Hypothesis:
the blogosphere, due to its characteristics of openness, interactivity and participation, constitutes a particular form of public sphere in a discursive space, with a political density, in which practices of deliberation can take place
1.Blogopshere public sphere 2.Use of blogues deliberation 3.Framework to assess deliberation in the blogosphere 4.Patterns results of empirical studies
Deliberation 2.0
91% of the links to like-minded sites or blogs 25% related with crossing ideological discussion Fragmentation Polarization it is a gross exageration to conclude blogs as na incarnation of deliberative ideals (Sunstein)
POLITICAL DEBATE ON WEBLOGS - A VIRTUAL PUBLIC SPHERE FOR DELIBERATION?
Deliberation 2.0
Bankler and Shaw (2010) Internet: Increase the range of opinions available Provide users with the capacity of participate Develop democractic practices
Deliberation 2.0
Bloggers Do not justify: structure, control or views expressed Presonal criteria in links Its common the homophily.
Deliberation 2.0
Readers Polarization homophily.
Analytical framework
1. 2. 3. 4. Quality of the discourse Paterns of homophily. Ideological cross-linking The nature of that cross-linking
conclusion
Deliberation does not apply to the type of communication widespread in political blogs Participation: what kind of participation?
Final remark
As Bohman writes, positions optimistic about democracy through cyberspace suffer from conceptual problems: "is guaranteed that technologically mediation, in itself, is constitutive of new possibilities. However, technology is intricate in social contexts that shape their potential achievement.
Thank you!
Gil Ferreira gilbferreira@gmail.com