diastereomeric faces
X = C, O, N
does this center control The direction of attack at The trigonal carbon?
M L
O R
M L
Nu:
Nu S
R S
Nu
M OH Major product
M OH Minor product
L
M O Favored Conformer for Attack
L
O S
This is the important interaction that must be minimized. Thus, in this approach the carbonyl substituent plays the majo role.
p*
C M O
R
S s L
The obtuse angle of attack supports the nonpassive role of the R-group in ketones. Not only will there be steric interactions between the S or M groups and the R-group, but also interactions with the incoming nucleophile due to the attack trajectory. In this model one would predict an increase of stereodifferentiation as the size of R increases. This has been found experimentally
O O
R Preferred conformation. Less interaction between the small group and the R-group. Note that this model "feels" the influence of increasing size of R.
R In this coformer, an increased interaction is seen between the medium group and R. Also, there is more interaction with the nucleophile.
A useful orbital approach by Cieplak, suggests that the nucleophile will attack the carbonyl anti to the best donor ligand.
A.S. Cieplak, B.D. Yait and C.R. Johnson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., (1989), 111, 8447 A.S. Cieplak, J. Am. Chem. Soc., (1981), 103, 4548.
E
D onor
O
Nu:
s* of nucleophile
Nu:
S H
:Nu
Dipolar Model
often described as the Cornforth model
R Cl
O R'
O
R"M
R Cl
R" OH R'
O L L S
S R
X R
favored conformer
Chelation Control
L Het
S O M
R S R L O
Ph Cl Ti Cl O O H Me R
Me
MeMgI
Me
A potentially useful extension of Cram's rule is the asymmetric induction provided by a remote ester (Prelog's rule):
R
O
L S M
R'MgX
Why would you think this might not provide as important directing influences?
Explain the following trends observed by Midland and coworkers M.M. Midland and Y.C. Kwon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1983), 105, 3725.
Me Me O H G H G
Me Me
OH
Me Me
H H
OH H
H Ratio
NaBH4
Sia2 BH
5
1
:
:
1
10