Tony Brown MCQI and material provided by Dr. Bill Truscott FCQI
ISO9000 Status
WORLDWIDE INCREASE IN CERTIFICATIONS TO 780,000 NUMBER OF ECONOMIES USING THE STANDARD INCREASED BY 50% CHINA TOP THE TABLE WITH 144,000 CERTIFICATES UK CURRENTLY HAVE 46,000 WITH SOME DECLINE
Policy and strategy formulation, planning & deployment 6.1 Policy and Strategy formulation 6.2 Policy and strategy planning and deployment 6.2.1 Planning 6.2.2 Scenarios and strategic risks 6.2.3 Deployment into processes and structures of an organization
Resources Management of resources Financial resources Human resources General Management of Human Resources Competence of people Involvement and motivation of people in the organization Partners
Partners and partnership Selection of partners Issues to be considered concerning partners Evaluation of relationships with partners Improvement of the partners capability Review of relationships
9.3.1 General
Question 1
Why should the integration of any specific continual improvement initiative within the ISO 9000 family be worthy of consideration?
ISO 9001
ISO 9001 is concerned primarily with the quality assurance aspects of quality management It specifies requirements for a quality management system for any organization that needs to demonstrate its ability to consistently provide product that meets customer and applicable regulatory requirements
ISO 9004 - 1
Generic principles of performance improvement are enunciated in ISO 9004 There is no information on:
any specific initiative alternative approaches the HOW? to achieve the WHAT?
ISO 9004 - 2
ISO 9004 does, however, make reference to its compatibility with quality excellence models There is a huge gap between this ideal state and that achieved by the basic ISO 9001 Surely it is in this gap where the opportunity for providing real practical information on how to achieve significant improvement in business efficiency and effectiveness lies
ISO 9004 -4
This poses the question Should ISO 9004 fill this information opportunity gap? ISO 9004 is currently being revised Decisions on ISO Standards are made on a consensus basis by member bodies It is up to the International fraternity to decide NOW !
Question 2
Why should Six Sigma be deemed preferable by the International community to any other initiative?
Six Sigma - 1
Formal integration of Six Sigma into the ISO 9000 family could ensure sustainability What are the prospects? Integration into ISO 9004 is unlikely Why? Six Sigma violates the principle of non prescriptive nature of ISO/TC176 Standards Furthermore the name Six Sigma is protected by copyright Six Sigma has a strong statistical basis which is outside the ISO/TC176 remit.
Six Sigma - 2
Formal integration of Six Sigma into ISO 9004 would thus not appear to be feasible However ISO/TC176 would claim that: ISO 9001 provides the basic regulatory platform ISO 9004 presents the generic concepts to further encourage and support organizations These enable any organization to adopt and implement the specific performance improvement initiative best suited to their own needs and aspirations
Six Sigma 3
Individual organizations are free to use the ISO 9000 family as a platform to adopt and deploy the Six Sigma Initiative ISO 9000, 9001 and 9004 are completely compatible with that of Six Sigma and are intended to foster and encourage such a response
Question 3
Is the ISO 9000 family the most desirable pathway into ISO for Six Sigma?
not to take up the recommendation to initiate action to integrate the statistical tools of Six Sigma with Management System Performance Improvement Standards through partnering with a Management Standards Body (e.g. TC 176s ISO 9000 family)
Question 4
Is then the development of a National Standard rather than an International one more feasible?
Proposal for new British Standards integrating improvement initiatives with ISO 9000 family
The intent of these British Standards is to fill an existing void: to provide the specific HOW? to match the generic WHAT? Of Management Systems Standards such as the ISO 9000 family
Question 5
Can ISO play a useful role in the attestation of Six Sigma belts?
Summary of Conclusions
Q1: There is a gap in ISO Standards between the WHAT of the ISO/TC 176 ISO 9000 family and the HOW of quality improvement initiatives Q2: The Six Sigma initiative is widespread and commercial training schemes are well established Q3: ISO/TC69 is the only current feasible pathway into ISO for Six Sigma Q4: National Standards are being proposed in the UK to integrate the methods and tools of quality improvement initiatives with the ISO 9000 generic family Q5: The validity and integrity of current Six Sigma belt attestation is questionable. No early ISO solution is expected