NEW TESTAMENT THEOLOGY BTH 532 Missio University Training Leaders to Transform Nations
DOCTRINE OF THE SCRIPTURE AND OF GOD
PowerPoint #2
constantly
used the OT to demonstrate He was the Messiah - Isaiah 61:1-2, Luke 4:16-21 Jesus used the OT in a typological approach Matthew 12:39-41
Typology
Persons or events referred to in the OT may be regarded as models (or types) for other persons or events.
In
did not question the historicity of OT people and events, i.e. the book of Jonah. Jesus quoted the OT as authoritative. Jesus saw the OT as inspired by the Holy Spirit. Mark 12:36 Jesus spoke of God speaking through human authors. Matthew 24:15 Jesus saw every thing in the OT as inspired. Matthew 5:18
21:33 When Jesus said But I say unto you in the Sermon on the Mount places His words above the Law. Matthew 5:21-48 Jesus expected obedience to His words as a basis for living. Luke 6:46-49 In John, Jesus often introduced His teachings with the words Truly, truly I say
said He spoke on the authority of the Father John 5:37-50 Jesus said His words were Spirit and life - John 6:63 Jesus said the Holy Spirit would recall His words to the disciples John 14:26 Jesus told His disciples He gave them the words the Father gave Him John 17:8
10
11
Summary
Jesus
and the NT writers all saw the OT with the full inspiration and authority of God. They quoted and alluded to it often as Gods truth. Jesus said His words had full authority and were from God. Paul and John clearly understood that they were speaking authoritative words from God Peter taught that Pauls writings were on the same authority as the OT. In the NT we can see the embryonic beginning of the NT canon with equal
OT and NT Comparison
Both
assume the existence of God. Both teach that God is the creator and sustainer of the Universe. Both teach a God of transcendence and immanence Transcendence: God is infinite in that He is not the subject of any limitations of humanity, or of creation in general. He is far greater than everything He has made, far greater than anything that exists, and
OT and NT Comparison
Both
teach a God of immanence and transcendence - Ephesians 4:6 Immanence - God is personal: He interacts with us as a person, and we can relate to Him as persons. We can pray to Him, worship Him, obey Him, and love Him, and He can speak to us, rejoice in us, and love us. God is actively involved with and upholds/sustains His creation. We are dependent upon Him. Hebrews 1:3, Acts 17:25, 28, Colossians 1:17
OT and NT Comparison
Progressive
revelation show us: In the OT we see God commanding the wholesale slaughter of people and allowing the imprecatory prayers of His people.
In
the NT although justice is taught, we see a clear focus on the mercy and love of God in the revelation of Jesus
God as Father It is the idea of the fatherhood of God which is most characteristic of NT teachings and especially the teachings of Jesus. - Donald Guthrie
God as Father
In
OT Fatherhood is more nationalistic Israel rather than individualistic. In the NT the Fatherhood of God is seen in:
The
Father
of all creation
6:9 Your heavenly Father knows Matthew 6:32 His care for His creation My Father Jesus Father - John 5:17 My Father and Your Father John 20:17
God as Father
God
disciplines us as sons. Hebrews 12:5-11 God is so personal we can call Him Abba, Dear Father, Papa. - Romans 8:15, Galatians 4:6 People have one of two fathers, either God or the devil. John 8:4244
God. The concept of a kingdom implies a king who sovereignty rules over his subjects. The subjects of the king are those who have submitted themselves to carrying out the will of the King. NT Christians prayed to God as
is seen in Revelation as seated on a throne. Revelation 4:2-3, 5:1 The throne implies sovereignty and justice. John the Baptist proclaimed the judgment of God. Matthew 3:7-10 Paul speaks much of God as judge. Romans 2:5, 3:6, 14:10
NT Uses of doxa
Glory seeing the glory of
transfiguration Matthew
Visible
God
Jesus
17:1-2 John and apostles John 1:14 Stephen at his martyrdom Acts 7:55 Believers transformed 2 Corinthians
NT Uses of doxa Spoken Praise giving glory to God Luke 2:20, Mark 2:12 Our purpose is to glorify God 1 Peter 2:12
Attributes of God: Wisdom and Knowledge Gods wisdom is contrasted with mans 1 Corinthians 1:19-25 The depth Gods wisdom Romans 11:33 God knows all Matthew 10:26 Gods will proceeds out of an all-wise, all-knowing God The NT stresses the importance of the
Attributes of God: Wisdom and Knowledge What about suffering? The key is our attitude.
If
suffering comes God it must have a purpose. God is no less wise or good because suffering exists. In a hostile world Christians will suffer for their faith. -2 Timothy 3:12 Hardships are tools in the hands of God. 2 Corinthians 4:16-17
Righteousness comes from God Romans 10:3 When we are saved we become righteous - Ephesians 4:24 A Righteous God must judge in righteousness Romans 2:5 God judges impartially 1 Peter 1:17, Romans 2:5-11
3:36 Gods wrath is His revulsion due to His absolute holiness toward that which is unholy Romans 1:18 Gods wrath is reserved for those who
love. Grace is the favor of God towards those who do not deserve favor. Grace is another name for the outgoing character of Gods love. If there is one characteristic of God which captured the imagination of Paul more than another, it was the grace of God. -
formula Matthew 28:19, 2 Corinthians 13:14 Triadic passages Ephesians 4:4-6, 1 Corinthians 12:3-6, 1 Peter 1:2 Three persons in non-triadic passages Galatians 4:4-6, Mark 1:9-11 Trinitarian relationships John 14:26, 15:26, 16:13-15
Trinitarian
is a person called the Father who has the all the attributes of God There is a person called the Son who has all the attributes of God There is a person call the Spirit who has all the attributes of God Therefore, there is one God in three distinct persons
Moreover, both in the titles and attributes of God found in the NT, there is a remarkable combination of what might at first appear to be opposites. The paradox of the love and wrath of God, his kindness and severity, his mercy and judgment are examples of apparent antitheses which nevertheless are perfectly balanced in the