Management Course
Session Agenda:
GHG types and sources GHG Indicator to calculate emissions GHG accounting and reporting
But first
In what step(s) of the methodology is (energy and) GHG measurement relevant?
task 1a: Meeting with top management task 1b: Form a Team and inform staff task 1c: Pre-assessment to collect general information task 1d: Select focus areas task 1e: Prepare assessment proposal for top management approval
Step 2: Assessment
task 2a: Staff meeting and training task 2b: Prepare focus area flow charts task 2c: Walkthrough of focus areas task 2d: Quantify inputs and outputs and costs to establish a baseline task 2e: Quantify losses through a material and energy balance
Greenhouse Gases
GHG sources
Industrial sources
Fuel use Electricity use Industrial processes Transport
GHG Indicator
Based on UNEP/IPCC methodology for GHG emission calculations Provides common method for reporting GHG emissions
Used by organizations to calculate GHG emissions from energy use and other sources
Used by Governments to translate national GHG targets (e.g. Kyoto Protocol) to industrial targets
GHG Indicator:
Methodology
Raw data Conversion Aggregation Normalisation
GHG Indicator:
1. Fuel Use
Fuel Annual Fuel Consumption (Tons) 500 3502 Emission Factor t CO2 X 1.85 X 3.25 X 3.09 = = = t CO2equivalent
GHG Indicator:
2. Electricity Use
Electricity Annual electricity consumption (kWh) 1,000,000 100,000 900,000 Emission Factor t CO2 X 0.000618 X 0.000618 = = t CO2
equivalent
GHG Indicator:
3. Industrial Processes
Emission source CFC 11 Lime TOTAL Annual consumption (tonnes) 0.1 10,000 Emission Factor t CO2 X 3400 X 0.396 = = t CO2
equivalent
GHG Indicator:
4. Transport
Transport mode Car Petrol Car Diesel Train Annual travel (km) 20,000 100,000 EF tCO2 / km 0.00019 0.00016 = = t CO2
equivalent
3.8 16
150,000
0.00034
51
TOTAL
270,000
70.8
12
GHG Indicator:
Aggregation
Source
1 2 3 4 Fuel use Electricity use Industrial process Transport
t CO2
equivalent
TOTAL
16872
13
GHG Indicator:
Normalisation
Normalising Annual t CO2 Normalised factor figures t CO2 Turnover $ 20,000,000 16872 0.000844 Added value $ 500,000 16872 Employees Units of production 500 1,350,000 tonnes 16872 16872 33.744 0.012498
14
0.033744
GHG Indicator:
Reporting
Year 1990 1991 . 2002 24267
43.8%
2,000,000
0.012134
2.9%
15
GHG Indicator:
16
17
The GHG Protocol lists 5 accounting & reporting principles: Relevance Completeness Consistency Transparency Accuracy
19
Relevance
Define boundaries:
Organizational structures Operational boundaries Business context Specific inclusions / exclusions
A multinational operates a plant but owns only 60% of shares Do you count 100% or 60% of emissions?
20
Completeness
Include all GHG sources & activities
Fuel use Electricity use Industrial processes Transport
Sometimes companies do not include all emission sources / activities Can you think of reasons why?
21
Consistency
Meaningful comparison of emissions over time
Production changes Process changes Acquisitions, mergers, sales Outsourcing
Why is it important that GHG emissions be compared between different years?
23
Transparency
It is clear how emissions were calculated (audit trail)
Measurements Assumptions Calculation methods References Exclusions or inclusions
Who makes use of the audit trail of data?
24
Transparency (cont.)
Independent External Auditors
Review of inventory Provide assurance on data quality & accuracy
Corporate Team
Check quality of incoming data Compile data Analyze emission inventory and forecast against BPs GHG target
25
Accuracy
Data must be materially accurate
Measurement methods Calculation methods Aggregation and reporting
27
28
Why verification?
Increased credibility of reported emissions Increased senior management confidence Improved accounting & reporting Preparation for mandatory verification requirements
29
Summary
GHG emission accounting and reporting increasingly important
GHG Indicator useful tool to calculate GHG emissions Dont assume data company gives you are accurate and complete!! (think of the 5 principles) Verification improves the credibility / reliability of GHG data
30
31
Acknowledgements
This training session was prepared as part of the development and delivery of the course Energizing Cleaner Production funded by InWent, Internationale Weiterbildung und Entwicklung (Capacity Building International, Germany) and carried out by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) The session is based on UNEPs The GHG Indicator (www.uneptie.org/energy/tools/ghgin/index.htm) and the WBCSD/WRIs The GHG Protocol - A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, revised edition (www.ghgprotocol.org)
32