B. Charles Tatum
Operant/Instrumental Conditioning
Definition: A form of learning (conditioning) in which the organism is free to respond to (operate on) the environment and changes in behavior occur as the result of the stimulus consequences (reinforcement/punishment) of the spontaneous actions. Trial and Error (Trial and Success) Learning Thorndikes Puzzle Box/Skinners Operant Chamber/Tolmans Maze Law of Effect
Stimulus Consequence
Produce (Onset)
Positive Punishment (e.g., spanking) Negative Punishment Extinction (e.g., time out)
Remove (Offset)
The Confused Soldier Hey Dude to Officer + Criticism = Reduce Verbal Salutations (Positive Punishment) Saluting an Officer + No Criticism = Increase Saluting as Form of Address (Negative Reinforcement)
Parental Dynamics
Future Result Increased Gift Giving (Negative Reinforcement) Future Result Increased Sulking (Positive Reinforcement)
Marital Dynamics
Generalized Reinforcer: Secondary reinforcers that have been paired with a wide variety of primary reinforcers (e.g., money, praise)
SPONTANEOUS RECOVERY
SPONTANEOUS RECOVERY
Break (Interruption)
Break (Interruption)
100 90
80
Work Proficiency
70 60 50 40
30
20 10 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Salary Increase
Hedonic Theory Reinforcement strengthens behavior because it produces pleasurable sensations Problems with theory Masochism: Pain (unpleasant sensations) are reinforcers Negative reinforcement: Removal of aversive stimuli reduces discomfort but is not pleasurable Tautology: If it makes you feel good, its a reinforcer. If its a reinforcer, it makes you feel good (circular reasoning). Drive Reduction (Hull) Drive: A motivational force. Tension from unfulfilled needs or desires Primary Drives (e.g. hunger, thirst) Secondary Drives (e.g., success, popularity) Reinforcer: Any stimulus that reduces drive by fulfilling the needs and desires (e.g., food, water, money) Difficulties with the theory Some reinforcers do not reduce drives (e.g., electrical stimulation of the brain, copulation without ejaculation) Some motivations do not create states of tension that need to be reduced (e.g., exploratory behavior)
Theories of Reinforcement
Escape Conditioning
Example # 1 UCS (hot water) Example # 2 UCS (shock) UCR (pain reaction) Operant Response (jump hurdle) Negative Reinforcer (remove shock) UCR (pain reaction) Operant Response (turn nozzle) Negative Reinforcer (remove hot water)
Avoidance Conditioning
Example # 1 Warning Signal (flushing toilet) Example # 2 Warning Signal (ringing bell) Operant Response (jump hurdle) Negative Reinforcer (avoid shock) Operant Response (turn nozzle) Negative Reinforcer (avoid hot water)
Theories of Avoidance
Two Processes Classical Conditioning UCS: A noxious stimulus that produces an unpleasant reaction (e.g., flinch, startle reaction) or an escape response (e.g., jump aside, run away) CS: Some signal that precedes the noxious stimulus (light, bell, flush) Operant Conditioning Operant Response: Response that removes the noxious stimulus Negative Reinforcer: Termination of a noxious stimulus Explanation: The CS becomes noxious and the animal learns to escape the noxious CS Problems Avoidance continues even after CS loses its aversive qualities Avoidance response does not extinguish even though CS is no longer paired with UCS
One Process: Only operant conditioning is involved in avoidance. The warning signal (CS) becomes a discriminative stimulus.