Anda di halaman 1dari 58

Master in Advanced Power Electrical Engineering Techno-economic aspects of power systems

Ronnie Belmans
Stijn Cole Dirk Van Hertem
Copyright 2005

Overview

Lesson 1: Liberalization Lesson 2: Players, Functions and Tasks Lesson 3: Markets Lesson 4: Present generation park Lesson 5: Future generation park Lesson 6: Introduction to power systems Lesson 7: Power system analysis and control Lesson 8: Power system dynamics and security Lesson 9: Future grid technologies: FACTS and HVDC Lesson 10: Distributed generation

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Outline Introduction to power systems


Power systems

Grid structure Grid elements New investments in the grid

Tasks of the TSO Grid operation issues

Copyright 2005 - 2008

The grid of today


Transmission network

To transport the electric power from the point of generation to the load centers All above a certain voltage

(Subtransmission) Distribution network


To distribute the electric power among the consumers Below a certain voltage

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Transmission system

Structure of the power grid Whats the difference?

Higher voltage (typical at least 110 kV and higher) Power injection by generation and import, large consumers Interconnected internationally Meshed nature-Redundancy (Subtransmission system) Between transmission system and distribution system Connection of large industrial users and cities Open loop/partly meshed Distribution system 400 V to some ten of kV Industry, commercial and residential areas Radial
Copyright 2005 - 2008

Industrial network (Haasrode)

Transformer: 70 kV/10kV, 20 MVA

Copyright 2005 - 2008

UCTE

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Example: Map of the Iberian transmission system

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Transport of electric power

Electric power P [MW]

Alternating current S [MVA]

Two ways to increase the transported power

P or S = U * I

Increase current I
o

Larger conductor cross-section

Increase voltage U
o

More insulation

Two ways to transport electricity

Alternating current (AC) Direct current (DC)


Copyright 2005 - 2008

Problem faced by electricity pioneers AC or DC?

Direct Current DC

Generator built by W. von Siemens and Z.Gramme


o

Low line voltage, and consequently limitation to size of the system

Alternating current AC

Introduced by Nikola Tesla and Westinghouse


Transformer invented by Tesla allows increasing the line voltage o Allows transmitting large amounts of electricity over long distances
o

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Transformer

Copyright 2005 - 2008

AC transmission system
Frequency of 50 or 60Hz

Current changes direction 100 or 120 times a sec Active AND reactive power in the same line

3 phase system Line voltages can be easily and economically


transformed up and down AC current does not use the whole conductor

Skin effect
o

AC conductors have larger diameters than adequate DC

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Switchyard

Copyright 2005 - 2008

DC transmission system
Only active power
Current flows in one direction Conductor cross-sections fully used Low transmission losses Requires DC-AC converters to control the voltage level Expensive Switching of higher voltage DC more difficult

Copyright 2005 - 2008

AC vs DC
Advantages of AC

Advantages of DC
o

Cheaper transformation between voltages Easy to switch off Less equipment needed Known and reliable technology More economical in general Rotating field

Long distance transmission


Higher investment costs offset by lower losses
on 1000 km line, 5% for DC opposed to 20% for AC

Undersea and underground transmission


o o o

No reactive power problem With different frequencies (Japan,South-America) Different control area, i.e. UCTE with Nordel and UK

Connection of separate power systems

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Cost of transmission line function of voltage level

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Lines and cables

Overhead transmission lines

Economical
o

However, visual pollution

Widely used in transmission over large distances More expensive than lines
o

Underground cables

5 to 25 times higher capital costs for 380kV Ground above the cable can be still used However, maintenance costs are significant

Underground, thus invisible to the public


o o

Widely used in urban areas

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Overhead line

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Transmission capacity upgrade


AC overhead

Evaluation: different
points of view

New line Refurbishing New conductor types

AC underground

Technical Economical Regulatory Environmental

Conventional cables GILs HTS

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Overhead AC transmission New line

Advantages

Widely used in transmission over large distances Most economical (especially in rural areas) Well-known technology
Best choice from techno-economic point of view Classic approach to network reinforcement

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Overhead AC transmission New line

Environmental aspects

Visual impact Vegetation Population Town planning Cultural heritage Natural site and landscape

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Overhead AC transmission New line

Social and political issues

Concern about health effects Not popular heavy resistance


o
o o o o

Regulatory

NIMBY NIMTO BANANA CAVE NOPE

Permit process up to 15 years

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Overhead AC transmission New line

Conclusion

Best from technoeconomic point of view Worst from environmental, social & political point of view

Very difficult to construct new lines in industrialized countries

alternatives needed!
Copyright 2005 - 2008

Overhead AC transmission Adding/replacing conductors

Increased ampacity

Without supplementary environmental impact Within existing right-of-way

Equip second circuit

No new towers needed cost effective Tower and foundation modifications may be needed very high cost new conductor types

Heavier conductors

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Overhead AC transmission New conductor types

Material properties

Economics Regulatory

Composite core Surrounded by aluminium(-zirconium) Increased strenght and reduced weight Increased ampacity Significantly higher cost No tower modifications needed Outdated standards state maximum conductor temperature independent of conductor type

Other drawbacks

New technology limited experience e.g.: no data on expected lifetime available Higher operating temp losses increase
Copyright 2005 - 2008

AC cables

AC cables vs. overhead lines

Technical
o o o o

Almost no maintenance needed Repair more difficult Technical difficulties at high voltages Limited distance

Economical
5 to 25 times higher capital costs (/MVA) o Although cost differences have narrowed o Repair costs are significant
o

Copyright 2005 - 2008

AC cables

AC cables vs. overhead lines

Environmental
o
o

Invisibility Dangers: oil spill, poisonous SF6 arcing byproducts


Less right-of-way needed Permitting takes less time Less concern for health risks (although electromagnetic fields are higher) Ground above the cable can still be used

Social & political


o o o o

Widely used in urban areas

Copyright 2005 - 2008

AC cables

Classic

Paper insulated, oil-filled XLPE

New types

Higher voltages Lower losses More expensive

Copyright 2005 - 2008

AC Cables New types

Gas Insulated Cables (SF6)

Temperature protection

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Higher voltages due to better insulation Suited to bulk transmission C lower suitable for long distances Complex placement (many joints) Arcing by-products hazardous for environment Considered for future tunnel connections (e.g. in the Alps)

Operating very close to limits Belgium: Tihange - Avernas

AC Cables New types

High Temperature Superconducting

No conduction losses at cryogenic temperatures Cooling losses Cooling and cooling equipment expensive Reduced dimensions Environmentally friendly Could prove economic for specific cases R&D needed

Copyright 2005 - 2008

AC cables vs DC cables

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Source: ABB

Cables

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Tasks of the TSO


Transmission System Operator TSO

Operates the grid


o o o

Constant monitoring of system conditions Frequency control (active power) Voltage management (reactive power) Access Responsible Parties (ARP) need to balance their productions and consumption

Administrates the settlement of unbalances


o

TSO takes actions if ARP deviates from the schedule TSO charges the ARP for the incurred costs

To keep the lights on


Copyright 2005 - 2008

ARP
Production Import/ Export

~
Grids

~
ARP1 ARPN

~
I/E

I/E

Consumer
Copyright 2005 - 2008

Frequency control

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Tasks of the TSO


Frequency control

Primary frequency control


o o

Compensate for short-term unbalances at local level Stabilize frequency within acceptable range around set point Control the load-generation balance at the programmed export-import Contribute to bringing the frequency back to its set point Relieve the primary control reserve after an incident Laufenburg control centre in Switzerland To account for the Synchronous Time deviations

Secondary and tertiary frequency control


o o o

Scheduled (set point) frequency (time control)


o o

50.01 or 49.99 Hz for the whole day

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Tasks of the TSO


Reactive power management and voltage control

Primary voltage control


o o o

Excitation of generators Capacitors SVCs (Static Var Compensators) Zonal coordination of the voltage and reactive power control Maintains the required voltage level at a key node Optimization of the reactive power distribution

Secondary voltage control


o o

Tertiary voltage control


o

Based on real-time measurements Device settings adjustment

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Tasks of the TSO

Constant monitoring of system conditions

State estimation
o

To get best possible picture of system conditions


Find a best-fit load flow Based on metered values (imperfect measurements)

Contingency analysis
o

N-1 security rule


One accident cannot bring the system in danger Redundancy

Copyright 2005 - 2008

From national to international grid

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Synchronous areas in Europe


UCTE

Established in 1951 as UCPTE, 9 control zones, currently 27


o o o o

23 countries, 33 TSOs, 620 GW installed capacity, 295 TWh exchanges Full synchronous operation of its members in 1958 absorbed many smaller initiatives along the way

CENTREL, SUDEL, COMELEC

450 mln. people, annual electricity consumption 2500 TWh.

Nordel
UKTSOA ATSOI UPS/IPS

F,SWE,NO,DK (part) UK

Ireland Ex Commonwealth of Independent States

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Synchronous areas (1) Why create synchronous areas ?

Increase grid reliability and mutual support

Improved system frequency control to minimize major disturbances Mutual support in case of emergencies Sharing reserve capacities

Facilitate functioning of the electricity market

non-discriminatory domestic and cross-border access to the grid No need for synchronous area as such, also possible with dc links

Example of direct benefits

Zone of 15 GW production capacity loses its largest unit 1 GW


Isolated: needs to develop 1 GW in less than 5s to avoid collapse o As a part of UCTE it needs to develop its share of the two largest UCTE unit, and thus x% of 3GW, in 15-30s.
o

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Synchronous areas (2) Challenges

Coordination and control of the power flows

Interdependency of power flows Interconnected systems share benefits and problems

Problems on top of the above

Often different standards applied in control zones

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Technical standards differences


Exact same line can have different capacities

Different interpretation of frequency control Different operational standards

Source: IAEW
Copyright 2005 - 2008

Synchronous areas (3) Operational handbook (UCTE)


Stronger interconnections require common and consistent understanding of grid operation and control and security in terms of fixed technical standards and procedures

Result of discussion between all TSOs involved

Successor of past technical and organizational rules and recommendations Unification and formalization of standards To make the best possible use of benefits of interconnected operation To keep the quality standards in the market environment
Operation handbook: http://www.ucte.org/publications/ophandbook/

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Cross-border power flows in European grid

Typical power flow pattern

Countries structurally exporting or importing Unstable production strongly influences the pattern
o

However

Wind generation

Restrictions consist typically of several lines


What matters for the grid are individual lines flows! o This differs considerably from the physical border capacity
o

Copyright 2005 - 2008

UCTE physical energy exchanges 2004 [GWh]

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Level of congestion between EU Member States


Source: DG COMP

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Franco-Belgian Border 2001

Unexpected flows not just ONE TIME event

More like a permanent thing

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Wind power is a problem


Large wind parks problematic for the network

Unstable dispatch within a zone


o

Will there be wind? Not too much?

Unstable loop flows

Benelux case

Positive correlation between loop flows and wind in Germany


o

Up to 0.4

Loop flows almost entirely through BE and NL

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Phase shifter investments in the Benelux in order allow power flow control
1

2 5
3 4

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

Meeden (Nl) Gronau (D) Kinrooi (B) Kinrooi (B) Zandvliet (B) Monceau (B)

6
Copyright 2005 - 2008

How dangerous can unexpected flows be?

Unannounced wind power in the north Germany

Actual event - Monday 27 Oct. 2003, 18h00 - 20h00

Very heavily loaded D-NL border


4550 MW total physical flows in the direction of NL


o

2380 MW more than scheduled

Loss of N-1 security on 2 cross-border lines Loss of N-1 security on phase shifting transformer Gronau (charged at 1250 MW) Risk for the blackout in Benelux

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Unannounced wind power in the north D


scheduled power exchanges
- 980 - 3068

B
- 1017
ELIA

798

NL
- 2967
TENNET

2169

CENTREL
PSE

D
RWE

2150

PSE PL

CEPS CZ

1815

North South GB

SEPS

MVM H

+3903

SK

+3126

4669
RTE 752

- 504

+3846

1525
DC link

118

- 426

A
120

APG

575
+677

CH E
REE

646

+2614 +2560

ETRANS

3022

I P
REN

ELES SLO

1704

- 5380
TERNA

481
HEP HR

ELES
BiH

- 452

Copyright 2005 - 2008

401

Unannounced wind power in the north D


scheduled power exchanges vs physical power flows
- 980 - 3068

B
- 1017
ELIA

798 1485

NL
- 2967
TENNET

2169 4553

CENTREL
PSE

D
RWE

2150 1421

PSE PL

CEPS CZ

1815

505

North South GB

SEPS SK

MVM H

+3903

+3126

4669
RTE 752

- 504

+3846

1189

1525
DC link

342 118
- 426

A
120

APG

575
+677

CH E
REE

646 846

+2614 +2560

ETRANS

28 401
ELES SLO

3022

I P
REN

2875

1704 1267

- 5380
TERNA

481
HEP HR

ELES
BiH

- 452

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Unannounced wind power in the north D


difference between physical and programmed flows
B
ELIA

2283 2320

NL
TENNET

2384

CENTREL
PSE CEPS CZ

North South

D
RWE

729

PL

SEPS SK

MVM H

PSE

F
RTE

4327
1307

A
APG

CH E
REE

1492

ETRANS

92 147

I P
REN

ELES SLO

437
TERNA
HEP HR

ELES
BiH

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Cumulative wind power installed capacity 2005

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Wind power installed in Europe by end of 2005

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Share of daily wind power in respective daily peak demand in E.ON-grid (Germany).

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Conclusions

Grid operation becomes more complex Due to the market based flows Caused by wind energy Controlling frequency and voltage by active and reactive power

Copyright 2005 - 2008

Anda mungkin juga menyukai