
experienced hesitation at the thought of duplicating our efforts from another class. Next Meeting: Sunday, October 2nd, 8 PM Pacific/9 PM Mountain time. Assignments: 1. Read Rajesh's materials and the wiki uploads so far. 2. Find a CC library's strategic plan to get your brains storming about ideas for 1. the vision of our library 2. what changes to affect 3. how we get there, 4. the breakdown of individual tasks - particularly if there's some aspect you'd especially like to take charge of.
40
wikithen everyone can edit) Mission statement: were doing later after more info is gathered/work done. Kate: Anyone have any research on weaknesses, etc? Kim: found out that theres an equal to their budget amount of money available for the libraryjust have to prove they need it (by using all existing budget maybe? We dont know how to prove they need it) Significant growth in the cc (100%+ increase in 1 yearcool!) Holly: will post her power point of some history about ccs that she did for another class (as background info) Some discussion of Kates SWOT analysiswhere she got facts cited, etc. Kim: so what tasks are we working on this week? Holly: prep and planning piece Kate: (see below) Kim: strategic profile Crystal: will try working on gap analysis now that she/we have more info [geeI realized that I didnt say anything herePatrick, being secretary is not my forte! I was awfully concentrated on recording, etc and was not so successful in the participation aspect of this meeting! MR] Should they measure the staff? (ie, how does the staff feel, how effective, etc) Holly: maybe they (our ccs lib) should have a Patron User Experience Librarian (they have one at OHSU)this person does interviews, etc of patrons/users -Maybe this should be a goal/suggestion for our plan? Kate: has a change: Wants to do a stakeholder analysis. Who are we justifying ourselves to? -Kim: will do some digging Next meeting: 10/23 After next week we should be in a place where we can all talk about what we want to include -Tackling new priorities -talk about where we are in relation to larger community, etc. -where are other cc libraries (in comparison)? -and do we want to go there? Strategic Plan: College of Mid-Cascadia Library 41
Kate will get herself a new headset. Holly has two mascots for us to vote onshell post pictures Everyone will post what they got this week: -Maureen will post minutes -Kate will post agenda for next week
Present: Kate, Holly, Maureen, Crystal, Kim Absent: Patrick (with notice) Kate moves that we all refresh on what was done last week.... Work this past week: Kate began a user needs assessment - uploaded onto the wiki - with a description of the people who will be affected by any of library decisions. Kate broke these into users. Analysis of library employees and users is the name of the upload, so all can go there to peruse. Holly uploaded the Org profile, and is working on the Preparation/Planning section (All agreed to change the name to Cascadia College, and will also use fake place names.) At correct time, before submission, Holly offered to do the edit for consistency of names, wording, voice, etc. Crystal noted that she is focusing on the metrics, besides surveys, etc. Crystal is starting work on Gap Analysis. Kim reports she is working on the strategic profile, hoping to finish up this week. Maureen stated she added some pages to wiki so they match the assignment as laid out in the assignment for the strategic plan. Next steps: In underline Maureen noted this next week will be challenging, Holly seconds that!!! Crystal thirds it! Maureen asked if we know the timeline for the strategic plan - noted in Rajesh's notes is that the strategic plan is for 12 months, but Holly will ask for clarification from Rajesh. Since Patrick asked for something to do, group decided that he could begin work on the Strategic Profile and the Future Vision part of the New Priorities section. Kate has questions about the budget. Kim suggested that we come up with some questions to ask Donna Reed about this Strategic Plan: College of Mid-Cascadia Library 42
issue, and maybe Patrick to tap her to get some further clarification on budgets and organization. Maureen noted we should find out the names of some pertinent grants that our library will win, and has agreed to do this in near future. Kate wondered if we could begin work on the contingencies, but Maureen suggested that we need initiatives to be able to know what cold threaten them. Crystal mentioned that we should all watch Freedom Writers. Maureen and Kate have seen it.... Holly may watch with Patrick, and Kim knows where to get a copy. Group decided to meet next week for a brief check-in to keep the schedule.
Present:
Maureen,
Patrick,
Kim,
Holly
as
note-taker.
Absent
with
notice:
Crystal,
Kate
Holly
took
notes:
Patrick
updated:
Was
able
to
do
some
work
on
strategic
profile
on
the
future
vision.
Got
a
rough
draft
set
down.
Since
we
are
looking
at
opening
two
more
campuses
over
the
next
few
years,
we
may
have
hard
time
trying
to
keep
with
the
big
plan,
so
Patrick
is
hoping
we
can
tighten
the
plan,
keep
to
smaller
vision
for
the
sake
of
manageability.
In
terms
of
user
needs
-
we
could
probably
address
two
-
1)
library
wants
space,
In
terms
of
a
place
that
serves
as
heart
of
school,
students
and
faculty
may
want
space
to
be
community
space
around
their
learning.
Patrick
states
a
vision
for
a
space
to
combine
learning
with
interests/lifestyles.
2)
user
needs
are
access,
place
that
acts
as
heart
of
school-
we
can
access
in
person
and
online
-
focusing
on
both
to
be
more
cost
effective
and
create
a
central
library
that
ultimately
serves
three
very
close
campuses
Patrick
will
post
his
vision
piece
to
wiki
-
he
read
it
to
the
three
others
on
Skype.
Guiding
values,
Patrick
notes
that,
although
basing
on
real
college,
he
thought
it
would
be
useful
to
start
with
our
values/beliefs.
So,
ideas
to
start
the
process:
Free books, free information Palpable sense of welcome Friendly, helpful staff Internet access Sense of intellectual space, intellectual home, encompasses that that space is "mine" Design features can support the environment to be our intellectual space. 43
People still crave physical interaction How are we going to create that environment? Instruction space - yes! Quality teaching Multiple use space Quiet space, computer space, huddle rooms, space for everybody!
We had a small discussion of community college libraries combining with community libraries...so, as Patrick noted, we need a contingency plan maybe could be entering into collaboration with local public library to share space could be a contingency plan. Patrick has offered to put the pieces all together and put into one document. All expressed appreciation. (We think it should be PRETTY!! Oh, so PRETTY!!) The following could be our two strategic initiatives, and each can be broken down into at least two goals and two objectives that are measureable: 1) Creating an intellectual home for students and faculty of college 2) Maximizing access to information for students and faculty of the college. Patrick and Kim liked a particular team's strategic plan, which we will add to notes. (See bottom of page) Just a note: College of Mid Cascadia is the name (CMC), as there is a Cascadia College already. We decided to put it in a hypothetical place, that is same demographics of Moses lake, etc. Lets call it Emerald Lake?!? (Kim noted that their library just did a survey, which her staff thought would be focused on ebooks and electronic resources, but found that users want quiet study space, and more books. Plus, library was approved for 300k for books, and staff to catalog new collections. ) Doing this week: All: Page on Wiki for the initiative for objectives and goals for the Initiatives - include ways to measure these, too. Please add to these as you can!!! Patrick: Putting all that is done so far in one document. Holly: Getting Preparation/Planning piece onto wiki. For next agenda: 1) Money from student fees, and population of students is growing. There may be other routes for funding, so let's talk about it next week. 2) Strategic initiatives and goals/outcomes 3) The presentation (Kim noted that their library just did a survey, which her staff thought would be focused on ebooks and electronic resources, but found that users want quiet study
44
space, and more books. Plus, library was approved for 300k for books, and staff to catalog new collections. )
All in Attendance -We discussed ensuring that our initiatives keep to our commitment to be a user- centered space and Holly suggested using ILL as measure of distance learning objective. -Holly added initiative one and Maureen combined pages. -Maureen pointed out that we have to work on executive summary, organization profile, gap analysis, decisions on initiatives, action plans for those initiatives, contingencies for the chosen initiatives, and conclusions. -Patrick added that budget and timelines need to be done. -Holly plans to finish executive summary Monday or Tuesday. -We agreed about having 2 objectives with 2 goals each. -Maureen suggested we post goal/objective ideas to the wiki by Wednesday. -Holly added that we need the objective, then initiatives and measures. -Maureen clarified that we'll post initiatives on the wiki by 1159pm Tuesday and vote by Wednesday at the same time; then get the rest of our stuff on the wiki by Saturday, then start working on the presentation. -Holly confirmed that she is finishing demographics. -Patrick clarified that we're meeting again next Sunday (11/27).
Patrick discussed the budget and how he arrived at the percentages based on similar libraries and formulae he had used in a tech plan for a previous class Holly clarified that any budget for expanding and implementing our initiatives would likely be over and above this general, base-line budget We discussed the structure of our presentation: Vision Strategic plan (individual initiatives) Tuckman's Theory Question/answer portion Kate noted that we needed to discuss measurable outcomes for the initiatives, and Patrick suggested that we each take an initiative and outline measurable outcomes, who's responsible for seeing it through, timeline, and budget/resources. Patrick took responsibility for Goal 1 (increasing online accessibility and digital resources). Kate took responsibility for Initiative B of Goal 2 (offering innovative programming that aligns with course outcomes). Holly took responsibility for Initiative C of Goal 2 (maintaining a collaborative relationship with college faculty) and will also still do the executive summary. Maureen took responsibility for Initiative A of Goal 2 (repurposing space within the library) Kim took responsibility for Initiative A of Goal 3 (Increase the number of library staff). Crystal took responsibility for Initiative B of Goal 3 (Expand the existing library). We committed to post to the wiki on Tuesday, and also meet on Skype again that night.
All in attendance. We looked at the Prezi that Maureen worked on. We discussed what we need in terms of a reference list, and whether to include that on the Prezi. We looked at the wiki, and discussed who posted the separate parts. We discussed organizational performance: Database access, providing reference, circulation numbers, headcount/use of group study space, statistics on ILL, teaching info literacy, working with faculty on assignment creation. We discussed contingencies: Budgets, technology breakdown, conflict with other departments in the college space allocation, replacing materials, drop in enrollment, Washington CC budget cuts. Kate volunteered to do the appendix (Stages of Group Development) and post it to the wiki. Holly wondered about practicing the presentation before class. Most of us could meet at 4pm in Cramer. Maureen said she would finish the Prezi after she has all the parts, and we can look at it Friday. She will also break it up into logical parts for a presentation. Strategic Plan: College of Mid-Cascadia Library 46
Patrick volunteered to write up the discussed contingencies. Holly is working on the organizational performance piece.
47