Faculty Disclosure
It is the policy of The France Foundation to ensure balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor in all its sponsored educational activities. All faculty, activity planners, content reviewers, and staff participating in this activity will disclose to the participants any significant financial interest or other relationship with manufacturer(s) of any commercial product(s)/device(s) and/or provider(s) of commercial services included in this educational activity.
The intent of this disclosure is not to prevent a person with a relevant financial or other relationship from participating in the activity, but rather to provide participants with information on which they can base their own judgments. The France Foundation has identified and resolved any and all conflicts of interest prior to the release of this activity.
Learning Objectives
Recognize criteria for remission and recovery in patients with schizophrenia. Evaluate patients for the potential to achieve these outcomes and implement strategies directed towards these goals Recognize how clinical practice guidelines relate to the individualized treatment of patients with schizophrenia Integrate strategies that will help to improve the effective use of medications by patients with schizophrenia
Negative Symptoms
Blunted affect Emotional withdrawal Active social avoidance Lack of spontaneity Poor rapport
Disorganized Symptoms
Poor attention Conceptual disorganization Difficulty in abstract thinking Disorientation
What is Response?
Speed? Magnitude? Proportion responding? Effect in refractory patients?
Response defined as at least a 30% decrease from the baseline PANSS to the last observation
Functionality
Distribution of patients achieving 1 change in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Scale category at end point. Intentto-treat population; PSP scale scores at end point for individual patients to show a clinically relevant change in personal and social functioning as represented by improvement of 1 category (classified as one 10-point interval); PSP = Personal and Social Performance Scale.
Kane J, et al. Schizophr Res. 2007;90:147-161.
Response vs Remission
Disease Response Remission Depression 50% HAM-D HAM-D 7 Mania 50% YMRS YMRS 12 Schizophrenia 20-30% PANSS ?
Remission Definitions
Recovery
Davidsons Nine Common Elements of Recovery
1. Renewing hope and commitment
2.
3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
8.
9.
Consumer self-direction Individualized and person-centered Redefining self treatment Incorporating illness into life as a whole 3. Empowerment 4. A holistic treatment focus Involvement in meaningful activities 5. A nonlinear perspective of change Overcoming stigma 6. Treatment focused on strengths instead of deficits Assuming control 7. The inclusion of peer support in Becoming empowered and exercising treatment citizenship 8. Respect for consumers and consumer self-respect Managing symptoms 9. Consumer acceptance of personal Finding social support responsibility 10. Hope in recovery
Treatment Effectiveness
Efficacy
Does Rx reduce Sx?
Treatment Effectiveness
Lehman AF, et al. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161(2 suppl):1-56. Swartz MS, et al. Schizophr Bull. 2003;29(1):33-43.
Effectiveness
Time to Any-Cause Discontinuation
CATIE Clozapine Pathway Results
Effectiveness
Any-Cause Discontinuation: NNT
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
93%
OLZ
RIS
CLO
QUE
McEvoy JP et al. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:600-610; Citrome L. Psychiatry MMC. 2007;4(10):23-29; Citrome L and Stroup TS. Int J Clin Pract.2006;60:933-940.
Recovery
Remission
Stabilization
Liberman P, et al. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2002;14:256-272. Liberman P, Kopelowicz. Psychiatr Serv. 2005;56:735-742.
versus
Recovery in Illness: being in recovery
Process of managing illness more effectively Having a meaningful life in the community
Moving ahead with ones life despite illness
Process of Recovery
The Person Play
The Illness
The Person
Factors Associated with the Potential for Positive Clinical and Functional Outcomes
Short duration of untreated psychosis Good early response to antipsychotic treatment Collaborative therapeutic alliance Supportive family/caregivers Access to comprehensive, coordinated, and continuous treatment Opportunities to engage in functional activities and receive specialized interventions Absence of substance abuse
Cognitive Deficits Are the Bridge Between Brain Functioning and Functional Impairments in Day-to-Day Life
Cognitive deficits are a frequent and robust feature of the illness Cognitive deficits are present at illness onset and persist throughout the illness Cognitive deficits directly contribute to poor functional outcome in schizophrenia
% of Cases
25 20 15 10
7.2%
16.5%
16.0%
16.0%
5
0
< 50-50
51-60
61-70
71-80
81-90
91-100 101-110
111-120 121-130
131-140 140+
Social Cognition Emotion processing Social perception Attributional bias Theory of mind
Cognitive Remediation
Behavioral treatments that specifically target:
Memory Attention Executive functioning Reasoning
80% Unemployed
Barriers
Cognitive impairments Psychiatric symptoms Episodes of illness Stigma from employers Internalized stigma/low self-confidence Fear of losing disability benefits
McGurk S, et al. Schizophr Bull. 2009;35:319-335. Kurzban S, et al. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2010;12:345-355.
Vocational Rehabilitation
Skills training Sheltered workshops Transitional employment Supported employment Vocational rehabilitation + cognitive remediation best results Employment = Increased self esteem Reduction in symptoms and hospitalizations Enhanced social functioning Improvement in overall quality of life
McGurk S, et al. Schizophr Bull. 2009;35:319-335. Kurzban S, et al. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2010;12:345-355.
Supported Employment
Basic Principles 1. Zero exclusion; eligibility based on consumer choice 2. Focus on competitive jobs in integrated community settings 3. Rapid job search 4. Respect for consumers preferences in terms of the nature of the job and types of support services 5. Ongoing job support 6. Close integration with a psychosocial rehabilitation team approach 7. Benefits counseling (disability benefits, social security, medical insurance)
McGurk S, et al. Schizophr Bull. 2009;35:319-335.
* **
3000 2500
VR VR + CR
Weeks Worked
30 25 20 15 10 5
Wages Earned
Total
Total
* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01 VR + CR: Greater improvements in verbal learning, memory, executive functioning vs VR only
McGurk S, et al. Schizophr Bull. 2009;35:319-335.
Management of Schizophrenia
Patient-focused therapeutic alliance Individualized approach Reduce or eliminate symptoms Optimize quality of life Assist patients in attaining personal life goals (work, housing, relationships) Guidelines and algorithms provide a framework for decision making
Guideline/Algorithm Recommendations
APA 2004 TMAP 2006 PORT 2009
First episode
Second choice Third choice Fourth choice Fifth choice Combinations
SGA
SGA, FGA, C C (C+)
SGA
SGA, FGA C C+ A,T CF
SGA, FGA
SGA, FGA C
FGA: first-generation antipsychotic SGA: second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic C: Clozapine C+: Clozapine augmentation CF: Clozapine failure
Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Schizophrenia. 2nd Edition. APA. 2004. Moore T, et al. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;68:1751-1762. Kreyenbuhl J, et al. Schizophr Bull. 2010;36:94-103.
Supported employment Skills training Cognitive behavioral therapy Token economy interventions Family-based services Interventions for alcohol and substance abuse disorders Interventions for weight management
Dixon L, et al. Schizophr Bull. 2010;36:48-70.
80 70 60 50
40
30 20 10 0
Use of Dose in Range Antipsychotic Illness education Vocational Rehabilitation Substance Abuse Treatment Any Psychosocial Treatment
Second-generation antipsychotics are used in over 70% of individuals with schizophrenia (use may be higher in first-episode patients) Rate of clozapine use is much lower than the incidence of treatment-resistant schizophrenia Antipsychotic polypharmacy
~10 to 30% of individuals with schizophrenia FGA + SGA most common combinations
Dosage of antipsychotic medications within therapeutic range 64 to 83% of the time during inpatient treatment
Moore T, et al. Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2007;30:401-416.
74%
N=1432
EXTRAPYRAMIDAL EFFECTS SEDATION
24%
30% 6%
OTHER
15%
Efficacy
Does Rx reduce Sx?
Treatment Effectiveness
Adherence/ Persistence
Will Pt take Rx?
Lehman AF, et al. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161(2 suppl):1-56. Swartz MS, et al. Schizophr Bull. 2003;29(1):33-43. Lieberman JA, et al. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(12):1209-1223.
The medicine has work well enough, be tolerated well enough, and the patient has to take it
Medication Nonadherence
Prevalence ~30 to 50% (and higher); rates vary depending on clinical setting, definitions, study duration, study population Relatively short gaps in medication coverage can increase the risk of relapse Nonadherence is associated with poor outcomes
Relapse Hospitalization Suicide attempts
Lacro J, et al. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63:892-909. Novick D, et al. Psychiatry Res. 2010;176:109-113. Masand P, et al. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;11:147-154.
We Overestimate Adherence
Nonadherence viewed as failure consistent bias to overestimate adherence/underestimate nonadherence We assume lack of adequate response as treatment-resistance and lack of efficacy for the antipsychotic for that patient
This is a possible explanation for high dosing of antipsychotics, polypharmacy with other antipsychotics and combination treatment with anticonvulsants This is a no-win cycle: adherence is even more of a challenge with complex regimens
Velligan DI, et al. Psychiatr Serv. 2007;58(9):1187-1192.
Step 2: Identify the specific barriers to adherence present for your patient
Environment/Relationship-related1
Lack of family/social support Problems with therapeutic alliance Practical problems (financial, transportation, etc)
Treatment-related1
Side effects Lack of efficacy/ continued symptoms
Societal-related2
Stigma attached to illness Stigma caused by medication side effects
1. Velligan DI, et al. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70(suppl 4):1-46. 2. Lee S, et al. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(7):1685-1696.
Environment/Relationship-related1
Lack of family/social support Problems with therapeutic alliance Practical problems (financial, transportation, etc)
Treatment-related1
Side effects Lack of efficacy/ continued symptoms
Societal-related2
Stigma attached to illness Stigma caused by medication side effects
1. Velligan DI, et al. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70(suppl 4):1-46. 2. Lee S, et al. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(7):1685-1696.
Clinician barriers2
Underestimating importance of relationship Hopelessness conveyed to patient Lack of interest in life goals and other issues important to patient
1. Velligan DI, et al. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70(suppl 4):1-46. 2. Pitschel-Walz, G, et al. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67(3):443-452.
Relationship Between Early Alliance and Later Medication Adherence: The Boston Collaborative Study
Adherence After 6 Months, %
80 60 40 20 0
< 0.001
74
26a
28a
Good
Poor
aP
Environment/Relationship-related1
Lack of family/social support Problems with therapeutic alliance Practical problems (financial, transportation, etc)
Treatment-related1
Side effects Lack of efficacy/ continued symptoms
Societal-related2
Stigma attached to illness Stigma caused by medication side effects
1. Velligan DI, et al. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70(suppl 4):1-46. 2. Lee S, et al. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(7):1685-1696.
Subjective Distress
Objective Severity
Environment/Relationship-related1
Lack of family/social support Problems with therapeutic alliance Practical problems (financial, transportation, etc)
Treatment-related1
Side effects Lack of efficacy/ continued symptoms
Societal-related2
Stigma attached to illness Stigma caused by medication side effects
1. Velligan DI, et al. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70(suppl 4):1-46. 2. Lee S, et al. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(7):1685-1696.
Pill boxes in obvious locations Self-monitoring tools Establishment of routines Consider long-acting injectable antipsychotic
Weiden P. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;68(suppl 14):14-19.
Environment/Relationship-related1
Lack of family/social support Problems with therapeutic alliance Practical problems (financial, transportation, etc)
Treatment-related1
Side effects Lack of efficacy/ continued symptoms
Societal-related2
Stigma attached to illness Stigma caused by medication side effects
1. Velligan DI, et al. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70(suppl 4):1-46. 2. Lee S, et al. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(7):1685-1696.
There is heterogeneity in efficacy outcomes among the different antipsychotics, and this heterogeneity is observed among groups in clinical trials and in individual patients
McEvoy JP. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67(suppl 5):15-18. Kane JM, et al. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64(suppl 12):5-19.
Treatment n/N
3/19 8/20 22/55 5/29 1/19 2/14 21/27 26/107 88/290
Control n/N
3/17 5/24 32/50 4/27 4/24 6/15 59/61 35/107 146/325
5 10 Favors Control
Mentschel C, et al. Presented at: The International Congress on Schizophrenia Research (ICOSR) 2003; March 29-April 2; Colorado Springs, Colorado.
Proportion Surviving
Months in Community
Hogarty GE, et al. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1979;36(12):1283-1294.
Adherence Summary
Strategies to improve adherence include Admitting that partial or nonadherence is a possibility Identifying risk factors specific to the individual Addressing barriers to therapeutic alliance Tailoring interventions to adherence attitudes and behavior Pharmacologic strategies to improve adherence include Considering patient history, efficacy, and side effect profile when choosing treatment Considering utilizing long-acting injectable antipsychotics, if available, in patients with recurring relapses related to nonadherence
Summary
Response, remission and recovery are necessary goals of treatment, but each can be interpreted differently by clinicians, patients, and their families Clinical practice guidelines can provide advice regarding a comprehensive approach, unfortunately not often done Treatment effectiveness is dependent on a medication being efficacious enough, tolerable enough, and the patient has to take it Adherence can be the ultimate confounder regarding effectiveness
Questions? nntman@gmail.com