Zairul Nor Deana Md Desa, Ph.D. Department of Educational Foundations and Social Sciences Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Email: zairul@utm.my
7/9/2013
Outline
7/9/2013
What is it the changes in composite DV as a result of different treatments (or groups) and their interaction. Is a combination of DVs varies as a function of IVs?
Is there any difference between the means and, thus, is there any statistically difference among groups?
7/9/2013
Overall Model
What is the proportion of the composite DV explained by each IV? Separate test for each IV Are there mean differences in composite DV associated with differences in treatment (or group)? - without covariate Are there differences in composite DV associated with IV, after adjustment for covariate prior to treatment (or condition)? - with covariate (for next week) Does change in the DV over levels of one IV depend on the level of another IV? Is the pattern of responses to the different types (or levels) of one IV the same for different levels of another IV? Given different types of treatment, does one treatment works better than the other? 7/9/2013
Main Effect
Interaction Effect
5
Theoretical Issues
Logic and research design! Skills and area of study A set of continuous DVs Start from looking at more important DVs than others Categorical IVs CVs are need to be controlled for or removed. Identify a set of CVs that are uncorrelated with each other Select CVs that adjust the DV for predictable but unwanted sources of variability. Based on theoretical ground and literature. Can look at CV with highest correlation with DV.
7/9/2013
See Example
7/9/2013
Example
A study on proficiency assessment among English language leaners. See SPSS output
7/9/2013
Example
How-to-SPSS
Select the DVs (e.g. listen, read, speak, write) Select the IVs (e.g. Nation) In Options button:
Choose all IVs to Display Means for Check Descriptive Statistics, Estimate of Effect Size, Homogeneity test
Choose pairwise comparison adjustment method (optional for this example) Use LSD for <4 pairwise comparisons, and use sequential Bonferroni for more than 4 comparisons. Note.
# =
1 2
7/9/2013
Examine the Boxs M Test (i.e. test for the assumption of homogeneity variance-covariance of DVs across IVs)
We want non significant result (Why?) at = .001 (why conservative significance level?) followed up with Wilks Lambda. If the test is non-significant the follow-up analysis must use Pillais Trace in order to use MANOVA!
2.
10
Levenes Test
Test for the equality of error variances in each DV Want significant results reject null hypothesis that variances across groups are unequal. If significant for some DVs proceed with nonparametric or univariate ANOVA. We can also use MANOVA and assuming for unequal variances across groups!
4.
11
12
7/9/2013
We need to examine significant interaction, main effect, and simple main effect. Use sequential Bonferroni adjustment for follow-up test with more than 4 pairs of comparison.
13 7/9/2013
Next Week
14
7/9/2013