By :Nishita 50026
PENETRATION
Penetration is a measure of brand
VISBILITY
Visibility can also refer to a company's presence in the marketplace.
No. of village societies: No. of producers members Total milk handling capacity:
AMUL
Formed in 1946
Started out of white Revolution
MARKET SHARE
SUPPLY CHAIN
Manufacturing Unit (IDPL in Kolkata)
Distributor
Consumers
Buyer Power:Bargaining power of customer is high Customers are able to substitute from one brand of ice- cream to another
Industry Rivalry:The principal competitors in the ice-cream industry are large, diversified companies with significant greater resources.
STRENGTH
Brand Image Market Position Quality Variety
WEAKNESS
Less number of Pushcart Lack of Supply Offer & Schemes
OPPORTUNITIES
Sugarfree & Probiotic Wellness Ice cream
THREAT
MAJOR COMPETITORS
BRANDS
LOCAL PLAYERS
OBJECTIVE
Primary objective:
The main objective of the project is to enhance the visibility and penetration of
Amul ice-cream in Patna market at retail level
Secondary objective:
To identify the issues related to retailers. To take the retailers feedback regarding the service
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Design: Descriptive Data Sources: Primary Data: Questionnaire Secondary Data: Data given by Amul office like distributors list etc Research Tool: Questionnaire Sampling Methodology: Sample Frame: Retailers in Patna Sample Size:50 Sampling Method: Convenient Sampling
ANALYSIS
The detail analysis of questionnaire is done by the graph & t-test
Explanation: Null hypothesis (Ho): There is no significant difference in the perception of retailers for the Brands of the two companies. Alternative Hypothesis (H1): There is significant difference in the perception of the retailer of the Brand Image of the two companies.
T-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means Amul Kwality 4.16326531 3.959184 0.55612245 0.581633 49 49 0.04859219 0 48 1.37306602 0.08805624 1.6772242 0.17611248 2.01063472
Mean Variance Observations Pearson Correlation Hypothesized Mean Difference df t Stat P(T<=t) one-tail t Critical one-tail P(T<=t) two-tail t Critical two-tail
From above output we can see that p-value is 0.17 which is larger as compared to the alpha-value 0.05. So here we accept the null hypothesis and arrive at the conclusion that there is no significant difference in the perception of the retailers of the Brand Image of the two companies.
FINDING
Strong Brand Image Irregular supply Lack of presence in Push cart segment Customer first choice Lack of advertisement
RECOMMENDATIONS
Need to improve supply scenario Need to increase Number of push cart Good distributors and retailers should be awarded Need to increase advertisement material
LIMITATIONS
The time period of the project was 8 weeks, which may not enough to understand the whole market.
Findings are based on the assumption that the respondents have revealed the correct information. There might be other possibility i.e. hiding of data by shopkeepers, sharing of personal grievances about the company which can hinder the result.
Being peak season many retailers were busy and did not give time to conduct survey.
Some of the data like sales figure, amount of delivery and profit margin the retailers didnt want to share.
THANK YOU