TENTH EDITON
SECTION 2
Staffing the Organization
Chapter 4
Learning Objectives
After you have read this chapter, you should be able to:
Differentiate among diversity management, equal employment opportunity (EEO), and affirmative action. Discuss the key provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII, and define five basic EEO concepts. Give examples of three sex-based discrimination issues. Discuss the major requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Describe four other types of EEO discrimination.
42
43
Diversity
The variety of dimensions differentiating people
Protected Class
Individuals within a group identified for protection under equal employment laws and regulation.
Race, ethnic origin, color Gender Age Disability Military experience Religion Marital status Sexual orientation
44
Figure 41
2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 45
Affirmative Action
Affirmative Action
A process in which employers identify problem areas, set goals, and take positive steps to enhance opportunities for protected-class members and to remove the effect of past discrimination.
Reverse Discrimination
Occurs when a person is denied an opportunity because of preferences give to protected-class individuals who may be less qualified. Cases
Hopwood v. State of Texas Bakke v. University of California
46
47
Figure 42
2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 48
Business Necessity
A practice that is necessary for safe and efficient organizational operations.
Disparate Treatment
A situation that exists when protected-class members are treated differently from others.
49
Disparate Impact
Occurs when substantial underrepresentation of protected-class members results from employment decisions that work to their disadvantage. Griggs vs. Duke Power (1971) decision:
Lack of intent to discriminate is no defense if discrimination occurs. The employer has the burden of proof in proving that an employment requirement is a business necessity.
Retaliation
EEO laws prohibit employers from taking punitive actions against individuals who exercise their legal rights.
2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 410
Significant provisions:
Employment practices must be job-related and consistent with business necessity. Plaintiffs must identify particular employment practice and show that protected-class status was a factor in the employment practice. Provided limited compensatory damages for intentional discrimination. Allows plaintiffs to seek jury trials.
Prohibited norming and use of alternative scoring based on protected class membership.
Extended EEO coverage to U.S. citizens overseas.
2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 411
412
Figure 43
2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 413
414
Sex/Gender Discrimination
Sexual Harassment
Actions that are sexually directed, are unwanted, and subject the worker to adverse employment conditions or create a hostile work environment.
415
Undue Hardship
416
Figure 44
2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 417
418
419
420
Figure 45
2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 421
Enforcement Agencies
422
Figure 46
2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 423
No Disparate Impact
Disparate impact occurs whenever a substantial underrepresentation of protected-class members is evident in selection decisions.
4/5ths Rule
If the selection rate for a protected-class is less than 80% (4/5ths) of the selection rate for the majority group or less than 80% of the groups representation in the relevant labor market, then discrimination exists.
424
Source:
2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Figure 47
425
Validity
The extent to which a test actually measures what it says it measures.
Reliability
The consistency with which a test measure measures an item.
Employment test
Any employment procedure used as the basis for making an employment-related decision. Must have both reliability and job-related validity.
426
427
Content Validity
Validity as measured by a logical, nonstatistical method (job analysis) to identify the KSAs and other characteristics necessary to perform the job. Example: A work sample test measuring how well an applicant performed essential tasks of the job.
428
Criterion-Related Validity
Validity measured by a procedure that uses a test as the predictor of how well an individual wool perform on the job.
Correlation coefficient
Index number giving the relationship between a predictor (a test) and a criterion variable (a measure of success on the job).
Construct Validity
Validity showing a relationship between an abstract characteristic (e.g., honesty) and job performance (e.g., bank teller). A form of validity that is more likely to be challenged for legality and usefulness in the selection process.
431
EEO Records
EEO Compliance
432
Figure 49
2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 433
Source: Developed by Robert L. Mathis, Mathis & Associates, L.L.C, 1429 North 131st Avenue Circle, Omaha, NE 66154. All rights reserved. No part of this may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without written permission from Mathis & Cole. 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Figure 410a
434
Source: Developed by Robert L. Mathis, Mathis & Associates, L.L.C, 1429 North 131st Avenue Circle, Omaha, NE 66154. All rights reserved. No part of this may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without written permission from Mathis & Cole. 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Figure 410b
435
Figure 410c
2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 436
Figure 410d
2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. 437