Strategy recommendations
Recommendations 1. Supply side responsible for infrastructure 2. Client contract requirements must be clear 3. Client must use the information it requires 4. Investment will be required but technology does not need to be complex 5. Changes should be in small steps 6. Target is level 2 of the maturity model in five years
Government as a client can derive significant improvements in cost, value and carbon performance through the use of open sharable asset information Culture Process
BIM
Industry Push Client Pull
Technology
BIM, CEEC, October 2011 www.bcis.co.uk
Government will pull BIM adoption by: Encouraging BIM use on publicly funded projects Setting consistent information requirements across the programme Specifying and collecting data from the BIM model Using the data to improve performance
Industry will push BIM competence Creating an infrastructure of standards, guidance and training Focusing industry on defined targets for benefits realisation Removing blockers to adoption Raising the trailing edge to a minimum level of BIM performance
Push
Industry responsibility Investment in standards
Pull
New Build Civil Engineering Infrastructure Refurbishment
Defined workload Clear targets Client utilisation
Strategy application
Strategy application
Strategy application.
The Strategy will only succeed if: Benefits realised General adoption Gains to supply chain
Supply side responsible for infrastructure The client will define the data that is required from the BIM Leaving complexity where it belongs in the supply chain Define a none proprietary means for exchanging information - COBie
Target
Target for all projects to deliver information at the level 2 of the maturity model within five years. Managed 3D environment held in separate discipline BIM tools with attached data. Commercial data managed by an ERP. (Enterprise Resource Planning software) Integration on the basis of proprietary interfaces or bespoke middleware could be regarded as pBIM (proprietary). The approach may utilise 4D programme data and 5D cost elements as well as feed operational systems.
The effective adoption of BIM technologies by cost consultants and planners has been slow to date, and should this situation remain, then cost and programme services will not benefit from the productivity and speed of response that a settled BIM process can offer. This is not to say that the adoption of BIM will not be without its challenges, but that the professions cannot afford to be outside of the BIM loop.
Methods of measurement and duties may need to be reviewed to ensure that the appropriate information is produced so that measurement can be automated to a greater degreeMeasurement will be accelerated but discretionary skills will still be necessary. Clients should expect QSs and Project Managers to be familiar with BIM and actively develop ways in which processes can be made more cost effective and value adding
COBie
COBie
COBie drops
COBie drops
Drop
Tender documentation
Package scope check, Cost checks, Carbon checks
Handover
O&M Data handover, Actual costs, Actual programme, Actual carbon performance
Key client Does the brief benefits meet my requirements in terms of function, cost and carbon
Strategy Setting the requirement dont force the market Taking incremental steps keep it simple to start Leaving complexity where it belongs in the supply chain Only asking for information if it will be used.and committing to use it Preparing for the leading edge..but focusing effort on the trailing edge
Early Adopters O& M Handover Consistency Cultural Change Packaging PUSH - PULL
Active Management Building Management Strategic Management Budgets Carbon Enable IGT Delivery Green Economy Roadmap
Database Repository
Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4
More Years
Live Operations
Need for training and education to support: Awareness Provide guidance and toolkits Technical skills Non-technical, ancillary skills Accreditation Review and benchmarking Post project evaluation
Classification
Functions Assets
Thanks
UNCLASSIFIED
Questions