Industry Analysis & Trends Target Market Competition Strategy/Business Model Marketing and Sales Plan Production/Operations Plan
Technology Plan Management & Organization Social Responsibility Development & Milestones Financials
Appendix
Market
Industry
Industry-side goal
Busine ss Landscape
70 60 50 Return on 40 Equity (%) 30 20 10 0
Describe, in detail, the competitive, industry, and environmental landscape in which your firm will operateto find a defensible space you might occupy.
Financial Management
The supply chain traces processes and transformations. As these become more complex, they tend to differentiate into various functions.
The value chain maps value added and captured onto the supply chain. Each step in the supply chain contributes different amounts of value. Effective management involves both identifying new sources of value and tying together pieces to create more than the sum of the parts.
As underlying processes become more complex, supply chains often evolve into chains of firms that interact through negotiated transactions or markets - rather than chains of functions managed internally Note how the margin divides (and multiplies)
Each cluster of competitors is an industry, industry segment or strategic group Supply chains and industries evolve over time as do their rules, cultures, technologies and sources of value
Direct marketing
Promotions
$0.375 $0.50
Sales groups
$3.50 $1.00 $5.50 $10.00
Packager
Author
$0.50
Agent
$0.05
Publisher
$1.25
Wholesaler
Retailer
Reader
From trade sales, a publisher might keep 7% for salaries etc though the amounts and percentages do increase with print runs and cover prices. From direct mail, a publisher might keep 12.5% or so, but without as many economies of scale (since so much goes to logistics).
Direct marketing
Ask industry informants Look at customer and supplier lists Look at industry magazines
Identify sources of competition Note the supply market Note the demand market
The related functional cluster of firms direct competitors from within the industry indirect competitors from related supply chains
Socio-cultural Forces
Firm/
Structure Culture Competencies Resources
Political Forces
Organization
Regulators Stockholders Creditors
Technological Forces
Suppliers Customers
Economic Forces
Ecological Forces
Socio-cultural Forces
Firm/
Structure Culture Competencies Resources
Political Forces
Organization
Regulators Stockholders Creditors
Technological Forces
Suppliers Customers
Economic Forces
Ecological Forces
Stakeholder analysis
Who matters, how much
Customers, suppliers, owners, workers, community groups, government At core, strategic, or environmental levels What is at stake for the stakeholders? Why do they care? When and how might they act? What is at stake for the firm? What are the likely impacts on the firm? Why? When? Cooperate, compete, coopt, cut out...
Response options
Stakeholder management
Influence on Initiative
High
SH3
Averag e
SH1
SH2
Low Low
Importance to Firm
Average
High
Socio-cultural Forces
Union/ employees Trade Association Competitors Suppliers
Political Forces
Firm/
Structure Culture Competencies Resources
Organization
Technological Forces
Economic Forces
Customers
Ecological Forces
Industry power
Threat from New Entrants
Suppliers Power
Rivalry of Firms
Buyers Power
Rivalry:
Oligopoly
Other Stakeholders:
Minimal domestic, some international, financial concerns
1. Entry
Industries that are hard to enter are cozy for insiders, but also often attractive to outsiders longing for the value being shared by so few. Barriers to entry make it harder for newcomers to play.
Fierce reaction by incumbents. Size of payoff/relation of supply to demand. Economies of scale: minimum efficient scale of production distribution or sales networks Pioneering brand advantages. Experience curve. Licenses or patents. Cost of exit.
2. Substitutes
Industries with few substitute products are more attractive than those with many substitutes. Effective substitutes can often provide ways in for upstarts. The threat of substitutes is often the weakest of the forces -- except during times of high demand or fast change, when interlopers may see opportunities.
3. Buyer power
Attractive industries feature disorganized, small customers, with little purchasing and negotiating power. Buyers gain power when:
They are large, relative to the seller (superstores). They are organized (eg., a coop). It is easy to switch to another supplier (eg., when products are standard). They could integrate backwards and so take over a supplier.
4. Supplier power
Attractive industries feature small and disorganized suppliers. Suppliers gain power when:
They are large, relative to the buyers. (Alcoa). It is difficult for buyers to switch to competing suppliers. (Custom products, proprietary information). They pose a credible threat of integrating forward and taking over the buyers functions.
5. Rivalry
Attractive industries are controlled by monopolies or gentlemanly oligopolies.
On the other hand, the more the players, and the more equally matched, the closer the industry approximates perfect competition and minimum profits. Power is concentrated (C4 Index ) Competitors can truly differentiate. It is easy to exit. Demand is stable and predictable. Regulation takes the edge off.
6. Stakeholder power
Governments (if not in the environmental scan), unions, creditors (if not a supplier), advocacy groups (eg., environmentalists) can all constrain industries.
Rivalry is reduced when governments or other stakeholders limit access to the industry and so limit competition.
Profit pools
20%
Banking
20%
Banking
Operating Margin
Operating Margin
0
Acquisition
Funding
Servicing
100%
Acquisition
Funding
Servicing
100%
Operating margin: Industry reports, interviews Share: Profit amount x total sales in sub-segment
Industry dynamics
While useful, the five forces, value chain and profit pool models are essentially static. It is critical to make guesses about the future -- especially about when trends might stop and the existing power structure shift. STEEP and technology life cycle analyses can help with this. If you need a more dynamic model, ask me later about the 4 Arenas analysis.
Suppliers Power
Rivalry of Firms
Buyers Power
Competitors are the firms that compete to serve the same customers in the same marketplace. Competitors can compete directly (cars) or indirectly (bicycles, mass transit). Competition happens on two levels:
1.
2.
Company competition
Competition at the level of the value proposition and marketing (covered in the first workshop)
Competition at the level of company strategy
Quality, service, low price, something else? How well designed are they to compete as they do? What resources do they control? Money, people, influence... How hard do they compete? Whats their trajectory?
How aggressive?
Abilities
Current Strategy Price, quality, distribution, resources
Response Profile
Satisfied or ambitious? Likely next moves? Vulnerabilities? Sensitive spots? (What will provoke retaliation?)
Competitors table
Organizes competitors using crucial dimensions of competition, plus effectiveness, power, trajectory, likely changes...
Market Share Competitor1 Competitor2 Competitor3 Competitor4 Competitor5 15% 25% 5% 20% 15% Quality Cost Effective- Power ness H L M L M H L M L M M H L H H Aggressiveness
M
H L H L slipping very
Strategic groups
Upscale Chains
Price
Diners/Family Style
Fast Food
Selection
market share how they stack up on crucial dimensions of value effectiveness (star the most competent ones) resources (underline richest ones) aggressiveness (arrows to indicate trajectories)
Bibliography
Andersen Business Consulting interview, Summer 2001. Richard DAveni, Hypercompetition (Free Press: 1994). Craig Fleisher & Babette Bensoussan, Strategic & Competitive Analysis: Methods & Techniques for Analyzing Business Competition (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003) Jay Galbraith, Strategy & Organization Planning in Human Resource Management (SpringSummer 1983) for Supply Chain. Pankaj Ghemawat, Strategy and the Business Landscape (Prentice Hall, 2001). Robert Hamilton lecture notes, 1998. Robert Hamilton, E. Eskin, M. Michael, "Assessing Competitors: The Gap between Strategic Intent and Core Capability", International Journal of Strategic Management-Long Range Planning, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 406-417, 1998 TL Hill lecture notes, 1999, 2001, 2002. J. D. Hunger & T.L. Wheelan, Essentials of Strategic Management (Prentice Hall, 2001). Philip Kotler, Marketing Management, 9th Edition, (Prentice Hall, 1997). Sharon Oster, Modern Competitive Analysis, 2nd Edition (Oxford University Press, 1994), for Porter and other economics-based strategy. Henry Mintzberg & James Brian Quinn, Readings in the Strategy Process, 3rd Edition (Prentice Hall, 1998). Michael Porter, Competitive Advantage (Free Press, 1985). Michael Porter, What is Strategy? Harvard Business Review (November-December 1996).