Antazo Bautista Buquiz Singson

I. Problem Statement II. Discussion of Issues

III. Generating Alternatives causes of action IV. Evaluation

V. Conclusion and Recommendation

Improve theirStatement service in which the I. Problem

main focus is to satisfy the needs of the customers and give the manager more responsibilities without any difficulties.

It has complication in reengineering

wherein they need to switch and develop their system without affecting their costumers and workers.

Since their efforts of reengineering is focused on

business process system wherein they pay attention to flexibility, innovations, and theof proper use of the II. Discussion Issues technology in the current time.

It is essential to add other managerial policies so that

they will have stepping stone in the disadvantages of their business process system design.

II. Discussion of Issues

cont.

As for the managers the sudden change of

system is quite a huge impact to them because they were the leaders of the group like k+12 all of the schools have a huge adjustment because they have to add 2 more years which means they need to add more rooms and supplies, so if I connect it with a managers they need to add more rooms where they can absorb and apply all the sudden changes of the system

II. Discussion of Issues

cont.

In the management structure it will be installed at

the right time, because there will be still holes in the worked system it is much effective to harness first the strategy before putting the management structure.

And Lastly for the approach, it is good to have them both top-down and bottom-up approach because if it joined together it will be a huge success because these two approaches can cover up with their disadvantages and cut the risk into half.

It will be a great decision to have a business

process system with the other managerial policies but the problem will be if they cannot perform this process including the other policies so it can be an option business process andcauses human of action III.where Generating Alternatives system will be the only one used in reengineering, although it can decrease the success rate it is better than an unsuccessful reengineering. It satisfy both the corporation and consumers

III. Generating Alternatives causes of action

For the managers there will be

complications on the sudden change of the system so it is advisable to change it little by little. For management structure it will be good alternative to include it at the first phase of reengineering because it can be a good experiment to define the capacity of the strategy that was made

III. Generating Alternatives causes of action

For the approach it is quite reasonable to change

the approach because even if combining the two approaches and going to cover up each others disadvantages it will also give another disadvantages which can be more complicated, so if go to that point I recommend using a bot-up approach because this approach focuses on awareness on products with this they can have a good study on the disadvantages of the product they released. Bot-up will be an alternative if something went wrong, and if it is hard to find the precise and good solution.

Pros
Much easier to develop new products because of the help of human feedbacks and reactions. The corporation broadens identity management skills and understanding Benefits will be realized at the early phases.
Can replace many manual processes in the early stages. Can develop talented managers.

Cons
The implementation cost is likely to be higher. The organizational structure you establish might have to be changed in a later roll-out phase.
Required good reflexes and reactions because it might have great impact during early phases. Required good reflexes and reactions because it might have great impact during early phases.

IV. Evaluation

Have multiple alternatives

Weak products might die because of its low popularity.

Corporations are extremely sensitive as they must be to

demographic, political, technological and economic developments. Environmental changes most affect strategic perspective. Competition is such a big deal you got to know the different perspective of each product, with this you can easily reconstruct a new strategy in order to regain the attention of the consumers.

Reengineering is a very difficult task not because of the

process but because of the uncertain possibility of risk with reengineering it can improve a company at the same time it can also V. Conclusion and Recommendation kill one.

V. Conclusion and Recommendation

cont.

It is recommended to have a charismatic

manager wherein he/she can easily adopt the changes and perform the actions in a fast and accurate ways with this it will not be a huge risk if something went wrong in the process of reengineering he/she can provide backups.

MGT and insight.

We learned that not all the time you will get the
exact and same result that not all your assumptions are correct and will give a right and good output. P & G is a good example because of its more than 50 years of management style they can foresee that in the near future they might lose to other company thats why they decided to reengineer or to level up before someone attempt to fight them. Also I learned that reengineering is a huge risk that it can be a trigger of either success or failure.