PRODUCIBILITY ENGINEER
SUPPORTABILITY ENGINEER
Mike Osborne, CPL, CCDM CAS Inc., VP Education Council of Logistics Engineering Professionals (CLEP)
Slide 0
Whining
Slide 1
Part A Narrative
Overall Program Health Any Operational Impacts Implementing Program Strategy Addresses TLCSM and PBL
Part B Outcome Based Assessment Focused on Goals and Variance from Goals
Goal Forecast/ Actual Rating
Operational Availability
* ALT: Materiel Availability Mission Reliability * ALT: Materiel Reliability Logistics Response Time * ALT: Mean Down Time Program Funding Status Cost per Unit of Usage Reduction in TOC Safety
___
___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___
___
___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___
___
___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___
As a support planning baseline, it has been used in that context for eonsits been a comfort zone that if the Ao is good then everything is fine.but so much is missing in the equation that it actually ADVERSELY affects war fighting capability.
The result of Ao measurement in an IOT&E environment is always near to 1.0 ---- its perfect but meaningless. Because in the real world while the techs are refueling, rearming, reconfiguring the aircraft/tank/ship, it is NOT really availablewe need to shorten the DURATION and FREQUENCY of all support events to make the System TRULY Available..and the Ao equation does not support this.
Slide 3
Whats the difference between Ao and Ma? Three big factors influence Operational Availability: Reliability, Maintainability and ALDT (Administrative Logistics Down Time)
R&M are fixed values in a given point in time, but ALDT is never, ever, constant The resultant Ao value has no goodness since it totally hinges on the debatable average ALDT used in the Ao equation
Ma is influenced by measurement of System Downtime, both planned and unplanned; Inventory metrics plus Material Reliability and Total Ownership Costs associated with material readiness.
Slide 4
MATERIAL AVAILABILITY AS A KEY PERFORMANCE PARAMETER EXAMPLE OF COMPUTATION OF SYSTEM LEVEL Ma Threshold MTBF= 226 hr Threshold MTTR= 2.83 hr MLDT = 4 days = 96 hr
___226__ 324.83
Ma = 0.695749 (0.70)
Slide 5
Conclusion: Mean Logistics Down Time (MLDT) is the most critical metric in increasing Ma. Increase of Ma from 0.70 to 0.82 is predominantly due to streamlining Logistics Response.
Slide 6
We have to reduce system downtimes and reduce O&S costs through deliberate systems engineering to get rid of the logistics infrastructure
Slide 7
Our logisticians either dont know how to do this, or dont have the detailed backing in directives and policy.
Slide 8
PBS-72
Definition of Supportability
Supportability elements - major
Operational suitability Readiness In-flight and Operational sustainability Survivability Mobility/transportability Reliability and maintainability Human Factors System Safety
Energy Management
Standardization Interoperability Vulnerability Affordability Life-cycle cost, and lest we forget Availability (AO)
Slide 11
And This
Subordinate Supportability elements : 01- 09 support general codes - Work Unit Code reflects system data definition for historical data collection or for new systems 2) Preventive maintenance 3) Corrective maintenance 4) Resource consideration 5) Personnel requirements 6) Support equipment and facilities
Slide 12
PBS-58
Slide 13
Availability
Availability is a measure of the degree to which an item is in an operable state and can be committed at the start of a mission when the mission is called for at an unknown (random) point in time. Availability as measured by the USER is a function of: how often failures occur and corrective maintenance is required, how often preventative maintenance is performed,
Slide 14
PBS-96
Provide a Contractor incentive program that is acceptable and do-able, such that the contractor has a profit incentive to improve readiness.
Slide 15
Slide 16
PBL IPT
Establishing an IPT leadership role for the supportability and producibility engineers ensures each of the support disciplines and considerations for Support are balanced and cost effective before Systems Engineering and Design are involved.
This significantly reduces possible requirement contentions between disciplines. Empowered by decision support models, the supportability and producibility engineers can quickly ascertain the potential of proposed design improvements before stimulating a design response. The result of this process is a supportable design that enhances the prime mission system or equipments mission capability, but is also quite cost effective in reducing the support system and its infrastructure with increased capabilities. An additional and non-trivial benefit is that the producibility and supportability engineer can synergize their requirements in areas of mutual interest.
Slide 17
PBS-40
PBS-58
Pareto Analysis
A Pareto analysis of existing supportability and maintainability data on the system/product/service we are replacing or improving gives us definition of logistics down time high drivers Weighted or relative importance of elements for system being replaced or modified - Comparison Baseline Weighted or relative importance of elements that we want to see in the new systemThe New Project
THE PRIMARY FOCUS OF THE PBL IPT, THEN, IS TO
CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHAT WAS WRONG AND WHERE WE NEED TO PLACE DESIGN EMPHASIS
Slide 19
PBS-80
Slide 20
PBS-32
Slide 21
The frequency of the support event where f = support event frequency (also includes reliability); i.e., how often will it occur?
The duration of the event where d = support event duration (also includes maintainability); i.e., how long is the event?
The cost of the event where c = support event cost (support system costs per event, e.g. all ILS elements); i.e., how much will it cost? SUPPORTABILITY IS AT ITS OPTIMUM WHEN S IS MINIMIZED, I.E., AS FREQUENCY, DURATION AND COST APPROACH ZERO.
Slide 22
PBS-16b
Requirements Definition
Support
Support
Customer Needs
Product Production Support System Production
5
Product Design
Support
PBS-2
A NEW LOGISTICS PARADIGM Supportability is now defined (a shift in the paradigm): A metric that addresses every support event within the domain of the Integrated Logistics Support Elements, with respect to support event frequency, event duration, and event cost. Reflected in a composite, quantitative and qualitative characteristic of the supported system (project) to meet specified operational requirements for its intended life cycle, and is optimized for Total Ownership (TOC).
Slide 24
Each coded element is evaluated for acceptable performance in development, test and evaluation, and operational assessment Failure to meet anticipated status is grounds to delay test events or to result in unacceptable and unsuccessful testing
Slide 26
relationships between performance, design and cost - using Supportability Design-to requirements (SDTR) and Producibility Design-to requirements (PDTR) algorithms