Choose a disease Choose a drug target Identify a bioassay bioassay = A test used to determine biological activity.
Find a lead compound lead compound = structure that has some activity against the chosen target, but not yet good enough to be the drug itself. If not known, determine the structure of the lead compound
Synthesize analogs of the lead Identify Structure-Activity-Relationships (SARs) Synthesize analogs of the lead Identify Structure-Activity-Relationships (SARs)
Identify the pharmacophore pharmacophore = the structural features directly responsible for activity Optimize structure to improve interactions with target
Determine pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the drug. Pharmacodynamics explores what a drug does to the body, whereas pharmacokinetics explores what the body does to the drug.
Patent the drug Continue to study drug metabolism Continue to test for toxicity
Design a manufacturing process Carry out clinical trials Market the drug
Choosing a Disease
Pharmaceutical companies are commercial enterprises Pharmaceutical companies will, therefore, tend to avoid products with a small market (i.e. a disease which only affects a small subset of the population)
Choosing a Disease
Pharmaceutical companies will also avoid products that would be consumed by individuals of lower economic status (i.e. a disease which only affects third world countries)
Drug Target = specific macromolecule, or biological system, which the drug will interact with Sometimes this can happen through incidental observation
Selectivity is Important!
e.g. targeting a bacterial enzyme, which is not present in mammals, or which has significant structural differences from the corresponding enzyme in mammals
The chosen target, may over time, lose its sensitivity to the drug. Example: The penicillin-binding-protein (PBP) known to the the primary target of penicillin in the bacterial species Staphylococcus aureus has evolved a mutant form that no longer recognizes penicillin.
In vitro testing
Has advantages in terms of speed and requires relatively small amounts of compound Speed may be increased to the point where it is possible to analyze several hundred compounds in a single day (high throughput screening) Results may not translate to living animals
In vivo tests More expensive May cause suffering to animals Results may be clouded by interference with other biological systems
Screening Natural Products Plants, microbes, the marine world, and animals, all provide a rich source of structurally complex natural products.
It is necessary to have a quick assay for the desired biological activity and to be able to separate the bioactive compound from the other inactive substances Lastly, a structural determination will need to be made
Screening synthetic banks Pharmaceutical companies have prepared thousands of compounds These are stored (in the freezer!), cataloged and screened on new targets as these new targets are identified
NH2 H N H3C O N H 5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) Serotonin (a natural neurotransmitter synthesized in certain neurons in the CNS) S O N H Sumatriptan (Imitrex) Used to treat migrain headaches known to be a 5-HT1 agonist
N(CH3)2
HO
Toxicity Toxicity standards are continually becoming tougher Must use in vivo (i.e. animal) testing to screen for toxicity
Each animal is slightly different, with different metabolic systems, etc. Thus a drug may be toxic to one species and not to another
It can prevent blood sugar levels from dipping perilously low, or stop it from
spiking and causing damage to the liver, kidneys, eyes and limbs In 1992, Eng's studies revealed that the venom contained two compounds, including one that had never been documented. He named it Exendin-4.
The compound seemed to have properties similar to a human gut hormone, GLP-1, that was being researched around that time by scientists at Massachusetts General Hospital. GLP-1, however, is that enzymes in the blood cause it to degrade quickly
Mile Stones
American Diabetes Association annual meeting in San Francisco
In October 1996, Eng licensed his discovery to Amylin
Then in 2002, Lilly gave Amylin a $325 million shot in the arm by agreeing to work with the biotech company on exenatide.
"It really is a beautiful lizard," Eng said. "Like many other animal species it is under pressure from development and other environmental concerns. "The question is, what other animal has something to teach us that can be of future value? And plants, too? We will never know their value if they are gone."
The END