The rural consumer is discerning and the rural markets are vibrant. At the current rate of growth it will soon outstrip the urban market. The rural market is no longer sleeping we are The real India lies in the villages. All smart marketers Indian as well as MNCs have revered this gospel.
Companies like Hindustan lever, Godrej, Colgate Palmolive, Parle Foods, Nirma works, Philips, have made in roads into the countryside. Rural reach is on the rise and it is fast becoming the most important route to growth.
Rural marketing can be seen as a function which manages all those activities involved in assessing, stimulating and converting the purchasing power into and effective demand for specific products and services, and moving them to the people in rural area to create satisfaction and a standard of living to them and thereby achieves the goals of the organization.
The big question facing marketers entering the rural sector is whether it needs a transactional or developmental approach. The role of rural marketing is more developmental than transactional. It is more process of delivering better standard of living and quality of life to rural environment taking into consideration the prevailing rural milieu.
It is a two-way marketing process wherein the transactions can be: Urban to Rural: It involves the selling of products and services by urban marketers in rural areas. These include: Pesticides, FMCG products, consumer durables etc.
Rural to Urban: Here, a rural producer (involved in agriculture) sells his produce in urban market. This may not be direct. There generally are middlemen, agencies, government co-operatives, etc who sell fruits, vegetables, grains, pulses and others. Rural to rural: These include selling of agricultural tools, cattle, carts and others to another village in its proximity.
2.
3.
3. Accessibility of MarketsThe attraction of a market depends not only on its potential but also on its accessibility. A market that cannot be exploited is a case of sour grapes. The development of infrastructure facilities and marketing institutions has increased the accessibility of these markets.
3. Accessibility of MarketsThe road network has facilitated a systemized product distribution system to villages. In the past, companies relied on a trickle down of stocks to the buyer in interior villages, which resulted from the active participation of channel members. Today, an increasing number of companies are Supplying village markets directly. Increasing direct contact with villages helps product promotion and availability of the product in the village shop. Delivery-cumPromotion vans traversing eight to 10 villages a day and covering haats or mandis(markets) is a widely used method of direct contact in rural areas.
5.Risk Reduction
During recession in urban markets, the rural markets help to reduce risk. Companies selling to both urban and rural Markets better withstand fluctuations in demand. The situation faced by the color television industry in 2001 is an example. While the growth in the market for colour televisions in urban India was a low 5 per cent, the growth in the rural markets was 16 per cent as compared to 10 per cent in 2000. The factors that affected the urban Economy the stock market crash or the threat of war did not affect the rural markets. The positive growth in demand for color televisions in rural markets was due to good monsoon rains and increased income levels in the rural areas. The demand for certain products in rural areas is
2)Population
Rural population forms a major portion of the Indian population which is about 70% of overall population. In other words for 1 urban consumer there are 3 consumer in rural areas . This big size of consumer will require a wide variety of consumable and durable goods & services but at the same time these needs of the rural areas dont guarantee an automatic market , unless backed by rising disposable income & the resultant purchasing power. The villages are also not uniform in size. Nearly 48% of the villages have a population of less than 500 persons or about 100 households, which is probably of no consequence to marketers. Thus the location and size of population of villages throw a challenge to marketers. This phenomenon is not true for the whole country and there
3.Occupation
The main occupation for a vast majority of rural population is agriculture & allied activities. About half of the rural population own or lease land to cultivate it for their livelihood. Another 27% are dependent on these cultivators for jobs as agricultural labourers.The implication of this occupation patteren is that incomegeneration in rural areas entirely depends upon how land is used,what crops are cultivated,how much is marketed,how much is consumed & what arrangements are made to market agricultural produce.This cultivation majorly depends upon adequate rainfall,weather condition,favourable & appropriate technology available.Sme implication can be applied on households also as there are over 100 million households in rural areas,72% cultivators & 15% are agricultural labours.
4 Literacy Level
As pur the distribution of rural & urban population, it has been noticed that the number of literates in rural areas are more than in urban areas. For eg. though in 2001 urban literacy level was high at 80% with adult literates around 200 million people against a population of about 367 million in rural areas. The high literacy rate implies that communication should not prove a hurdle with the rural population,provided appropriate means are chosen. Today television has proved to be an effective mass medium for communication with rural masses .The television network in country today covers nearly 100% of population offering a greater reach when compared to any other medium.
5.Land Distribution
As we know that nearly 75% of rural income is generated by agriculture. The basic resource in agriculture is land and so land distributions is a main factor in deciding the distribution of rural income. The distribution of land is highly skewed nearly 75% of holdings account for 25% of total land cultivated, while the balance 25% of holdings account for 75% of land. Since land distribution is uneven so is the income because land is basic asset for income generation, land holding can be considered as a proxy for income in rural segmentation. The number of families in lower income groups in rural groups is larger when compared to families in higher income groups. This situation is very important for marketing of agricultural inputs. While fertilizers ,pesticides & seeds may be demanded by all holdings, irrespective of level of income, durable inputs like tractors or major agricultural
5.Land Distribution
Machinery may be in demand only with large sized or higher income groups. There were only 71 million holdings in 1970-71 which increased to 89 million in 1980-81 & to 98 million in 1985-86.Now the number of holdings exceed 100 million, due to sub-division & fragmentation is widely prevalent in rural areas, especially when landed property is partitioned among family members. Thus rural areas consist of a large number of small consumers though total of their consumption will exceed the urban consumption. Marketing efforts of a high magnitude are required to cater to approximately 100 million farming families.