The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) & Targets to be achieved by 2015 come from Millennium Declaration, signed by 191 countries, in September 2000.
MDGs Pakistan
MDGs
1 2 3
Targets
2 1 1
Indicators
3 3 4
Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger Achieve Universal Primary Education Promote Gender Equality & Women Empowerment Reducing Child Mortality Improving Maternal Health Combating HIV/AIDS, Malaria and other Diseases Ensuring Environmental Sustainability Develop a Global Partnership for Development*
4 5 6
1 1 2
6 5 5
7 8
3 5 16
8 7 37
77 65 90 %
Target 7: Have halted by 2015, and begun to reverse, the spread of HIV/AIDS Target 8: Have halted by 2015, and begun to reverse, the incidence of malaria and other major diseases Proportion of TB cases detected and cured under
DOTS(Direct Observed Treatment Short Course)
Descriptive Epidemiology
Prevalence and Incidence
What is Epidemiology?
Study of the distribution and determinants of states or events in specified populations, and the application of this study to the control of health problems
Study risk associated with exposures Identify and control epidemics Monitor population rates of disease and exposure
What is Epidemiology?
Looking to answer the questions: Who? What? When? Where? Why? How?
Descriptive epidemiology deals with the questions: Who, What, When, and Where
Analytic epidemiology deals with the remaining questions: Why and How
Descriptive Epidemiology
Provides a systematic method for characterizing a health problem Ensures understanding of the basic dimensions of a health problem Helps identify populations at higher risk for the health problem Provides information used for allocation of resources Enables development of testable hypotheses
http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/epi/Data/race03t.pdf
Prevalence
The number of affected persons present in the population divided by the number of people in the population
Prevalence Example
In 1999, a US state reported an estimated 253,040 residents over 20 years of age with diabetes. The US Census Bureau estimated that the 1999 population over 20 in that state was 5,008,863. 253,040 Prevalence= = 0.051 5,008,863 In 1999, the prevalence of diabetes was 5.1% Can also be expressed as 51 cases per 1,000 residents over 20 years of age
Prevalence
Useful for assessing the burden of disease within a population Valuable for planning Not useful for determining what caused disease
Incidence
The number of new cases of a disease that occur during a specified period of time divided by the number of persons at risk of developing the disease during that period of time # of new cases of disease over a specific period of time
Incidence =
Incidence Example
A study in 2002 examined depression among persons with dementia. The study recruited 201 adults with dementia admitted to a long-term care facility. Of the 201, 91 had a prior diagnosis of depression. Over the first year, 7 adults developed depression. Incidence = 7 = 0.064
110 The one year incidence of depression among adults with dementia is 6.4% Can also be expressed as 64 cases per 1,000 persons with dementia
Incidence
High incidence represents diseases with high occurrence; low incidence represents diseases with low occurrence Can be used to help determine the causes of disease
Prevalence
= prevalent cases
New prevalence
Incidence
Old (baseline) prevalence
= prevalent cases
= incident cases
= prevalent cases
= incident cases
= deaths or recoveries
Practice Scenario
A town has a population of 3600. In 2003, 400 residents of the town are diagnosed with a disease. In 2004, 200 additional residents of the town are diagnosed with the same disease. The disease is lifelong but it is not fatal. How would you calculate the prevalence in 2003? In 2004? How would you to calculate the incidence in 2004?
Descriptive Epidemiology
Person, Place, Time
Descriptive Epidemiology
Who? When? Where?
Place
May include information on home, workplace, school
Time
May look at time of illness onset, when exposure to risk factors occurred
Person Data
Age and Sex are almost always used in looking at data
Age data are usually grouped intervals will depend on what type of disease / event is being looked at
May be shown in tables or graphs May look at more than one type of person data at once
60
50
Percent
40
30
20
1960- 196365 62
196670
197174
197680
Year
198894
19992002
SOURCES: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Health Examination Survey and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Bathrooms, 85,630
Housewares, 52,990
Time Data
Usually shown as a graph
Number / rate of cases on vertical (y) axis Time periods on horizontal (x) axis
Time period will depend on what is being described Used to show trends, seasonality, day of week / time of day, epidemic period
6 4
2 0 10/11 10/14 10/17 10/20 10/23 10/26 10/29 11/1 11/4 11/7 11/10
Date of onset
http://www.dhhs.state.nc.us/docs/ecoli.htm
http://www.hivclearinghouse.org/0Surveillance%203rd%20Quarter%20Report.pdf
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5153a1.htm
http://www.health.qld.gov.au/phs/Documents/cdu/12776.pdf
Place Data
Can be shown in a table; usually better presented pictorially in a map Two main types of maps used: choropleth and spot
Choropleth maps use different shadings/colors to indicate the count / rate of cases in an area Spot maps show location of individual cases
Source: Olsen, S.J. et al. N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 18; 349(25):2381-2.
Analytic Epidemiology
Hypotheses and Study Designs
Analytic Epidemiology
Used to help identify the cause of disease Typically involves designing a study to test hypotheses developed using descriptive epidemiology
Developing Hypotheses
A hypothesis is an educated guess about an association that is testable in a scientific investigation Descriptive data provide information to develop hypotheses Hypotheses tend to be broad initially and are then refined to have a narrower focus
Example
Hypothesis: People who ate at the picnic were more likely to become ill
Exposure is eating at the picnic Outcome is illness this would need to be defined, for example, ill persons are those who have diarrhea and fever
Hypothesis: People who ate the egg salad at the picnic were more likely to have laboratory-confirmed Salmonella
Exposure is eating egg salad at the church picnic Outcome is laboratory confirmation of Salmonella
Types of Studies
Two main categories:
1. Experimental 2. Observational
1. Experimental studies exposure status is assigned 2. Observational studies exposure status is not assigned
Experimental Studies
Can involve individuals or communities Assignment of exposure status can be random or non-random The non-exposed group can be untreated (placebo) or given a standard treatment Most common is a randomized clinical trial
Observational Studies
Three main study designs: 1. Cross-sectional study 2. Cohort study 3. Case-control study
Cross-Sectional Studies
Exposure and outcome status are determined at the same time Examples include:
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) - http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/ National Health and Nutrition Surveys (NHANES) http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm
Cohort Studies
Study population is grouped by exposure status Groups are then followed to determine if they develop the outcome
Exposure Outcome
Prospective
Retrospective
Cohort Studies
Study Population
Exposure is self selected
Exposed Non-exposed
Case-Control Studies
Study population is grouped by outcome Cases are persons who have the outcome Controls are persons who do not have the outcome Past exposure status is then determined
Case-Control Studies
Study Population
Cases
Controls
Had Exposure
No Exposure
Had Exposure
No Exposure
Study to determine an association between salmonella infection and eating at a fast food restaurant
Measures of Association
Assess the strength of an association between an exposure and the outcome of interest Indicate how more or less likely a group is to develop disease as compared to another group Two widely used measures:
1. Relative risk (a.k.a. risk ratio, RR) 2. Odds ratio (a.k.a. OR)
2 x 2 Tables
Used to summarize counts of disease and exposure in order to do calculations of association Outcome
Exposure
Yes
Yes
a
No
b
Total
a+b
No
Total
c
a+c
d
b+d
c+d
a+b+c+d
2 x 2 Tables
a = number who are exposed and have the outcome b = number who are exposed and do not have the outcome c = number who are not exposed and have the outcome d = number who are not exposed and do not have the outcome
***************************************************** ************* a + b = total number who are exposed c + d = total number who are not exposed a + c = total number who have the outcome b + d = total number who do not have the outcome Outcome a + b + c + d = total study population
Yes Yes Exposure No
No
a c
b d
Relative Risk
The relative risk is the risk of disease in the exposed group divided by the risk of disease in the nonexposed group RR is the measure used with cohort studies
Outcome Yes No Yes Exposure No Total
a c
b d
a+b c+d
a a+b
RR = c c+d
RR =
a / ( a + b) c / ( c + d)
23 / 33 7 / 67
= 6.67
Odds Ratio
In a case-control study, the risk of disease cannot be directly calculated because the population at risk is not known
OR =
axd bxc
= 1.27
Interpretation
Both the RR and OR are interpreted as follows: = 1 - indicates no association > 1 - indicates a positive association
Interpretation
If the RR = 5
People who were exposed are 5 times more likely to have the outcome when compared with persons who were not exposed
If the RR = 0.5
People who were exposed are half as likely to have the outcome when compared with persons who were not exposed
If the RR = 1
People who were exposed are no more or less likely to have the outcome when compared to persons who were not exposed
Tests of Significance
Indication of reliability of the association that was observed Answers the question How likely is it that the observed association may be due to chance? Two main tests:
1. 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) 2. p-values
95% CI Example
Disease Odds Ratio 95% CI
Gonorrhea
Trichomonas Yeast
2.4
1.9 1.3
1.3 4.4
1.3 2.8 1.0 1.7
Other vaginitis
Herpes Genital warts
1.7
0.9 0.4
1.0 2.7
0.5 1.8 0.2 1.0
Grodstein F, Goldman MB, Cramer DW. Relation of tubal infertility to history of sexually transmitted diseases. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Mar 1;137(5):577-84
p-values
The p-value is a measure of how likely the observed association would be to occur by chance alone, in the absence of a true association A very small p-value means that you are very unlikely to observe such a RR or OR if there was no true association A p-value of 0.05 indicates only a 5% chance that the RR or OR was observed by chance alone
p-value Example
Disease Gonorrhea Trichomonas Yeast Odds Ratio 2.4 1.9 1.3 95% CI 1.3 4.4 1.3 2.8 1.0 1.7 p-value 0.004 0.001 0.04
1.7 0.9
0.4
0.04 0.80
0.05
Grodstein F, Goldman MB, Cramer DW. Relation of tubal infertility to history of sexually transmitted diseases. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Mar 1;137(5):577-84
Summary
Descriptive Epidemiology
Answers: Who, what, where, when Key Terms: Prevalence, person, place, time Hypothesis-generating
Analytic Epidemiology
Answers: Why, how Key Terms: Measure of association Hypothesis-testing