1) Basic objective - make a profit 2) Very competitive - there are hundreds of chemical companies, both small and very largethere tend not to be monopolies 3) Highly dependent on science and technology 4) Spends large amounts of its money on R&D 5) Large capital requirements - to construct, expand and maintain production facilities 6) Low labor requirements - BUT needs highly qualified personnel 7) Industry Growth - generally through integration rather than diversification
North American Chemicals Output (2002): $505 Billion USD USA Canada Mexico 92% 5% 3% ($467 Billion USD) ($23 Billion USD) ($15 Billion USD)
Goal:
Laboratory Scale bubble ethylene into 98% H2SO4 dilute and warm the reaction mixture to hydrolyze the resultant sulfate ester Industrial Scale a stream of ethylene is mixed with steam at 325C and 1000 psi and passed over a solid catalyst consisting of phosphoric acid absorbed on diatomaceous earth; the process is run continuously, and unreacted ethylene is recovered and recycled to the feed stream.
Evaluation of a Reaction
If a chemist has an idea for an industrial scale process, what are the steps that must be taken before the process can be implemented? 1) Evaluation of the reaction: Before any serious literature search or laboratory work is started, various possible strategies are proposed. 2) Economic feasibility 3) Technical feasibility 4) Other considerations: environmental issues, etc.
Evaluation of a Reaction
The chemist must consider not only the well-known, obvious approaches, but also unknown or untested approaches.
Economic Feasibility
Estimate the difference between the market value of the products and the reactants. First approximation, assume: 1) 100% yield 2) no costs of solvents or catalysts 3) no value for co-products
Technical Feasibility
There are two basic questions that a chemist or chemical engineer must ask concerning a given chemical reaction: (1) How far does it go, if it is allowed to proceed to equilibrium? (Does it go in the direction of interest at all?) (2) How fast does it progress?
Question (1) is concerned with thermodynamics and amounts to evaluating the equilibrium constant (K). Question (2) is a matter of kinetics and reduces to the need to know the rate equation and rate constants (k).
Technical Feasibility
Generally, the first approach is to consider the thermodynamics of the reaction. This may be done by evaluating the change in Gibbs free energy (G). GR = HR - T SR A spontaneous reaction has a decrease in Gibbs energy of the system. To calculate the Gibbs energy of reaction, use standard Gibbs energies of formation Gf.
H2C CH 2
+ HCl
Hf Gf S
12.50 16.28
-22.06 -22.77
Hf Gf S
Hrxn = HfCH2=CH2 + HfHCl - HfCH3CH2Cl Grxn = GfCH2=CH2 + GfHCl - GfCH3CH2Cl Srxn = SCH2=CH2 + SHCl - SCH3CH2Cl
At 298 K: Hrxn = +17.14 kcal/mole Grxn = +7.86 kcal/mole Srxn = +31.15 cal/mole At 1000 K: Hrxn = +17.08 kcal/mole Grxn = -14.43 kcal/mole Srxn = +31.52 cal/mole Change in Free Energy -G small +G large +G
- G at 1000 K only!
Indication promising worth further investigation possible only under unusual conditions
G298 = + 16.78 kcal/mol G1000= + 34.83 kcal/mol G298 = -1.65 kcal/mol G1000= -1.91 kcal/mol
Question: Under what conditions would the following reaction be the most promising?
H2C CH 2 + NH3 CH 3CH 2NH2
Pressure?
Stoichiometry?
Other Considerations
Evaluate: