Investments - Approach
A function which has to reckon both internal firm specific issues as well as
external aspects.
products and services and their market impact, internal managerial views regarding specific fixed assets to be acquired or acquisitions to be carried out. economy, interest rates and inflation, the size and direction of capital flows in the country and industry, nature of competition, possible regulatory policy changes. for the requisite type of assets. This combined decision is called Capital budgeting. investment option.
The important external aspects are current and anticipated state of the
The next step is firming up the business decision and allocation of resources
There are various decision rules and techniques to identify the right
ROC Contd.
If the post tax Roc > cost of capital, accept the project.
If post tax Roc is <cost of capital, Reject the project. If 10% were the cost of capital for the above example, the company should find the project as good for investment. Another measure is ROE. ROE=Net Income/ Average Book value of Equity investment in a project. The benchmark or hurdle rate would be the cost of equity. The decision rule is: If the ROE is > cost of equity , Accept the project. If the ROE is < cost of equity, reject the project.
accounting return exceeds a target average accounting return. Average net income to be worked out by summing each periods income and dividing the sum by the sum of periods. Average book value will be sum of opening and closing book values/2.
It reckons the time value of money. The capital budgeting process is a search for investments with
positive net present values.
The NPV decision rule is: Accept an investment when its net
CFt NPV t ( 1 k ) t 0
n
PAY BACK.
It is a measure followed by some companies to find out if the
initial outlay on a project is getting recovered within a prespecified time period.
Illustration: A project costing $500, has cash flows of This project would pay back somewhere between end of yr 2
and end of yr3- 2.4 yrs precisely: 200(500-300)/500.
PAY BACK-contd.
If the desired payback period is 3 yrs, this project would be
accepted.
Payback is calculated the same way for both very risky and very The cut off period is chosen arbitrarily. The cash flows beyond the cut off period are ignored leading many
a time to rejection of profitable long term investments.
However, although it considers time value, it ignores cash flows On the whole, the payback and discounted payback is used by the
managers for relatively minor investment decisions, and as a kind of break even measure in an accounting sense.
We have to use trial & error to find the unknown rate starting with
Trying with 15%, the NPV becomes -$2.46. So the NPV would be
decisions. The problems with IRR arise when there are projects with nonconventional cash flows or there are mutually exclusive investments.
NPV Profiles
A graphical representation of project NPVs at
various different costs of capital. k 0 5 10 15 20 NPVL $50 33 19 7 (4) NPVS $40 29 20 12 5
. 40 .
30 20
. .
.
L
10
IRRL = 18.1%
10
0 5 -10
. .
15
20
. .
.
23.6
If k > crossover point, the two methods lead to the same decision and there is no conflict. If k < crossover point, the two methods lead to different accept/reject decisions.
k, the opportunity cost of capital. IRR method assumes CFs are reinvested at IRR. Assuming CFs are reinvested at the opportunity cost of capital is more realistic, so NPV method is the best. NPV method should be used to choose between mutually exclusive projects. Perhaps a hybrid of the IRR that assumes cost of capital reinvestment is needed.